Cimageommon sense, as any good dialectician will point out, tells you that the Earth is flat. That’s probably why it’s held in such disdain by so many adherents of materialist dialectics. Sometimes though it has its uses and this “Agreement on Protocol Agreed Between Right to Work Campaign and Coalition of Resistance Steering Committees” demonstrates one of them.

In recognition that there are over-lapping ‘footprints’ for the two organisations and that cordial relations are important if we are to build a mass movement capable of taking on the government, it was agreed that both sides would return to their respective committees with the following proposals:

1. That each organisation will appoint a contact liaison officer
2. That there would be national co-ordinating meetings as and when required
3. That each organisation would attempt to co-ordinate on
meeting dates etc
4. That we would support the biggest possible joint union demonstration if called by national unions
5. That CoR will attend the 5 December R2W forum
6. That R2W are invited to participate, speak etc on 27 November
and COR to speak at RTW Conference in Sheffield
7. That both campaigns would work with Labour Party members who supported the aims of the campaigns
8. That we will co-ordinate on stunts (e.g. Vodafone)
9. That we will organise joint meetings, lobbies and events
10. That we will publicise each other’s meetings, lobbies and events
11. That we will consider a joint week of action/local activities in first week of February
12. That we are witnessing a mushrooming of local anti-cuts
campaigns but that there still needed to be a national focus
13. That we would work hard to build the biggest possible TUC 26
March demo
14. That we would both participate in a meeting with NSSN, Peoples Charter, R2W, CoR and support a ‘non-aggression pact’.

13 responses to “Alleluia”

  1. And the reason for not just merging into one organisation is?

    Like

  2. What total rubbish. Egos get in the way of action. A plague on all their houses.

    Like

  3. That probably requires a little bit of trust to be built up Joseph.

    Bill, I’m pretty certain that some of your chums are participating in Saturday’s event for which 500 people have now registered.

    That’s significant. There are no large organisations putting members under a three line whip to attend. The conference will be the biggest, broadest, most open event of its sort we’ve seen in a long time. It’s even resulted in baby steps towards some form of joint working. When was the last time that happened?

    Like

  4. Smacks of a sectarian lash up based on no principles. Nevertheless I’ll be there to argue for politics and prey that it is swept away by a genuine mass movement before it gets big enough to stop one.

    Like

  5. Admidst the depression at all the grimness, I was getting all excited about the return of the 1980s, but form is already stiffling the content. The local anti-cuts campaign organized a ‘mass’ meeting – main items on the agenda being to agree the constitution and the composition of the steering committee. The best people there by a country mile were the ‘another world is possible’ anarchists. I will even learn the hand signals if it means some kind of open organization able to harness rather than kill the energy of people who want to get active.

    Like

  6. I was invited to speak at an anti-cuts meeting tonight. By Monday there were NINE other speakers. Rather than waste two hours travelling there and back for the sake of a five minute contribution, and out of sympathy for the audience, I’ve sent my apologies.

    Ten speakers in an evening meeting! That really is how you deaden initiative.

    Like

  7. tamworthalternative Avatar
    tamworthalternative

    “Nevertheless I’ll be there to… prey”

    Freudian slip, David?

    Like

  8. “500 people have now registered.”

    I’ve been told that there are 1,000 people registered for the COR conference on Saturday.

    They’ve booked 2 overflow halls next door to the Camden Centre for workshop events and want as many people to be able to speak as possible.

    RTW probably could have saved some time if they’d taken my advice in the first place. I wonder what the NSSN’s attitude will be towards forming a representative coordination committee, along with NUS and the left Trade Unions?

    Having spoken to the deputy Gen Sec of the TUC Frances O’Grady the other day, I’m pretty certain that they will be putting a serious effort into building for the big March demonstration. But the question of coordinated strike action remains the rhino in the garden shed.

    Like

  9. I’m sure you’re right Liam the COR meeting will be big. And as we know RTW have been busy splitting the anti cuts movement up and down the country while arranging boring top down meetings “rallies” of the type you describe.
    Trouble is COR have been too. In Lewisham they’ve arranged a meeting for the day after the RTW one with 7 top table speakers!
    At the COR meeting on Saturday there are 8 speakers to the final session.
    And now we find that the “steering group” – not even elected – before the COR has even had its founding meeting – have arranged a lash up a “non-aggression pact” would you believe it, with RTW.
    This doesn’t look at all promising.
    On the ground things are progressing much better. My view is that until there are local groups none of these “national” groups mean much. They are all an attempt to hijack the movement, albeit the COR is an attempted hijack by the ex-SWP as opposed to the SWP.

    Like

  10. This is a very positive step in the right direction.

    Like

  11. That’s to say we have to accept the crappy status quo. Why should we?
    The SWP established RTW for their own sect interests. They’ve been busy splitting the anti-cuts movement up and down the country. Counter-posing themselves to real anti-cuts committees wherever they can.
    This is not something that should be accepted at all.
    The SP via the NSSN proposed the same thing – the establishment of their own anti-cuts coalition to serve their sect interests. Fortunately it was voted down.
    Now we have Counterfire and a few smaller allies trying to establish a third campaign the COR. Does that movement seek to unite the different campaigns? No it wants a “non-aggression pact” a carve up to support their own sect interests.
    The only good thing about all this is that none of them are large enough to actually control the movement. In between the gaps real locally built and implanted committees can be established.
    That is the only alternative to these unprincipled shenanigans.

    Like

  12. What will be needed on the day is first of all the rejection of this non-aggression pack between RTW and COR, a rebellion against this agreement to carve up the anti-cuts movement between them. Second, a succinct political alternative policy and programme for mobilisation must be adopted on which CoR can compete legitimately and politically with all other would be leaderships. If these two things do not happen CoR and RTW will simply be left adjuncts of the labour and trade union bureaucracy not leading a movement but holding one back.

    Like

  13. Well so far none of these groups have been very succesful in mobilising in that way:

    The SWP, wearing their RtWC hat, managed to get well under 10,000 for their demo at the Tory Party Conference.
    i.e. a national mobilisation of their membership & mainly student sympathisers.

    The SP- NSSN – FBU March & Rally prior to SERTUC’s meeting had around 1,000 on it.
    Nothing much to write home about.

    COR reflects a desire for unity and a hope that something like the StWC will develop again.
    They’ve rolled out a few of their old TU sponsors to publicise the Conference, but organisationally it’s still quite weak

    “Counterfire” is more of a website with a student base in London than an organisation. They may have had some media success on the NUS demo, but the bulk of people attending were there because it was organised by NUS and UCU.

    The Fees & EMA issues are clearly affecting a whole layer of 16-18 year olds.
    Some, now studying to get to Uni and realise how hard the fee increases will hit them.
    Others, the most deprived working class kids, realise that they will be hit hard by withdrawal of EMA.

    Even the Plod admit that they didn’t expect such a large turnout for the demo at Tory HQ.
    They were watching the wrong people!
    Most of the students arrested were not members of any political organisation.

    Like the Nov 24 demos, it was organised on social networking sites, by word of mouth and via text messaging. Yet this achieved a near-national mobilisation yesterday!

    The lesson is that Sect-based front organisations haven’t, and almost certainly won’t, deliver the goods.

    Any political organisation worth its salt needs to provide a voice to these youngsters, to the rank and file workers and to the pensioners affected by ConDem cuts.

    It’s not a question of turning these new layers of people against political organisations.
    It’s question of developing a broad based organisation, with a representative structure, that allows for open debate and votes.

    Spontaneity & Direct Action aren’t enough.
    They will need politcal solutions.

    Like

Leave a comment

Trending