It’s a knotty problem. You’ve got your vanguard cadre organisation and you’re up for a bit of revolutionary action because you know it’s right and necessary. The only trouble is that the working masses don’t share your enthusiasm. What’s a fighting Marxist party supposed to do?

Che Guevara went off to Bolivia and look at what happened to him. The Red Army Faction thought they could shake the German proletariat from its Social Democratic torpor. That ended in tears too.

Yesterday’s stunt, to use one of the kinder possible descriptions, by “some 200 SWP members and supporters” was more farce than tragedy.

In a way you can understand why they did it. They been stuck in a hall at the wholly independent Right To Work conference for hours on the hottest day of the year so far. Speaker after speaker after speaker had fulminated against the injustices of capitalism. People, they may have been told, are angry. A mood of resistance is building. Oh and that dreadful Willie Walsh, British Airways union busting chief executive is in negotiations with Unite’s leaders just a short walk away.

Seized with righteous anger and maybe chanting “Willie, Willie, Willie – out, out, out” they re-enacted the storming of the Winter Palace. Though in this low budget version the masses weren’t there.

With each month that passes the British left sets as new standard for embarrassing, counter-productive behaviour. Years of setting up phony “campaigns” controlled by a single group; electoral “alliances” in which no one talks to each other and now a small group of activists and political full timers decide that it’s they rather than Unite members who have the right to tell Tony Woodley what to do. Or let Willie Walsh know how dreadful he is, or something.

This is a low water mark.

Overzealous use has given public self-criticism a bad name but there is a place for it. It does not have to involve people sitting in the streets with placards around their necks saying “I am guilty of anarchist situationist deviations” but surely when the pictures are viewed in the bright morning sunshine someone should put their hands up and say “maybe that was a wrong call”.

Who would now fancy being a member of the SWP trying to do serious work in Unite? No matter how well intentioned yesterday’s protest was it was as clear an example of a propaganda group substituting itself for the working class as you’ll ever see endlessly looped on the news channels.

Pete Townshend’s warning of the dangers of this sort of thing is below and Dave has a good piece here.

 

45 responses to “Substitute”

  1. liked this song from the Who in 60s when i was a kid. heard it again recently and the racism of the lyrics spoiled the memory

    sandy

    Like

  2. What Macuaid fails to understand is that it is the historic role of the SWP to be fucking amazing at everything they do – therefore by definition they could not have been wrong.

    So the BA workers did not endorse this protest, nor even know about it, but that is because they are so *oppressed* that they need dozens of class conscious young cadre to speak for them.

    Admittedly to say things that they would not necessarily say themselves, but the principle is there, and I’m sure they would have done the same thing had they read as much Cliff as the full time SWP organisers who led this protest.

    Once you’ve read History and Class Consciousness a hundred times you will understand how amazing this day was. The start of possibly the greatest workers revolution in history – one where no worker need actually even attend.

    Like

  3. So when Woodley and Simpson declare the terms of surrender we should all rejoice that the workers have yet again spoken! Another victory for commonsense over infantilism.

    Good to see the left in fighting mood for the savage cuts ahead!

    Like

  4. Mark Victorystooge Avatar
    Mark Victorystooge

    The Red Brigades operated in Italy, not Germany.

    Saying “Che Guevara went off to Bolivia and look what happened to him” suggests a defeatist attitude to me. If you only struggle when you are almost sure of success, then in current circumstances that means not struggling at all. No wonder people are acting like Diane Abbott is the answer to all prayers (2 weeks ago it was the Lib Dems – where are they now?)

    Like

  5. Tempest in a teapot was one of my first reactions to the reports, though I suppose in a time of 24/7 ‘news’ channels this sort of protest becomes a media tsunami. By the time the history of the BA cabin crew dispute is finally written, however, I suspect that this incident will feature as nothing more than a tiny footnote.

