This is in the current issue of the East London Advertiser.

OUTSPOKEN MP George Galloway has slammed London’s financial “sharks, gorillas and spivs” in a week which has seen the collapse of Lehman Brothers and a crash rescue bid launched by Lloyds TSB.

They have brought the financial system to “rack and ruin,” he said tonight (Friday) in an angry letter to the East London Advertiser.

“We have absolutely no sympathy for the sharks, gorillas, spivs, former masters of the universe and short sellers—whatever they are—who have brought the financial system to rack and ruin,” he argues.

“Most of them will have secured themselves ‘golden parachutes’ should they now find themselves out of a job.

“But there are thousands of people who have been working long hours to earn a basic living in the financial industry who will now be jobless and maybe even homeless soon because of the gross irresponsibility of those who just sought to boost their bonuses and inflate their profits.”

The MP—whose Tower Hamlets constituency of Bethnal Green & Bow is wedged between Canary Wharf and the City of London global financial centres—blamed the big corporations for failing the British public.

“The glittering spires of Canary Wharf and the Square Mile have produced little ‘trickle down’ to the vast majority of people of Tower Hamlets,” he continues.

“Now those same institutions are going to plunge millions in this country into severe financial problems as a result of the credit crunch.

“Unemployment alone is predicted to rise to two million by the end of the year.”

BLAMING BROWN

But he also attacks the Prime Minister for allowing the banking world to take charge of the nation’s monetary matters when he first became Chancellor 11 years ago.

“Brown foolishly handed over control of monetary policy to a bunch of unelected bankers days after New Labour was elected in 1997,” he says.

“He presided over the deregulation which the spivs and sharks have exploited.

“Now he must take back control and force interest rates down, as the noted economic expert Graham Turner has urged. Britain must lead the way.”

Galloway is calling on the Government and local authorities to adopt radical measures to reverse the effects of “this financial meltdown” and its dire consequences for the real economy.

The Respect Party founder insists the Labour Government draws up plans to inject investment into the economy and meet pressing social need.

He pointed to direct investment in council house building “which has been neglected for the last 25 years.”

His attack came after the National Housing Federation had just announced that the Government target of three million new homes by 2012 was now impossible because of the slump in construction.

It might take another nine years to achieve that target, he warns.

“But it won’t be impossible if the Government launches a crash house-building programme now,” Galloway believes.

The MP, whose East End constituency forms the major part of the Labour-run London Borough of Tower Hamlets, believes the local authority—which has six Opposition ‘Respect’ councillors—also has a role in tackling the crisis.

“The Government needs to enable Tower Hamlets and other councils to grant mortgages again as they used to 25 years ago,” he urged.

“They also need to ensure funds are available to meet increased demands on Town Hall resources that are going to occur—without penalising less-well-off council taxpayers.”

Galloway, writing from the House of Commons, co-signed his letter with Cllr Abjol Miah, his Opposition Respect group leader on Tower Hamlets council.

  

33 responses to “Galloway: Sharks and spivs ruining UK’s financial system”

  1. I’m 5’4″ and do a bit of Ebay, so that makes me a short seller. But what the hell is a gorilla or former Master of the Universe?

    Like

  2. Masters of the Universe was a term coined by Tom Wolfe in his novel about wall street traders The Bonfire of the Vanities.

    Like

  3. Off topic, but wouldn’t it be great if Respect was the first organisation with elected reps in Britain to take a one state position on Israel/Palestine?

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/sep/25/middleeast

    Like

  4. “Most of them will have secured themselves ‘golden parachutes’ should they now find themselves out of a job.”

    Doesn’t this also apply to Gorgeous George, the man who could not manage on less than £150,000 a year and now earns a lot more from his media career. I believe he now works for a government Iranian TV company as well.

    Surely a “golden parachute” for when he loses his seat in Parliament?

    Like

  5. The difference is Stuart, that Galloway advocates a high rate of tax for high earners such as himself. I doubt that many of these fat-cats will be touring the country speaking to packed meetings about social justice and peace…

    Like

  6. It is a difference, sure: Galloway is to the left of the super-rich.

    However, the principled socialist stance should be to take a workers’ salary and donate the rest to the labour movement.

    Like

  7. Though I should add that it is quite a good article and that my comment is only an aised to someone who sees fit to defend Galloway earning a high salary.

