“Everything about today is amazing” was how Jane Loftus of the Communication Workers’ Union’s executive summed up the conference. She was right. It’s been quite a while since stage management and choreography of this standard has been seen at an audience of anti-bureaucratic, class struggle trade union militants.

At a guess there were about 800 people at the event. Roughly half were SWP members. Maybe another 20% were from other left organisations. When I left at half four there had been nothing that vaguely resembled a debate on how you organise in the unions or why or how you can organise a political alternative to new Labour. Instead we got an interminable series of platform speakers and when they had spoken for as long as they wanted a few people from the floor were given three whole minutes, though this could be extended if you were particularly rambling and off the point. The cynical part of my brain found itself thinking that they were not chosen at random because so many of them seemed to be expressing ideas very close to those of the SWP. The exception was Ted Knight. He was about the only speaker in the entire event who tried to give something that resembled a political analysis of the level of class struggle, why union leaderships behave like they do and how we can start recruiting to unions by taking up workers’ demands.

First speaker up from the floor in the morning session was a Muslim woman from Birmingham who remarked that she is not oppressed. She is liberated because her brothers and her parents allow her to carry out her union duties and attend meetings. Am I alone in finding this an original concept of liberation? Most of the other floor speakers kept us enthralled with anecdotes about what is happening where they work and how everything is dead brilliant even when they are being victimised out of a job.

Valerie Wise was the second most high profile ex Labour Party member at the event. She spoke about how dreadful New Labour is for the benefit of those in the audience who were undecided. Then she asked rhetorically whether or not she should join Respect. “Yes!” shouted many in the audience as though they were watching a pantomime. “Ah ha!” I thought. We are in for a surprise announcement. But she didn’t, saying only that she would have to think hard about what to do next. So along with the overwhelming majority of ex-Labour members she does not feel that a political home yet exists for her.

Interesting fact of the day came from the lawyer John Hendy. He pointed out that when Thatcher came to power 78% of workers were covered by collective agreements. Today it is 33%. In the morning such discussion as there was looked at whether or not the anti-union laws could be got rid of by parliamentary or industrial action, with Hendy favouring the former. Not one speaker that I heard tried to give an analysis of what the industrial situation in Britain is like, has been like or what the balance of forces are. It was set-piece after set-piece.

It was a dismal day. The majority of the audience was not in the first flush of youth. There were no significant new forces, bureaucrats or Labour Party members engaged with the project. While there was lots of rhetoric about how we need to organise at a grassroots level there was no opportunity to do much other than sit on your arse listening to the great and the good with the occasional on message speaker reassuring us that things are pretty good in their patch. If you wanted a template of how not to organise fighting unions this was it.

17 responses to “Organising for fighting unions conference”

  1. Hendy gave a similar speech at the Grunwick conference re: collective agreements. Was there any mention of the Trade Union Freedom Bill, which John McDonnell has been actively involved in promoting?

    Like

  2. Yes. John Mc Donnell, or Satan as Tami thinks I call him, talked about it. I’ve left out quite a bit of detail because I wanted to give a feel of the day. I don’t think my reaction was too untypical.

    Like

  3. I was thinking of attending but….. Anyway, sounds like activism is a bad word to mention. They could have invited a JJB sports warehouse striker to speak.

    Like

  4. The JJB strikers did speak, as did people from/about a couple of other disputes – Daily Telegraph, Yunis B. from Newcastle.Liam is spot on about stage management and choreography, remember this when the SWP denounce New Labour for lack of democracy.For me the worst session was the one on political representation. John Rees (speaking as National Secretary, Respect) said we need a debate on political representation. Yet the 4 platform speakers were himself, Andrew Murray, who did not speak about political representation as such,but Stop the War, Valerie Wise, who spoke about how close she is to joining Respect, and Mark Serwotka, who plugged Respect. First up from the floor, Michael Lafayette, Respect Councillor. Some debate. Not least, no-one who put in speakers slips against disaffiliation and wanting to speak on the McDonnell campaign were called. Though McDonnell spoke, there was zero discussion of his campaign or its importance.This was a repeat of the Socialist Alliance trade union conference a few years back, where the organisers can’t decide whether they are organising a conference for trade union supporters of Respect/Socialist Alliance or a conference for left trade unionists. They pose it as the latter but then the day is like the former.Those of us who don’t support Respect/S.A. but accept the need for discussion of the issues facing us are soon going to give up on trying to persuade others to attend such conferences.

