Will Brown, this site’s economic boffin, offers some advice for anyone who plans to use the Christmas holidays to read Capital. The bad news is that it’s a bit like playing soccer. He also mentions meeting members of left groups who “were happy just to select the negative stories in the Financial Times and talk about the capitalist crisis with plenty of hand waving” but that must be apocryphal.

After the miners were beaten in 1985 I set about reading Marx’s big one – Das Capital. In my mid 20’s, I’d met enough ‘Marxists’ in the labour movement to realise the tradition was important – but most didn’t seem to have read the key works themselves – they were sketchy when quizzed on the details. Sales of Capital have trebled over the last 12 months. Below are a few suggestions on how to tackle a daunting book.

Capital comes in 3 volumes and is definitely not user-friendly. Marx only completed the first volume himself, the second was in rough manuscript and the third was reams of disorganised notes. The heroic Engels published volumes 2 and 3. Though Capital is hard, like playing Manchester United at Old Trafford, it is hopeless to treat Karl Marx with too much respect. You must get in with a big slide tackle, have a jostle in the tunnel and get close up behind whispering obscenities. Marx’s style can be verbose, repetitive and meandering. His sentences can be very long. He may stick on one point and make it at great length in repeated ways. He can wander off on long examples and tedious arguments with long forgotten Victorian professors. Of course, he can also write with stunning lucidity and power.

The first thing to read is Marx for Beginners by Rius. This was a 1976 Spanish comic book setting out the key Marxist ideas with a thumbnail biography. It has spawned a whole industry of illustrated guides to big thinkers. ‘Marx for Beginners’ gives an entertaining introduction to the broad scope of Marx’s thinking and allows Capital to be placed in a wider context. Next read The Communist Manifesto, written with Engels in 1848. It is mercifully short. It is written in passionate, lucid prose with characteristic paradox and assertion. The radical originality of the ideas is startling. I was shocked aged 16 to read Marx’s claim that monogamy was derived from private property and the hypocrisy of the bourgeoisie and that communists might advocate free love. I’ve thought about that one a lot since. The Manifesto moves from a riveting and concise exposition of communism’s main ideas to a rather laboured and extended dismissal of the theories of their rivals. This is classic Marx – re-read the good bits, skim the boring stuff.

On to Capital. Some very brainy and determined people just read the thing through and understand it all. Some read it in a group – great if you can keep it organised. I found three invaluable books that I used to guide me through it. The first was Anthony Brewer’s A Guide to Marx’s Capital (1984). This splendid book takes you through the key arguments chapter by chapter and volume by volume. I used to have it beside me as I read my way through Capital. I’d read Brewer’s synopsis of a chapter and then read the real thing. The second was Marx’s Capital by Ben Fine (1975). Mr Fine takes the key economic theory from the three volumes and sets it out in 100 clearly written pages. The third – and a treasured possession – is A Dictionary of Marxist Thought edited by Tom Bottomore (1983). This wonderful encyclopedia compiles the contributions of a galaxy of leading Marxists from a wide of traditions: Monty Johnstone, Ralph Milliband, Ernest Mandel, Paul Sweezy, Anwar Shaikh and 30 others from round the world. In 500 pages it gives concise introductions to every aspect of Marxist thought, leading Marxist figures and Marxist movements. Absolutely invaluable.

Marx’s goal was to analyse human society using the rigorously rational methods employed by scientists. This leads him to assertions of certainty that today sound bizarre. It was the spirit of his time. It turned out that science was not as certain and sure as he hoped. Within 50 years of the publication of Capital Vol 1 even physics – the most rigorous archetype of hard sciences – was rendered inherently uncertain by Einstein’s relativity and the Heisenberg’s new uncertainty principle. This leaves Marx’s certainty sounding dogmatic – it doesn’t in itself invalidate the ideas and arguments.

Once I’d made some headway with Capital I started trying to see the economy around me using the notions Marx introduces. The primary importance of class for example. The fundamental role of profit. The mysterious nature of money and exchange. I set about following the world economy and trying to understand its characteristics through Marx’s theory. I found that some Marxist organisations could explain his theories eloquently but put little effort into following contemporary capitalism. They were happy just to select the negative stories in the Financial Times and talk about the capitalist crisis with plenty of hand waving. It seemed to me that there were significant aspects of contemporary Capitalism – such as the bond markets, currency markets and state fiscal and monetary policy which were not extensively analysed by Marx. So that’s ok – we’ve just got to figure these things out for ourselves.

