It looks like I have become Socialist’s Resistance top expert on Nepal. It was not a hotly contested struggle. This is for the next issue of the paper. I’d be really grateful if anyone could suggest a less rubbish title.

Earlier this year Nepal was on the threshold of revolution. Ten years of armed struggle, weeks of strikes and street protests involving tens of thousands of people in conflict with the police and army had brought King Gyanendra’s regime to its knees. The Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) controlled two thirds of countryside and was leading huge daily protests.

Gyanendra yielded to the mass pressure for democracy and has restored the Nepalese parliament under the leadership of Prime Minister Girija Prasad Koirala. Koirala is the leader of Nepali Congress, a party that belongs to Tony Blair’s Socialist International. The eighty four year old politician is a longstanding figure in the country’s politics and is accused by opponents of being utterly corrupt.

Faced with a choice of taking power themselves as representatives of Nepal’s peasants and workers the Maoists opted to send their leader Prachanda to meet the prime minister to discuss a settlement. They have disagreed publicly on the continued need for a monarchy but have found an accommodation on most other important points.

There will be elections to a constituent assembly which will write a new constitution. In the meantime an interim government of seven parties, in which the Maoists are poorly represented will replace the current parliament and the “people’s government” in areas controlled by the CPN. Neither the guerrillas nor the state forces will disarm but they will be overseen by the United Nations.

The CPN has thrown away an historic opportunity for Nepal’s workers and peasants. They have allowed themselves to become part of a slapdash coalition of the parties of Nepal’s ruling class. Instead of relying on the support that they were able to mobilise in the cities they are now making secret deals with an incompetent bourgeois crook. It is reported that members of key decision making committees found out that they had got their jobs through the newspapers. This sort of deal making means they are not accountable to the workers, peasants and urban poor whose pressure forced the monarch to make concessions to democracy.

Maoist organisations have always swung between murderous political gangsterism towards other socialists and a willingness to make deals with the “patriotic bourgeoisie”. The CPN is no different in this respect. It seems certain that they will fight the forthcoming elections as loyal defenders of the new ruling class constitution. In doing so they will have betrayed the Nepalese peasants and workers who brought the country to the edge of revolution.

3 responses to “Nepalese revolution hits the buffers”

  1. “Faced with a choice of taking power themselves as representatives of Nepal’s peasants and workers the Maoists opted to send their leader Prachanda to meet the prime minister to discuss a settlement.”What can I say to such sentiments, which are congruent with Trotskyism and subjectivism, other than to iterate the Maoist perspective? Yes, Maoists in third world, semi-feudal, neo-colonial countries support including the national bourgeoisie insofar as possible in a multi-class alliance against imperialism, comprador capitalism, and feudalism.But I must also add that a frontal assault on Katmandu and the district capitals by the PLA under the leadership of the CPN(Maoist) would be very bloody, and could in all reality fail. It is far wiser to build up a coalition government in these times of dual power. In this way, the masses in the cities can be won to the revolutionary program, and if the reactionaries resist, they can all the more easily be swept to the side.

    Like

  2. Liam Mac Uaid Avatar
    Liam Mac Uaid

    The guerrilla struggle was a very bloody affair too but that did not stop the CPN from conducting it. Experience of revolutions suggests that the police and the army begin to disintegrate very quickly when the urban masses arise. There’s a great account in Trotsky’s History of the Russian Revolution of this process.The essential point is that the bourgeoise have shown themselves incapable of fulfiling even the democratic revolution in Nepal and now the Maoists will use the revolution to do it for them and hand over control of the country.

    Like

  3. I am not clear who will do the sweeping away, klement, as i understand the armed forces of the existing state and the CPN rebels are to be integrated into a single force.

    Like

Leave a reply to Liam Mac Uaid Cancel reply

Trending