Respect paper This is from the new issue of the Respect Paper

This month sees two important events for the development of left unity. The first is the special conference called by the Rail and Maritime RMT union on 10 January to discuss the issue of working-class representation. The second is the reconvened Convention of the Left taking place in Manchester on 24 January.

Both of these events can play significant roles in advancing the cause of common action on behalf of working-class people. Every step forward in the direction of collaboration on the left, however tentative, should be supported. For far too long the left in Britain has been fragmented and much weakened as a consequence.

Last September’s Convention of the Left in Manchester in October brought together many on the left including representatives of the Labour left, such as John McDonnell MP, Respect, the Green left, Socialist Workers Party, Socialist Party, Communist Party of Britain and other groups, along with many with no party affiliation, to discuss how the left could work together to resist the attacks of Gordon Brown’s New Labour government.

This spirit of unity must be developed into practical campaigning activity in which everyone on the left can participate. From climate change and war to job losses and fuel poverty, there are a thousand things around which we can unite.

Many of us who attended the COTL event believe that these issues demand not just opposition through campaigning, vital as this is, but also opposition by the presentation of left-wing candidates in local, national and European elections. After all, those who are persuaded to join campaigns against job losses or privatisation or wars are faced with a stark choice at election time: who do I vote for?

However, for the time being, those of us who believe in the necessity of creating the widest possible electoral challenge to New Labour from the left are faced with the fact that there are many socialists inside the Labour Party who agree with us on nearly every single issue apart from the need for a new left-wing party.

The issue of party affiliation – Labour, Respect, Green, none – cannot be a reason not to work together on common causes in between elections.

There is no question, though, that the left would be much stronger if it were united in one democratic party – a new party – that brought together all those opposed to capitalism and its effects.

There have been many false starts to the creation of such a new left-wing, socialist party. The Socialist Labour Party fell apart, the Scottish Socialist Party and then Respect split. We must not let those set-backs prevent us from continuing to strive to create a new party for working-class people. And, remember, it is possible to learn from past mistakes and difficulties.

Respect has an elected MP, George Galloway, and councillors on three councils. The Socialist Party also has several councillors, including former MP Dave Nellist in Coventry. The Socialist People’s Party in Barrow has four councillors, while Michael Lavalette was first elected to Preston council as a Socialist Alliance candidate. There are a few other isolated left wingers who have been elected as councillors. It shows that the left can win elections in opposition to New Labour. But these victories are very few and isolated.

Respect will be standing half a dozen or so candidates at the next general election. We have won a sizable electoral constituency in Birmingham and east London but it is by no means the finished article. We do not claim to be the new party of the working-class across the whole of the country but, rather, one part of the wider movement towards such a party. We want to work with all others on the left, including the various left groups and individuals in none, to create that new party.

We support every step taken to challenge New Labour at elections. There are a few good left-wing, socialist Labour MPs who should be supported by everyone on the left. But it is just a few. We need to have the widest challenge against the other rotten pro-war, pro-privatising New Labour MPs.

That is why the RMT conference is an important one. It would represent a real step forward if, before the next general election, the RMT and other unions were to decide to give backing to candidates that represented working-class interests standing against New Labour. Trade union involvement in the move towards a new working-class party is crucial.

In the past, the steps to move towards a new party involving the different left groups have foundered, largely through a deep distrust between the groups. However, most of us on the left agree on most of the fundamental policy questions. While not seeking to diminish important questions of principle, more often than not the differences between groups are of secondary importance, usually of tactics or presentation or even of campaigning methods. Such differences develop through long periods of working separately from others on the left. These sorts of differences should not allow us to be divided and weaker.

It should also be recognised that the vast bulk of those who think of themselves as leftwing or vote left are not currently in any party.

All those groups who intend to stand left-wing candidates in opposition to New Labour should seek to work together to maximise the impact of such a challenge. Firstly, every effort should be made to ensure that there is only one left-wing candidate challenging New Labour in each constituency or ward. Secondly, at the very least it would make sense to try to get all such candidates to stand under one umbrella name. This would preserve the independence of each party’s policies and campaigning activity but would be an important step towards a united challenge from the left.

Time is short. There will be European elections on 4 June this year. Where is the left-wing alternative to present to the many disenfranchised voters, including some traditional Labour voters who may, in desperation, try out the racist BNP as an alternative?

The general election may be called early this year. At most it can be postponed until 3 June 2010. A concerted effort is required from the whole of the left to work together so that there is a joint challenge at that election. It would be a tragedy if, after twelve or thirteen years of a New Labour anti- working-class government, the left challenge is weaker than in 1997 or 2001.

