David Ellis regularly comments on this site and knows a lot more about the dismal science than most of us. I asked him to offer a critique of Keynsianism.

He authors the Trouble With Centrism site.

 

The debate on how best to respond to the financial crisis and the worsening recession has now completely polarised between the New Labour government on the one side and the Tory Opposition on the other.  The Tories, 1980s style, want to cut off public spending and allow businesses and the most bankrupt banks to go to the wall.  Let it rip they say and we can rebuild from there. This is monetarism.  Arch Thatcherite John Redwood is waiting in the wings for a chance to enact such a policy. Unfortunately there can be no way back for Britain from such a devastating destruction of the economy.  Not this time.  Everything that can be privatised has been privatised.  Huge swathes of the economy are owned abroad and the financial and service sectors that led us out of the Tories’ last mess, but which have made this mess so much worse, will be irredeemably destroyed the remnants relocated to the continent.  It will be us heading to Poland in our millions and not the other way round if the Tories get their way.  On your inter-continental bicycle, as they say. New Labour takes the opposite tack.  Fiscal stimulation is now their mantra having so quickly and rudely replaced Gordon Brown’s once legendary prudence.  Public borrowing, public spending, tax cuts and so on to inject money into the economy so that people will spend, spend, spend to save jobs and prevent bankruptcies.  What about the pound, say the monetarists, and inflation?  In the not so long run, they warn, it is 1930s Germany here we come.  In the long run, replies New Labour, echoing the newly rediscovered economist John Maynard Keynes (although he was never forgotten by the reckless lenders), we are all dead.  Very cynical but we must do what we can now.  Government’s must act or at least be seen to be acting.

In the excluded middle is a possible solution that incorporates both monetarism and fiscal stimulation but also reaches beyond the capitalist system itself to the possibility of a better future.  It is a debt amnesty.  A debt amnesty would wipe out the mortgages, credit card, student and personal loans of individuals and the debts of small and medium enterprises to the banks.  That represents both a monetarist policy wiping out billions in accumulated, unprofitable capital and a huge fiscal stimulation as the newly debt free can go on to spend on the things they need instead of paying of dead debts.  Yes, the banks would be wiped out by such a move but better they are wiped out than the entire economy.  You will notice that both the Tory and New Labour plans are geared to saving the private banking system – the last of our net earners (cough!). They should be replaced by a single state bank which, by cutting out the private middle man, could lend at just above the Bank of England base rate to the businesses and individuals that need it.  The state should also of course repudiate the accumulated toxic debts of the City geniuses who brought them in shiny packages from their seemingly more sophisticated rivals in Wall Street.  The US had no qualms leaving Britain holding the pawned baby when they let Lehman Brothers go bankrupt effectively ending London’s once central role in world finance for ever.

Northern Rock, in an effort to be more capitalist than thou after its nationalisation, started viciously repossessing homes.  It has now reversed that policy.  The more it repossessed, the more homes it was putting on the market, the more it was driving down prices and undermining its own (or our own) asset base.  Now it is bending over backwards to help people to stay in their homes offering, in some cases, to virtually wipe off all mortgage arrears.  This, essentially, is a nascent debt amnesty.  It needs to be extended to the population as a whole. Of course, like GM and Ford in the US many of our biggest companies are effectively bankrupt.  They are being eyed-up by rivals for purchase and asset stripping.  The massive unemployment that results will undermine any fiscal stimulation one cares to make and render it pointless.  These big companies need to be nationalised to prevent this happening.  Giving them money won’t work as they will simply use it to buy out others and close them down or take it offshore where it will sit and wait for better times in other places and they’ll shed jobs anyway. Keynes said it would be a good idea to get half the population burying five pound notes in bottles and the other half digging them up.  The modern equivalent is to build airports and golf courses across the whole country to keep people working and stimulating the economy.  Japan tried it and it didn’t work and now it is covered in unused airports and golf courses.  Better that people are doing socially productive work.  The unemployed from the luxury goods manufacturing and selling sectors must be incorporated into the wider economy  by sharing the work.  The forty-hour week must become the twenty-hour week.  For instance, when the ten or so private banks that litter the high streets are organised into one state bank, instead of the economic benefits of such a rationalisation going to the few in the form of job cuts let them accrue to the workers in the form of cuts in working hours.  Apart from the economic benefits of keeping everybody working in proper jobs, the social benefits to the family and community of everybody working a twenty hour week are incalculable.

A debt amnesty will of course require mobilising the population in support of such a thing as it will not happen if the bankers and politicians get their way.  It is people who must act when governments will not or will only give the appearance of acting.  On the back of such an achievement it would be possible for the first time to discuss what kind of bank we want and what kind of things we want it to finance.  We could have a bank that is socially and environmentally responsible because that is its job and that is what it wants to be not because it is `regulated’.