    There is a difference between left reformism and socialism. We need campaigners like Galloway and others on the Labour left and in various left groups to get behind the campaigns for nationalising the public utilities and a massive expansion of public sector housing. Socialist should argue for this to be under the democratic control of tenants and energy users and for direct action tactics to get there such as workers’ strikes, for the trade unions to take up the demands, for occupation of empty housing stock for defence pickets against eviction and where possible rent and fuel payment strikes.

    Like

  8. Oh for goodness sake. How come we don’t here these arguments about other socialist MPs like JOhn McDonnell, Jeremy Cotbyn. Linda Riordan and Adam Price?

    You complain that George earns money from the media. Well good luck to him, should he decline to take the rate for the job?

    Lots of socialists earn more than the average skilled wage. Why fethishise the salary of one MP?

    Like

  9. Without doubt it’s only a matter of time before George Galloway applies to join Socialist Resistance. When he does we will have a thoroughgoing conversation about the worker’s wage. In the meantime we all have to live with the fact that he does not consider himself as adhering to the Trotskyist tradition. This will be true of any MP who splits from Labour to the left in the foreseeable future. Isn’t real life awkward sometimes?

    Like

  10. Of course.

    My main comments were positive it was a good article. The question of the workers’ wage is one among many but it is relevant and I was not criticising Galloway exclusively- I was responding to a person defending him. I would respond to a person defending a TU bureaucrat getting a high wage or a Labour MP.

    However, it is worth pointing out that whilst we welcome Galloway and other left MPs supporting the campaign against fuel poverty there are other things to say and to add-

    for direct action

    for tenants and energy users’ control

    That’s not fetisihing anything.

    It is suggesting positive ways forward for the campaign.

    Like

  11. Unfortunately most of the left are repeating tired old slogans and totally underestimating the depths of the economic crisis, which worsens by the day.

    Galloway’s call for interest rates to be reduced is pretty hopeless. It’s hardly likely to avert recession when the issue that’s plaguing the economy is the overvaluation of capital assets and paralysis in the movement of money within the banking system.

    In fact, there isn’t a huge difference between what he says here and what the Liberal Democrats say. They also have the benefit of being able to harp on about their el-Cid figure of Vince Cable – who allegedly got it all right. Whereas Galloway’s pronouncements on the economy are somewhat thinner on the ground than his forays into religious eschatology.

    Of course, it’s generally a vote-winner for MP’s and TU officials to accept a workers wage, as was shown in the case of Dave Nellist and the other Militant MP’s.

    Like

  12. Jason – I wasn’t defending Galloway’s salary as an MP. I think all MPs should be on the average workers’ wage, and think it unfortunate that Galloway does not do this – unlike his friend Tommy Sheridan, who as an MSP took a workers’ wage and gave the rest to his party. My ‘defense’ was in response to Stuart – who sought to turn Galloways attack on City slickers.

    One worthwhile thing that Galloway has called for is that Bank of England to lend directly to consumers through Northern Rock (and now Bradford & Bingley, I suppose). The demand for a people’s bank will have great resonance…

    Like

  13. …Trouble is that the nationalised bank that’s likely to emerge from the collapse of NR and B&B will mainly be adminstering an array of dodgy mortgages.
    So it may not be in a position to lend much money to consumers at all.
    And there is now a very real possibiilty of panic -mass withdrawals of savings by retail customers, which which will cause a chain reaction of banking collapses and a 1929 style crash.
    So it’s very important for the left to be precise about what exactly they mean by nationalisation (a term I don’t believe Galloway used in his E.London Advertiser article)
    It can’t mean bailing out financial capitalism but retaining overvalued housing as private property.
    The housing needs to be owned by the state and mandated to and rented out via local councils at affordable rents.
    * No bail outs and fleecing of the exchequer without nationalisation.
    * No nationalisation without trade union representatives on the board, with a right of veto over investment decisions.
    * Amalgamation of the banks into a state finance company which can extend the process of nationalisation to the energy companies.

    Anything short of demands like this is doing what the Guardianista types like Will Hutton suggests is happening – the left coming to the aid of capitalism once again – that, comrades, is the logic of the Popular Front.

    Like

  14. “Of course, it’s generally a vote-winner for MP’s and TU officials to accept a workers wage, as was shown in the case of Dave Nellist and the other Militant MP’s.”

    Not a strong argument. They were elected when they stood as Labour MPs. They lost when they stood as Militant. I don’t think the “worker’s wage” position had much to do with the election outcome, though I don’t disagree with it. Most people vote on broader issues.