    On the one hand, the protest was a superficially successful publicity stunt for the SWP, gaining incomparably more media exposure than weeks of canvassing door-to-door for TUSC candidates. There were no casualties in terms of either injuries or arrests, and even accusations of property damage would have appeared quite flimsy. (Strange behaviour, some might say, from an organisation that cannot bring itself to back Jerry Hicks for Unite general secretary against Len McCluskey, who oversaw the earlier talks with BA, which included the offer of huge concessions with an estimated value of more than £50 million, but then that’s another story).

    On the other hand, the demonstration, which seems as to have been as much about embarrassing the Unite bureaucrats as attacking Willie Walsh union-buster, does not seem to be playing well among many left-leaning bloggers and FB participants, partly evinced by postings on this blog. While that probably says something about the limits of those authors’ own political horizons, as well as the almost pathological hatred the SWP has engendered among many other leftists, there is also a substantial and very hard to refute objection to ‘substitutionism’ by the comrades, which in different ways Liam and Dave Osler (http://www.davidosler.com/2010/05/acas-sit-in-the-future-of-the-socialist-workers-party/) have made on their blogs.

    ACAS talks are not sacrosanct and the SWP comrades did not violate a holy shrine in Euston Road, but they did so in insolation, apart that is from the company afforded by a BBC camera crew.

    In short, there was no indication of any BA workers (or for that matter Unite members, not in the ranks of the SWP) taking part in the demonstration, and I cannot ascribe that absence solely or primarily to the levels of intimidation cabin crew have faced from BA management over the past few months. Whatever their intention, loud chanting by SWP members/the Right to Work campaign cannot disguise the fact that there is currently no organised opposition at the base of Unite, including within the comparatively bolshie BASSA branch, to the national union’s bureaucracy to what is likely to be a large-scale retreat on most every issue, which sparked the original dispute deep in the mists of 2009.

    In my view, Dave Osler is unduly charitable to Tony Woodley, though my impression – and it is only an impression – is that a very significant number of the BA cabin crew have little or no confidence in Derek Simpson. Woodley is admittedly not yet a discredited figure in the eyes of more than a tiny minority, though my understanding is that McCluskey is his anointed successor as a sole general secretary for Unite.

    Quite by chance I met a couple of BASSA stewards in mid-March, who were awaiting for a face-to-face briefing with Woodley, who was due to appear at Unite’s Holborn HQ after a lengthy session at the alternative ACAS, the TUC’s Congress House building. These reps certainly had concerns about a sell-out, though there was no animosity towards Woodley per se and as far as I know he arrived later on his own, bar a couple of television camera crews left waiting outside, for a lengthy report back to reps based at Heathrow and Gatwick.

    Finally, though, I found it fascinating to watch the sharp contrast in reactions between an apparently unfazed Willie Walsh in shirt sleeves with a mobile clutched to his ear, and an apoplectic (and besuited) Tony Woodley. Was this the reaction of a man thinking that the demonstration had handed a huge gift to BA management or furious at being caught out cutting a dodgy deal?

    Like

  6. So, the Situationists are back.

    Like

  7. Hardly seems like the crime of the century. So a few dozen young strike supporters – led by the SWP – chanted some angry slogans at Willie Walsh, and got into a slanging match with Woodley and Simpson who are working trying to maintain bureaucratic control over this strike – the kind of thing that has led to many sellouts in the past.

    Might have been better to have been able to take some strikers with them. But so what? At least they got the issue into the media. At least they made it obvious that there are some on the left who support the strikers and don’t go along with the agenda of cretins like Simpson and Woodley. That may well be important, particularly if an overt sellout is attempted.

    This was not the March action of 1921. It was a protest with slogans being chanted. Those who condemn it outright as a ‘disruption’ are pushing a key part of the New Labour agenda – that ‘militancy’ is counterproductive because it antagonises the media. That is a very slippery slope indeed.

    Like

  8. I don’t agree with everything that George B says, but he does at least have the great merit of getting this into perspective.

    It was a stunt, to highlight the danger of a sell-out. The sky is not falling; the world is not coming to an end; SWP members will not be expelled from our unions or thrown out by our workmates on Monday.

