For the last year or two in primary school I was in the school choir. It was a Christian Brothers school. Among the songs that Brother Lynch taught us was The Bold Fenian Men. That’s about the Fenians who killed English cops, planted bombs and tried to invade Canada. Then there was The Foggy Dew. That’s about the Easter Rising when a small number of people staged an insurrection during World War One, fought the British Army and killed British soldiers. Going a bit further back The Minstrel Boy told the story of _44226866_policemalik203a musician who went to fight against an English army with a view to killing some of its members. While we were committing these songs to memory the ideological successors of the people they commemorated were having gun battles with the British Army and planting bombs in the city centre. Some nights my father made us leave the living room because the local news used to show body parts being shovelled into bin bags.

23 year old Samina Malik’s world view is slightly different from that of most of the readers of this site. Her nom de plume is “The Lyrical Terrorist”, chosen because she thought it sounded cool. According to The Times One document in her handwriting read: “The desire within me increases every day to go for martyrdom, the need to go increases second by second.” She fancied herself as something of a poet. Her works include How To Behead and The Living Martyrs. Part of the evidence presented to the court against her was that she had visited websites connected with Abu Hamza and had downloaded information about weapons systems.

For these crimes of opinion and curiosity she is looking at jail time. This is something that should be concerning for all of us. We all have the right to be curious, stupid and wrong and we shouldn’t have to worry about ending up in prison because of it. Researching the materials at the extreme end of the spectrum is part of everyone’s political and intellectual development. If you are of a certain age the Red Army Faction or the Red Brigades might have seemed cool for about six months. If you are a young Muslim in Europe you might well want to look at these websites and be momentarily attracted by them . Then when you roll up to your job behind the counter at WH Smiths the real world reminds you that it’s still there.

Malik’s views might be wrong and her poetry is probably worse than Bobby Sands’ but that is no reason to put her in prison. New Labour is flexing its authoritarian muscles and Samina Malik is paying the price. She hasn’t killed anyone. She wasn’t planning to kill anyone. She wasn’t conspiring to do anything illegal. She was just silly enough to get caught writing down some daft ideas and visiting some unpleasant websites. These are not things she should go to prison for because if they get away with this sort of thing New Labour will find some other opinions to criminalise.

Thanks to Charlie Marks for the video suggestions.

15 responses to “Lyrical Terrorist and the right to be offensive”

  1. Apologies for posting this more general point under this thread (which is really important in it’s own right) but I received this from a comrade in Turkey;

    Dear Eddie,

    You may be interested to know that Liam McUaid’s blog is censored here. I tried to access it and a message popped up saying access was denied by decision of a Turkish court.
    I do not know why this is the case. There was no other explanation. Perhaps McUaid wrote on the Kurdish issue.

    Like

  2. Yeah, I agree with majority of this. New Labour is indeed flexing its authoritarian muscle. It is “thought crime” and this way of control is creeping into all aspects of life. The musings of a young woman is being criminalised and she will be imprisoned.

    Other areas include the Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill (passed its second reading in Oct) which proposes to make it “an offence for a person to be in possession of an extreme pornographic image”. A violent image that could be downloaded from a movie but would be considered, under this Bill, a criminal offence. The Bill talks about “extreme pornography” but gives no clear definition.

    These attacks by this Government are to further erode civil liberties and to give that extra Orwellian Big Brother kick. I mean, Brown is desperate to up the ante re terrorism legislation and holding people for up to 56 days.

    “Thought crime” and fantasises are being criminalised.

    Yet the biggest travesty of all is a group of trigger happy cops will probably have got away with pumping bullets into the head of an unsuspecting and innocent member of the public. I won’t hold my breath on whether they will be prosecuted along with cowardly Ian Blair.

    Now that is one big miscarriage of justice.

    Like

  3. Well I would like to know what our brave Arts Community is doing about the erosion of free speech demonstrated forcefully by Ms Maliks prosecution? We as a small scottish theatre group (AcidTheatre) are putting on a play on the subject… But what are the big guns playing at? Behzti got shut down and now this…. I fear for the future… And my own liberty once our play is on!!

