This comes via Unite Left

Steve Acheson is a Unite/EPIU member – being charged under the Prevention of Terrorism Act for protesting over his blacklisting.

“A hearing is pending in the Royal Courts of Justice, London, on Wednesday 21st October at 10.30am, at which a company is applying for an injunction against Steve Acheson, one of the 3 electricians in the class legal action blacklist case against companies affiliated to Ian Kerr’s Consulting Association, & also Sec. of the Unite/EPIU Manchester Contracting Branch: this is an injunction sought by the company (main contractor) at Fiddlers Ferry.

This injunction is being brought under the Prevention of Terrorism Act & seeks to show that Steve, as the first respondent, & others unnamed [as second respondents] , by their constant picketing of the site represent “a threat to the energy supplies of this country”. Because this application is being brought under the Prevention of Terrorism Act, Steve will not be able to defend himself at this hearing, as we understand it. The basis of the application is that by picketing the site he is committing a Trespass because he and others are on the firm’s property; that having issued leaflets to workers on the site calling for ‘direct action’ he is ‘inciting’ the workforce to commit acts contrary to the national interest which may impact on energy supplies and that he has, at times, acted in a way that might have intimidated the workforce. There is no mention in the company’s deposition to the Court that he was formerly employed by them, nor that his picket represents a campaign against blacklisting. One senior trade union leader in the RMT has already said that if this goes ahead it will have consequences for the whole trade union movement.”

2 responses to “Terror laws used against blacklisted union activist”

  1. It seems that the relevant legisaltion being used is the Terrorism Act 2000, not the PTA.

    Like

  2. Mark Victorystooge Avatar
    Mark Victorystooge

    Indeed.
    It has actually taken them a while to use “war on terror” laws against trade unionists (unless there are precedents I don’t know about). The fact that the TU movement has been rather unmilitant and supine may explain this.

    Like

Leave a comment

Trending