It is incumbent on all socialist groups and individuals on the left to try to work together for the needs of the working class. Faced with job losses, house repossessions, continued privatisation, insecurity and uncertainty there has to be a common front from the left, arguing for radical and socialist policies to counter the failures of capitalism.

18 responses to “Unity is strength – Nick Wrack”

  1. Why does Nick omit the ‘Progressive London’ conference on 24 January. Given George Galloway is speaking at it he must surely be aware of it?

    The RMT initiative and the Convention of the Left are both excellent initiatives but this curious omission of the Progressive London event cannot surely suggest lack of interest in this initiative either? If it does then that should be explained.

    Ken Livingstone has managed to pull together an impressive alliance behind Progressive London for the 24 January launch. Whether that leads to some serious coalition building which can negotiate electoral pacts remains to be seen. But it is to be applauded that Respect are involved from the outset and this is as important as involvement in other initiatives, especially as it is in London that Respect has two of its most important electoral bases.

    Mark P

    Like

  2. Youv’e just answered your own question, Mark P. You mentioned Ken Livingstone. You could also have mentioned a whole host of others who real socialists also wouldn’t touch with a bargepole.

    BTW, Nick, who was at the COl from the SP?

    Like

  3. As I mentioned in my report of last week’s demo Livingstone gave a very good speech. On the other hand what anyone can find progressive in people like Harriet Harman, Tessa Jowell, Len Duvall, Ian Blair or Cressida Dick is beyond my reasoning.

    It’s not clear what the political purpose of this event is. From the outside it looks like something organised so that a self selecting group of the great and the good can hold forth and remain pretty much within a New Laour neo-liberal concensus on about 80% of what is happening in the world. It seems, and I’m open to correction, to offer no opportunity for discussing a break with Keynes, Labour or the Lib Dems.

    This is a pretty negative judgement but there is nothing in the publicity to contradict it and given that Livingstone’s principal interest is in getting himself re-elected this looks like an early shot in his election campaign.

    Like

  4. Mark P – like the majority of the population, including the majority of leftwingers, I cannot get very excited about an event concentrating exclusively on London, let alone the exciting prospect of listening to David Lammy talk about his policies.

    The RMT conference and CoL are, however, genuinely national and genuinely left wing, and thus far more important.

    Like

  5. BLIMEY!! David Lammy is speaking. That makes all the difference.

    Like

  6. Mark – possibly this was written a while ago?

    Liam – Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit and the highest form of ignorance… Lammy is lovely.

    Prinkipo – He has policies? News to me… On the London thing, it has implications for the rest of the country, no?

    Regarding Progressive London, there’s a mention of social justice, which has obviously yet to be fleshed out. Worth engaging with, however, and would hope, in light of the agitation around a People’s Woolies, Galloway will pose the question of economic democracy.

    Like

  7. I am sure that the Progressive London event is worth Galloway speaking at and putting forward Respect’s point of view. I hope that he will give more than a passing mention to the importance of mobilisation against the attack on Gaza.

    But with such a diverse group of no less than 55 speakers, some of whom do not deserve the label “Progressive”, let alone “left wing”, it is debatable whether it will act as a focal point for organising the sort of left wing unity we need.

    “Speakers include:

    Ken Livingstone; Harriet Harman MP; Jon Cruddas MP; Bonnie Greer; Tessa Jowell MP; Professor Eric Hobsbawm; Polly Toynbee; Steve Hart, Regional Secretary of Unite; Linda Perks, Regional Secretary of UNISON; Billy Hayes, General Secretary of Communication Workers Union; David Lammy MP; Martin Gould, President of SERTUC; Christian Wolmar; Seumas Milne; John Harris; Baroness Helena Kennedy; Dawn Butler MP; Val Shawcross; Jenny Jones, Green Party; Darren Johnson, Green Party; Len Duvall – Labour Leader on the Assembly; Mike Tuffrey; Karen Buck MP; Susan Kramer MP; Cllr Stephen Cowan – Hammersmith and Fulham Labour Group Leader; Cllr Paul Dimoldenberg; Nicky Gavron; Professor Doreen Massey; Kevin Maguire, Associate Editor of the Daily Mirror; George Galloway MP; Kate Hudson, Chair of CND; Claude Moraes MEP; Jeremy Corbyn MP; Jean Lambert MEP; Graham Turner – economist and author; Neal Lawson, Chair of Compass; Anas Altikriti; Martin Hoscik – editor, MayorWatch website; Adam Bienkov, ToryTroll blog; Tom Barry, Boriswatch.co.uk; Navin Shah; Chris McLaughlin – Editor, Tribune; Professor Ivor Gaber; Christine Blower, Interim General Secretary NUT; Mick Shaw, President FBU; Bell Ribeiro-Addy, NUS Black Students’ Officer; Adam Sampson – Director of Shelter; John Haylett – Editor of the Morning Star; Bruce Kent; Dr Abdul Bari, MCB; Tony Juniper; Bob Worcester, Founder of MORI; Dabinderjit Singh OBE; Lester Holloway – Editor, New Nation; Finn Mackay; Jess McCabe – Editor of the F Word.”

