Most of the big name Marxists were a bit reluctant to make predictions about what humanity’s communist future might look like. Trotsky hazarded a guess in Communism and Socialism when he wrote: hairless cats-1

“Man will become immeasurably stronger, wiser, and subtler; his body will become more harmonious, his movements more rhythmic, his voice more musical. The forms of life will become dynamically dramatic. The average human type will rise to the heights of an Aristotle, a Goethe, or a Marx. And above these heights, new peaks will rise.”

That’s all very well for us. I’ve yet to meet the reader of this site who would not benefit from most of those improvements but Marxism is mute on the subject of cats. Behind Trotsky’s rosy view of human improvement was the Victorian love affair with science and he seemed to be adumbrating genetic engineering. We have been genetically engineering all sorts of species for thousands of years and what we’ve been left with is, for the most part pretty satisfactory. Horses, pigs, sheep and dogs other than poodles. The exception to the rule is the misbegotten creatures in the photos. They are called Sphynx or Canadian Hairless and though they looked like something that has been evolving in Chernobyl they have been bred to look that way. Some people want an animal to look like that.

image

Cats carry a hairlessness gene and, as good Darwinians, we should just accept that it’s rotten bad luck on the ones that inherit it. The kindest thing to do would be to throw them into a nearby body of water in a weighted sack to save them being ripped apart by other cats. Some people have decided to exploit the gene and breed the animals for profit. There are niche markets among people who are allergic to cat hair and those who don’t like the stuff on their sofa. With predispositions like that there is a very obvious solution to the problem of feline companionship. I deal with my allergic reaction to Bono by not letting him into my house. This works out a lot cheaper than breeding a version lacking the self-righteous, tax-dodging, wanker gene.

Even though you wouldn’t be surprised to see these animals emerging from a spaceship they do have their fans. One of whom says that “they are very people-orientated and affectionate…and are very talkative.” Yet even the fans have to admit that the genetic tinkering which began in 1966 has unpleasant side effects for the animals.

◊ They have to eat more to compensate for heat loss.

◊ They have to avoid strong sunlight or they will burn. For an animal that was domesticated in Egypt that’s a drawback.

◊ They sweat due to its lack of hair.Dinner

◊ They can’t have the grooming rituals which are cats’ social life when not shagging or fighting.

◊ They have to be bathed once a week with special products and if they are not dried off with a towel immediately they catch a chill.

◊ Their ears have to be cleaned weekly.

◊ They have to be kept indoors and like nothing better than climbing into tumble driers.

The Sphynx is incapable of surviving without intensive human support. Its relationship has transcended dependency to the extent that it relies on its owners for survival and the owners only want it for the very qualities that make it so helpless. Even the most inbred pedigree dog has a better chance of fending for itself. Freak animals are being bred to satisfy a perverse human desire. Trotsky would not have approved.

24 responses to “Hairless cats – what would Trotsky say?”

  1. Oh I don’t know.I think they look quite cute.:-)

    Like

  2. I’m sure there are words of wisdom in “Their Moggies and Ours”.

    Unfortunately I can’t check, I loaned my copy to Sean Matgamna. He keps saying he hasn’t got round to it yet, and I’ll get it back in a few weeks.

    That’s what he said about “State and Revolution”. As you can imagine, I’ve kissed that one goodbye.

    Like

  3. He’s probably given it to someone in the Israeli state’s army.

    Like

  4. Be fair, Liam, he also recommended it to some Jordanian bloke.

    Cracking sense of humour that man’s got.

    Like

  5. “I deal with my allergic reaction to Bono by not letting him into my house. This works out a lot cheaper than breeding a version lacking the self-righteous, tax-dodging, wanker gene.”

    Very funny post, but I can’t help but find the cats quite cute. I think it’s because they look so pitiful, I wouldn’t mind taking one home and knitting it a little jumper. Bit unfortunate calling something that burns in the sun a “syphnx” though

    Like

  6. Hasta siempre comandante Avatar
    Hasta siempre comandante

    Why are the AWL Zionists? Are they paid in shekels or is it merely some form of mental confusion?

    Like

  7. “The average human type will rise to the heights of an Aristotle, a Goethe, or a Marx. And above these heights, new peaks will rise.”
    As Robert Nozick pointed out, this doesn’t really address the problem of human inequality, does it? I t merely displaces it to a higher level.

    Like

  8. splinteredsunrise Avatar
    splinteredsunrise

    There is a sort of ugly cuteness there – they look like something out of Gremlins – but you really feel a nice cat-sized cardy would do them the world of good.