15 responses to “Time for a debt amnesty and the twenty hour week”

  1. […] Time for a debt amnesty and the twenty hour week « Mac UaidSat 22 Nov: London- Hands Off Venezuela National Conference · Sat 6 Dec: London – National Climate March · Tue 25 Nov: Birmingham – The great city academy fraud · Tue 25 Nov: London – Defend Council Housing conference … […]

    Like

  2. A debt amnesty confuses two quite distinct things.

    The debts of the workers
    and
    The debts of the capitalists

    The debts of the workers should be written off and mortgages and rents assessed on the basis of what is reasonable to pay – without regard to any debts.

    The debts of the capitalists should also be written off – when their properties seized without compensation by the workers government!

    Centrism…pah!

    Like

  3. I don’t think I confused anything. I made it specific that the amnesty extended to small and medium enterprises and that the large ones should be nationalised to prevent buy outs, asset stripping and massive job shedding. That way the working class is leading the small and medium capitalists behind it against the imperialist banks and big capital.

    Like

  4. Also Bill, it is about trying to think of ways to mobilise a popular movement around specific aims to get the ball rolling rather than saying `this’ should happen or `that’ should happen.

    Like

  5. But the word amnesty is unclear. Presumably it means only a temporary lifting of debt. In which case it won’t solve the problem
    I think we’re better off putting forward clearer demands around housing

    no repossessions
    transformation of empty second homes/buy to lets into council flats
    nationalisation of the builders without compensation under control of the unions and communities

    etc.

    Like

  6. Whose going to stop the reposessions bill, you? A movement could possibly and this is an attempt to think about how we could mobilise a large popular movement against repossessions, bankruptcies, mass unemployment etc. People put all sorts of programmatic demands under the umbrella of the Stop the War Movement.

    I think a debt amnesty speaks for itself but I don’t know what you mean that its not a solution to the immediate problem unless it is that you think lending will end the day after the revolution.

    Like

  7. Who’s going to implement the debt amnesty David, you?
    Doesn’t sound too likely.
    So given that both are mobilising slogans, mobilising around something which has both a local, specific and universal application – stopping repossessions seems a much better idea to me, given that a debt amnesty cannot be introduced locally and is anyway a pointless half way house.
    If we were ever strong enough to introduce it why would we bother to limit ourselves to an amnesty?

    Like

  8. Very childish. The debt amnesty would be implemented by popular demand and you are right if the movement did become strong enough to introduce it it probably would go further, much further.

    I think we’ve got to think national and act local but of course it is much easier to act local if you have a national movement supporting you. A debt amnesty would not preclude stopping repossessions in fact that would be served by the growing demand for one as a stopped repocession is essentially a debt amnesty but please don’t let me stop you from stopping as many reposessions as you can. Good luck.

    Like

  9. Further, a debt amnesty would give those stopped reposessions legitimacy whereas simply stopping one while good in itself wouldn’t stop the creditors from continuing to try to repossess in the future or illegalise the occupiers occupany.

    Like

  10. Yes, i think what it is bill is that your approach is anti-political.

    Like

  11. I don’t think anyone will fight for a 20 hour week.
    The avereage working week in 2006 was 36.9 hours, but that figure includes p/t workers.
    Around 13% of the work force exceed 48 hours/week, due to opt outs from European law.
    The main reason being, they need the money!
    Aiming for a maximum enforceable working week of 40 hours and an average of 30, without loss of pay, is a realisitic possibility though.

    Like

  12. prianikoff: well its not whether they will fight for it as such it is about accommodating the unemployed. The 20-hour week would be paid at the equivalent of today’s 40-hours but I would willingly negotiate a bit and perhaps your 30 hour week is more realistic. However, I chose 20 because it allows men and women to work productively without their children suffering neglect, obesiity etc, as one of them will always be around and allows more time for community participation. It is a form of economic consolidation whereas Keynesianism would try to restore growth by making people build, dig, grow crap. But we’ve already got capitalist overproduction anyway so that won’t work.

    It is an interesting question though. The gains of capitalist productivity always accrue to a small number of indiividuals because they result in job cuts rather than cuts in hours. I think someone noted that with today’s productivity and 1950s America’s living standards we’d be working 5 hours a week.

    I’d say though that just for the moment the 20-hour issue is subordinate to the debt amnesty issue.

    Like

  13. But every struggle is a political struggle. So evidently its not.

    Like

  14. http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1873/01/indifferentism.htm

    Read the above on this subject. If every struggle was a political struggle we wouldn’t need a socialist party to express the general economic interests of the working class in political terms. Most struggles are purely economic, wages, jobs etc.

    Like

  15. Economic struggles are never purely economic. The separation between economics and politics is typical of economism.
    Economic struggles are political ones. That isn’t to say they’re conscious. Which is a different thing.
    And anyway beside the point and I don’t see what indifferentism’s got to do with it either.

    Like

Leave a comment

Trending