    Like

  8. The post seems to be all punchlines with no build-up, it seems to follow a pattern of vague statements which it is hard to disagree with while never addressing the issue of why other socialists should care , let alone respect Respect Renewal in its death-throes.

    “You can’t have a Respect campaign and still criticise the referee week after week”-Rafael Benitez (el beeg kloob manager).

    It’s hard to know where to start (or whether to bother).
    How about here :
    “However, for the time being, those of us who believe in the necessity of creating the widest possible electoral challenge to New Labour from the left are faced with the fact that there are many socialists inside the Labour Party who agree with us on nearly every single issue apart from the need for a new left-wing party. ”

    Well socialists in the Labour party obviously aren’t convinced about the necessity of that widest possible electoral challenge. Or they wouldn’t be in the Labour Party. When Respect was a unity coalition rather than a lunatic concoction, the issue of the Iraq was was so dominant it could say that by remaining in the Labour Party it was impossible not to be an accomplice of Tony Blair. Now Respect Renewal seems to believe that there is no point now in trying to persuade anyone to leave, and noone ever seems to identify whether the New Labour pro-war element is just a tiny clique or a majority of Labour MPs, leaving the suspicion that that depends how friendly they are to Respect Renewal.

    “Make friends on the way up. You may need them on the way down.”[?Mae West?]

    A few months ago, Respect Renewal cadre talked about groups much larger than theirs actually on the Left as sects. The words may get nicer, but has the thinking changed at all?

    “Respect will be standing half a dozen or so candidates at the next general election. We have won a sizable electoral constituency in Birmingham and east London but it is by no means the finished article.”

    We’ve already decided what we’re going to do at the next election, but we’re still open-minded. I’ve previously addressed the notion that Respect Renewal has created electoral fortresses that it can only expect to build on: in reality those successes were those of Respect(classic) when the Iraq war was the dominant political issue, the economic crisis has tende to make normal socialist politics rather than RR’s strange hybrid mopre attractive, once the momentum has gone, there will be no more MPs.

    “Victory doesn’t need need to be explained, Defeat cannot be explained”-Hungarian on their defeat to West Germany at 1954 World Cup.

    Re-arranging the deck-chairs on the Titanic – In his conference speech Nick Wrack talked about getting articles on the Respect Renewal website translated into 20 or 30 languages. Yet looking a couple of days ago I noticed a glaring spelling error (I don’t have time to look now, I think it is the addition of the figure 20 between two words) in one of the motions passed by conference. It goes uncorrected because noone cares. None of the motions really said anything anyway (Hands up who likes socialism). When I asked what the amended motion on Iran the original sponsors didn’t like the amended version of, noone from this fine democratic open body were prepared to enlighten me. How many papers are you selling, or is that a state secret too? Maybe you have 10,000 secret members stashed away somewhere (a la John Rees) , but I doubt it. Until RR can be honest about simple questions, its cadre can debate in an honest manner, it can have an honest account of how it came to be where it is, it’s unlikely to be honest enough with itself to see the brick wall coming.

    Like

  9. You’ve gotta love this Skidmarx joker, haven’t you? So now its John Rees- persona non-grata so its OK for SWPers to have a go at him- who claimed the 10,000 rather than the Saintly T Cliff, at the time of the early 90s pit closures demo when it bcame an article of faith for all the The Party Faithful. I know ‘cos i was there.

    Like

  10. Skidmarx – none of us respond any more to your petty little questions about Respect because, over time, we have realised you don’t care about the answers – you simply persist with your own bizarre interpretations of events, backed up by nothing but you own ‘insights’ . Why don’t you give it a rest. You are tedious beyond belief.

    Like

  11. RobM – glad you’re spreading the love.I’ve thought for a long time that it’s not good to exaggerate figures for membership paper sales or demonstrations, it means that it is the more impressive when they actually grow. It doesn’t mean that I’m necessarily antipathetic to everything John Rees has to say, though that hasn’t stopped Nas and others claiming that I was slavishly obedient to him. All I know is that you know nothing.

