John McAnulty in Belfast wrote this short, but customarily abrasive, piece for Socialist Democracy’s site which more accurately reflects the real outcome of the strike than some of the more jubilant reports. It was a partial victory which resulted in the Visteon workers getting more in redundancy payments due to their fight. That’s temporary good news for the workers and their families. It will mean a big improvement in their quality of life for a while but they are still out of work and the chances of anyone finding a comparable job or wage in Belfast are about zero. It’s not likely to be much better in Enfield and Basildon in the coming year or two either.

Visteon car workers in west Belfast have voted to accept a deal to end the occupation of the factory.  The deal offered an increased redundancy payment, the payment of holiday pay and compensation in lieu of notice. Workers backed the deal on Sunday 3rd May by 147 to 34. They had little choice, as their union had already signed up, publicly lauded the deal and recommended acceptance. Voting no would have been to cast themselves free of the ‘support’ of the Unite bureaucracy and left them facing both union and multinational bosses.

What was really astounding was the comments of the union spokesperson.

Unite spokesman Roger Madison said the deal was “10 times what people were being offered originally”.

“They’ve only been offered this because of the actions taken, especially by the people in West Belfast – to lock themselves in a plant for nearly a month is refreshing – it’s old-fashioned trade unionism.”

The company was formerly owned by Ford, and Mr Madison said it was “the sort of closure package we would see if a Ford plant was closing”.

“Unfortunately we weren’t able to keep these people in their jobs, but in terms of a financial package, we think we’ve done the best we possibly can,” he said.

Later the union admitted that the workers had lost their pension rights and said that they would revisit this issue.

Almost 600 jobs were lost at Visteon’s three plants in Belfast, Basildon and Enfield, with staff being given less than an hour’s notice.  At the end of a 34-day occupation the job loss stands, as does the loss of pension rights that the workers contributed to. If the union leadership consider this a victory what would defeat look like?

The unions weren’t alone.  Sinn Fein, through their cover sheet the Andersonstown News, had front-page headlines proclaiming a victory for ‘Peoples’ Power.’ At an earlier meeting discussing Visteon, Socialist Workers Party spokesperson Eamonn McCann had claimed that there was no such thing as defeat in industrial struggles – to struggle was in itself a form of victory.

So what does victory mean in these circumstances? It means, in the case of UNITE and Sinn Fein, the outer edge of what is possible from a process of lobbying capitalism.  They must define victory in this way because the idea of confronting and challenging capitalism does not exist for organisations that are in partnership with the capitalists. For the SWP it means supporting their member Jimmy Kelly in the leadership of UNITE and putting their links with the bureaucracy above the needs of the working class.

‘Visteon Victory’ means something different to workers.  It means that organisations like the UNITE bureaucracy and the Sinn Fein leadership cannot possibly be considered as useful aids in the battle against capitalism and must be removed from the field of play if workers are to have a fighting chance.

16 responses to “A Visteon victory? Union leaders' supporters re-write dictionary”

  1. I had a chat with a Visteon steward at the Mayday rally in Manchester on Monday. He voted against the deal and would I’m guessing broadly agree with this assessment.

    Like

  2. Visteon occupation is definitely a victory. There is still the issue of the pensions and jobs . However the fact that over a month ago the workers were told that they were to recieve nothing and now they are getting a redundancy package has to be seen as a victory to me. Maybe with a small v but definitely a victory.

    I didnt know that Jimmy Kelly joined the SWP or that their orientation was the TU bureacracy . Shocking news . Learn something new everyday i suppose .

    Like

  3. I would say it illustrates that it is better to struggle than go under without a fight, but calling it a “victory” is exaggerated. It may reflect the need of left groups to grasp at straws, with the British left week and the BNP poised to win European Parliament seats.

    Like

  4. Yeah,Steve,the SWP’s orientation is to the TU bureacracy because Liam says so and he’s always right (must admit I don’t know who Jimmy Kelley is).

    I do agree with a lot of this post by the way . It’s not the greatest of outcomes by a long way but if the Visteon workers hadn’t occupied they would have ended up with nothing. So it is a victory of sorts.

    What is significant is that we’re seeing for the first time in years militant workplace occupations that are actually meeting with some degree of success.

    “Socialist Workers Party spokesperson Eamonn McCann had claimed that there was no such thing as defeat in industrial struggles – to struggle was in itself a form of victory. ”

    He didn’t really say anything that daft, did he?

    Like

  5. Sorry, it’s not Liam who said that about the SWP and TU bureacracy, it was John McNulty who wrote the article.
    I really must pay more attention.

    Like

  6. Rob , your understanding of events is determined by what Liam or in this case John says . By that same logic if they said the world was flat and that Gerry Adams was an SWP enthusiast would you believe that as well ?

    If you know anything about the SWP you would know that they are not orientated towards the TU bureacracy but infact to working class people .
    Im surprised that people who debate and discuss meticulusly the left and especially the SWP know very little about it currently. Jimmy Kelly is not a member of the SWP and thats a fact .

