STRIKE ACTION ESCALATES AS WORKERS FIGHT FOR THE RIGHT TO WORK: But it should come as no surprise!

An emergency meeting of the national construction shop stewards forum took place in London as long ago as the 8th January. The meeting discussed the escalating crisis in construction following a series of protests in November and December of last year, over employment rights and also the proposed exclusion of UK workers by foreign companies on power stations and other major UK contracts.

The meeting was originally called for at Newark on the 3rd December following a series of protests at the gates of Staythope Power Station. At the meeting shop stewards voted overwhelmingly to organise a programme of demonstrations toward targeted construction projects within the UK power generation sector.

Shop stewards and trade union activists find it is hard enough as it is to get a job in the industry because of the black listing by the employers. It is a way of reducing their costs and attempting to break union organisation on the major projects.

Rank and file members are preparing for mass disruption on projects throughout the country that refuse to recognise union national agreements. There will be organised demonstrations strikes and mass disruption. We are preparing for a battle to defend our jobs.

Jerry Hicks a candidate in the coming election for General Secretary in the UK’s biggest union Unite-Amicus is supporting the action. He was present at a recent protest at Staythorpe power station where he sustained a fractured leg, having been assaulted by the police.

He said “This should come as no surprise to anyone. The employers have deliberately and actively been looking for ways to exploit cheap labour while covering their eyes and ears to the growing rage of discontent and ignoring all the warning signs, it’s outrageous”,

He went on to say, “To its shame the union leadership failed miserably to grasp the nettle months ago when the dispute was a crisis in the making. The union needs to confront the employers and organise a national campaign for industrial action.”

The employers watch and listen to everything we say and do. If the union does little and says even less they drive the boot in harder and our situation gets worse.

This is not about race or prejudice it is about the exploitation of labour, playing one worker against another. It is about the employers trying to break nationally agreed arrangements and in doing so it is an attack on the union.

Gordon Brown, who at the last Labour party conference said ‘British jobs for British workers’, has created a huge problem all of his own making. He can no longer simply sit on his hands waiting on the sidelines.

Meanwhile, other energy companies are observing what happens next as they seek to further exploit the cheap foreign labour market.

This issue is as a result of the Employers deliberately exploiting a situation, the union leaderships woeful lack of response and Browns pronouncement, Now they act like the like the three monkeys. Hear no evil, speak no evil, see no evil.

14 responses to “STRIKE ACTION ESCALATES AS WORKERS FIGHT FOR THE RIGHT TO WORK – Jerry Hicks”

  1. Hang on a minute. No one is *losing* a job over this contract. A contract was awarded to an EU subcontractor, that is all. At the time that the contract was awarded, there was a skills shortage and no one gave a toss. Now, we’re in the economic scary zone and people care: “we were counting on those jobs” (except they weren’t, until now).

    Arguments like “my grandfather built this refinery” just won’t wash as a political basis for a strike. Is this how jobs are bequeathed, along with the blood flowing through your veins? Perhaps we shall resurrect the old artisan guilds, while we’re at it.

    It’s one thing to argue against exploitation of migrant labour and the need for fair access to jobs (and more jobs). It is another thing entirely to do so on the basis that “British labour” is being discriminated against. You might as well put down the welcome mat for the BNP right there.

    Like

  2. Jodley – it seems to me that IF the employers are systematically ‘refusing to recognise national union agreements on major projects’ and ‘attempting to break union organisation on major projects’ as Jerry Hicks claims (and it sounds very plausible to me) then I suspect workers anywhere would support the action if they had any sense.

    Like

  3. Looks more to me like the EETPU/Unite have stirred something up, and now they don’t quite know what to do with it, and it’s going to get pretty ugly pretty fast. The “British Jobs for British Workers” and “New Labour = Foreign Labour” placards are not isolated fringe slogans, but would seem to be the entire thrust of the strike. Whereas, I’ve yet to see a single placard “Defend National Agreements” or “Keep your side of the Bargain” or “Honour your promises” or “No to Blacklisting” or words to that effect. Admittedly, I’ve just been perusing the media images, but they show wideshots of demonstrations and I think you’ll have to admit that these placards are not to the fore.

    Like

  4. I take your point about the placards: I certainly don’t like seeing striking British workers waving the Union Jack around – and there’s certainly a tradition of national chauvenism in the British labour movement (and that of many other countries). There’s also a strong tradition of internationalism. I went to a Unite day school last year which was discussing solidarity with Columbian workers, merger with US unions and the prospects for a world government.

    Newsnight reported last night that European unions were struggling to get EU agreement on social legislation preventing cross border labour contractors creating a ‘race to the bottom’ in pay and conditions. Agreement had been blocked by New Labour ‘defending’ Britain’s much vaunted ‘workforce flexibility’.

    BTW – does the EETPU still exist? It used to be dreadful – Frank Chappell etc. I thought it had merged with the AEU which then merged with the TGWU which then merged with MSF to form UNITE? Hard to keep track!

    Like

  5. The EETPU doesn’t exist, but I wouldn’t be surprised (when all the dust has settled) to see their old stalwarts the beneficiaries of this. Especially now that you have told me that Amicus-Unite is generally much more internationalist than the slogans of these strikes suggest. This action does make Simpson look pretty silly and the beneficiary is as likely to be Kevin Coyne as Jerry Hicks.

