A History of Christianity: The First Three Thousand Years. By Diarmaid MacCulloch

image If the kitchen scales are to be believed this book weighs in at as near two kilos as makes no difference. That’s a bit of a drawback. Unless you are training for some endurance event you’re not likely to stick it in your bag for something to read on the bus.

MacCulloch’s provocative title hints at the scale of his ambition. His history of Christianity begins with the Bronze Age Greeks’ attempts to understand their cosmos and ranges from Homer to an explanation of why Aristotle become so influential on medieval religious thought in Europe. One of the book’s charms is its liberal peppering of anecdotes. We learn of the man his contemporaries called Diogenes of Sinope or Diogenes the Cynic. These days you buy your clothes in a jumble sale if you want to show your contempt for social pressures. Diogenes conveyed the same message with onanism in the agora.

Then there is the example of Kondratii Selivanov who should stand as a warning to anyone inclined to base their thoughts and deeds overly on old books which have been frequently translated. A lot of people would have been spared a lot of pain if Selivanov’s dyslexia had been identified in childhood. The Russian word for “Redeemer” is Iskupitel’ . Selivanov misread it as Oskopitel’  which means “castrator”, a difference obvious even to the non-theologian. To make matters worse for anyone who joined his sect he mistook the Biblical injunction to the Israelites to be fruitful (plodites’) as plotitites’, meaning “castrate yourselves”. Many readers will be surprised to learn that despite the rigorous entry conditions this group lasted from the late 1700s till the mid 1950s.

The BBC has made the book into a TV series which scratches the surface of the principal themes. The same is true of the text. To take one example, the Jesuit missions to China and Japan are fascinating stories and Liam Brockey’s book Journey to the East is an excellent account of their Chinese adventures. Every single philosophical trend, historical event or artistic movement that MacCulloch refers to is already the subject of a massive literature. In 1016 pages all he can reasonably set out to do is to give the general reader a brisk introduction to the topic and anyone wishing to go down one of the countless scenic diversions is signposted by an extensive bibliography.

Self describing as the apophatic son of an Anglican cleric MacCulloch is incredibly tolerant in his judgements on all forms of Christian ideas. Now while it’s probably wrong to pick out one form of religious belief as less rational than any other you would think that the Mormons should be prominent in the line for a bit of ridicule. MacCulloch is too nice for that and lets them off the hook. He engages with every manifestation of Christian belief as some attempt to understand the divine ranging from the Gnostics, the Chalcedonians and the ancient isolated Ethiopian Church. He especially good at briskly summarising the theological disputes which led to excommunications, doctrinal clarifications and burnings and the ideological violence of many Christian leaders from the earliest days is a salutary reminder that ideas can have an impact in the real world.

The one thing MacCulloch fails in is to sufficiently set developments in religious thinking against the backdrop of the societies in which theological  innovation was taking place. It’s as if the academic believes that ideas are disconnected from the material world. At a basic level he does not even point out that a big attraction of the religion in early medieval Europe was that it offered local rulers a ready made literate bureaucracy to help administer their kingdoms which was a competitive advantage indigenous religions generally lacked. He compensates for this lack by trying to understand how the persistence of Christianity is partly due to it being appropriated by communities onto which it was forced. The picture is a Haitian representation of Saint Patrick, a slave himself according to the myth, who is often to be found in the churches of the descendants of slaves. Whether it’s Mexican Cristeros or charismatic contemporary African religious practice the author is intensely sympathetic to the rank and file who give life to these movements. He does not seem too fond of Benny Ratzinger.

Provided that you’re not irrationally hostile to every positive reference to religion A History of Christianity is a useful addition to the bookshelves of anyone wanting an elegantly written and often witty tour d’horizon of three millennia of intellectual history but don’t plan on taking it to the beach.

14 responses to “I’m pretty sure it says “plotitites’””

  1. For those troskyists who are fond of trivia: Trotsky actually met members of the “castrators-sect” who had fled Russia, when working as a journalist in the Balkans during the Balkan wars. He didn’t give them much of a future… ; )

    Like

  2. sounds interesting, thanks Liam.

