Peace, love and unity now reign in Respect following the National Council (NC) meeting on September 29. This is a very good thing and not something too many people were predicting a week ago. Meaningful smiley_1_big opportunities to create mass, class struggle parties are very rare. Maybe they come along once in a generation, or less, and it would have been a serious responsibility on all involved if this chance were fouled up. Instead the settlement is very positive indeed and builds on the statement from the National Council which was issued last week. This was a list of the action points taken from a document written by George Galloway. It echoed many of the arguments that supporters of Socialist Resistance have been making inside Respect for the last couple of years.

John Lister and Alan Thornett had written a resolution which they intended to offer as a proposed NC resolution on building the organisation for this year’s conference. Experts have commented on the document’s similarity to previous offerings from these two. A slightly modified version of it was passed unanimously today which I hope to post tomorrow. The most significant change was that it was not seconded by John Lister even though he was in the room and still agreed with what he’d written earlier in the week. The task fell to John Rees at his request. Life can be full of surprises.

Another piece of good news is that the unloved slate system is to be dropped. The NC that will be elected at this year’s conference will be charged with devising a structure for a delegate based NC from the 2008 conference. The plan is that it will be elected by single transferable vote.

It also seems likely that a new post of national organiser will be created with powers equal to that of the national secretary. You may want to start buffing up your CV.

But the good stuff doesn’t stop there. Next week the first exploratory talks are to be held between Respect and the CPB. Let’s keep our fingers and toes crossed that this is done with a bit more subtlety than was on display at recent meetings of RMT members when they were looking into standing candidates. SWP supporters argued against the idea and instead suggested that the RMT candidates stand for Respect. Slick, eh? Years of training go into honing political skills of that quality.

There was another unanimous vote from the NC to ask George Galloway to stand again for election. The ill-feeling and harshness which soured last week’s meeting were absent. A representative of Bristol Respect handed the MP a letter which had been agreed at their AGM also requesting that he put himself forward.

Now we are all rather at the mercy of Gordon Brown. Respect has three potentially winnable seats. Two in Tower Hamlets and Salma Yacoob’s in Birmingham. A week ago the organisation was on the life support machine and its nearest and dearest were thinking of pulling the plug. Today it has almost been relaunched with an overture to another left party and a consensus around measures to strengthen the accountability of elected officials, pluralism and democracy. This makes fighting an early election a much less intimidating prospect.

In politics, as in love, a good row can clear the air.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

18 responses to “Respect – peace breaks out”

  1. F*****g A!

    possibly the most enjoyable blog entry I have ever read.

    Like

  2. Yes, this is excellent. Just to clarify one slight ambiguity – the slate system is to be replaced for the this coming conference, and the new NC is to be elected by STV, or so I understand. The delegate-based NC will be instituted later. It will probably have to be a hybrid, with delegates from branches or districts side-by-side with non-delegate NC members elected by STV at conference.

    Overall, this looks like a major step forward for the Respect project, showing the truth of Lenin’s old adage “better a good quarrel than a bad peace’. It shows the strength of the project that it has been able to overcome barriers to its progression organically, by an internal process. It is marks a major change in the SWP; it is rather obvious that a change has been forced in that organisation from below by active members who were perhaps more rooted in reality than some higher up, saw the potential dangers of what was happening and forced a sobering up. This is a very hopeful development.

    Like

  3. Michael Crick will be well pissed off.

    Like

  4. The replacement of the slate system is very welcome news – this was the biggest bureaucratic block to democracy within Respect. But it’s only a relatively small step towards the actual operation of democracy within Respect, since, as you’ll agree, democracy can’t be created by fiat from the top.

    In practice, we need to see whether the leadership of a certain party can resist the temptation to create a secret slate, for which members of that party would then be instructed to vote. If that happens, then the NC’s decision will be a mere fig-leaf for a continuation of past practices.

    But if they do refrain, then that will set a major precedent, and would provide an opening for both organisations to become more democratic.

