G20 - Riot police storm squat  by Tanya N. Are we being too hard on the techniques that the Metropolitan Police used to terrorise, intimidate and crimnalise the G20 protesters? Sure it’s easy to get outraged and start swearing at the telly when you see a cop anywhere thumping someone over the head with their truncheon or smashing their shield into a defenceless person’s face. But isn’t that only half the story? Shouldn’t we be more appreciative of the valuable educative role they are carrying out when, to pick random recent examples, they arrest 114 people in a “pre-emptive strike against environmental protesters or push and club a man walking away from them who dies minutes later?

When people hear Marxists explaining that cops are a paramilitary force with the principal function of limiting dissent and defending wealth and privilege it can sound a bit disconnected from daily life. Getting whacked over the head by a cop while taking part in a peaceful protest goes a long way to clarifying the finer points of the theory of the repressive role of the bourgeois state. That’s a two hour educational meeting condensed into a split second. And maybe a split skull. You definitely learn more by experiencing something than by listening to someone talking about it.

copsThe serious point in all this is that the cops appear to have recently been on a mission to teach thousands of anti-capitalist protesters that the state is organised force. What they don’t seem to have anticipated is that what they intended to be a series of small tutorial sessions are now prime time TV. They got away with the execution of Jean Charles de Menezes and it’s a fair bet that no heads will roll over the G20 attacks. The big problem it leaves them with is that their public profile is that of a gang of unsupervised hoodlums who are free to dole out random violence with impunity to anyone whose views don’t coincide with the Daily Mail.

The cops made a judgement about the balance of forces on the G20 protests and who was involved in them. Having concluded that the protesters were relatively marginal and few in number they felt free to lay into them. If Ian Tomlinson hadn’t died the cops would have got away with their new form of terror policing. Now they have to work out how they can continue to use their preferred intimidatory techniques while limiting some of the PR damage. We know that they quite haven’t worked this out because that inspector who headed their media operation before and during G20 has been mute since. Just at the time when he could have the run of any TV news programme he fancied.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6 responses to “The baton as teaching aid”

  1. “They got away with the execution of Jean Charles de Menezes and it’s a fair bet that no heads will roll over the G20 attacks.”

    Which is why we must continue to investigate and uncover *ourselves* – not just appeal to the police, to the IPCC, to the politicians who gave the cops the rope in the first place.

    We must point out those with bloodied fists, uncover those who provided command and control, identify those responsible on high, and hold them to account, publicly.

    Ian Tomlinson died because he was mistaken for one of ‘us’; we owe it to him, his family, his friends, and to ourselves, to find justice.

    Keep up the pressure.

    Like

  2. I would check out the role of Superintendent David Hartshorn. He was described in the Guardian on Feb. 23 as predicting a rough summer because of demonstrators, not least at the G20, and he was the head of the Met’s public order branch, at least at the time he spoke to the Grauniad.

    Like

  3. Hmm, just as Dr Who is telling us that men and women in uniform who work for the state are Our Friends and may even gis a job.

    Get them while they’re young.

    Like

  4. there has been a lot of talk on the left websites and blogs about the G20 policing.But it needs to go much further than us.The Liberal Party are calling for a public inquiry into Ian’s death and they are right,though an inquiry should also address kettling,the “we’re up for it ” comment pre-1/4/09,the IPCC lies and the BBC lack of reporting.We need to hold vigils for Ian outside every city police station – perhaps on 1st May (I tried to organise this in Brighton in the week after Ian’s death,but fortunately this issue has got bigger) as well as public meetings (I’m trying to get my local Liberal MP Norman Baker) letters to local papers,statements by local worthies and celebs etc. If the left is to be able to mobilise ordinary people against the effects of this recession over the next year,we must make sure the police continue to be on the defensive and are not allowed to scare people away from protest.If protesting becomes something only for those “up for it”,the BNP will be laughing all the way to the ballot box.

    Like

  5. According to The Economist “no policeman has ever been convicted of murder or manslaughter for a death following police contact, though there have been more than 400 such deaths in the past ten years alone.”

    That’s approaching an average of one per week.

    http://www.economist.com/world/britain/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13497460

    Like

  6. I am sure that you understand that the police work in very difficult circumstances.

    Good enough for me.

    Like

Leave a reply to Faust Cancel reply

Trending