This is a draft editorial for the impending issue of Socialist Resistance.

  • Leap in inquiries on how to sack staff
  • British economy shudders to a halt
  • Property sector points to deepening downturn
  • Credit crunch takes toll on world’s rich

image This selection of headlines from the Financial Times over a two day period in late summer leaves no room for doubt that the year ahead will be a hard one for working class families in Britain. Energywatch predicts that this coming winter more than 5 million household will be in fuel poverty meaning that they will have to spend more than 10% of their disposable income on heating and cooking. The average UK household gas bill has risen by 31% this year and by 160% since 2003. Electricity bills over the same period have risen by 22% and 96%. Combined with rises of 28% for petrol and 25% for food this has led to a fall of 15% in the average household’s disposable income.

Building firms and firms in the finance sector have made job cuts of 10 000 between June and early September and Marks and Spencers is seeking to reduce the redundancy benefits that it pays to staff. This can only be a harbinger of significant job losses in the retail sector.

All these facts combined make a compelling case that Gordon Brown was dishonest or stupid when he announced the end of “boom and bust” economics. Recession and economic collapse are eternal features of a capitalist economy and this is now the worst financial crisis since World War Two. The Bank of England’s deputy governor has revealed their cunning plan to sort it out saying: “We’ve got our fingers crossed that things will improve.”

Responding to this situation has to become a major focus of Respect’s activity as an urgent priority. Respect’s support is clustered in some of the poorest communities in Britain. These are the people who will have to choose between heating their living room or buying food as in late 2008 and 2009 New Labour presides over the deepening impoverishment of millions of working class people.

At the moment no party is offering a fighting leadership to defend working people. On the right the Tories and the Liberal Democrats accept the logic of the free market. None of the organisations on the left other than Respect is in a position to put forward a nationally credible strategy of resistance to the imminent deep poverty into which so many people will shortly be thrown.

Respect’s base in local government gives it an authority to start making the demands that have to be part of the fightback. Although local councils have no control over the economy they do raise their own budgets. This is a strong point of leverage to begin building alliances of trade unionists and communities as well as to drive a wedge between neo-liberal Labour and its voters. The demands can be focussed on realistic and achievable target such as:

· No rises in rents, council tax or service charges

· No cuts in council spending

· Pay rises to match inflation

To win these demands it is necessary to start reaching out into the communities that will be affected. This can be done by organising meetings which pull together new coalitions of activists and residents, raising the demands in the local press and street activity which calls on councils to refuse to add to the hardship so many people are already enduring. This has to be combined with an active support for and intervention into the wave of industrial action which will break in the next few months as trade unionists begin their own resistance to neo-liberalism.

A time of increasing industrial militancy, recession and impoverishment requires a party that is willing to give leadership to the struggles of working people, the poor and the elderly. The gains that the far right has made in some parts of the country show what conclusions despair can make people draw. Respect has to put itself in the middle of the struggle to protect jobs, income levels and dignity and has to start finding the partners who have the stomach for the fight.

11 responses to “Fightback needs leadership not crossed fingers”

  1. “None of the organisations on the left other than Respect is in a position to put forward a nationally credible strategy of resistance to the imminent deep poverty into which so many people will shortly be thrown”

    Its good to be upbeat about ourselves but this kind of cloudcuckoo land rhetoric does absolutely no one any favours. This is the kind of leftism where moralistic sloganising takes the place of intelligent thought. If this starts to creep into Respect, and there are worrying signs of it already then its the dead-end.

    We are a group of 3-400 member, 5-6 active branches without even the bare bones of a national network. Quite how that is going to play a meaningfful part in any putative nationwide ‘strategy of resistance’ apart from the fantasy of the revolutionary socialist fairies goodness only knows.

    On the other hand we could be laying roots deep into the communities in London’s East and and South Birmingham where we have councillors and prospects for winning seats in a General Election. There is some sign of this in Birmingham with tremendous results, little sign of this in Tower Hanlets and Newham. This is of far more immediate importance than this sort of gung-ho editorialising.

    Mark P

    Like

  2. All hail the one true party! Respect! Respect for ever more! Jesus… have we not tried this over and over and over? What makes you think it will work this time? Superior leadership? Better cadre? Better ideas? Nothing has changed!

    Try working with the rest of the left to assess where we are at and try to come up with ways to work together instead of deluding yourselves that you’ve got all the answers and claiming to be the one true religion. There’s no future in this kind of organising anymore.

    I agree with Mark P.

    Like

  3. Which kind of organising though TWP?
    Ironically Respect is precluded from providing answers to the needs of the working class because its a not a working class organisation. Its a broad party that includes business people, media figures and wannabe MPs.
    As far as I can tell, it has produced exactly no theory so far to explain how to take the class struggle forward, for a simple reason, its not in favour of the class struggle.
    Lay down deep roots in the communities? To do what?
    Nothing from what I can see.