    Like

  5. Im not entirely sure that a ‘secret slate’ could be carried out. With a secret ballot, STV, and given the already demonstrated ability of the SWP ranks to correct errors by their leaders, I really dont see how this could be carried out. There would be no way of verifying who voted for who in any case.

    Like

  6. What a sycophantic piece of nonsense from Liam. Peace breaks out in Respect – surprise, surprise – facing anihilation at a potential snap election in November, what would one expect?

    The national council of Respect knows they either “hang together or hang separately”. Nothing has changed – same old opportunist politics, same old alliance with small businessmen, same old dead end for the left and the working class.

    But don’t worry the fifth calvary are coming over the hill – the ageing stalinist rump of the CPB might give Respect an even more bureaucratic and rightist profile. Now they know a thing or two about slate systems.

    Like

  7. Ah, a secret ballot as well – I hadn’t heard about that yet. I agree, in that case, that it would be impossible to police a vote (although I wouldn’t be surprised if orders were given in spite of this).

    If election of the NC becomes democratic, the next item down the list is voting at branch level. Although this would have to be decided by branches individually, it would seem wise if they introduced secret ballots at that level as well to stop manipulation from above leading to bloc votes that don’t reflect genuine opinion within the branch. National Executive members would still be able to make their recommendations, but branches would be free to decide on the basis of local knowledge and debate.

    I’m not fetishising secret ballots – for example, I think it’s right to demand that open ballots should be allowed again for strike votes. But in the present circumstances within Respect, adoption of the secret ballot seems to offer a way out of this cul de sac.

    Like

  8. splinteredsunrise Avatar
    splinteredsunrise

    …the already demonstrated ability of the SWP ranks to correct errors by their leaders…

    Huh?

    Like

  9. What about a postal ballot?

    Like

  10. Transit, if you’re happy with the near-collapse that Respect reached during the course of this month and the undemocratic behaviour that led to this, then you can keep your disingenuous sarcasm.

    Otherwise, read again my last paragraph above:
    I’m not fetishising secret ballots – for example, I think it’s right to demand that open ballots should be allowed again for strike votes. But in the present circumstances within Respect, adoption of the secret ballot seems to offer a way out of this cul de sac.

    Like

  11. I dont see how STV elections can be run without a secret ballot. It is far too technically complex an endeavour to run by a show of hands, for instance. Secret ballots are already used for candidate selections in Respect and that is a norm, so it would be no big leap to use it to elect the National Council.
    In most cases, secret ballots at branch level would be using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. Except for candidate selections, of course, where they are already in use.

    And I’m not that surprised that sects that prematurely announced the death of Respect are a bit green around the gills. Workers Power and Permanent Revolution are not even capable of organising a durable bloc with each other, despite massive political overlap on most questions comprehensible to outsiders, so I’m not that suprised they are fuming that Respect has not wantonly splintered the way they did. And the ‘zombies’ front page on the Weekly Worker now looks suspiciously like a self-portrait.

    Like

  12. On the other hand, it would be wise to be aware that what is agreed to under political pressure, whether external or internal, has to be consolidated and carried out in practice. We can’t take it for granted that all will be hunky dory from now on – the problem being really whether the SWP leadership still see Respect as a ‘united front of a special type’ … to be subordinated to their strategic goal of building the SWP … or whether they can go beyond that.

    Assuming they fail to go beyond that, these kinds of problems are likely to recur, even though they have been forced to sign up on key issues that point towards Respect becoming a party. The only real antidote to that possibility is the further growth of the project so that this sectarian ‘united front of a special type’ concept can be marginalised to the point of irrelevance.

    Which does not mean, and should not be understood as, adocating that the SWP comrades themselves should be marginalised. Rather that they have to make an adjustment in strategy … away from the belief that only they are ‘the party’ and all other formations need to be subordinated to that. Not merely adjust their tactics about how to relate to a project they helped create but whose potential to grow falsifies their schemas of the way things are supposed to develop.