I’ve never regretted my effort in getting to grips with Capital. It’s by far the most profound and comprehensive analysis of our economic system from a critical and detached stand point. While celebrating capitalism’s productive power it also discusses how capitalism doesn’t work. Conventional academic economy only discusses how capitalism does work – not appealing if you are of the majority on the wrong end of things. Capital contains powerful and radical insights – the labour theory of value, the idea of commodity fetishism, the tendency of capitalism to monopoly and scores more. Capital is rich in remarkable historical detail. Marx insists we are capable of understanding the world that we have created. Above all, Marx never loses his outrage at exploitation and oppression, his belief that humanity is capable of a better future and his determination that working class people can create a better world.

I heartily recommend this book.

Will Brown

Totterdown

Bristol

4 responses to “Reading Capital”

  1. This is interesting: I have been contemplating starting to re-read Capital, using “Reading Capital” a pamphlet put out by the IMG in the 70s as a guide. I will also now look at the Dictionary of Marxist Thought, which I bought in Oxfam a couple of months ago, and possibly the other recommended books.

    I think the comments about the “uncertainty” of science are not helpful. In my opinion, the suggestion that relativity and Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle make physics inherently uncertain comes uncomfortably close to a post-modern or relativist attitude to science (which has been a bane of sections of the left for thirty years now) and is a misunderstanding of the meaning of these two developments. In fact, these theories, which are backed by experimental data, make physics “more certain” than previously (rather obvious, really).

    The Marxist analysis of capitalism and its development can be considered to be scientific knowledge of a different type, particularly as it cannot easily be tested and verified by prediction-then-experiment. In that sense, it is possibly more akin to the theory of evolution by natural selection or some of the more sound aspects of psychology (don’t quote me, though, as my knowledge of both (all?) of these is scanty).

    Like

  2. An excellent (and free) resource for anyone thinking of reading or re-reading Capital V.1 is the series of video lectures by David Harvey.

    Harvey has been teaching a course on Capital to postgraduate students for many years and this year he had his lectures recorded and put on line. They also include the questions and discussion contributions from his students.

    The format is that you watch the introductory lecture and then read the first two chapters, watch the next lecture and so on.

    http:\\www.davidharvey.org

    Like

  3. I like this review and it makes me finally want to dip my toe into the actual text.

    One of the things that steered me away from marx previously is the notion that his work/ideas are a static and musty ideology that history has outgrown. I was recommended to read Harry Cleavers ‘Reading Capital Politically’ of which i only read the introduction which was really useful and interesting.

    Basically the introduction in ‘Reading Capital Politically’ is a kaleidoscopic history of class struggle, how class changes its composition, but most importantly how Capital itself changes and adapts often because of the *actions* of the w/class. It’s a two way process. here’s a quote from it that hopefully explains it better than me

    “What these two sets of observations forced me to recognize was that the kinds of interpretations of Marx that I had been using involved an overly one-sided focus on the dynamics of capitalist exploitation. Precisely because of this focus, the interpretations failed to grasp the initiative of those resisting and attacking capital and, by so failing, they could not even accurately understand the actions of capital itself –which always developed in an interplay with that resistance and those attacks.”

    and this kind of thing is what makes the ideas so alive, and relevent for today.

    http://libcom.org/library/reading-capital-politically-cleaver

    Also worth mentioning is the work of john bellamy foster who has written plenty about marx and ecology, as it’s also common criticism that marx isn’t relevant now because of the current recognition of ecological limits, problems with energy use and climate change. He shows how these problems are very much related to Capital, that ecological damage is fundamental part of capitalism. THis is really relevent in terms of the false divide that occasionally surfaces between red and green.

    http://monthlyreview.org/ecologyvcap.htm

    Like

  4. This piece is by far one of the best articles I have read on a blog, it almost wants to make you grab a copy of Capital off the shelf. I read Capital when I was in my twenties and found it very hard going. I ploughed through it but looking back, I am sure much of it passed me by.

    On reading Will’s piece I intend to get hold of one of the books he mentioned to read alongside Capital V 1 and read the old beards book again. The Communist Manifesto I found much easier to read and an inspiration.

    Like

Leave a reply to Irish Mark P Cancel reply

Trending