More on this as the day progresses but this announcement comes from The Guardian.

Today a major new political initiative will be launched. The People’s Charter for Change is a set of six policy priorities we believe will resonate among millions of people who face the harsh realities of the present economic crisis, and which will help build a popular movement to support the new agenda. The charter calls for a new model for our finance industry, with priority given to more investment for new jobs and green technology, and protecting the existing jobs of ordinary working people; an end to the half-baked privatisations like that proposed for the Royal Mail, and for previously publicly owned companies to be taken back into public ownership.

The charter calls for a massive building programme of new affordable social housing to deal with the chronic housing crisis that affects almost every town and village, and sets out a radical agenda to end the waste of lives and billions of pounds of taxpayers’ money on wars and weapons.

Finally, it recognises that there will be no economic justice without social justice, with a demand for fairness and equality for all our citizens – equal pay for women and an end to racist scapegoating; an end to City super-bonuses; and the payment of proper pensions. The charter sets out an alternative vision for our young citizens, with free childcare for all, better youth facilities and free education at all levels.

It is because the charter sets out such a clear alternative vision that offers hope rather than the failed financial policies of recent decades that we support this new initiative.

This is the text of the charter

A fair economy for a fairer Britain Take the leading banking, insurance and mortgage industries fully into democratic public ownership run for the benefit of all. Regain control of the Bank of England and keep interest rates low. Tightly regulate the City markets to facilitate lending and to stop speculation and takeovers against the public interest. Ban hedge funds, raids on pension funds, asset-stripping and corporate tax loopholes. Restructure the tax system so big business and the wealthy pay more and ordinary people pay less.

More and better jobs Existing jobs must be protected. Public and private investment must create new jobs paying decent money. In particular in manufacturing, construction and green technology. More jobs mean more spending power to stimulate the economy, increased tax revenue and fewer people on benefit. Build full employment. Reduce hours, not pay, to create more jobs. Raise the minimum wage to half national median earnings and end the lower rate for young workers.

Decent homes for all Stop the repossessions and keep people in their homes. Offer ‘no interest’ loans. Control rents. We need 3 million new homes. Give local government the power and money to build and renovate affordable quality homes and buy empty ones, ending the housing shortage, and creating jobs.

Protect and improve our public services – no cuts Save public money: bring energy, transport, water, post and telecommunications back and keep post in public ownership. End corporate profiteering in health, education, social and other public services. Stop the EU privatisation Directives.
Fairness and Justice Free heating and transport for every pensioner. Link state pensions and benefits to average earnings. Protect pension schemes and restore the lost value of private pensions. End child poverty by increasing child benefits and tax credits and providing free nurseries and crèches. Enforce equal pay for women. End racism and discrimination in all its forms. No scape-goating of migrant workers. Invest in young people and give them a real stake in the future. Provide youth, community, arts and cultural centres, sports facilities, and clubs for all. Guarantee training, apprenticeships and education with grants for everyone and no fees. Restore union rights to allow them the freedom to fight the crisis and to protect workers.

Build a secure and sustainable future for all End the cost of war in blood and money. Bring our troops home. Don’t waste £billions on a new generation of nuclear weapons. And beyond the current economic disaster, climate change threatens us all. Our future must be based on massive investment for a greener, safer world now. Debt is crushing millions of people forcing them to move and producing war, famine and misery. Get rid of the debt economy in Britain and cancel the debts of the poor of the planet. A better future for all the people of the world.

Victoria Brittain,
Louise Christian,
Bob Crow

General secretary RMT,
Professor Mary Davis,
Professor Keith Ewing,
Suresh Grover,
John Hendy QC,
Imran Khan,
Jonathan Ledger

General secretary, Napo,
Mike Mansfield QC,
John McDonnell MP,
Robert Monks
General secretary, URTU,

Keith Norman

General Secretary, Aslef,
Peter Tatchell,
Mark Serwotka
General secretary, PCS,
Matt Wrack
General secretary, FBU

An article by John McDonnell is here.

12 responses to “The People's Charter for Change launched”

  1. I welcome the arrival of this charter and the willingness of those representatives to put their name to something that does make demands that would take the working class movement forward.

    However, there seem to be a number of problems with it.

    1) It seems to have been developed from above – wouldn’t it have been so much better if they had issued a draft and called on socialists and trade unionists around the country to set up meetings to discuss it, pull people together and make proposals then followed this with a properly mobilised conference where a final document would be produced?

    2) Top ‘names’ can sign all the declarations they want – what action does it commit them to? – Are they committed to touring the country promoting the charter? Will they be working to set up local groups in support of the charter?

    3) On the website it declarers the aim as getting “one million signatures to show we mean business” – fine, but petitions are easy to ignore – how about an aim of getting a million people on the streets? Is the charter to be seen as just a petition or could it not be a set of demands that people could build all sorts of action.

    The SWP came out with a charter last year. It had all sorts of problems, chief among them that they had total ownership of it but tried to dress it up as something separate from them; something with more social weight then they have.

    However, many SWP members had a much better idea of the kinds of positive work that might be done by uniting around a charter then first impressions suggest are emanating from this charter.

    They understood that getting peoples names signed up is if anything the least important aspect – rather, holding rallies, building demo’s etc. is where it is at.

    The contradictions of the SWP’s charter (as well as internal issues) eventually seemed to put a break on their agitation around it. They are now supporting this new charter.

    My hope is that those of us at the grass roots of left politics can rest this initiative away from those at the top, inject some nitro into it and turn it into a real participative mass movement for change.