    Like

  3. The Shakers here in the States don’t believe in pro-creation and I think they still have a few members left after 250 years. I think they didn’t believe in having babies because it would be a sign you had sex and therefore, possibly, fun. They had to adopt new members as children because a “no sex” religion doesn’t hold a lot of appeal for even the most zealous of adults. The audience for a castration sect would have to be more significantly more limited, and yet they soldiered on. Our species is pretty rich with all kinds of unintended adaptations. The Shakers made fantastic furniture though, their well developed hand muscles made them master craftsman.

    Like

  4. splinteredsunrise Avatar
    splinteredsunrise

    Some of those Russian sects were amazing. I think some of the Doukhobors still run little communes in the mountains around Vancouver.

    The Jesuit missions to Japan and China are fascinating in themselves – that’s why you can’t go wrong with a biography of Francis Xavier – but it is good that he gets in things like the Nestorian presence in China, or the ancient Ethiopian Church, that aren’t as well served by the literature. The TV series was breathless, but then it would have to be to get so much content into five hours.

    Like

  5. You’re being a bit hard on the mormons. It’s only the patina of time that separates their quirky supernatural beliefs from anyone else’s.

    Like

  6. In the last TV episode about evangelical prods, he mentioned a Moravian missionary called Dober, and how wonderful it was that this humble working man crossed the ocean to tell other working men about his faith. If he’d been a socialist people would ask why he didn’t go back to Russia.

    He does mention that the lack of appeal of Catholicism in West Africa had some connection to the slave trade, and to the bad example Christian Europe set in WWI, and I suppose it is somewhat inevitable that he would be more interested in the internal logic of the theology rather than its social causes.

    Like

  7. Self describing as the apophatic of an Anglican cleric

    Hmm?

    Like

  8. I see that there’s a protest this Sunday against Benny Ratzinger’s planned state visit to England. Peter Tatchell is involved.

    The plan seems to involve having a row with the congregation at Westminster Cathedral before stomping off to the Italian embassy. Sometimes it’s hard to tell the difference between a puerile stunt and a demonstrative gesture. Other times it’s not.

    It would be the Foreign Office, Buckingham Palace or Downing Street that cancel state visits rather than a bunch of antagonised papists.

    http://stroppyblog.blogspot.com/2010/02/protest-pope-this-sunday.html

    Like

  9. splinteredsunrise Avatar
    splinteredsunrise

    The Italian embassy thing is not at random as it looks. Endearingly, one of the demands of the coalition is for Berlusconi to invade and annex Vatican City. Somebody has spent too much time playing Risk.

    Like

  10. This just in: The tiny Vatican State is inhabited mainly by priests.

    A nation of priests! What if they breed? No, wait…

    (Seriously, “invade”? Not just “stop the 0.1% income tax subvention and repudiate the Lateran Treaty”? (Which isn’t going to happen either, but at least doesn’t sound silly.) Cite plz.)

    Like

  11. Under any other regime annexing the Vatican might be a good idea, In the given circumstances Benny’s a lot less objectionable than Berlusconi.

    Like

  12. For those of you interested in bizarre ways of combining religious beliefs and political radicalisation, look no further: http://themormonworker.org/
    Libertarian mormons…

    Like

  13. splinteredsunrise Avatar
    splinteredsunrise

    Well, perhaps I was carried along by the hyperbole. Terry S is in the habit of issuing cryptic calls for UN inspectors to be sent into the Vatican. Why, he doesn’t say. I am fairly sure there are no WMD there.

    Like

  14. But doesn’t Rev 17:8 “The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition” tell us that the WMDs not found in Babylon are to be found underneath the palace of the whore of same?

    Even further off-topic, splintered sunrise, would it be a terrible imposition for you to be polite enough to tell me if the reason my comments on your blog disappear into the ether is because you’ve banned me or because of a quirk in WordPress? If the former it would be nice to know what could be done to remdey the situation.

    Like

Leave a comment

Trending