Today’s demonstration marking the 40th anniversary of the Six Day War organised by Enough! was much bigger than last year’s Palestine demo which barely filled a forlorn, damp corner of Trafalgar Square. I’ll let you judge the numbers for yourself from the video. My guess is 5-6000.

The composition of the demo was unusual. My judgement is that it was the leftish, liberalish CND, peace movement types with a strong admixture of Christians. Surprsingly few Muslim organisations were there in any numbers. Someone carrying a home made placard, always a worrying sign, asked me what I thought of a two state solution. As politely as possible I offered the democratic secular alternative, explaining that socialists have a problem with confessional sectarian states, whatever the theological basis. Unless his express purpose in coming was to annoy me it’s hard to work out why he was there.

The far left was there in its full variegated splendour. A special mention to the Revolutionary Communist Group whom the world also knows as Fight Racism Fight Imperialism. They had a lively young contingent. You can see them early in the video. I fear a dreadful fate awaits them. The organisation seems to have developed a sideline in pirating DVDs including The That Shakes the Barley and I Am Cuba which they sell on their stall. I find the ethics of this very questionable and it’s only a matter of time before the group’s younger members are sent into pubs offering Shrek 3 or Battleship Potemkin for a fiver.

(On an autobiographical note I was FRFI’s man in Belfast for about two months a very long time ago. I bought a paper from them on a demonstration in the town when I first got interested in politics. I was a keen listener to Radio Moscow and would strongly endorse any organisation which included support for shooting British soldiers in its programme. The RCG ticked both these boxes. They then started sending me a bundle of each issue which I was supposed to sell. This career ended abruptly when a member of Peoples Democracy took them from me and ripped them up. Even at the time I recognised the wisdom of the act.)

As is now compulsory at most political events in Britain the platform speakers that I heard were mostly of a religious or a liberal bent. So there were frequent reminders of how we are all a god’s children or international law must really be enforced. It wasn’t made clear but I think the speakers were hoping that this would be done by the people bribing Saudi princes or extraordinarily rendering people. This didn’t really seem to be what most of the audience wanted to hear.

Enough! is planning a lobby of parliament in November. Based on today’s successful turnout should be able to sustain a fair level of street politics keeping Palestine on the radical left and peace movement agendas.

7 responses to “Successful Palestine Demonstration in London”

  1. One of your local Labour Cllrs was there I think

    Like

  2. God, I love your writing. I read this entry to my half-sister, in a fairly successful Belfast accent, and she agreed with me that you write wonderfully and are also a funny motherfucker. Sorry, that’s the Yankee vernacular there.I had no idea you had any organized political engagement before PD.Your analysis of the crowd seems spot on, and the size, too.

    Like

  3. I’d be more worried about “Fight Racism, Fight Imperialism”‘s anti-semitism than their willngness to ignore copyright law on DVD’s.

    Like

  4. Liam Mac Uaid Avatar
    Liam Mac Uaid

    Jim I’ll take your word for it. If your politics are half sensible it’s easy to go for years without having any dealings with them. I have.Steady on Maeve.Anonymous I’d only be able to recognise three of this borough’s Labour councillors with any degree of certainty so there may have been twenty of them present yesterday. Not very likely tnough.

    Like

  5. London is a weird placeBy making my way to the Silver Cross for refreshment after the demo I was in place to see 500 naked cyclists going past, apperently something to do with oppsoing car use.Then on the way to Embankment tube station I was privilaged to see the bizarre spectacle of an Orange march, with assorted nut-jobs from all parts of these fair islands wearing their bowler hats and sashes, swaggering and beating big drums. We were told off by the police for mocking them, and I was told i could be arrested for pointing at a sweaty middle aged twat in a suit with a union jack clown hat and asking if he was part of the master race. Even under new Labour I am not quite sure what legislation this is against.

