image The Marx Memorial Library is running a series of lectures on Marxism and ecology. In this recording of his talk on 23 February Marx’s biographer David McLellan looks at Marx’s ecological thinking.

You can download the MP3 here.

David begins by pointing out that although we are in a major recession it is probable that capitalism will make a recovery in the next two or three years. In his view the major threat facing humanity is not a temporary economic crisis but the ecological disaster that capitalism is creating. Quite a bit of what he says will be familiar to readers of John Bellamy Foster.

The subsequent discussion, which isn’t on the recording did not show a grasp of the urgency of the situation that David conveyed and, although stimulating enough, was more academic than political with Althusser getting a particularly rough time though whether or not an exploration of the right translation of Stoffwechsel is critical others will have to judge.

 

Technorati Tags: ,,

2 responses to “Marx and ecology – David McLellan lecture MP3”

  1. At the end of his talk, McLellan says the we should take account of the “intrinsic value” of things in the ecosphere, in order (presumably) to develop a rationale for defending said ecosphere. The reasoning is that objects with no use value or exchange value can thereby still be “valued” in some way. This echoes a similar point made by Joel Kovel in a talk at the climate change seminar organised by the FI last February.

    I can see the point they are trying to make: things that are of no use value to humans still could have some value to the environment or possibly even have a “value” just by existing. But I’m not sure that saying this get us very far. Human activity will always have its impact on the environment, destroying animal and plant life and whole ecosystems as well. We are still left with the issue of how to judge whether go go ahead with such destruction in specific instances, whether or not objects have an “intrinsic value”.

    Like

  2. Sorry for going completely off-topic here but just to say I have posted very rough drafts of Part One and Part Two of an essay I am writing called `Why Marxism is true’ on my blog.

    Part One is the introduction and part two is on historical materialism which attempts to explain what it is and what is really meant by `the end of history’. Part three: capitalism and part four: dialectical materialism will hopefully follow shortly. Any comments appreciated remembering it is a rough draft.

    http://thetroublewithcentrism.blogspot.com/

    Apologies again for the off topic interjection.

    Like

Leave a comment

Trending