    Clive Searle – I was actually getting tired of the way you demand apologies from me when I’ve done nothing wrong (such as over your US Socialist Worker article), yet have nothing to say when one of your own accuses me of lying and is shown to be in the wrong (Kevin Ovenden over de Menezes). You haven’t responded with actual answers to many of my questions so far, so I may not see much change. They aren’t petty questions, it isn’t a bizarre interpretation of events. The most recent ones are sensible ones I might ask to see if any (actually left) organisation had a future, the question about the Iran motion is one that seems sensible to ask when it is skated over in the Respect paper, the question of paper sales seemed pertinent after someone mentioned the tiny number of paper sellers you had on the first big Gaza demo, perhaps you should be grateful to me for being one of the few bothering to read it. It would seem a natural explanation that your refusal to engage is due to the relevance of the questions rather than the opposite, your Respect(minority) split in in a terminal crisis and you’re willing to put off admitting to that until the end comes.
    By the way, I was already saying weeks before the Mile End result that RR would be stuffed at the next general election. If my predictions are backed up by nothing but my own ‘insights’ , how flimsy is the basis of your thinking? I think you wish to avoid answering because you find any truthful answer extremely embarrassing. It certainly isn’t a way to project openness and accountabilty, but you do seem to be only interested in the appearance therof and not the reality.

    As an addendum, Galloway’s economic thinking now seems to tail that of Vince Cable. While adding to the perception that there is nothing really socialist about Respect(tertium quid), I also found myself reflecting on GG’s claim that Vince Cable is the only person to see the economic crisis coming. Actually I started advising friends with houses at the time of the Northern Rock crisis that they would be advised to sell them then as the housing market would fall a lot further before it recovered. But what do I know?

    Like

  12. Oh dear. Skidders is a bit upset that his economic genius wasn’t recognised by Galloway. I imagine that the Galloway referred to Cable on the grounds that Cable is a front rank politician and was the only one of such to say this recession was coming in roughly the way it did.

    You really have a knack of getting things entirely upside down, Skidders.

    Like

  13. No I am not concerned out not being acknowledged by Galloway. The more important point is that he thinks the only astute economist of the moment is a non-socialist. Remember the time Rob Hoveman complained about the lack of an economist cadre in the SWP? Ha, ha.

    Like

  14. Tedious and long-winded.

    Like

  15. But he’s still a genius Clive- telling all his friends with houses to sell them as there is a recession coming!

    Like

  16. Skidders: there was another character who used to leave his droppings about Galloway obsessively around the blogosphere. You’re showing disturbing sings of Tim. Don’t go there. It’s bad for your state of mind.

    Like

  17. Clive Searle – Don’t know if I can make it any brief…

    RobM – were you suggesting to any friends you have that have mortgages that negative equity is a wonderful thing. Actually it was the housing market correction I saw coming rather than the overall slowdown.
    But what is remarkable is the way you all want to jump on this as it avoids engaging in any debate and exposing your lack of answers to anything and the poverty of your thinking.

    Nas – if you were better at pretending sincerely that you care about my state of mind I’d thank you for it. If you think I’m obsessed with Galloway you’re barking up the wrong tree. I’d suggest that it is those who have abandoned socialist politics because they were dazzled by the man and thought he would dominate radical politics that have such an obsession, whereas his split from Respect can’t decide if it follows his every whim or tries to mix and match his Stalinist popular frontism as it staggers to its demise. I can understand why you and the few left who share your nightmare want to turn your bitterness on a convenient critic like myself rather than facing up to the mess your political organisation is in, and how you all got there. When you want to actually debate, why don’t you start by telling me how members Respect(not so Popular but with immense Front) has and how many copies of the Respect paper are being sold, so that we might judge my contention that it is on its last legs. Probably you would prefer to follow your friends examples and claim that I’m the one with no grip on reality, so that you can avoid the question.
    I haven’t even got round to mentioning recent broadcasting difficulties and him being taken of air the day the Gaza war started, and whether the demise of Talk 107 is a precursor to the end times of G’s DJ career. If I was really so concerned, I’d be setting up a site called something like GallWatch; seriously I have better things to do than spend all my time kicking a dead dog that’s had its day.

    Like

  18. Negative equity is a terrible thing if you bought a house (or a second house) with the intention of sellign it on for a profit.
    Negative equity is a bad thing if you want to move but can’t afford to sell. And its bad if you are divorcing.

    For most people who have a house with a mortgage and actually live in it, then negative equity means very little. The value of the house to those people (the majority, by far) is immaterial- it is a place to live and offers a degree of security greater than you might have in the rented sector.
    And, of course, in the present climate, mortgage repayments are falling quite sharply.

    Like

Leave a reply to Liam Cancel reply

Trending