    I am pleased to learn that the Fourth International now think Che Guevara going to Bolivia was a mistake – it’s not what they said at the time, but it’s nice to know that you can be wrong…

    Like

  9. Reply to George Avatar
    Reply to George

    Actually…

    While Operation ACAS was taking place the SWP Unite caucus was meeting and deciding to back Jerry Hicks.

    SWP Unite members weren’t involved in the Willie-bating.

    Like

  10. is the SWP copying the strategy of the EDL: creating turmoil somewhere, where the media is, in the hope, that some (new fee-paying members) are attracted to the party?

    Like

  11. If you have an ET case it is not a success to end up in court or if you’ve won a strike ballot its not successful if you always strike – ideally one would like an ACAS settlement beneficial to TU members – why the SWP would want to gatecrash the Woodley/Walsh talks beggars belief. Maybe this event isnt as important as the news of Tories plotting 300,000 job losses in public sector – but if it damages attempts by UNITE to win this dispute then its not helpful. Walsh will no doubt be happy with this SWP stunt after losing the court case.

    Like

  12. Thanks for the update regarding the decision to support Hicks in the Unite general secretary election.
    Liam, as someone else pointed out, the Red Brigades operated in Italy, and I think that you’ve conflated them with Germany’s Red Army Faction, which became far more widely known as Baader-Meinhof.
    At any rate, this has provoked an interesting (!) and sometimes very heated discussion across the blog-o-sphere and among FB friends.

    Like

  13. Would Liam agree that “Respect” has been an exercise in substitution?

    Like

  14. the Brigate Rosse in Italy were btw in their early days very much embedded in the factory struggles in Italy in the early 70ies and their “armed propaganda” in support of existing struggles was widely supported by advanced parts of the working class, unfortunately, after the arrest of most of its founding leadership in 1974, the BR switched to the elitist and militarist strategy of a “concentrated strike against the heart of the State, because the state is an imperialist collection of multinational corporations” resulting in several killings and the Moro abduction in 1978

    Like

  15. Greek anarchists actually kill people:

    Is firebombing a bank an acceptable tactic?

    No such Red-baiting as here.

    Like

  16. It looks like this could be part of a global tactical turn. Something similar was tried in Dublin a week or so ago by co-thinkers of the British vanguard.

    ” ONE of the main speakers at the rally which ended with gardai baton charging people outside the Dail is refusing to condemn the protesters who tried to break into Leinster House.

    People Before Profit councillor Richard Boyd Barrett also said the tactics used by gardai, who were forced to push the protesters back from the Dail gates, were an overreaction.

    And the Socialist Worker’s Party (SWP), whose members were trying to force an entry, praised the incident as “in the spirit of the Greek resistance”.

    Around 70 to 80 protesters broke away from a Right to Work march and tried to force their way into the Dail on Tuesday night. ”

    http://www.independent.ie/national-news/speaker-refuses-to-condemn-protesters-2178031.html

    Like

  17. So the correct socialist position would be to condemn the people who tried to break into Leinster House??

    Like

  18. So clearly instead of sitting down with the Left and other anti-capitalist activists to jointly discuss and plan, they are taking top down leadership to its ultimate sectarian level.
    On one hand we have popular frontism with non critical approach within the UAF etc and now ultra leftism. What did Lenin say? Certainly both infantile and disorder combined!!

    Like

  19. Does anyone know where I can buy a t-shirt saying “I am guilty of anarchist situationist deviations”?

    Like

  20. It’s seldom a good idea to make political positions based on headlines in the Irish Independent. However it is permissible to question the wisdom of a political organisation trying to persuade a few dozen people to force their way into a government building.

