image The Islamic Forum of Europe has become a very popular whipping boy in the last few months. My consistent impression is that its supporters have played a hugely positive part in building the meetings and Sunday’s upcoming demonstration against the EDL. They have collaborated very well with every variety of religion, trade union and atheist who’s been willing to oppose the far right. It may be dreadfully empirical but sometimes observing what people say and do can be helpful in forming an opinion on them.

They have felt obliged to issue this press release defending their reputation. The statement to which they refer is underneath.

The divisive and misleading press release by the so called Unity Platform Against Racism & Fascism is a disgraceful attempt to undermine the united stand against the EDL.It begins with words that are immediately contradicted by what follows: “We will do everything in our power to defend the peace in the borough, protect the lives of Muslims and ensure that the unity amongst all is maintained.”

They then go on to destroy that unity by attacking the very target of the EDL.“The IFE does not represent the Muslim community in Tower Hamlets.”Neither IFE, nor ELM for that matter, has ever claimed to represent the Muslim community.

“Under the patronage of an exclusivist Islam emanating from Saudi Arabia they are attempting to impose it amongst the Bengalis in this borough.”

The IFE has no links whatsoever with Saudi Arabia or any country outside Europe, nor has it sought to impose anything on anyone in Tower Hamlets or elsewhere.

“IFE acts as the sole representatives of ordinary Muslims but are in fact operating under the direction of their parent organization Jamaat Islam in Bangladesh.”

IFE has never claimed to “the sole representative of ordinary Muslims”. IFE does not have a parent organisation, so does not answer to Jamaat-e-Islami or any other organisation in the UK, Bangladesh or elsewhere.

“It is Jamaat that was party to the massacre of innocent Bangladeshis in the 1971 war of independence that establish the independent state of Bangladesh. A war Tribunal has been established in Bangladesh to try leaders of Jaamat Islam who are IFE’s real ideological and organizational gurus. In other words IFE represent a virulent form of political Islam that is fascistic in nature like Jaamat Islam and verges on the anti-Semitic and is very exclusivist and undemocratic.”

IFE was established in the UK in 1988, most of its members were either children or not even born back in 1971. It has no ties at all with Bangladeshi political or religious parties, unlike the authors of the divisive press release who are linked to a hardline faction of the Awami League in London. The truth is that these people display an unrelenting hatred that seems to stem from the civil war almost 40 years ago, and they are still fighting it here in the UK. IFE, and indeed the East London Mosque and London Muslim Centre, work tirelessly in our own communities. They do not take part at all in Bangladeshi politics, nor do they want to get dragged into it as it is a huge distraction from the real needs of our community and the many people who have no ties with such politics other than their parents or grandparents came from Bangladesh.

“In defending the people of Tower Hamlets and especially the ordinary Muslims we do not have to defend IFE. EDL is attacking the Muslims of this borough and we must protect them.”

It is clear that these people would be content if the EDL limited their attacks to the IFE and ELM. Hardly surprising, as many of them were conspirators in Gilligan’s discredited Dispatches programme, which the EDL give pride of place on the front page of their website.

“Using this latest EDL threat to the local community, it is clear to us that the IFE brigade is trying to terrify the most vulnerable in our community – the Bangladeshi women and children into joining their ranks under the banner of ‘defending the Ummah’. It has come to our knowledge that IFE and its operatives have sent out mass e-mails, text messages and visited members of the community including young children in primary schools ask them to join forces and defend Muslims and East London Mosque from imminent threat of destruction.”

These accusations are lies. Of course, they give not a shred of evidence to support their outrageous claims. And we openly challenge them to bring any kind of creditable proof. We know they cannot, their slander will just add to the alarm and disunity they are trying to generate.

Some of the signatories have no knowledge of the statement. A Bangladeshi Youth Movement official said: “We are appalled our good name is linked to this divisive statement, we do not share these views, rather we support the cohesive work initiated by United East End”.

APASENTH also distanced themselves from the statement, saying they were not even consulted on the content of the statement.

Some signatories are paper-based organizations with no following in the community.Their shameful statement undermines all the hard work of the many organisations that have come together to form the United East End. Our partners in the recent efforts to stand against the EDL will know that we have not sought to lead the coalition, or used it to promote any other agenda.

We call on all those who strive to maintain a unified and strong coalition against the EDL to reject the divisive calls of the so-called ‘Unity Platform Against Racism and Fascism’.