    Like

  5. My My – who are those two dashing gentlemen in your photo Liam? Is this perhaps the leadership of the next Labour cabinent? 😉

    Like

  6. Ah, the old trick about the speakers slips. They are, of course, a means of ensuring ‘balance’ in the discussion!What conclusions re Respect and working with the SWP do you draw, Liam?

    Like

  7. When this came up at my T & G branch I opposed sending a ‘delegate’ (and won) on the basis that it would be ….exactly as you’ve described. I can think of better and more political things to do on a day out in London. Like buying a bag of chips,a bottle of White Lightening and visiting the Tate Modern. Andrew Coates

    Like

  8. I’m interested that Andrew thought his T&G branch should not be represented. There was debate, both on the floor, and at the lunchtime joint Amicus/TGWU caucus, about whether to support the merger between the two unions. Does Andrew have a position? Does he want to be part of the debate?Pete

    Like

  9. petefirmin@btinternet.com Avatar
    petefirmin@btinternet.com

    I’m intrigued, anonymous. What debate did you spot on the floor of conference?

    Like

  10. Three contributions on the merger – 1 for, 2 against plus a heated discussion at the lunchtime caucus. I hope you eren’t asleep.Pete

    Like

  11. Are many of the Respect Councillors in Tower Hamlets Trade Unionists, and do many have jobs?

    Like

  12. I don’t like unsigned anonymous comments. It’s not that hard to come up with some sort of alias. I really hate them when there is something that seems like sneering racism implied in the question either. Respect is not a fully formed working class party. Outside the public sector levels of union organisation are not high in Britain. Much of the economy in Tower Hamlets is comprised of small family run, low waged businesses. That’s reflected in some of Repsect’s activists and many of its voters. Isn’t that asatonishing?Pete has identified some of the major points. As for Martin’s questions recent events are certainly cause for reflection. I’ll answer in more detail in the fullness of time.

    Like

  13. This is clarly a step backwards from the trade union conferecnes oganised by the socialist allaince.And LKiamn, you should adress martin’s question.You describe the sysmptoms, but what is your prognosis for the disease/ What conclusions do you draw about continuing to worlk in respect. there is not much milleage in “the only game in town” if it is Russian roulette.

    Like

  14. Satan? Liam, I hope that’s not true.I thought JM spoke really well at the conference. It was just a shame he didn’t use the same speech on his slot on Sunday AM a few weeks ago, where he did not come across well.I’m guessing I haven’t mentioned to you that I’ve joined the LP a couple of months ago to support the JM bid for leadership? Oh, yes – it’s the delights of the Romford CLP now. Actually JM is coming to speak this month (23rd) so that should be a good indicator on how healthy the left activist base is locally. I suspect I may be disappointed…Sandra.

    Like

  15. Like the vast majority of commentators who were in attendance at this “conference” (in reality a rally) I thought it was a stage-managed, boring and almost sub-political (the nadir being – IMHO – Jane Loftus’ stream of consciousness) waste of time. Sorry, though to have missed the lunch-time Amicus/T&G discussion, presumably featuring Rod Finleyson in thge “pro merger” corner and Ted Knight in the “anti”. Now, that must have been both entertaining and useful: two things the rest of the event most assuredly *were’nt*.

    Like

  16. I was one of 4 delegates from Brighton & Hove UNISON. I was assured by the Chair of our Branch, an ISG and Respect member, that the Conference was not a Respect one. Indeed he cited the fact that Dave Nellist had been invited as a guest speaker. Well he did speak, for about 3-4 minutes, from the floor not the platform, on political representation in a session that wasn’t about political representation! It seems that like the leopard, the SWP is incapable of changing its undemocratic and manipulative spots. I fail to see what possible purpose is there to holding such rallies when the burning need is for rank and file organisation and the rebuilding of a shop stewards movement. It is little wonder that Bob Crowe has so little time for Respect.Liam’s Report says it all so rather than spend time drafting my own report, I’m going to borrow it wholesale and put it in to the branch (with acknowledgments of course!).Tony Greenstein

    Like

  17. nellist isn’t in the swp. he’s in the Socialist Party, which is setting up the Campaign for a New Workers’ Party (Bob Crowe is quite friendly to it). Also, how are you going to motivate a shop stewards’ movement without a political organisation prepared to protect them and push forward their interests? Look at what Thatcher was able to do when Labour had just started to abondon the workers in the eighties.

    Like

Leave a reply to Pete Firmin Cancel reply

Trending