cost The Costcutter shop across the road sells organic loaves baked on the premises. It may be self indulgent but they taste like real bread. Before the summer they cost 99p. Today they cost £1.29. That is one third more in half a year. Kerrygold butter is the preferred choice in this house. It has gone up by about 40p in the same period.

In common with most men my method of grocery shopping is to wander in a set pattern buying the usual stuff and not really noticing the price. But the sharp, frequent rises in the prices of these staples caught even my attention. This is more than the owners of a small supermarket franchise sticking the arm in. The Economist reported that “in early September the world price of wheat rose to over $400 a tonne, the highest ever recorded. In May it had been around $200.”. According to The Financial Times “in the UK, food inflation was already running at an annual 5.1 per cent in October”.

Australian grain production has been hard hit by that country’s two year drought. That seems to be the only place with a drop in production. This year has seen the world’s largest ever grain harvest totalling 1.66 billion tonnes, up 89 million tonnes from last year. So if we are not looking at a drop in production why are our sandwiches becoming more expensive?

bread A subsidiary reason is that people in India and China are eating more meat but this is a medium term trend and cannot explain the recent sudden increases. The answer is the use of American maize to produce ethanol as fuel for cars. One ton of corn gives an average 413 litres of ethanol (109 gallons). The centrepiece of George W. Bush’s response to climate change is to use food to allow relatively affluent Americans to drive their cars. The US government buys up one third of the country’s production which raises the prices. As maize becomes more profitable farmers are keen to convert land previously used to grow soybeans and wheat to maize production. All of these crops can be used to feed people and animals. Instead they are fed to cars. The Economist says “federal subsidies alone cost $7 billion a year (equal to around $1.90 a gallon).”

The poorer you are the more of your income is spent on food and that’s not only true in east London. In the very poorest countries a one third rise in food prices reduces living standards by over 20%. The International Food Policy Research Institute estimates that the expansion of ethanol and other biofuels could reduce calorie intake by another 4-8% in Africa and 2-5% in Asia by 2020.

This is a glimpse of the capitalist solution to some of the problems created by climate change. Petrol contributes to global warming. Let’s try to reduce the amount we use but still keep our cars on the road. How do we do that? Easy! Make everyone pay more for the food, making sure the worst off are hit hardest and that people already on the edge of subsistence get even less to eat.

Technorati Tags: ,

5 responses to “Bread and butter”

  1. Opposition to biofuels is a key part of ecosocialism especially in the form of palm oil they involve rainforest destruction, enclosure of land and destruction of local communities.

    Ecosocialist solutions including proper investment in public transport are simply not on the agenda.

    Being blogging on the biofuel boat Earthrace which seems to have upset them…also have a look here on biofuel http://another-green-world.blogspot.com/2007/12/its-about-enclosure-its-about-world.html

    Like

  2. The obvious point to me is that the market cannot price local (hence, lower carbon) products. Especially not if labour costs are lower elsewhere in the world (and hence, profits greater!)…

    But is there a green alternative to petrol – solar powered hauliage? Just asking, as I expect we will be force fed “technological solutions” along with the market ones…

    Like

  3. Biofuels are as insane a use of resources as the fish catches they used to use as fertiliser.

    Poor orang utangs – victims of palm-oil production and now joining the polar bears, pandas and tigers as our poster animals illustrating what’s happening to the planet.

    BTW, what does happen when the US runs out of oil in around seven years?

    Like

  4. #
    Madam Miaow: BTW, what does happen when the US runs out of oil in around seven years?

    They won’t run out of oil in around seven years. As the price of oil rises, it becomes profitable to extract oil from more expensive (and more environmentally destructive) sources, for example the so called oil sands that lie beneath the Canadian province of Alberta and form the world’s second-largest proven oil reserves after Saudi Arabia. BP are investing nearly £1.5bn to extract oil from the Canadian wilderness using methods which Greenpeace describe as the “biggest global warming crime” in history. Other options include drilling for oil under the arctic ocean once global warming has removed the troublesome ice that has kept the oil companies’ grubby hands off it up to now. Capital will manage to irreversibly wreck our environment long before it runs out of oil, unless we do something to stop it.

    Like

  5. More on the Athabasca tar sands mining from the Financial Times here – http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b880c39c-a7b3-11dc-9485-0000779fd2ac.html
    It’s ironic (not sure that’s the right word for eco crime on this scale) that Shell are one of the major oil companies currently raping the boreal forest of Alberta in mining the sands whilst also being the sponsors of this years Wildlife Photography of the Year exhibition. If the oil companies carry on as they are there will be little wildlife left to photograph. If you felt like pointing out the contradictions in Shell’s sponsorship of the exhibition the Natural History Museum’s address is – feedback@nhm.ac.uk and the BBC wildlife magazine is – wildlifeletters@bbcmagazinesbristol.com It’s not much but at least we can make our feelings known when oil companies attempt to present a ‘green’ hue to their activities.

    Like

Leave a comment

Trending