I considered it while swimming. I considered it while drinking and the conclusion was the same. There is no point in me remaining in Respect any longer. Below is the resignation message I sent to the Tower Hamlets branch committee yesterday. Consider it an early Christmas present to those in the organisation who want it to become ever more hegemonised by the SWP.

Supporters of Socialist Resistance who feel that they have something to contribute in their area will continue to remain in Respect but last weekend’s rally was the clincher, in particular the reaction of those who thought one of its main achievements was to piss off every other socialist in the room. The fact that some of the most disappointed were people who led unoffical, illegal strikes, organised anti-deportation campaigns, shut down their workplaces when the war broke out and the loudest sneerers haven’t done much more than read Althusser and Tony Cliff was just the icing on the cake. A little self questioning is a useful virtue in politics.

I’m resigning from Respect. I joined it because it represented a real opportunity to create a mass class struggle socialist party to the left of Labour. I am still committed to the establishment of such a party. Last weekend’s Organising For Fighting Unions conference was the final proof for me that Respect will not be the vehicle for this.

Even at this stage in the organisation’s life it is not clear if it is a party or a coalition. All the fundamental decisions and arguments are thrashed out in private between rival cabals rather than in front of the organisation. Members who are not in the SWP or the councillors’ support base are left guessing about much of what is going on. This is an undemocratic method of working that disempowers ordinary members and prevents the development of a democratic, socialist ethos in the organisation.

I have always welcomed the participation of large numbers of SWP members in the life of Respect at the national and local levels. Now however the boundaries between one section of Respect and the SWP are virtually invisible. By my reckoning half of the Tower Hamlets delegates to this year’s conference were SWP members. I do not question the entitlement of any of these comrades to have been elected. What I find alarming is that a political current operating in something that is supposed to be broader doesn’t see why this might be a problem. The final straw is the bookstall which sells nothing but SWP literature at branch meeting.

The open hostility to political discussion inside Respect is its most serious handicap. The vast majority of working class and socialist militants expect to be able to discuss ideas freely. The entire history of socialist organisation in the twentieth century proves that this type of freedom is a necessity not a luxury. The tradition established at Respect conferences is to use a block vote and apolitical sneering to reply to debates. This method repels most activists. That is why Respect is politically narrower now than at any time in its history. Where are the thousands of ex-Labour members, the environmentalists and the other fighters who should be in Respect?

None of what I have written here is new. I took the limited opportunities available to raise these concerns during my time as a loyal member of Respect. Equally I have defended Respect on countless occasions in public and in private against its critics. Evidence of this can be found at http://macuaid.blogspot.com.

I will continue to vote for Respect candidates who maintain its programme of fighting imperialism and capitalism. However I cannot remain a member as it is presently structured and functioning and feel unable to ask anyone else to join it. I hope that I will be able to continue collaborating with the many fine class fighters who are in Respect and I look forward to the day when we are re-united in a democratic, socialist, anti-imperialist party.

In solidarity

Liam

16 responses to “Gold turned to lead – leaving Respect”

  1. Can I just say, well done comrade. And here’s a link about getting involved in the John4Leader campaign.http://www.john4leader.org.uk/😉

    Like

  2. Welldone indeed.And if you don’t want to go from one undemocratic party to another one and you don’t want future campaigning to be based on waiting to see if 40 spineless MP’s will grow a spine and put a socialist on the ballot paper you could always sign the declaration and get involved in something different atwww.cnwp.org.uk;)

    Like

  3. The winds of change blow……if one of the eleciton petitions in Tower Hamlets go through, who do you think you will campaign for?

    Like

  4. “I joined it because it represented a real opportunity to create a mass class struggle socialist party to the left of Labour.”That was NEVER on the agenda with Respect, so who is kidding who?

    Like

  5. I’m really sorry to hear you feel you can no longer play a productive role in Respect. I know this must have been a very difficult decision for you to make as you have been one of its strongest defenders.I also know that whatever political decisions you make in the future will be made with equal seriousness and thought.It’s probably a nice time of year to shake off organisational chains as you have a ready made excuse to cry off political activity for drunken socialising anyway.My advice, for what it’s worth, is take off your shoes and wiggle your political toes for a bit – don’t let people rope you into another marriage before the ink is dry on the divorce papers.

    Like

  6. Congratulations.As you know I was under discipline at the time I left Respect but I still think it was the right thing to do at the right time. Plenty of left-wing organisations only pay lip-service to gay rights and women’s rights but that was my first experience of an organisation openly ditching those things to pander to less progressive belief systems.Whatever the potential of any project we should never be so blase about signing away the gains of our class.Sandra.