    Like

  2. It seems there is a website but my god its dull!

    http://www.thepeoplescharter.com/

    it doesn’t exactly inspire confidence that this has the backing of serious forces!

    Where are the glossy leaflets?

    Where is the logo for sticking on posters, leaflets, placards, our websites, blogs, Facebook etc?

    Where are the voices of real people and real struggles?

    And, I know its early days, but if the website isn’t ready yet, don’t launch it yet!

    Like

  3. RobM – my information is that the campaign will have a full time worker and that planning is starting for a series of meetings across the country.

    Haven’t you heard of small acorns?

    Like

  4. OK, I’ll reserve judgement for a now but reading McDonnells Guradian piece and following the link to the website will be the first time most people come across the Charter. i wonder how many would go back?

    I agree with your idea that the logo should be an acorn though 🙂

    Like

  5. Joseph makes some excellent points,

    We had some very modest success with the People Before Profit Charter in S.E Wales, it was signed by trade unionists, 3 prominent Plaid Cymru leftwingers – Leanne Wood AM, Bethan Jenkins AM & Jill Evans MEP (The deputy-leader of Plaid). the most well known Labour Leftwinger in S.Wales, Cllr Ray Davies, The National Secretary of CND in Wales and surpisingly Cymdeithias – The Welsh Language Society voted at its AGM to endorse the Charter (after we got a Welsh translation up!) and one of their organisers wanted to work specifically on promoting Charter campaigns around housing, poverty etc.

    We also had some interest from people involved in radical social work and anti-poverty campaigns & discussed ideas like Direct Action Casework, claimants unions, and setting up wider solidarity like co-ops, credit unions etc.

    Hopefully, if this new Peoples Charter takes off and is seen as having more social weight behind it and broader forces, we can build a broader coalition of activists & it will be able to provide some focus for those who want to campaign for working class people in the face of the recession.

    With the PBP Charter the main thing that we did with it, was not see it as a petition but rather a useful tool to help build a network of activists & particularly to call demonstrations and meetings.

    To give an example, I was involved in setting up a demonstration outside the office of British Gas over fuel poverty. It wasn’t actually a very big protest but got loads of coverage, and we tried to use that to become the alternative voice on the credit crunch in the local-media, one of my colleagues spoke several times as the guest on radio-phone ins on stuff to do with the recession on Radio Wales

    Successful protest in Cardiff


    Naturally it is a bit hard to contact people such as trade unions and charities to support a demonstration called by Joe Bloggs, but having a Charter signed by prominent people was a useful tool

    We also tried to do some stuff around job cuts that ran into some objective problems, despite hundreds of people signing petitions over the closure of a town’s main workplace, the union wasn’t prepared to fight & most people didn’t think you could do anything, we got a lot of press coverage with a full page spread on job cuts in the local paper the centre-piece which was a statement that Tony Benn sent us.

    But I think the key is for the Peoples Charter to be a tool for action not a petition or a boring talking shop rallies where people talk about the ideas abstractly.

    At this stage building a social movement around the recession will have to take place in flexible loose structures.

    Like

  6. It seems fine to me. If it had been put before `Socialists` around the country to make proposals it would never have come out. Every Party and Sect would have found something to disagree with. It`s out there now so either support it or don`t. If you disagree with it, please don`t turn up to any rally or meeting. Just let the people who do ,get on with building it.

    Like

  7. Upnorth, there are of course positives and negatives to every possible course of action.

    You are right that one negative of building up a document from grassroots would have been the potential of the dictatorship of the hyperactive with those who represent little but are prepared to come to every meeting finding loads to disagree with.

    However their are ways that this could have been overcome. such as the way such meetings were organised etc. Most importantly – if the forces at the top of unions bods really threw their weight into mass engagement those voices would be drowned out.

    The massive positive of building such a document through grassroots participation is that it would give individuals a sense of ownership and participation which I don’t think can be replicated with a from above method.

    Still, even if you think I’m wrong on the possibility of building democratic movements because its much easier to let those at the top sort it out (sorry that’s probably a cheeky way to discribe your view) – even if I’m wrong about that don’t you agree with the second part of what I and Adamski have said? I.E. the importance of seeing this not as a petition but as a tool to build a movement on the streets?

    I am gladdened by Liam’s information that “the campaign will have a full time worker and that planning is starting for a series of meetings across the country.” – perhaps I am being to pessimistic about the commitment of these top bods to build a real movement.

    Like

  8. I agree with Joe. This is a diversion from the real task of re-building the rank and file of the unions. Its presented as a fait accompli and cooked up by exactly the same union chiefs who are currently doing nothing to fight the recession.
    Don’t expect any great results.

    Like

  9. Joseph, i do agree with most of your contribution, that is why i only commented on the the first paragraph. I think that people like myself who do not belong to any political party any more become pissed off with `Socialists` whose only aim in life seems to be to find fault with anything that anybody proposes. And yes , it was a cheeky way to describe my view.

    Like

  10. A critical look at the People’s Charter appears here.

    the people’s charter: a charter for change? – updated

    It will soon be supplemented by a look at the RMT electoral slate “No2EU”, which also has strong CPB overtones

    Like

  11. The RMT has organised day schools with speakers from the`Peoples Charter` as well as `Searchlight`. Great to see a Union taking the message to it`s members.

    Like

  12. Related to all this, here is an article that deserves to be read, from someone very distant from the left:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/mar/16/david-cameron-conservatives-election

    Like

Leave a reply to RobM Cancel reply

Trending