    Like

  21. In general I’m in favour of more not less anarchist deviations. It did make me smile when the SWPs stunt was condemned by both Andy Newman and the Socialist Party. It will be a long time before either of those forces are involved in anything “illegal”, indeed heaven forfend, and before I’m accused of libel I do honestly believe that and I’m not being ironic.
    The problem is that the SWPs anarchism is bureaucratic and therefore when these things go a little astray they are discussed in bureaucratic terms, as if the SWP had planned to occupy the talks and could have stopped the protest that they had initiated, even if they had wanted to.
    These things have a life of there own and it seems likely to me that once the demo was underway, arrived at ACAS and found the doors open and unlocked then one thing naturally lead to another. Was that the best idea? Maybe it was maybe it wasn’t. But that’s life. Stuff happens.
    It is the idea that it was “correct” or “incorrect” and the discussion of it in those terms, which really is the life of Brian.

    Like

  22. Would it be fair to say, Liam, that if your organisation had had the numbers to do such a thing the criticism would have been directed at media distortion rather than at those protesting?

    Also your snipe at “the wholly independent Right To Work conference”; wouldn’t it be better to encourage such an initiative rather than deriding it?

    Perhaps your slogan, if I’m not being too forward, should be “Welcome to the Green-Eyed Monster”.

    Like

  23. I’m not sure that building the RTW conference does have any point.
    I went for my sins on Saturday, it was absolutely as one would have expected. Around 600 overwhelmingly SWP members. A series of speakers in the morning. No discussion fro the floor. Some small groups, very democratic who made proposals, which were then referred back to the conference. Why was it democratic? Because the discussion was meaningless. No one is going to enact any of these decisions, except the proposals already put by the SWP, namely a couple of demos and protests.
    Of course it has an “elected” steering group. But this is only a charade. It is overwhelmingly SWP members who do as they are told.
    They can be democratic because at its core the RTW has no democracy.
    The problem is that the SWP does not have any credibility amongst the wider left, and hardly any of the wider left attended or even bothered to sell their papers.
    Who is going to respond to the SWPs call to build local RTW groups? I can’t see anyone doing so apart from themselves. And from what I understand, even not that many of them. Why would they? Everyone knows all the decisions are stitched up in advance. Everyone knows its an SWP front. Everyone knows it will do nothing except what the SWP instruct it to do.
    Not too appealing really.

    Like

  24. billj – what other should it be doing, or to put it another way, what should a Right To Work organisation do other than demos and protests?
    Your point about “the wider left” (aka other left parties) can be turned on its head, seeing that RTW is an SWP initiative they figure they aren’t going to benefit from it themselves and choose to ignore it. Good for you for bucking the trend.
    Your point about democracy seems to be that the prevalence of SWP members makes it a charade. Well you would say that is one possible response. Another is that if it is democratic with so much SWP preponderence, there’s no automatic reason it shouldn’t be if “the wider left” got off its collective arse and got involved.

    Like

  25. I am following London’s williegate with interest.

    I sincerely hope this does not damage the campaign of Jerry Hicks, which should be supported in Ireland, where the Union has many members.

    It participates in many useful activities, including the event I call Dublin’s scufflegate.

    Speeches from the officially titled Right to Work Protest at Dáil Éireann Tuesday 11 May 2010 are at the at Irish Left Review site (and they are are in the main good).

    Mainstream media coverage of the event highlighted a melee – the scufflegate incident. There are easier ways to enter the parliamentary precincts – e.g. an admission ticket from a TD (Dáil member, MP) or a Senator.

    http://www.irishleftreview.org/2010/05/13/work-protest-dail-tuesday-11th-2010/

    Like

  26. “Around 600 overwhelmingly SWP members”

    How does one distinguish and then count who are the SWPers and who aren’t? Do they have particular physical traits? Did they wear name tags announcing their party affiliation? Did you perform a census?

    As for the broader article, it is about as silly as it gets. So, some SWPers took advantage of a fortuitous opportunity to protest against a renowned and reviled union-buster who was down the street? This was bad because… Willie Walsh’s agenda has no general significance and therefore he shouldn’t be protested by anyone but BA employees? That seems too sectional to be believed. Do you not protest against Israeli leaders when they come to Britain? How about other corporate leaders? If the president of BP – which is presently fouling the Gulf of Mexico and beyond – came to London would you oppose picketing him unless you got the go ahead from residents around the Gulf of Mexico and perhaps BP employees?
    And comparing this to the (later) Red Brigades or Baader-Meinhof or Guevara’s unfortunate end in Bolivia is just stupid and ahistorical. There is a (minor) debate to be had whether this was the tactically best move – but to put it above what should be the first order of business – a condemnation of BA union busting, craven media attacks on the action, and the UNITE’s leadership sell-out that is being prepared demonstrates a shocking lack of priorities for someone who calls themself a socialist. Was it really only a few years ago that we were all celebrating the “substitutionalist” tactics of the anti-globalization movement?