Their shameful statement undermines all the hard work of the many organisations that have come together to form the United East End. Our partners in the recent efforts to stand against the EDL will know that we have not sought to lead the coalition, or used it to promote any other agenda. We call on all those who strive to maintain a unified and strong coalition against the EDL to reject the divisive calls of the so-called ‘Unity Platform Against Racism and Fascism’.

PRESS STATEMENT FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

TOWER HAMLETS COMMUNITY STANDS UP TO FIGHT FASCISM IN ALL its COLOURS:

The entry of the English Defence League (EDL) into Tower Hamlets to protest against a meeting organized under the auspices of the Federation of Student Islamic Societies (FOSIS) is a direct provocation to stir up racial tensions, foment dissent among faiths and attempt to bring disunity amongst the communities of the borough. We condemn the fascist EDL whose sole objective is to act as storm troopers for the British National Party (BNP) and pick up the pieces for them after their miserable rout in the local and national elections in neighbouring Barking and Dagenham Council. Under the guise of being non-political and upholding “English” values they are propagating a virulent form of naked Islamophobia which is rejected by the communities of Tower Hamlets. We will do everything in our power
to defend the peace in the borough, protect the lives of Muslims and ensure that the unity amongst all is maintained.

This borough has a rich tradition of successful challenge to fascist forces of the Blackshirts and the National Front. The Battle of Cable Street in the 30,s and the Struggle for Brick Lane following Altab Ali’s murder in the 70’s and the move to oust Derek Beackon in the 90’s is part of our common history. The values of universalism, anti-racism and no compromise with fascism inform our thinking and has become part of our existence. We will build on this rich tradition as we face Oswald Mosley’s grandchildren.

As we confront the fascist thugs of EDL we in the Bengali and the Muslim community are being asked to stand side by side with Islamic Forum in Europe (IFE). This we refuse to do. The IFE does not represent the Muslim community in Tower Hamlets. They do not uphold the glorious tradition of Cable Street, Altab Ali and the anti racist movement. Under the patronage of an exclusivist Islam emanating from Saudi Arabia they are attempting to impose it amongst the Bengalis in this borough. Just as the EDL takes the guise of being ordinary English citizen to hide their true identity of fronting the fascist BNP so do IFE act as the sole representatives of ordinary Muslims but are in fact operating under the direction of their parent organisation Jamaat-e- Islami in Bangladesh. It is Jamaat that was party to the massacre of innocent Bangladeshis in the 1971 war of independence that establish the independent state of Bangladesh. A war Tribunal has been established in Bangladesh to try leaders of Jaamat-e- Islam who are IFE’s real ideological and organisational gurus. In other words IFE represent a virulent form of political Islam that is fascistic in nature like Jaamat Islam and verges on the anti-Semitic and is very exclusivist and undemocratic.

In defending the people of Tower Hamlets and especially the ordinary Muslims we do not have to defend IFE. EDL is attacking the Muslims of this borough and we must protect them. IFE must not be allowed to use this occasion to propagate their very reactionary version of political Islam.

We must also alert the entire community about the opportunist and divisive politics of IFE. Using this latest EDL threat to the local community, it is clear to us that the IFE brigade is trying to terrify the most vulnerable in our community – the Bangladeshi women and children into joining their ranks under the banner of ‘defending the Ummah’. It has come to our knowledge that IFE and its operatives have sent out mass e-mails, text messages and visited members of the community including young children in primary schools ask them to join forces and defend Muslims and East London Mosque from imminent threat of destruction.

All progressive forces must realize that the gut reaction to EDL is to defend everybody including IFE because they might be accused of being Islamophobic. But we boldly proclaim that it is not Islamophobic to have no trucks with the heirs of Fascist Jaamat. It is not Islamophobic to denounce the anti democratic credentials of IFE and their Saudi patrons. It is not Islamophobic to show solidarity with the Muslims of Tower Hamlets and their diverse representative organisations without marching under the leadership of IFE. We cannot be consistent in fighting the fascist EDL if we elect the “fascist” IFE as our Imam. In line with the best in the Islamic and Bengali tradition we reject the siren calls of IFE as we prepare to organise against EDL.