    Like

  4. Remember, she had a poisons manual and an explosive manual.

    That is a rather more serious matter than a collection of doggerel, celebrating her desire to behead people.

    Certainly, you could describe this as a form of thought crime, or an unwarranted criminalisation of curiousity.

    Many people make a similar point about child pornography.

    A defence of those convicted of posessing child pornography would go like this:

    Sure, for some people, the use of child pornography normalises the sexual abuse of children. Child pornography may even be used by some paedophiles as part of the process by which children are coerced into sexual activity.

    But there are loads and loads of people who use child pornography because they’re crazy and mixed up. Perhaps they’re interested in masturbating to images of children being abused because they were abused themselves. For some, the thought of sexually engaging with children is liberating, and allows them to break free from the bounds a society which represses sexual thoughts about children.

    And in any case, who is harmed by child pornography? If somebody downloads child pornography for free, there is no causal link between that act, and the prior abuse of children.

    Sure, Parliament may have criminalised possession of child pornography because it concluded that enjoying images of abuse is a disgusting thing, worthy of punishment, as well as a good way to stop some children subsequently being abused.

    But, hey. We’re talking about something which is a thought crime here, guys.

    Convinced?

    No, I’m not either.

    Personally, I’m perfectly happy to see people prosecuted if they are using jihadist material to radicalise themselves, to learn techniques from, and to work themselves up to the point at which they carry out a bombing.
    This is precisely what the 21/7 (and I would have thought, most UK jihadists) have done prior to committing their crimes. That’s why possession of jihadist material is a criminal offence.

    Like

  5. Good post. The previous commenter is using similar techniques to the ones widely used on the commentisfree debate on the issue to justify jailing a young woman. I suppose they are e-mailed out to those who are trusted to stand by the state at all hazards.

    Meanwhile, a young woman is at risk of being jailed because she had pieces of paper in her possession. Dangerous pieces of paper. I refer you to the Internal Security Act of 1982 for further details, a precis of which I took the liberty of putting into comments at Lenin’s Tomb.

    Like

  6. No objections to people posessing child pornography, another “thought crime” then?

    Like

  7. Iambic Terrorist Avatar
    Iambic Terrorist

    Can we all find out where to download that material and do a public download of the same stuff?

    Here is my terrorist contribution:

    I want to blow my head away in anger,
    mutinous bomb, so ready like a poem
    to save elusive beauty from contempt
    of lawyers pigs and under-nourished minds

    Like

  8. Would you cut similar Slack to David Copeland if he had waxed so lyrically on the Internet about nail bombing Brixton and Brick Lane markets and the Admiral Duncan. Ms Malik was found to be in possession of hate literature and has deservedly been sent to jail. She is no martyr for freedom of expression.

    Like

  9. Would you cut similar Slack to David Copeland if he had waxed so lyrically on the Internet about nail bombing Brixton and Brick Lane markets and the Admiral Duncan.

    If that was all he’d done, yes.

    It’s a ‘gateway drug’ problem. Maybe there are some people who go from collecting armed struggle porn and publishing homicidal fantasies on the Internet to actually becoming urban guerrillas or suicide bombers, but there are lots of people who start at A and never get to B – and there are people who get to B without starting at A (e.g. the July 7th bombers). Malik’s the wrong target.

    Like

  10. Barry, are you the same Barry Gilheany who was in the SDLP at QUB a long time ago?
    The difference between Malik and Copeland is one planted bombs and one wrote bad poetry and had some daft ideas.

    Like

  11. Hi Liam,

    Good looking blog.

    On Clattery MacHinery on Poetry, there is a call for poetic license, for freedom:

    World Samina Malik Day December 6th

    World Samina Malik Day December 6th

    .

    Like

  12. […] Mac Uaid: Lyrical Terrorist and the right to be offensive posted by Liam Mac Uaid […]

    Like

  13. Liam

    Yes I am the same Barry from QUB all those years ago. It”s quite simple Liam, Ms Malik published hate speech and we all know where that leads to. Look at the latitude given to Abu Hamza and whatever Mad Mullah preached at Brixton mosque and whatever mosque radicalised Muhammed Saddique Khan and his asssociates.

    Like

Leave a reply to charliemarks Cancel reply

Trending