Socialist Resistance normally retails at a very reasonable 80p. Affordable luxury, like a good bar of chocolate. The May 2007 issue will be selling at £10 a copy. Think of it as an investment opportunity. In years to come it will be worth as much as a Penny Black with the queen’s head missing.

As you can see we made bit of a miscalculation about John Mc Donnell’s chances of getting on the ballot paper for the Labour leadership. This issue was sent to the printers before the results were announced and we had to take a gamble. The plan is to get another front page printed in the next few days. That’s the plan. Thank Christ the back page is on Palestine.

Now that the dust has settled slightly it gives an opportunity to survey the landscape after the leadership battle that never happened. And what an interesting landscape it is.

In his comment on my previous Neprimereye asserts that Labour has been in long term decline. I think Simon answered him well. You can’t abstract the development of political organisations from the underlying social conditions. It’s true that in some parts of the country some local Labour organisations are in reasonable health but still far weaker than they used to be. The Mc Donnell campaign shows that there is a small number of MPs and sufficient activists to put up a pretty good rearguard action in opposition to Brown’s neo-liberalism. But they lost and they lost very decisively.

It is no longer possible to make a serious case for staying inside the Labour Party and fighting. The fight has been lost. That said, the worst possible outcome would be if hundreds or thousands of socialists left the Labour Party as pissed off individuals. Experience shows that they would drop out of political activity quickly or, and this is very very rare, join Respect or the Camaign For a New Workers’ Party. It’s much better that they preserve the networks developed in the campaign and start having real collective discussions about whether or not Labour is their party anymore.

I’m not in a position to pass judgement on the CNWP’s internal life but I do know that Respect’s development was badly stunted by the absence of serious numbers of members with an understanding of Labour Movement democracy. That’s why events like the Morning Star conference on politics after Blair has suddenly become very important. (I’ve used the link from the SUN blog because it’s the best description I’ve found.) That audience in the Communist Party and Labour which believed in holding on in and around Labour must be in reflective mood after John’s defeat and a message of “let’s carry on doing the thing that didn’t work” is not very convincing.

These are the sort of people who would be essential in creating a serious class struggle party in Britain and that would have to be done in conjunction with both Respect and the CNWP. The occasion demands that those of us looking for an alternative start having these real and virtual conversations with each other.

9 responses to “After Brown's coronation – the worst possible outcome”

  1. I don’t think the question of whether people want to stay in the Labour Party is the main point, rather I’d assert the issue is what do they do and what do we do outside it and how can we better co-ordinate our struggles.People are not going to leave the LP for the raft of terrible alternatives on offer, Respect, CNWP, SSP/Solidarity etc. instead the key point is we need to re-build socialist activity in every sphere of the class struggle from the base up. As John McD’s candidacy showed, competing with the bureaucratic machine on its own terms, will never succeed, however laudable or necessary was that competition. Instead of the left stressing the organisational nature of the split with Labourism “leave the LP join us”, while in all respects adopting its politics but outside it, we need a political split with Labourism and the struggle for genuine socialist politics and from that struggle will develop the type of organisations we need.

    Like

  2. Gordon Brown went out on Monday to ensure that he got enough MPs to prevent any competition. Unfortunayely union Gen Secs were also whipping up support for Brown in the deluded belief they could do business with Brown.

    Like

  3. 80p is not much compared to the thirty quid or whatever people paid to join Labour to vote for McDonnell – they have had an early taste of LP democracy and lost £30+ quid in the process. I can’t see why people would want to stay in the Labour party after this episode or are you waiting another 15 years for a new Mcdonnell to be carved out in another leadership election?

    Like

  4. Sorry about the Anon name, I just can’t be arsed to login.”thirty quid or whatever people paid to join Labour to vote for McDonnell” It was £12 and if you joined on a monthly basis you could have resigned by now and it would have cost you £1And the union gen sec’s where shit scared of a McDonneld win, if they had got it it would have ment they would have had to explain why they didn’t support him.Scotthttp://www.our-party.org.uk/Nucleus/

    Like

  5. £12 must represent a concessionary rate, I’m sure it must be £30+ if you are working – anyway it is still a rip off if you’ve joined to participate in the ‘historic election’and then been Browned off. Unfortunately there is so little internal life in the LP, membership amounts to little more than voting in a few elections and even voting for the grassroots alliance, you get Ann Black supporting Brown.Lynn Jones and Simpson retiring are bad omens – surely the time is ripe to consider an alternative to Labour – life seems to be ebbing out of the Labour left – dont waste your political energy – I had 12 years of the LP. There is life on the outside.George T

    Like

  6. The question of whether or not people stay in the LP is rather maturely approched by the CP, whose position is that people need to come to their own conclusions, and let’s find ways to work together over areas of practical agreement in the meantime. As the flame wars elsewhere show, this really is the only way of making progress.

    Like

  7. BTW, the worst SW headline (apart from the ill advised “It’s all lies”, that could only have been written by someone who had never done a street sale), was a huge banner MAGNIFICENT that we had for the weekend after labour lost the 1987 general election. (it was refering to a rather small and inconsequential civil service strike)

    Like

  8. Mac Uaid wrote “In his comment on my previous Neprimereye asserts that Labour has been in long term decline. You can’t abstract the development of political organisations from the underlying social conditions”Which is a nonsense if he is making reference to my previous post on this blog. I made very clear reference to the decline of the manual working class which was the primary base of the Labour Party in bygone years. If that is not a reference to changing social conditions I don’t know what is!What I was trying to suggest was that the rank and file of the Labour Party has been in long term decline as a result of its failing to recruit substantially from those layers and sectors of the class beyond its original base. I would suggest that this arose due to its typically social democratic division of economic and political struggles with the trades unions.That the far left groups have also declined and/or decayed politically is due to their failure to establish stable toeholds in the working class which has magnified their instability as is always the case with sectlike formations. But that crisis cannot be remedied by operating within a largely moribund Labour Party but rather by an consistant political orientation on the working class.

    Like

  9. If McDonnell had got on to the ballot paper, would that have been the right headline? Many, perhaps most, of your readers would not have been participants in the ballot. While an challenge to Brown had to be supported, it was doomed to fail and stood little change of taking people forward. Concretely, what is the best way to fight Brown’s plans for his administration? Perhaps you can answer that question with the headline on your next issue.Carlos.

    Like

Leave a reply to AN Cancel reply

Trending