The school attracted 100 people. Lots of them were unfamiliar faces and there was significant representation from Hands of Venezuela and the Bolivia Solidarity campaign.
Broadly speaking there was very little disagreement between the comrades who are active in solidarity work on the nature of the processes in Bolivia and Venezuela. At the moment Chavez is playing a positive role, though this may change. While there is no shortage of small Marxist groups the lack of a mass revolutionary party is a serious cause for concern. The bourgeiosie is on the defensive but will make a bid to recover governmental power, most likely through a war of attrition similar to that conducted against the Sandinistas. It’s at this point were autonomous armed revolutionary organisations have an opportunity to deepen the revolution. In Bolivia the mass organisation are in advance of the government while in Venezuela the government is sometimes in advance of the masses.
Our friends from the AWL turned up to support the contention of the International Bolshevik Tendency (I don’t know who they are either) that Chavez is a “bourgeois bonapartist”. Their courage is admirable. Not many people have the gumption to say that sort of nonsense out loud in public and accept the riducule.
The RCG did turn up. However instead of sending some experienced people to denounce us they sent a couple of young people. They hadn’t been told that their organisation had written to the Cuban goverment suggesting that they prevent Celia Hart from leaving the country. I felt a bit mean because they did look hurt. One of their fellow travellers stayed and we showed him the e mail. He said he’d got back into politics after 20 years on account of the Iraq war. He’d previously been in Mosley’s youth organisation, the National Front and the Empire Loyalists. Only change is constant.
I think that only one or two other groups on the British left could have organised an event of this sort. It’s starting point was the necessity of developing a well informed and critically thinking solidarity movement. I’m told by way of contrast that at Marxism last year discussion focussed almost entirely on criticism of Chavez’s shortcomings rather than solidarity. As is our way currents with which we disagree were given speaking rights and their points were addressed in a serious way. We are also able to put together platforms of independently minded people whose main purpose is to develop a real understanding of the processes at work and that’s what we did yesterday.






Leave a reply to Liam Mac Uaid Cancel reply