    Like

  7. “Yeah,Steve,the SWP’s orientation is to the TU bureacracy because Liam says so and he’s always right (must admit I don’t know who Jimmy Kelley is).”

    When I said that I was being sarcastic. It was a weak attempt at irony. Sorry.

    I know the swp is oriented to the working class,I’m a member of it .(The one in Britain,not the one in Ireland that Eamonn McCann is a member of and Jimmy Kelley apparrently isn’t.And yes I know they’re related.)

    I was trying to take a more optimistic view of the Visteon dispute than John McAnulty.

    Jeez. 😦

    ( and I haven’t heard of Jimmy Kelley till today , honest )

    Like

  8. […] to talk down the deal, and say that the workforce should have stuck out for a rescue package, as some are doing, would both be a strategic and tactical mistake, and is perhaps objectively anti-trade union; […]

    Like

  9. F##king sell-out! You are just…cough….splutter…..objectively anti-trade union! (perhaps)

    Like

  10. “Objectively” is a great prefix and so rich with historical connotation too. “Objectively counter-revolutionary”, “objectively anti-working class”.

    Oh and mind your language Jodley. You know my views on that type of coarseness.

    Like

  11. […] resolved. Blogger Liam McUaid argues the outcome was a “partial victory” and posts an abrasive article by Socialist Democracy’s John McAnulty that focuses on the loss of pensions and jobs. In […]

    Like

  12. Why the SWP or Jimmy Kelly will not issue a short confirmation that Jimmy has not been a member for some time, I do not understand. The (Irish) Socialist Party conducted a campaign in support of the Belfast Airport workers which was in part directed against the SWP on the grounds that Jimmy was a member. For most if not all of that time Jimmy was no longer a member.

    John McNulty should know by now that Jimmy Kelly is not an SWP member. For someone who assumes an omniscient familiarly with the Irish left and conducts, along with his colleagues, a running critique on it’s imperfections, to not know this is telling.

    BTW that there is a blog-commenting Irish SWP member who has never heard of Jimmy Kelly is a bit telling too.

    Like

  13. “BTW that there is a blog-commenting Irish SWP member who has never heard of Jimmy Kelly is a bit telling too.”
    I’m not in the Irish SWP,I did say I was in the one in Britain .
    I give up, I really do. 😦

    Like

  14. You did indeed Rob. Sorry.

    Don’t give up.

    Like

  15. D_D:

    The campaign supporting the Belfast Airport workers against the Unite bureaucracy was not aimed at the SWP as you should know. However, the fact that Kelly had at the very least been an SWP member up until very recently was indeed used as one way to put pressure on him – the sheer hypocrisy of someone claiming to be a socialist while fighting against workers in struggle is breathtaking. The SWP themselves were a side issue at best in that struggle.

    Like

  16. 1st OXFORD WORKING CLASS BOOKFAIR
    Saturday 20 June, 11 am – 6 pm
    Ruskin College, Walton Street, Oxford

    http://oxfordworkingclassbookfair.blogspot.com/

    We cordially invite YOU to visit the 1st ever OXFORD WORKING CLASS BOOKFAIR! There will be books, talks, workshops, short films and more books and magazines . . .

    We plan to recover/reclaim some of the hidden history of Merrie England, with its gallery of rogues, rebels and revolutionaries, to touch upon some topics of contemporary relevance to the man & woman on the street today, provide quality entertainment, discuss the big issues past and present & hopefully have a real good time to boot! – All in a relaxed and warm atmosphere!

    The range of local groups invited includes; political groups, Trade Unions, community groups, campaign groups, booksellers and history societies. If you would like to have a stall email us at the address above!

    The event will include a commemoration of the hundredth anniversary of the 1909 RUSKIN COLLEGE STUDENT STRIKE, a pioneering student uprising for independent working class education, that saw students breakaway to form a radical education and self-help networks based on an alternative progressive view of what education could be. They argued that it wasn’t enough for the working class to have limited extended access to higer education, but rather that they needed a fundamentally different kind of education, curriculum & pedagogy to meet their needs and the needs of the class. They were involved in the PLEBS LEAGUE (a grassroots education iniative) and set up an anti-capitalist education network of CENTRAL LABOUR COLLEGES, many of the leaders of the student uprising were miners and trade unionists who went on to be authors of THE MINERS NEXT STEP, a classic text of rank & file trade unionism and syndicalism.

    Along the way, we will learn the story of the RED SHIRTS, a group set up at Ruskin College to sabotage the attempts of Oswald Mosely’s fascist BLACK SHIRTS to get a base in 1930s Oxford & consider how we fight against fascism & racism today. There will also be sessions on culture, trade union & labour history, feminism/women’s liberation, ecology & climate, war & empire etc. More information about speakers, events and other happenings planned will appear on our page shortly – watch this space! Sponsors include the local I.W.W

    E-mail us for more info. or to get involved!

    oxfordworkingclassbookfair@googlemail.com

    Like

Leave a reply to Leftovers #6 « Left Luggage Cancel reply

Trending