    Like

  6. I think you’re right that this weakens Derek Simpson. In normal circumstances he’d be likely to win a GenSec election because as incumbent inertia is with him. With sections of the union in uproar it might blow it wide open – as as you say Coyne or Hicks may gain. Though Jerry Hicks’ account may be shaped by a need both to support the action and to stress its more honourable causes, I think its likely to be more informative than the BBC – who’s reporting of industrial disputes is, imho, always pretty useless and often sinister.

    In my experience of 15 years as an activist in ASTMS/MSF/AMICUS, trade unions are big, complicated organisations with complicated political landscapes. And no doubt the industrial relations of the power industry has a complicated recent history.
    I am encouraged that workers are taking action over jobs at least and that they are taking solidarity action with each other.
    New Labour will be frantically telling the unions not to repeat the winter of discontent.
    The unions will be telling New Labour that their strategy of ignoring the working class and pandering to Murdoch, the City and middle class opinion has to end – otherwise they won’t be able to control their members.
    I’m not sure how the ‘old stalwarts of the eeptu’ can benefit from this.

    Like

  7. According to yesterday’s Guardian, the Italian and Portuguese workers have the same conditions as the British workers. I have not read anything that suggests they are not members of unions; as permanent workers in the Italian construction industry it’s quite possible…

    Whether or not that’s the case (and, given the recent fall of the pound, they could be *better* paid than the Brits) Unite and the other unions need to shift their approach rapidly and welcome those foreign workers, looking for ways to ensure that Britiash and migrant workers co-operate to improve their mutual working conditions.

    Like

  8. I haven’t read details on how the trade unions were seeking to amend the European legislation to give it a social dimension as was referred to on Newsnite by John Cruddos(?) the ‘Left wing labour MP for Dagenham’.

    An irony of the situation is that having refused to renationalise the power utilities, New Labour has seen many of them them bought by partly or wholly nationalised europen companies like EDF, Total and Aeon. Brown might be on the blower to Ms Merkel and Mr Sarkosy as we speak urging them change their employment practices.

    I shouldn’t make generalisations about Gaurdian readers but my prejdudices would say that many of them are middle class people in good safe jobs who like to think of themselves as very internationalist and have a predjudice that working class people are ignorant and xenophobic. Is that wide of the mark? I probably need some re-education!

    Like

  9. These are dangerous times, nationalist ideas and slogans`British jobs for British workers` can only benifit the bosses and the right wingers. The only position to have is `WORKERS OF THE WORLD uNITE`. The so called bnp trade union `solidarity` will be overjoyed at the opportunies that this dispute offers them to divide British workers and foreign workers. What will be next , African workers who are employed on the railway being told to go home so British workers can have there jobs. We have to be consistant, a worker is a worker where ever they come from and we have to attack anybody in Unite who uses this situation in any election.

    Like

  10. This is a real August 4 turning point for the British Labour movement. Besides those wedded to Labour reformism and the TU bureaucracy we have those wedded to reformism as a theory – George Galloway. And we have the Libertarian Marxist, anarcho-syndicalist tradition that they see the socialist future as composed of workers as they are now, with their present level of consciousness and draw the conclusion that we must accommodate to that, however bad it is. The libcom anarchists take a similar line. No revolutionary hope for the future where the ‘muck of ages’ will be swept away – not for nothing does the International pledge to ‘change forthwith the old CONDITIONS’ a materialist appreciation of the source of consciousness. But to accommodate reaction like you are doing is inexcusable.
    I am exceedingly pleased that the AWL, the SWP and Workers Power have taken such clear positions against this chauvinist strike wave. Despite differences on other very serious matters we must now unite to fight this reaction; it is led by Gordon Brown, it is developed by the Unite leadership – Woodley, Simpson, Hicks, etc., they are defended by the Morning Star and the Socialist Party and Respect – has the ISG managed to find its voice behind Galloway’s arse yet? Or are they simply overpowered by the stench? Must you really rely on the reactionary Gregor Gall to speak for you on this matter?
    It will obviously now have repercussions on the NSSN and everywhere else. If I have criticisms of the AWL and SWP’s positions is that they are soft on the TU bureaucracy, who are funding Gordon Brown and whose capitulation to capitalism over the years has produced this situation. Now is the time to set ourselves the task of building a real principled internationalist rank-and-file movement in the TUs, independent of ALL TU bureaucracies. Let us now fight for that in the NSSN against all the British chauvinists and their apologists – and what really pathetic grovelling apologies we have heard! Poor old muddled Paul in an AWL post thinks their article does not ‘have any purchase on reality’. Hitler was a reality once. Perhaps it would have been a good idea to purchase him!
    “A trade union led by reactionary fakers organizes a strike against the admission of Negro workers into a certain branch of industry. Shall we support such a shameful strike? Of course not. But let us imagine that the bosses, utilizing the given strike, make an attempt to crush the trade union and to make impossible in general the organized self-defence of the workers. In this case we will defend the trade union as a matter of course in spite of its reactionary leadership.” Trotsky 1939

    Like

  11. Hi Bill,

    That’s a useful statement. Your link to the SR article is broken. You need to separate the closing bracket. As Kerstie points out, the articles closing demands are progressive.

    Duncan.

    Like

Leave a reply to Jodley Cancel reply

Trending