    Like

  9. Cats in cardigans! That is oppressively anthropomorphic.

    Like

  10. I think you are underestimating their powers.

    See:

    http://www.starwars.com/databank/character/yoda/

    Like

  11. Is there a competition to see which group of ecosocialists in Britain are most politically committed based on their knowlege of cats?….will the Alliance for Green Socialism and my comrades in Green Left be discusssing organic cat food in similar posts?

    We shall see.

    By the way we ecosocialists have been described as ‘kitsch socialists’ by the AWL…in a letter read out at today’s ecosocialist network meeting in the Lucas Arms.

    Like

  12. I’ve found it!

    Wrong about the original source, the comments came from reminiscences by a man called ‘Mad Jack Cleary’.

    Apparently, ‘LT’ (as we like to call him) said:

    “Fuck me, that’s grotesque. Chuck it outside, will you, I’m trying to eat my dinner.”

    When Jack queried him on his general approach to domestic pets, LT replied: “I’m eating my dinner”.

    Amongst some of his more straightforward analyses, wouldn’t you say?

    Like

  13. This is all about the triviaisation of the Cat species by humans.

    Hairless apes are scared of real cats. So they turn them into parodies of themselves.

    Silly hairless ewoks.

    I’d like a cat hard enough to rip apart a pit bull and eat it for breakfast, like

    Hercules the Liger

    (Actually, he’s a bit of a pussy)

    Or maybe a

    Savannah Cat

    Like

  14. They don’t like blog links on the Liger site, so here’s Youtube video about them:

    http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=DxruyH4o-2o

    Like

  15. those are some rough looking cats.

    Like

  16. I think it is right to criticise the attitude to science and technology expressed in the quote from Trotsky. It is this kind of thinking that leads many on the left to promote techno solutions to climate change. They then and to limit their critique of capitalism’s failure to deal with the issue to saying that the market is incapable of implementing these technologies. Instead, I reckon that fundamental social and structural changes are needed if we are to defeat climate change (but we also need a transitional approach).

    Trotsky was not the only one to hold these views. Recently, a paper has been published suggesting that there was a programme in the early 20’s in the USSR to get (Abkhazi) women to mate with apes. Lunacharsky was apparently involved, so it seems likely that Trotsky would have known about it.

    I should add that I don’t see this kind of aberration as a reason for rejecting Trotsky’s politics: as with all out “gurus”, Trotsky’s ideas should be considered on their merits, not by the fact that he propounded them. In my opinion most were good and some were not.

    Like

  17. Any chance of a link to that paper or a reference PhilW?

    That you wouldn’t see `this kind of an aberration as a reason for rejecting Trotsky’s politics’ says a lot more about you than Trotsky. You should read a bit of Trotsky one day straight off the page. You might understand then that the chances of him having had any truck with such a foul `experiment’ are zero if ever such a fantasy took place. Also, if you can find anything `guru’ like in Trotsky’s wriitings or practise or indeed demonstrate where he rejected the Marxist method when he wrote the `not so good stuff’ I’ll buy you a hairless cat.

    Liam: I don’t think Trotsky had a rosy victorian view of science. In fact he explicity rejected such an outlook as all Marxists must. The Victorians propagated the notion that any social problem could be solved by physical science at the expense of examining the contradictions inherent in bourgeois society. Trotsky didn’t just like PhilW in his first paragraph (I wonder where he got it). In fact Trotsky is specifically saying in that quote, when properly contextualized, that only after humankind has shaken off the last vestiges of class society can it start to take physical science and its own development truely seriously and I’m pretty sure that will include some not inconsequential genetic engineering. But let the more intelligent people of the future decide what is done in that sphere. It is after all their future and we cannot proscribe it for them. In the meantime resources will continue to be diverted into the production of unhappy creatures such as these cats and us and of course in to the miseducation of the likes of poor PhilW and we don’t want to be part of that do we?

    Like

  18. I’ve never actually interpreted that Trotsky quote as being anything to do with “genetic engineering”, or eugenics.
    Wasn’t it just about the way changing the social and economic system would improve the general health of the population and liberate their talents?

    There is after all, good evidence on that. The dental health of the population, especially working class people, improved greatly as a result of free dental treatment and flouridization.
    Better child nutrition and smaller family size has caused an increase in average adult height.
    MMR vaccinations reduce the incidence of these diseases with no significant link with autism.
    Genetic diseases can be reduced by screening etc..

    All of which developments are threatened by capitalist recession and the survival of anti-scientfic superstitions.