On behalf of:

Harmuz Ali (Bangladesh Welfare Association – BWA), Sajjadur Rahman (Brick Lane Mosque), Shamsuddin Shams (Altab Ali Memorial Foundation), Badrul Islam (Centre for Citizenship and Development (CCD), Akikur Rahman (Bangladesh Youth Association), Rajonuddin Jalal (London Bangladeshi Association), Ansar Ahmed Ullah (Nirmul Committee), Mahmoud Rauf (Brick Lane Business Association), Abdus Subhan Gedu (Banglatown Restaurant Association), Ethnic Minority Enterprise Project (EMEP), Abdul Ali Rauf (Chicksand Citizen’s Forum), Collective of Bangladeshi School Governors, Tower Hamlets Parents Centre, Tower Hamlets Parents Association, APASENTH, BYM, Nurul Islam (Kendrio Shaheed Minar Committee), Sundar Miah (Tarling Tenants & Residents Association), Nooruddin Ahmed (Bangladesh Youth League), Ruhul Amin (Progressive Youth Organisation), Taimus Ali (Bangladesh Youth Front), Shahab Uddin Ahmed Belal (Human Rights Secretary, Awami League), Cathy Forrester, Claire Murphy, Phil Maxwell, Terry Fitzpatrick (Blair Peach Project), Syed Sad Ahmed, Fanu Miah (Golden Moon Youth Project), Julie Begum (Swadhinata Trust), Amina Ali (international Forum for Secular Bangladesh), Sujit Sen (Liberation), Gita Sahgal, Subir Sinha, Alice Sielle (St. Barnabas church Bethnal Green), Imtiar Shamim (Muktangon: Nirman Blog), Rayhan Rashid (War Crimes Strategy Forum), Saikat Acharjee (WCSF), Nowrin Tamanna (University of Reading), Anisur Rahman Anis ( Bangladesh Human Rights Council UK), James Swapan Peris ( Bangladesh Hindu Buddhist Christian Unity Council- European committee), Whitechapel Anarchist Group, Ansarul Haque, Tower Hamlets Muslim Council & Jim Fitzpatrick MP Poplar and Limehouse.

Contact for further details:

Mr. Nurul Islam – 07984 610199 / 07836 332262

On behalf of UNITY PLATFORM AGAINST RACISM AND FASCISM

C/O  Bangladesh Welfare Association, 39 Fournier Street, London E1 6QL

12 responses to “Sowing the Seeds of Division: Statement by Islamic Forum of Europe”

  1. Nathan Anderson Avatar
    Nathan Anderson

    I’ve just spoken to Phil Maxwell and as well as confirming that he hadn’t signed the statement, he also stated that he disagreed with the content and was very angry that his name had been added to the list of signatories.

    Like

  2. This comment was released from moderation after verification. It’s also true that a lot of the organisations listed have not had much of a public profile.

    We have been here before.

    http://liammacuaid.wordpress.com/2005/11/01/malcom-x-and-socialism/

    Like

  3. I am appaled by the statement of so called Unity Platform as it appears that they are using EDL to divide the community. They have exposed themselves.

    Like

  4. may allah be with you

    Like

  5. I’m not sure we have been here before.

    You seem to be moving into new territory: from claiming complete ignorance of the IFE (“I’m just trying to be the best darn anti-fascist I can be”) to actually participating in the whitewashing of their history.

    The statement from the IFE says the allegations of its links with the Jamaat Islami are lies. Do you believe this? Or do you believe that they do indeed have this history, but have broken from or moved on from it? If the latter, don’t you think there’s a need to acknowledge it?

    This is serious business. The JI was involved in of one of the worst acts of genocide in the last century. The JI was and is a political movement (I’ll say that again: POLITICAL MOVEMENT) not ‘Islam’. We’re not talking about ‘nutty’ religious views here, and certainly nothing to do with Malcolm X.

    I think it’s very patronising and actually racist towards non-European fascists that some left groups don’t take them seriously – as if those millions of people the JI butchered are brown, so maybe it doesn’t matter that much.

    You’re such a well-read man, Liam. Alongside ‘observing what people do or say’, I think you should read some Bangladesh history to help you form your opinions about what’s going on in Tower Hamlets today.

