London is taking on the air of a medieval village with an epidemic of the Black Death. It hasn’t stopped raining in three months and travelling again has the frisson given by the prospect of instant obliteration at the hands of a misogynistic god-botherer. Did I let that stop me from going to Permanent Revolution’s weekend event? Certainly not. But I do lack the stamina of the the PR comrades and skipped the Friday night artistic bit and Sunday’s sessions.

I missed the introduction to the first session on Bolivia, arriving in time for the discussion. Some of this erred on the side of “if only they would take advice from proper Trotskyists.” Though if Dave who introduced is to be believed Trotskyist groups are as abundant as coca leaves in Bolivia. The issue was correctly identified as an extremely sectarian practice developed by these groups. My impression was that PR has a more negative assessment of the potentialites of the Venezuealan and Bolivian processes than is warranted by the levels of mobilisation and in Venezuela’s case, the rapid political development of the Chavez leadeership.

International Bolshevik Tendency – crazy name, crazy guys


The major session was described as the state of the British working class though as Richard of Labour Briefing pointed out it had more to do with the condition of the trade unions. There were introductions from activists in the PCS, NUT and CWU. CWU member Pete was justifiably buoyant having been on strike the previous days but observed that the union leadership, like every other union leadership, does not seem too interested in keeping up the momentum.

Comic relief was provided by the admirably named INTERNATIONAL BOLSHEVIK TENDENCY. A name like that implies that you think everyone else on the left is a wretched, social imperialist, reformist Mensehvik waste of space. And they do. Having just listened to a PR supporter describe how she’d help organise illegal action in support of another group of workers, a Labour Party member talk about a major strike in a very important union the IBT more or less denounce them as labour aristocrats for being in unionised workplace and taking industrial action. His call centre isn’t unionised and he seemed to think it was a badge of honour before droning on about how shameful it was that PR had supported John Mc Donnell.

This seemed to prove the point made by Stuart from PR in the closing session that the British left looks weird to most people. To be frank this was not the session I expected it to be. In fact I asked comrade Kate for my tenner back. She gave me an apple instead. Entitled What is the future for the left? it should have been called Why we think Permanent Revolution is pretty good. From the title one would have expected a discussion on Labour after Blair, the options for Marxists, an assessment of the opportunities for new parties and so on. Instead it was a quick tour of the weakness and isolation of the Marxist left, a couple of jokes at Respect’s expense (which sounded like they’d been nicked from me) and a very honest judgement of how awful life was in Workers Power before the split.

For a group as new and as small as PR to have got sixty plus people to the event on the Saturday was quite a success. As is their custom debate was honest and comradely. The discussion was on a pretty high level throughout and they understand that most important thing about socialist democracy that pluralism, disagreement and honesty are strengths.

9 responses to “"British left looks weird" says Permanent Revolution”

  1. You’re setting a higher and higher standard for those first paras. Where will it end?Simon

    Like

  2. …the start of the second para I guess.Simon K

    Like

  3. a very public sociologist Avatar
    a very public sociologist

    I was going to ask if PR had thought about getting involved in the Campaign for a Marxist Party, but seeing the reports from last week’s CMP conference in the Weekly Worker, I almost think it’s the sign of a healthy political tendency to give that shower a wide berth.

    Like

  4. Liam Mac Uaid Avatar
    Liam Mac Uaid

    Aw shucks Simon. The CMP were there and Gerry made a couple of thoughtful and interesting interventions but I didn’t get a sense that PR are interested in a lash up.

    Like

  5. Rereading those comments of mine I see that they could be interpreted as meaning that the quality of the first para ends at the beginning of the second – that’s not what I meant. I was trying to be nice.Simon K

    Like

  6. The left have looked weird for decades. I remember taking a nice normal middle-class girlf to an ISG rally in the early 1990s. She kinda freaked …

    Like

  7. I can’t see my socialist collegues from latin America or within the greens being very impressed by the British far left organisations.But then equally who loves political parties of any colour, so I am in no position to lecture.(incidentally do Irish political parties find particular cruel and bizarre ways of betraying us, I think we should be told).PR and I debated ecology in comradely manner, like Liam I thought it was a good event with some good discussion.In case the green right are reading this it does not mean I am ‘endorsing’ PR, ho ho.any way Michael Lowy is talking about ecosocialism at Marxism tomorrow soas 2pm, so hopefully see some of you there, no risk that even the green right will think I am endorsing the heirs of tony cliff

    Like

  8. I’m one of the young people from the iRevolution tendency who was at the PR event. What did you think of our contribution to the “youth question”?http://www.iRevolution.int.tc

    Like

  9. Wladek, I wasn’t there for the discussion on youth so I can’t comment. Though generally speaking I was impressed by the level of all the contributions and the thoughtful comradely way in which the event was run. By the way this site is no longer properly active I’ve shifted to WordPress.

    Like

Leave a reply to Dave Cancel reply

Trending