    Like

  4. I too agree with Mark. It is a tad hyperbolic to say the least! The left’s lack of a decent nationwide base continues to be a serious problem and not one that will be solved by continuing to recruits ones and twos. We need to work together more.

    Like

  5. One or two of the rhetorical flourishes might end up on the cutting room floor but the main premise is very simple. Only one organisation on the left British politics has a critical mass of councillors and a high profile MP who are in a position to put forward what I think are a pretty modest set of defensive demands.

    On what basis can we start laying deep roots in 2008/9? Iraq and Afghanistan are no longer enough to win elections. The new economic situation gives Respect an opportunity to start developing a practice in other areas of the class struggle and this will mean that local branches have to move slightly out of their traditional groove.

    My contention has always been that the big factor in getting GG into Westminster for Respect was the tireless work he did around council housing. This opened up entirely new layers of voters. In the months to come putting down roots will involve defending people’s standard of living and looking for levers to win support.

    On AVPS’ points about working together – of course. As for recruiting in ones and two that has always been the real fantasy strategy of the British left. The context to this piece is a discussion that is taking place inside Respect and which will feature in SR. Andy’s recent piece is one side of it and our reply will run alongside it.

    Like

  6. Mark P and VPS: you seem scared of socialism. What is the problem? (Sentence deleted. See policy – Liam)

    Like

  7. “Only one organisation on the left British politics has a critical mass”??? Liam are you feeling ok?

    Like

  8. But clearly respect cannot offer a nationally credible answer to anything. I was simewhat bemused by that calim.

    We have a much more modest base than that, in terms of numbers and geographical spread, and to be honest respect doesn’t have the political homogentity to play that role, even if it were desirable.

    Nor am I convinced that “finding partners who have the stomach to fight” really matches the prevailing political context.

    Like

  9. I wonder if this will help …

    Like

  10. “…. drive a wedge between neo-liberal Labour and its voters.”

    Right. I’m glad to see there’s now at least some realisation that we’re on the verge of a recession and it’s gonna get pretty nasty very soon.

    But I would have thought the obvious point is the effect that this will have in the unions, which remain the overwhelming basis of working class organisation and politics in this country.

    It’s possible that a few local councils might be won over in the next few years and “do a Liverpool”. But they will be fundamentally hamstrung over financing by central Government and won’t be able to go much further than ‘Poplarism’

    Whereas fighting for demands within the LP, up to including socialist nationalisation has the dynamic of being able to reach right into the decision making centres of power in the next couple of years and undermine Brown and co.

    The “Windfall Tax” being an example – obviously a very safe and quite feeble proposal geared to winning over the Cruddite ‘official left’, but raising questions about the entire tax regime for the energy companies and their control over all aspects of British energy policy affecting prices for consumers and the environment.

    Real socialists won’t just tail end the demand for a windfall tax, but argue for progressive taxation and tax regime change. If the energy companies get obstructive, they should face seizure of their assets.
    They have much more to lose than any government.

    Similarly for failing banks. Bourgeois nationalisation of the banks (like Northern Rock) means bailing out the major shareholders and biggest depositors, but repossession for the most needy.
    We should stand for the opposite and argue for the assetts of the banks to be nationalised. That’s a very quick way to rebuild the council housing stock in the case of failed mortgages.

    In many ways, much of the far left remain well to the right of the bankers and leading international financiers in their naive optimism about the prospects for capitalist growth. This probably stems from a deep seated mistrust of catastrophism which stems from burning its fingers in 1945 and the long wave of empiricism this experience led to.

    All the evidence though points to an imminent recession. The mass organisations and popular consciousness will inevitably be deeply affected by it.

    Like

  11. It is the rise of the far right that should be of greatest concern to socialists, particularly in a recession. The BNP turned over £650,000+ last year (compared to less than £400,000 for the Greens in 2007 and £200,000 for Respect).

    That was a bad year for the BNP, where they had an internal split and lost members. They have a strong organisation, many activists and at the moment seem to be able to outcompete the left, and in some areas to outcompete the Greens.

    I’m heartened by the positive attitude to developing partnerships, and I hope there is real scope for co-operation. We are also renewing the Greens, with the first ever Green leader getting announced on the 6th September, who I very much hope to be Caroline Lucas.

    We have to beat the BNP next year, for many reasons, not least to keep Nick Griffin out of the European Parliament. More here http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/aug/17/greenpolitics.thefarright

    Like

Leave a reply to David Gerard Cancel reply

Trending