    Like

    1. Rachel – it would have been very easy to have found a reason not to have collaborated with the Catholics or the Church of England, two organisations intimately involved in imperialist history. The SWP’s practice is not always to my taste. The Communist Party’s tradition has a history or murdering Trotskyists. As for the Labour Party’s recent history…

      My own knowledge of Bangladeshi politics and Islamist currents is embarrassingly sketchy. However anyone who witnessed Sunday’s demo will have seen that it was lively , militant, young and local. I think that illustrates the point that it’s entirely possible to work on a particular issue with a broad spectrum of people with whom you have strong historical and ongoing differences. That’s the meaning of the “Relevant Fable” post.

      Where I agree with the IFE statement is that it’s an obstacle to practical politics in the here and now to dwell on historical events, no matter how unpleasant. Organisations change over time depending on location and circumstances.

      Like

  6. Most of the people who “signed” this know nothing about it. This press release can be found nowhere other than on the Whitechapel Anarchists Group websites and Workers Liberty website. The WAG say that they didn’t know their names were added to the faked press release but nonetheless support the faked press release and posted it on Indymedia.
    The WAG campaigned against the IFE and campaigned to have the Troxy conference banned as did the EDL. The WAG were labelled Islamophobic when their articles and leafelts against IFE were read.
    It’s unlikely that a Muslim wrote the press release. If you look at the way it worded it seems that it has been written by non Muslims. “In defending the people of Tower Hamlets and especially the ordinary Muslims we do not have to defend IFE. EDL are attacking the Muslims of this borough and we must protect them”.
    Them? Would any Muslim group refer to themselves as “them”?
    Then there are all the proclamations that it is not Islamophobic this, not Islamophobic that with regard to the statements made against the IFE by whover wrote the press release.
    Why has it appeared nowhere other than on WAG related websites and on the Workers Liberty website?

    Like

  7. To be clear, I’m not a member of WAG and hence I in no way speak for them.

    The WAG campaigned against the IFE and campaigned to have the Troxy conference banned as did the EDL.

    The SWP campaigned against the war in Afghanistan and campaigned to bring the troops home as did the BNP.

    Cute try at a guilt by association smear. Not really a political analysis, but I accept that’s not the point of cheap rhetorical tactics.

    The WAG were labelled Islamophobic when their articles and leafelts against IFE were read.

    Labelled Islamphobic by who? Supporters of the IFE? The UAF? Little green men from Mars? That kind of context is pretty important here. Some links would be even better.

    There’s also the question of why, if WAG are heavily islamophobic, they were one of the groups present at the Mosque later on. After most UAF activists had gone home, it has to be said.

    It’s unlikely that a Muslim wrote the press release. If you look at the way it worded it seems that it has been written by non Muslims. “In defending the people of Tower Hamlets and especially the ordinary Muslims we do not have to defend IFE. EDL are attacking the Muslims of this borough and we must protect them”.
    Them? Would any Muslim group refer to themselves as “them”?

    Quite possibly, when you take that paragraph as a whole. It’s certainly grammatically correct and could be read as a simple statement that Muslims are the people under attack.

    On top of that, it comes across to me as a statement aimed at a general audience, as opposed to specifically addressed to the Muslim community.

    Who do you think wrote it then? Apart from anything else, your two main suspects seem to be the AWL and WAG. I doubt very much that AWL have the background to have included the part about Bangladesh, let alone WAG. (WAG aren’t a credible candidate for authorship to anyone who knows anything about them anyway. They’re unashamed stuntists. Hence there is absolutely no way that they’d pass up the opportunity to try and raise their media profile if it was them. That’s actually one of the main criticisms other anarchists have made of them).

    For your sake, if you aren’t a Muslim yourself, you’d better hope you’re right here. Because a non Muslim setting themselves up as a gatekeeper to the Muslim community and incorrectly telling people they aren’t Muslims because they ‘don’t sound Muslim enough’ is really dodgy.

    Then there are all the proclamations that it is not Islamophobic this, not Islamophobic that with regard to the statements made against the IFE by whover wrote the press release.>

    Possibly that was because some people are saying things like

    The WAG were labelled Islamophobic when their articles and leafelts against IFE were read.

    You can’t have it both ways. If you’re going to claim that criticism of the IFE is islamophobic, you can’t then act all suprised when critics of the IFE defend themselves against that same charge.

    Why has it appeared nowhere other than on WAG related websites and on the Workers Liberty website?

    We don’t know who it was sent to. I’m pretty sure the UAF wouldn’t have printed it if they were sent a copy.