    This change needs to be made in theory, and implemented in practice, otherwise these issues will simply re-emerge in a different way.

    Like

  13. It would be naive to think that because the SWP have made a tactical retreat over the national organiser that they will not still fight hard to retain control over Respect.

    The danger is that they continue to pose this as a false left-right polarisation, joining in the whispering about communalism, etc.

    Like

  14. In my opinion, what we really need is activists and militants coming together at the grassroots to campaign and fight together- on the postal strike, against the war, against privatisation, against pay cuts, for community organisation for better resources etc.

    Respect does not really fulfill this role, though of course socialists should urge joint campaigning and work on these issues with activists in Respect

    But to really take forward the strength of the working class we need something else- drawing in more workers, not based around personalities or backroom deals but based on genuine working class democracy and engagement.

    Whilst Respect’s problems were not positive in themselves the fact that it opened up a debate was positive- unfortunately even on the ground (where I live at least) people seem to again be less ready to engage and debate the ways forward and retreating to an easy but false picture of everything is fine after a temporary glitch.

    Whether or not that’s the case, it hardly addresses the burning needs to fight privatisation, fight the pay cuts, the war, and to strengthen the working class’s ability to fight.

    Like

  15. “Respect does not really fulfill this role”. That’s true but there have been occasions when it began to. To go back to the example of housing privatisation in Tower Hamlets that’s when Respect was the political focus of the struggle. Respect won a lot of votes on my estate because it was seen as the party defending the idea of social housing. It squandered most of that credit in the months since but you got a glimpse of the potential. I plan to write something later in the week about this taking issue with Stuart King’s conception of broad parties.
    In answer to RedKing’s point, one of the Labour councillors does turn up from time to time but people seem to prefer having a chance to talk to the staff responsible for getting tangible things done, such as the cleaning manager. The working class can be a pragmatic bunch sometimes.

    Like

  16. “To go back to the example of housing privatisation in Tower Hamlets that’s when Respect was the political focus of the struggle. Respect won a lot of votes on my estate because it was seen as the party defending the idea of social housing. It squandered most of that credit in the months since but you got a glimpse of the potential.”

    The way forward is at least partly indicated here- to take on a local burning issue, campaign around that, link it in to different campaigns- fighting unions, antidpeortation, against the war- whatever arises- and use this to strengthen working class organisation.

    Elections should be strictly secondary- though if a local vibrant campaign arises, standing in elections can be a useful tactic to strengthen our organisations on the ground.

    And indeed national elections could also play such a role. What’s important though is to promote the class struggle, getting people organised in the workplaces and on the streets.

    I think it’s quite possible and practical for revolutionaries to play central roles in these campaigns without disguising or muting our politics. Of course we shouldn’t badger people with what may seem like weird and alien formulations and jargon but we should say quite openly that we support the working class running society through democratic organisations and that this will require organisation, dedication, self-defence and a popular uprising to defen our power. Many people won’t accpet this but will be perfectly amenable to working with us as long as we put in the donkey work.

    As you say, “The working class can be a pragmatic bunch sometimes.”

    When they see it’s us who organise demonstrations down the housing, occupying the offices if necessary, taking up every little battle and linking to the idea of socialist housing- estates run by tenants not private bosses or the town hall bosses, whne they begin to see actual practical results, then they might begin to at least respect our right to have suhc ideas and may even be won over to them.

    “I plan to write something later in the week about this taking issue with Stuart King’s conception of broad parties.”

    Good. We’ll look forward to the debate,
    As far as I can tell he’s arguing the case I’ve just made.

    Like

  17. […] will recall that, at last Saturday’s National Council, peace broke out. An agreed resolution was adopted, and Alan reports that the proceedings were generally […]

    Like

  18. […] Most National Council members thought this was a positive way forward. […]

    Like

Leave a reply to SOCIALIST UNITY » SWP PURGES DISSIDENTS Cancel reply

Trending