    Like

  15. Prinkipo I tend to think you’re covering GG’s arse on this one…

    Meanwhile…..
    A couple of interesting articles on the Bailout from the US left; One from the Marcyite “Workers Word News, another by the IMT section on a demo against the Bailout plan


    Workers World…


    Socialist Appeal…

    Like

  16. Stick to principled positions and ….


    someday our day will come

    Like

  17. Prianikoff – no I’m not covering GG’s arse but I always had my doubts about whether the “worker’s wage” position was a “vote winner”, especially when Militant pushed it so much while their vote went down. I think there are wider issues, and the gap between MP’s pay and skilled workers is not as great as people claim when you take into account the need to live in London. GPs earn a lot more and you don’t hear anyone saying Socialists who are GPs should refuse to be paid the full rate.

    Like

  18. I’ve always stood on it.
    I heard similar arguments used to justify a big pay rise for the GenSec in my union.
    Yet we had been through several years where pay rises for members were behind inflation.

    But the cost of moving to London from a provincial city is a one-off, which can be dealt with by a relocation package.
    It’s also possible to rent a central London flat for £15k/ a year. I don’t see why that shouldn’t be compensated along with travel expenses.

    Personally I think many GP’s, NHS Consutants ARE overpaid. Certainly the ones who earn £100k a year.
    The Health Service would be better if there were more of them and they worked shorter hours.

    Like

  19. For some reason the html link I posted above is a dud. Try this:

    http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=i-1e7KskEFE&feature=related/

    Like

  20. Prianikoff – the AVERAGE salary across the country for a GP is now £100k.
    http://www.nhscareers.nhs.uk/details/Default.aspx?Id=553

    If alongside your campaign for MPs to only to take a “workers wage”, you simultaneously want to campaign for Consultants, GP’s and junior doctor’s salaries to be halved, I would have great respect for your consistency, but I think you would be going nowhere fast!

    As Liam said, if an MP were to join a revolutionary marxist organisation or be elected as a candidate of one, this would be a serious issue, but outside of that remote possibility, it’s largely an irrelevance.

    Like

  21. First of all, the qestion of a limitation on the salaries of public officials was first taken up by the Paris Commune, which adopted a 1:3 ratio as I recall.

    Secondly, the “workers wage” refers to the average salary of a skilled worker, with the level of experience an MP would have. So around 40K/ year is probably realistic, with tax relief or expenses payable for accomodation and transport etc..

    Not totally an irrelevance, the issue relates to Galloway, it related to MEP’s like Alain Krivine and it relates to left f/t officials in Unions too.

    The question of doctor’s salaries is slightly different due to the length of training required. But 100k is ridiculous, not to mention the ones earning more than that, or the Dentists who effectively won’t take on ANY new patients, let alone NHS ones!

    I support their right to a reasonable contract and working day within the NHS, so they can concentrate on patients needs. I don’t support their right to drive a Porsche or a holiday home in Tuscany or the Dordogne. The same thing applies to College Principals, HeadTeachers etc.. on close to 100K.

    Nurses, ancilliary workers, teachers, lecturers etc.. wouldn’t have any problems with that.

    Like

  22. “Of course, it’s generally a vote-winner for MP’s and TU officials to accept a workers wage, as was shown in the case of Dave Nellist and the other Militant MP’s”

    That would be the Dave Nnellist who lost election after election to Labour Party no-marks, despite nellist standing for a workers wage, and the Lbaour candidates taking the full salary?

    Like

  23. I have thought for a long time that the left should advocate a maximum income (from all sources, including investments and bonuses) and that it should be well below £100,000. I don’t think Prinkipo’s suggestion that this is “going nowhere fast” is necessarily borne out by the facts: if you look at figure 1 in the following link, you will see that an (earned) income of £1,000 a week (after tax) covers well over 95% of all “workers”.

    Click to access bn33.pdf

    Like

  24. Click to access bn76.pdf

    is probably even more interesting. It shows, for example, that to be in the top percentile, you “only” have to earn above £100,000 (mean: £160,000) and for the top 0.1% the figures are £351,000 and £780,000 (before tax) – Table 1. 84% of those in the former group are male and 91% of those in the latter are male (figure 5). Nearly 50% of the top percentile live in London and the South-East and 60% of the top 0.1%. These regions make up 28% of all tax payers (figure 6, table 3).