    Like

  7. What curious responses from people here (with the exception of Jim’s words of sense). There is nothing to rejoice about, and delusions in the John McDonald campaign, or the woefull CNWP are no better than delusions in respect.I remember a converstaion with Thornett a couple of years ago where he said if respect failed it may not be a disaster but it would be close to a disaster, and would require a period of long reflection at the very least.I agreed with that then and still do, although from day one i never beleived Respect could succeed.The SWP’s behavior in Respect has set back – perhaps for a generation – the prospects of building a left alternative to Labour in England. But building such parties still remains the task of the present historical period, from Germany, to Scotland, to Australia, to Portugal, and elsewhere.

    Like

  8. AN: “and delusions in the John McDonald campaign”.Hmmmm. Well, making the appointment with the doctor now tho’ I am utterly sure she will give me a clean bill of health i.e. no delusions…:)

    Like

  9. The SWP tends to impose itself on every left-wing movement, thereby pissing off a lot of people and leading to its disintegration. The ANL, Globalise Resistance, Socialist Alliance and others have all seen the SWP attempt to transform them into a front for its own agenda and each has fallen apart due to nothing more than an internal implosion. It is a pattern of behaviour for this fairly wealthy, well-organised party. SWPers always blame others for sectarianism, yet they are the most sectarian of the lot. It’s a shame as the SWP itself is a missed opportunity and a lot of people, like me, who joined SWSS while studying at university quickly became disillusioned – many have become disillusioned with left-wing politics and have also been turned off by politics altogether. The problem is its unaccountable hierarchy, control freakery by the leadership and lack of internal debates. I can see many Muslim members of Respect decamping to the Liberal Democrats anyway, leaving it as a rump of SWPers and the Galloway personality cult.

    Like

  10. I’d prefer it if people signed their comments even if it’s with an alias. I’ll reply to these comments in the next couple of days. What joker posted this on Lenin’s Tomb? If I want to have a dialogue on that site I’ll do it myself thank you.

    Like

  11. I am BTW bewildered by Sandra’s claim to have been under discipline when she left Respect.Is this some S&M practice that I am unaware of due to my sheltered life out here in the provinces?

    Like

  12. I left a few months ago for just the same reasons as you Liam, and since the Respect conference all the active non SWP members of the Camden branch have resigned. Even though I think you have done the right thing it’s still a matter of great regret, for like you I thought that the Respect project was an initiative that had the potential of breaking out of the cul de sac that we on the left have steered ourselves into. What a waste!

    Like

  13. I think that Liam’s departure shows that it is virtually impossible to work in Respect, at least with any prospect of influencing its direction. A number of comrades in the Socialist Unity Network believed that it was necessary to work in it, but all of them (I think with the exception of one comrade who is in the SWP) found that it was impossible.Why? To a large extent because the SWP treats the Respect branches as their property. They freeze out people with whom they have disagreements. You are either with them or against them. Liam suffered this when he was prevented from being a delegate to the Respect AGM.The more profound question which needs answering now, Liam, is why the SWP is such a profoundly undemocratic organisation. Their methods are in my view the result of their ‘vanguardism’. They have a self-selecting leadership. Look at the way Molyneux was treated.They can command their members but they can’t of course command the working class. The problem is that they discredit socialism.What has been the response of other SR comrades to your decision Liam?

    Like

  14. Well even though you didn’t post it there, the level of discussion on Lenin’s Tomb seems to sum up the mindset – ie Liam doesn’t respect religious beliefs, it has nothing to do with the “organisational question”, or just general nasty “glad to see you go” type comments. I am glad that you have left Respect Liam, not because I think that I have personally been proven to be correct in my estimation of where it is headed but because I think it is important that the left pour its energy into campaigns and promising movements that are going in a positive direction. I have written more on this which is in this month’s issue of Socialist Resistance and also on my blog http://unknownconscience.blogspot.com I think the McDonnell Campaign is just one of any number of positive campaigns that folks can be involved in. I don’t think anyone is claiming it is the “magic bullet” for the left. I am certainly glad that Liam will be able to use his excellent organising skills for more positive political activity in the future and not needlessly waste it on a project which has failed – even with all of Liam’s hard work to make it turn out the other way.

    Like

  15. Liam, you should never have left, this is accepting political defeat to the SWP. You should have stuck in, perhaps resigned from Treasurer position and worked on what you enjoy, events change. As for the meetings I did attend I found the atmosphere stifling. Even the Tower Hamlets delegate election for the conference meeting felt staged managed compared to the last year, and the meetings generally are SWP dominated. Anyway, what is going to happen to the Respect Party Platform now that you have left? Is it still viable? And what is you relationship to those within Socialist Resistance? Best of.

    Like

  16. Sian Berry is 157 votes off of becoming a councillor in Camden helping her in the by-election which is on 5th december would be appreciated!

    Like

Leave a comment

Trending