    Like

  27. Palestinian scarves and ethnic hats is usually a good guide.

    Like

  28. skidmarx: `billj – what other should it be doing, or to put it another way, what should a Right To Work organisation do other than demos and protests?’

    Now that just about encapsulates SWP bankruptcy. They don’t have a programme on anything they just have fronts. Right to Work is a front organisation designed to generate publicity for the SWP. It’s not about formulating policy on how full employment could be achieved or organising local unemployed to fight for the right to work or fighting politically against cuts that will generate unemployment and so on and so forth it is simply about demos and protests. They have their place but they are in fact the least of it. The true work is political, theoretical and organisational. What does, after all, the right to work mean? What does it entail? What demands are you placing on the reformists? What concrete agreements are you holding them to?

    I certainly wouldn’t get bent out of shape about the little ACAS stunt. Very little wrong with it really but it does illustrate the SWP’s go it alone, substitutionism and make you ask: what if they were big? Instead of harmless, self-publicising flash mobs would they be launching adventurists, directionless putches inviting defeat and a serious right wing backlash?

    Like

  29. I think Doug hits the nail on the head of why the SWP are so hated by sections of the ‘wider left’. It is their tireless, heroic support for the Palestinian cause.

    Like

  30. Steve & Doug – huh?

    Like

  31. How party notes reports it – available on the swp website. The last few lines show that this isn’t seen as the swp’s finest hour:

    Willie Walsh protest

    The SWP has been in the news a lot over the last 24 hours!
    First given the lies being peddled by newspapers like the Sunday Mail and BA fat cat Willie Walsh it is important to explain what did and what did not happen.
    On Saturday a journalist from Sky TV informed a member of the Party that Willie Walsh was in the ACAS building in Euston Towers, just around the corner from the Right to Work Conference.
    At the end of the conference, a group of 200 or so people marched to the building were Walsh was holed up.
    The door of the building was unlocked and there was just one security guard.

    About 100 protestors marched into the building and the rest of the protesters remained outside the building.
    The group who entered the building made their way to the 22nd floor and there they saw Willie Walsh in a corridor on his mobile phone (it is now clear that he was telling BA management that the talks were over).

    The protestors surrounded Walsh and chanted slogans at him for a few minutes.
    Tony Woodley (joint secretary of Unite) and Brendon Barber (gen sec of the TUC) were in a room on the floor above. They came down and argued with the protestors to leave and they did.

    Next, it’s important to challenge the lies being peddled by Walsh and the media.

    1) Willie Walsh claims he was intimidated by the protest: Since the dispute began Walsh and the BA management have sacked 7 strikers, disciplined at least 45 other strikers. Things are so nasty at BA that strikers involved in a legal and official dispute have to appear on TV with their faces and voices disguised and at some public meetings strikers have to speak behind screens. Walsh is the real bully not a small group of protestors shouting at him in a corridor.

    2) Did the protest stop the talks? The target of the protest was Willie Walsh. There was never any intention of stopping the talks and it is important to emphasise that we did not break up the talks. The talks were already over before the protesters entered the building. It is clearly absurd to claim that the protests scuppered the talks. Everybody knows that Walsh wants to break the strike and has made it clear that only complete surrender of the union is acceptable. Lastly the talks have been going on since Xmas – a ten minute protest on a Saturday made no difference

    3) What has been the response of the BASSA strikers? An official BASSA statement issued yesterday said “despite widely reported distractions that occurred at ACAS, in reality these had little effect on the outcome of these talks”. Also we have received a very warm welcome on the BA picket lines this morning – 39 copies of SW have been sold.

