Agriculture in post-independence Namibia
Normally dining with other people is a bit of a chore. They expect you to talk to them and it’s considered rude to watch the TV when you are eating. Different rules apply when you are on holiday and find yourself in circumstances not of your own making. An insight into how Namibia fits…
8 responses to “Agriculture in post-independence Namibia”
-
“As best I can judge all the big farms are still white owned. Many of them are diversifying very successful into tourism.”
To take up this point, progress would best be made by giving a shareholding to the workers on the farms rather than breaking them up into unviable smallholdings.(That is this side of socialism)
Treat them as large companies and nationalise under workers control where they are run as large entities.
Davitt in Ireland wanted the land nationalsied rather than broken up into small holdings. It took a 100 plus years but the era of the viable small farmer in Ireland turned out to be a mirage.I remember the size of the viable small farm was always changing.
In my opinion this is even more true in South Africa. Giving some to small holders would destroy agriculture. It would be like giving a bit of a factory to each worker.
Anyway it would be a smokescreen to give some ruling party people a freebie.LikeLike
-
“Treat them as large companies and nationalise under workers control where they are run as large entities.”
I would agree with this. Though I’m not sure who wouldn’t.
My parents in law in Ethiopia (though a long way from Namibia it illustrates this point well) have a very small farm, a couple of acres or so (about a hectare), but this was broken up from a previously collective co-operative that they much preferred.
As it is now they only make a small surplus and cannot invest at all in irrigation, greenhouse technology, new crops, let alone any mechanical ploughing (everything being ox-drawn). Hence at times they face real shortages and live in constant fear of famine. In addition, young children rarely go to school- girls never.
And every week in the small rural community of about 100 households there is a funeral. There is no health care or electricity or running water- water is drunk straight from the river.
In discussions with my relatives and their nieghbours they certainly much prefer the idea of large farms where resources are pooled. Socialists should certainly support nationalisation of the large farms to be run under workers’ control as model farms to encourage small farmers to voluntarily form co-operatives. My parents-in-law said they’d never heard of socialism but if it meant more food and security they were definitely for it!
LikeLike
-
Jason
I honestly don’t think your can generalise in this way, becasue it depends upon the degree of prior collective organisation of the peasantry, patterns of agriculture, degree of urbanisation, etc.
For example ithin China, collectivisation increased yields in some areas, and decreased them to famine proportioons in others.
LikeLike
-
Andy
You probably have a point that we should be very careful about generalisation. I was though making the point that in Ethiopia where plot sizes are extremely small this leads to quite desperate poverty. Therefore it would seem best to have much larger farm units either run as state farms under the control of the agricultural workers/farmers on the land where estates are confiscated from large owners or landlords or voluntary co-operatives of farmers pooling resources and expertise.
Obviously there can be collectivisation that could lead to even worse results if it was for example corrupt, or imposed by force on smaller farmers who resist and sabotage efforts or poor decisions are made for other reasons. But small holdings where farmers cannot afford irrigation, crop diversification and technology, education, healthcare or even enough guaranteed food for themselves and families are a disaster.
LikeLike
-
I could be wrong and probabl;y am but I would think theat the workers on the big vineries in South Africa nare more proletanised workers than peasants who dream of a plot of their own.
Again Leftwingers while accepting the democratic demands of the peasanttry should be advocating large scale farms where irrigation and other necessary things are possible. While the end of landordism in Ireland was progressive the splitting up of the land was in the long term unviable.
South Africa (not just Azania) is part of the world market and has to export an dthis is only possible as far as agriculture is concerned with large scale enterprises.
I would mof course oppose social engineering from above as in 30’s Russia and the various schemes in China which I feel ruined agriculture. In the case of Zimbabwe it was a cover for a land grab by the new bourgeoisie.LikeLike
-
addendum
I hope that it is accepted that I want nationalisation of the land which was stolen anyway.But in a form that creates real gains and prosperityLikeLike
-
From what I can judge small farms in dry countries are a surefire way to deep poverty. Typical Namibian farms stretch 30-40 kilometres from one side to the other and seem to rely on a mixture of wild game and cattle mostly. A large farm can support a fairly big population.
Jim’s point is right. The farmworkers were more like employees than peasants and it was alway the descendant of the colonalist who owned the land and was giving the orders. They also had the 4 wheel drives and the big houses.
LikeLike
-
Yeah good points, Jim and Liam.
Though I think- in Ethiopia anyway which is all I know in terms of farming- there are many small scale peasants but even there it’s not that difficult to convince them that large farms under workers’ or farmers’ control is the way to go.
LikeLike





Leave a reply to andyinswindon Cancel reply