Thanks to Campbell for this report. There is a lot in it that is interesting and innovative. One example that stands out is the use of small groups for discussion. A similar notion occurred to me after the Campaign Against Climate Change trade union conference. The traditional format of someone speaking for fifteen or twenty minutes with everyone else having three or four minutes to chip in creates a bias to participants giving their “line” rather than permitting a free flow of ideas. In a smaller setting people may be less intimidated, under less pressure to conform and more receptive to accepting what others have to say. Or is that a bad thing?

The Scottish Socialist Party held a highly successful Special Conference over the weekend of 29/30th March to discuss changes to our constitution and elected positions. This was the culmination of a 12 month long consultation process following a Commission established to look at the SSP’s structures and constitution.


The conference was addressed by a Shelter striker, Aileen Orr from the Scottish Independence Convention and also by Hilary Wainwright from Red Pepper who spoke on the future of political parties and the need to avoid repeating the mistakes of the past.

The way the conference was organised marked a radical departure from the norms of the socialist movement with discussion starting in groups of 6 delegates or so with a facilitator modelled on the participatory democracy and radical education methodology that the SSP has been increasingly using over the past 2 years.

Following the discussion groups the 110 branch delegates came back together for plenary sessions and voting, either with a traditional show of cards or using Single Transferable Vote proportional representation on issues such as the nature of the leadership of the party or the composition of elected bodies.

While many of the decisions involved small changes to the wording of the SSP constitution a number of highly significant changes were agreed underlining the SSP’s reputation as a ground breaking socialist organisation.

The SSP will introduce 4 year fixed terms for National office bearers Executive Committee members, spokespersons/ office bearers and Regional office bearers on a staggered basis from 2008, to avoid a situation whereby all national office bearers and experienced EC members stand down together in 2012.

The party has agreed that the SSP will have two national spokespersons, one male and one female to be elected in May 2008.

The party also unanimously agreed to preserve the rights of platforms within the party, despite the wrecking tactics of the Socialist Worker and CWI platforms prior to the split in the SSP in 2006. Other changes agreed include a more flexible approach to student organisation by the SSP’s highly effective student activists and that Point 2 of the Aims and Principles of the party should be rewritten to include a clear statement about women’s oppression.

This will be drafted by the Women’s Network and presented to Conference 2009. The party also reaffirmed its commitment to producing Scotland’s only socialist newspaper, Scottish Socialist Voice.

A special meeting of the SSP’s delegate National Council will be held in May to complete the changes agreed.

11 responses to “Scottish Socialist Party Special Conference Report”

  1. What ‘wrecking tactics’ by the CWI platform?

    It’s an indication of where the SSP is now that they invite some ‘soggy’ from Red Pepper.

    Like

  2. I’m most interested inthe way the SSP has developed discussion within the party ‘modelled on the participatory democracy and radical education methodology that the SSP has been increasingly using over the past 2 years’.

    I do feel that this has to be the way forward for the rest of the Left throughout Britain and in campaigns to start to energise and involve people and get in depth issues discussed properly and developed.

    Like

  3. Doug said:

    “Some soggy from Red Pepper” has a history of around forty years of activism on the left and has written interesting books about left organisation (Beyond the Fragments), conversion of industry/workers’ control and thge Labout Party.

    Even if you have differences with her views, she at least realises some of the issues we face are new, and the answers are not necessarily to be found just by applying old formulae. More of her kind of creative thinking and discussion is needed on the left.

    Making public personal insults is hardly the way to attract people to the socialist left.

    Like

  4. And people won’t be attracted by long-winded navel-gazing and dense convoluted jargon.

    Like

  5. Curious
    What is the full party memberhip, dues paying.
    Are they in shape to contest the next local elections.
    How are the Solidarity people doing.
    On a footnote if Solidarity does not work out there should be a possibility of some/all of them coming back into the fold.
    Worse mistakes have been made.
    There are so many grups around based on disagreement that predate the births of the membership. ( eg the 1952 split) Let us disagree about current issues.

    Like

  6. PhilW, given that Wainwright and her small milieu of associates have been saying much the same thing for thirty years now I think it’s pretty cheeky of you to compare her innovative, fresh thinking favourably with everybody else’s supposed love of applying stale old formulas. That particular bunch’s record in terms of effective organisation in that period has, incidentally, been pretty poor.

    The report itself is dreadful. It mentions the size of the conference without mentioning the fact that this was the SSP’s smallest ever conference. It doesn’t mention the elephant in the living room – the fact that most of the SSP leadership will soon be giving prosecution evidence against the country’s most prominent socialist and that this trial is going to overshadow everything else the SSP does for another extended period. For that matter, even the bit about Scottish Socialist Voice is misleading: It doesn’t mention that the paper has shifted from a weekly to a fortnightly (and that it may go monthly) and it makes the false claim to be the only Scottish socialist paper.

    Instead it’s all fluffy gibberish about facilitation procedures and other waffle.

    Like

  7. Hilary got a pretty hard time starting with me. She’s a lovely person but her ideas are wishy washy but if you are trying to create a class-struggle party which is the best we can do now it is important to debate people like Hikary who do represent a strand of opinion on the left of traditional social democracy but who still think you transform the state and capitalism. It is an opportunity to raise the debate amongts the majority of the SSP who are not revoltionary socialists about the lessons of the PT, the Greens in Germany and the left Italy.

    Like

  8. What “wrecking tactics” by the SWP?

    I love the way phrases like “wrecking tactics” are thrown around as if they’re facts.

    No one in the SWP has ever tried to wreck the life of another socialist by colluding with the state and Murdochs media empire.

    Like

  9. To Mark P, on the Voice.

    #1 it is staying as a fortnightly. It is not going to a monthly.
    #2 it is the only socialist paper written and produced in Scotland. The CWI merely put a wrap-round on The Socialist.

    On the Conference size
    It is higher than the pre-election conference in May 2007 and lower than the October/November ’07 Dundee conference.

    Unlike you lot always do, we are not inflating the size of it. 110+ is a decent number considering what’s gone on in the last couple of years.

    Like

  10. The fixed terms is good and theirs potential in the use of the new methods based on Friere.

    The SSPs future though is as a small issue chasing organisation and it will never get back to its strength and influence of the past.

    (SLANDEROUS RUBBISH DELETED – LIAM)

    Neither side either acknowledges this nor indeed has taken any steps towards confronting this problem.
    There is a need for a republican socialist working class movement in Scotland committed to the twin tasks of national liberation and socialist revolution, but in its absence the working class should support the SNP and the break up of the imperialist British state, whilst being ready for a section of the SNP to capitulate to a devolution max settlement with the British state rather than carry on the struggle for a truely sovereign Scottish Workers Republic.

    Like

  11. Liam no names were given- its a politically valid point that agents of the British state operate in any organisation that in any way challenges that state. If CND, Plane Stupid and Animal liberation groups are infiltrated and spied upon as well as when the state can – influenced/controlled; do you seriously believe that the SSP – with its former base and support levels along with its politics of an independent socialist Scotland was not subject to the normal intervention of the secret services of the British state?
    By the same token was PIRA not infiltrated etc etc?

    Like

Leave a comment

Trending