    There are two major factors that suggest it’s genuine.

    If you look at the “Tower Hamlets Unity Demonstration” thread, David Rosenberg seems to confirm that there was a boycott of the demonstration by some sections of the Bangladeshi community. That would fit with this. And David Rosenberg strikes me as prominent enough on the left to have more credibility on this than anonymous internet posters like you and I. Although you still can accuse him of lying, if you wish.

    The other is the IFE itself. In their response to this statement, they queried whether all the signatories were legitimate (entirely correctly) and they suggested that some organisations only existed on paper. What they didn’t suggest is that the statement itself was made up entirely or that it had no support whatsoever among the Muslim community. Whether people are with the IFE on this issue or against them, I don’t think anyone can seriously doubt they know the local political landscape in Tower Hamlets. If there was any real question about this statement being basically genuine, they’d have said so.

    None of this is to say that criticism of this statement is out of order. Political criticism is absolutely valid. To his credit, that’s what Liam has done in his responses. Sadly, you’ve chosen to create a smokescreen instead of responding to the statement itself.

    A lot of that is the fault of people behind it, for adding signatures to it that shouldn’t have been there. That’s wrong in its own right and it also gives people a convienant excuse to evade addressing it directly. It really has severly damaged the credibility of this and I hope whoever was responsible has learnt a lesson from that.

    And I have an issue with some of the signatures on there. I wouldn’t put a right wing reactionary like Fitzpatrick on any statement I was involved with. Ditto Terry Fitz. particuarly with the upcoming court case. The UAF aren’t really in a position to make that argument though, considering they have Tories listed as supporters and even as speakers.

    But if you want to check if this statement is genuine, it’s simple. You have on it a name, an organisation and a phone number. That’s more than enough to check it out. The fact you seem to be making these allegations without even bothering to contact the person listed makes me very cynical about your motivations.

    Like

  8. Deana, The press statement is certainly be open to critique, but I would also encourage you to be critical of the IFE response.

    The best thing might be to educate yourself about Bengali politics in Tower Hamlets (yes, people sometimes identify as Muslims, but it wasn’t too long ago they might have referred to themselves as Bengalis, or Asians, even Black, some might still, and I don’t think there is one Muslims way to speak!)

    Why don’t you contact Ansar Ahmed Ullah for example, via Swadhinata
    http://www.swadhinata.org.uk/

    Here’s an article he wrote not long ago
    http://www.humanistlife.org.uk/2010/03/from-secularism-to-sectarianism/

    Another source of basic background info is Delwar Hussain
    http://www.opendemocracy.net/democracy-protest/bangladeshi_3715.jsp

    he also writes on Comment is Free.

    There’s no need for conspiracy theories.

    I think you will find that, as David Rosenberg points out, the Press Statement against the IFE might represent a minority of secular groups, but there are many more Bengali groups/people who would not endorse the statement but who also have concerns about the prominence given to the IFE in the campaign.

    Like

  9. Enforced secularism is something that I find abbhorent. The EDL are against Islam, they are against Muslims, unless of course religious Muslims reject religion and become secular.
    Why is it that this call for secularism is being so concentrated [for now at least] against Muslims?
    MI5 and the state are trying to enforce secularism using campaigns of intimidation and violence.
    WAG are against religion and their support for and possible involvement in a faked press release has destroyed the scrap of credibility that they might have had. They are not interested as far as I can see in helping religious Muslims and their “defence” of the East London Mosque on June 20th has been found offensive and given their attitude towards Islam, their support for and possible involvement in the faked press release I can understand why.
    The persecution of Muslims by the EDL etc is not just confined to the UK.
    Muslim people in this country, in Europe, In Canada, in America are being persecuted for being being Muslims by “Defence Leagues”.
    We are witnessing a dangerous “looking the other way” when it come to Islamophobia. The current Islamaphobia is no different to the 1930s Nazi campaign against Jews.

    Like

  10. Yet again a claim the press release was “faked”, without any attempt to check it’s veracity. Still, I guess facts are counterproductive if you already have your analysis set out.

    Like

  11. It would be so easy to contact Ansar or one of the organisations on the press release – why don’t these people just contact them?

    So much easier to make accusations of ‘Islamaphobia’ instead of taking the opportunity to actually learn something!

    Like

Leave a comment

Trending