    I should think that quite a few people on the left, many of whom are getting on a bit and have a higher education, will be shocked to learn they are in the top 10-1% (4.2 million people, minimum income £35,345, mean £49,960). For the record, I’m in the second decile, but my partner is in this top one.

    Like

  25. It’s always useful when someone who’s done some reading posts a link. Because it helps share the information. Page refs would also be useful in long pdfs and word docs.

    From a quick skim reading of http://www.ifs.org.uk/bns/bn76.pdf,
    I note the disproportionately high number of people in the top 10-1% that live in London and the SE! (p.33)

    With reference to Andy Newman’s point re Nellist; I don’t accept the argument that voters were swayed by the MP’s salarly issue in this case. More like evidence of a realistic appraisal of the chances of breakway parties that affected many Labour voters at the time.

    Like

  26. No Priankoof.

    It was you who claimed they were swayed by the workers wage; my point is that the evidencne fails to establish hat this is an important issue for voters..

    Like

  27. Andy clearly thinks its good idea for candidates to be loaded…. anyway back on planet earth capitalism is in big trouble,,,,discuss??!!!

    Like

  28. An important issue for voters? There is a lot of working class resentment against politicians earning too much, and all the perks, fraudulent expenses etc.

    For example, in Wales, there was the scandal of Assembly Members awarding themselves a salary rise of over 8% when ordinary people are facing a wage freeze. There was another scandal over the claim of expenses from the public purse. One Assembly Member had the taxpayer paying for a thousand pound sofa, another a 2000 pound suround TV system, others got the taxpayer to pay for a 2 quid glass bowl. You also had Assembly Members getting the taxpayer to pay for very expensive accomodation in Cardiff Bay etc.

    I pay just over 200 quid a month in rent in Cardiff, I can’t take seriously when I hear a politician say that it is absolutely justifiable and necessary for her to have the public pay for her 750 quid penthouse flat in the Bay.

    Actually, the idea of the workers wage is one can have huge resonance with working people.

    Re. Adam Price MP, the darling of Plaid is too the right of Gordon Brown and Maggie Thatcher on taxing multinationals (Plaid’s economic strategy is based on dramatically cutting corporation tax to court foreign business – to even lower levels than Thatcher or Brown would contemplate)

    It’s simply amazing that RR think that asking socialist elected representatives to earn a similar salary to the people they represent is a revolutionary demand. (and let’s remember “the skilled workers wage” is actually more than most working class people earn – more than double what I earn!). I mean how outrageous! Suggesting that working class representatives should share the lifestyle of working class people!

    The workers wage would not be an obstacle to the overwhelming majority of working class people joining, supporting or standing for a broad left party. The only people who have it are a tiny majority of rich socialists who want to lead a lavish lifestyle.

    The trouble is if we want to build a genuine movement in the working class, if we – as Paulo Freire might say – want to see working class empowerment rather than reliance on leaders, then if our leaders are on 100k a year, then not only do they lose touch with the majority through their fat cat lifestyle. They move in very different lifestyles to the mass of working class people who must be the engine of the movement.

    The question is do we tailor our programme to rich socialists or to what will connect with the majority of our class? Do we want a workers party led by middle class professionals or based on working class self-empowerment?

    Like

  29. Further, I know of lots of reformists who have stood for SSP, Socialist Alliance etc. and had no problem standing on the platform of a workers wage – so not very revolutionary.

    Even Ron Davies, a former Labour Party cabinet minister, leader of the Labour Party in Wales & Secretary of State for Wales was prepared to stand in Wales on the platform of taking a workers wage, at a time when I suspect he was prob earning a very high salary as the director of a Race Equality Council.

    Like

  30. Clarification: The reference to Ron Davies and worker wages was after he had left Labour

    Like

  31. I’m sure any rev faction in Respect would want its MPs to work under its discipline and take a workers’ wage. It would be an exemplary thing to do. On the other hand, GG is not part of a faction as such and must pay for his extensive campaigning all over Britain and the world and to maintain a small office mainly out of his own earnings which goes for other left wing MPs too. McDonnell and Corbyn must spend a fortune getting about the place. A very expensive business. So we should remember that any rev MP takling a workers’ wage would have the backing of the resources of the faction that backed them to make it possible for them to campaign at all.

    Like

Leave a reply to Prinkipo Exile Cancel reply

Trending