    Like

  6. Charlie Pottins Avatar
    Charlie Pottins

    What has the possibility of a two-state settlement got to do with “faith-based” states? (glad you got a problem with that mind, I’m sure you’ll agree with me that Pakistan has no right to exist as a state, and that Britain should diestablish the Churches). The Palestinians are not a religion, but a people, with their own history and culture and entitled to self-determination.The imposition of the State of Israel and its occupation of the whole of Palestine has denied the Palestinian people their human rights at the same time as creating another nationality -whether you like it or not -in the same country. Israeli too is not a religion, although the Zionist state blurs the issue by claiming to be the state of the Jewish people around the world and privileging the Jewish religion.The existence of two nationalities must be recognised by any materialist, though it does not preclude the establishment of one state for both if they decide upon it. Meanwhile the immediate issue is that the Israelis must stop the land-grabbing colonisation, withdraw from all the territory seized in 1967, and recognise a Palestinian state -with Jerusalem as shared capital. You may not have noticed but the slogan and timing of the demonstration referred to the 40 years of occupation, not the near 60 years of the Nakhba. So by taking part you were accepting a “compromise” if you like. Maybe the missing Muslims were not aroused for a non-jihadi march (I know the MAB were not happy on hearing there would be an Israeli speaker). Regarding the “faith” issue you may also have noticed that one of the leading Palestinian speakers was the Anglican bishop of Jerusalem. Oh the nuisance of people who won’t conform to stereotypes!Our main focus here must be on demanding the UK government stops supporting the occupation, stops boycotting Palestine, and starts recognising and assisting Palestinian statehood.Would “two states” be a solution? No. For a start if Israel wants to claim it is a democracy it must guarantee equality for all its citizens. Besides, the geography alone of this small country requires close co-operation on water resources, environmental and economic activity, such that becoming one state or federation with free movement is bound to show advantages. This would also include a form of right to reurn for the refugees. But only the Palestinians and Israelis together can achieve that. So withdrawal and the right to Palestinian statehood is a bottom line for peace, which would then create conditions for moving towards a solution. To reject any advance on the grounds that it is not utopia is er…utopianism.On the other hand to ho;d up “two states” as a solution in itself or as though both parties were equally placed, is the AWL’s dishonest way of avoiding taking sides against Zionism, while people like Jim Denham just make themselves mouthpieces for the Zionist smear campaign to stop proper discussion. I met Dave Yaffe selling FRFI in Trafalgar Square. No surprise as he was a founder of the RCG,but though I didn’t buy a paper we exchanged hellos as he and I were in the same Zionist youth organisation. So much for Jim Denham’s cry of “antisemitism”. But then he has made the same charge against the UCU over its rsolution to discuss the boycott issue. An initiative which largely came from Jewish academics in response to a Palestinian call as it happens. I don’t know what Denham’s problem is, but his capacity to shout abuse which in other circumstances might bring an unpleasant(for him) response should place his presence in left-wing discussions in question.

    Like

  7. That is a useful contribution Charlie.-, in two regards.i) Whe i visited palestine, i was struck by the fact that I didn’t meet any palestinian interested in whether there would be two states or one – the issue is Isreali withdrawal from the West bank and East Jerusalem, and then see what happens. The AWL and others who bang the twin states drum fail to notice that the settlements make a palestinian state non-viable, but to dismantle towns and settlements with 500000 colonists would be a major political, strategic and military defeat for Israel of the sort they oppose as anti-semitic when anyone proposes it.Indeed the tediouos banging on about anti-semitism makes it a lot harder to discuss the iddue rationally at all, as they contribute to a hostile polarisation of the issue.The other issue is that although a single secular state is ultimately desirable, there are clearly distinct national identities – that will not easily be resolved, except perhaps in some confederation – but that can only happen if Israelis accept Palestinian equality. This is where the question of the 20% of Israel’s own population who are non-Jewish comes to play, beacsue currently they have second class citizenship, and will continue to do so as long as the state is defined on ethno-linguistic-religious lines, instead of civic responsibilities.This is why the two state / one state debate is sterile, becasue both are utopian positions starting from where we are now. And there are the same two obstacles to both i) the occupation and Zionist settlements; ii) the confusion between the requirement to respect Jewish national identity with the requirement for a Jewish state.

    Like

Leave a reply to AN Cancel reply

Trending