    Regarding “techno solutions” to climate change: any socialist society will have to have “techno solutions” alongside social reorganisation. The two things go hand-in-hand.

    Like

  19. Firstly, David, I don’t see why it is necessary for you to be insulting and alleging a lack of reading of Trotsky on my part, when you know absolutely nothing about me…… Generally, I find Trotsky brilliant (on the united front, fascism in Spain, permanent revolution, the nature of the USSR, the characteristics of the second world war (but not his prognosis!)). But his views on science and technology were naive, even for the time, IMHO.

    Of course, it is possible that this story is complete propaganda, and the author does seem to want to put the worst possible spin on it. But if it is a fabrication, then it has lasted for over 80 years (unlike the Zinoviev letter) without apparently being exposed as such, because it seems to have been all over the media in the 1920s.

    Here is the reference, abstract and one paragraph from the article, which is copyright. I don’t agree with the author’s diagnosis of the cause of the defeat of the left opposition, of course.

    Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
    Volume 39, Issue 2, June 2008, Pages 205-210
    Eugenics, sex and the state

    Beyond eugenics: the forgotten scandal of hybridizing humans and apes
    Alexander Etkind
    Department of Slavonic Studies, Faculty of Modern and Medieval Languages, University of Cambridge, Sidgwick Avenue, Cambridge CB3 9DA

    a b s t r a c t
    This paper examines the available evidence on one of the most radical ideas in the history of eugenics and utopianism. In the mid-1920s, the zoology professor Ilia Ivanov submitted to the Soviet government a
    project for hybridizing humans and apes by means of artificial insemination. He received substantial
    financing and organized expeditions to Africa to catch apes for his experiments. His project caused an
    international sensation. The American Association for the Advancement of Atheism announced its
    fund-raising campaign to support Ivanov’s project but gave it a scandalously racist interpretation. Ivanov’s
    own motivation remained unclear, as did the motivation of those in the Bolshevik government who supported Ivanov until his arrest in 1930. This paper discusses three hypothetical reasons for Ivanov’s
    adventure: first, hybridization between humans and apes, should it be successful, would support
    the atheist propaganda of the Bolsheviks; second, regardless of the success of hybridization, Ivanov would
    catch and bring to Russia apes, which were necessary for the rejuvenation programs that were fashionable
    among the Bolshevik elite; and third, hybridization, should it be successful, would pave the way to
    the New Socialist Man whose ‘construction by scientific means’ was the official purpose of the Bolsheviks.
    Ivanov’s ideas were arguably important for the American proponent of reform eugenics, Herman Muller,
    and for the Soviet anthropologist Boris Porshnev.

    In 1925, the top Bolsheviks agreed to finance Ivanov’s expedition to Western Africa. Anatolii Lunacharsky (Commissar of the Enlightenment) and Lev Kamenev (member of Politburo, deputy head of the Soviet of Commissars) signed the papers. Like Schmidt, they belonged to the intellectual and futuristic wing of the government, which was precariously led by Lev Trotsky. The main cause for their defeat was, I believe, their inability to realize their unrealistic promises.

    Like

  20. DAVID – I’VE DELETED THIS COMMENT BECAUSE THE LANGUAGE IN IT WAS UNACCEPTABLE. MORE OF THAT SORT OF ABUSE AND I’LL ADD YOU TO THE BANNED LIST. LIAM

    Like

  21. Last night, I re-read the paper referred to in my post above.

    I need to correct the statement that I made earlier that this was a programme to “mate” apes with women. Rather, it was to attempt to create “hybrids” using artificial insemination, in which Ilia Ivanov was a pioneer, as the full article referenced above makes clear. Obviously, there is a significant difference between what I said and what was actually intended in the project. My apologies for misleading people.

    The paper states that the programme was dropped because most of the apes died, causing delaysright up to the time of Ivanov’s arrest in December 1930. He died in exile in 1932. Five women (unpaid) volunteers had been found, apparently willing to undergo this ordeal out of their interest in the science. The primate centre in Abkhasia continued up until the war with Georgia in 1992, some of the animals being sent into space in the 1960s.

    Like

  22. PhilW: thanks for the clarification. Apologies for the foul language to the blog and to you. Got a bit hot under the collar.

    Like

  23. well, I adore Sphynx cats and think they are fabulous.
    On my travels to San Francsico I met two, look at my blog
    http://www.thoughts-of-chairperson-mikey.blogspot.com/ripley and you will see why

    Mike

    Like

  24. isnt there something in a movie about not getting these wet after midnight?

    Like

Leave a reply to Mike Calvert Cancel reply

Trending