    There has been a lot of blogging and Facebook chatter going on. Some of it has been untrue and unhelpful. I personally think it is best not to engage in these gutter debates, but if you are please try and find out the basic facts before firing off comments.

    Lastly I think it is important we learn some lessons from the protest on Saturday. We are trying to bring together a serious coalition that can resist the cuts. As Saturday’s RtW conference shows we are pulling together a wide coalition involving serious trade unionists and key Labour Party figures.
    That means when we hold stunts and protests we need to point all our fire at the Con-Dems and the bosses and should try and avoid at all costs protests that embroil Labour and trade union leaders in them.

    Like

  32. `That means when we hold stunts and protests we need to point all our fire at the Con-Dems and the bosses and should try and avoid at all costs protests that embroil Labour and trade union leaders in them.’

    Arse.

    Like

  33. Support for the basic contention of this post can be found here

    http://www.swp.org.uk/party-notes

    Like

  34. It obviously was silly and made them look unserious.
    Its easy to tell who’s a member of the SWP when you’ve been around a few years.
    And yes my basic contention is that there is nothing the RTW should do as it is simply misconceived. The SWP cannot serve as a rallying point for the left for a simple reason.
    Everyone knows what they’re really like.

    Like

  35. bill j – it’s helpful to know that you’re so unhelpful.

    Liam – does it?
    ” What has been the response of the BASSA strikers? An official BASSA statement issued yesterday said “despite widely reported distractions that occurred at ACAS, in reality these had little effect on the outcome of these talks”. Also we have received a very warm welcome on the BA picket lines this morning – 39 copies of SW have been sold.”
    Doesn’t seem like a bad reaction. It would seem to answer your question:”Who would now fancy being a member of the SWP trying to do serious work in Unite?”
    As for “With each month that passes the British left sets as new standard for embarrassing, counter-productive behaviour.” Et tu, brute.

    Like

  36. And maybe try looking at this first -hand account:
    Some people have suggested this episode was an attempt to publicise the SWP, others that it was an act of substitutionism. In fact, it was a spontaneous act of solidarity: when we realised there was a lot of media there, we thought that it would be brilliant if strikers (and millions of other people) saw some action in support of the cabin crew.
    As for the results—well, we have received a number of supportive emails from cabin crew, as well as a long and excited voicemail message from BA crew in Singapore saying how brilliant it was to see a show of support for them!
    SWP members got a great reception on the picket lines today. Nobody tried to get us removed, or argued with us. They even let us use their toilets, a sure sign of fraternal bonhomie. One group of pickets gave comrades a round of applause for being part of the “Battle of Acas”, shaking hands with them enthusiastically.
    http://leninology.blogspot.com/2010/05/right-to-work-conference-ba-strike-and.html

    Like

  37. ABUSE DELETED. SWP’s initiatives are not to promote the SWP but to promote socialism. And they are also designed to spark some life into the working class. The reaction of the left to these brave comrades makes me want to throw up.

    Like

  38. My Mum always recommended warm milk and honey for that.

    Like

  39. molotovs cocktail party Avatar
    molotovs cocktail party

    typical swp supporters, unless liam has altered the blog I read red army faction not red brigade, but swoppies seem to prefer arguing about statements without bothering trying to read them.
    As for how to spot one, it’s usually very easy – look for the ones ignoring the workers and coming out with rik mayall slogans (young ones era).
    Spot on Liam keep up the good work

    Like

  40. molotovs cocktail party Avatar
    molotovs cocktail party

    steve – have you any idea what either brave or comrade means? Stupid and selfish surely fits these people better.

    Like

  41. Steve makes the SWP sound like a party of Doctor Frankensteins. Some stunts are brave, but not this one

    Like

  42. As I said the reaction to the actions of these brave comrades makes me want to throw up.

    Like

  43. Steve’s ‘bravery’ may amount to coming out of the house in the morning – soon storming ACAS will be compared to storming the Bastille.

    Like

Leave a comment

Trending