Ex-Labour leftwinger and Socialist Resistance supporter Dave Hill tops the No2EU list in the South East. That’s him in the centre of the photo. He spoke to The Weekly Worker’s  Peter Manson. Even though there are a couple of contentious ideas in the piece it’s a good summary of his motivation and it should be read alongside the SR statement.

I’m away for a few days so moderation may be fitful.

How do assess the campaign so far? no2eulaunch1

It’s the beginning. No2EU is a new party. The manifesto comes out on May 21 – the same day as the national television broadcast. In the meantime I am making a regional broadcast on The politics show.

We reckon that the South East is the area where we can get elected with the smallest percentage of the vote anywhere in the country – we only need about eight percent to get in. And we could be on line to do that – it depends on the way the national publicity goes – there’s only so much we can do locally.

We’ve got a vibrant local campaign – I must say, mainly run by the local Socialist Party, but also with the RMT and some independents.

There isn’t much by way of the Communist Party of Britain in your neck of the woods then?

No, not in the Brighton area. But in other parts of the region, yes, there are – in Kent, Oxford and Southampton, for example, the CPB is active. In the Brighton area, where I’m mainly going to meetings, doing interventions, etc, we have a group of young comrades from the SP.

I believe you’ve recently come out of retirement from politics?

Yes, I joined the Labour Party when I was 16 – I was brought up in poverty in fact. All my family are working class and I was a socialist from a very early age. I was a parliamentary candidate a couple of times. But in the early 90s I started to go deaf. At the same time I was getting pretty disgusted with Labour – this was before New Labour, under Kinnock – because of the expulsions, which I always opposed. I also decided it was time to concentrate on my career.

But then I got new hearing aids from the NHS about three years ago and it made a huge difference to my life – I could actually hear what people were saying! I left New Labour finally in 2005 after 40 years – most of my friends and comrades had left in tranches over the previous years. The sense of relief I felt was incredible.

I then joined what seemed at that particular time to be the major group on the left, Respect, and indeed the International Socialist Group.

Are you still in Respect?

I am a member, yes. I have been engaged in very vigorous attempts to get Respect involved in No2EU. When I saw the campaign was being set up, I immediately got in touch – then it was just the CPB, SP and RMT on board, so I got in at the beginning. I thought, wow, this is what I’ve been looking for for years – a reconfiguration on the left; a trade union-backed, working class-backed movement and hopefully party to the left of Labour.

Respect at that time was still considering standing and I was opposed to that. Since then Respect, I’m delighted to say, along with Socialist Resistance, has come on board and supported No2EU.

Isn’t it more a case of Respect leaving it open to individual members?

Well, you and I are both right. They have supported No2EU except where there are local considerations – we’re really just talking about the North West …

… where they’re voting Green.

My view is that the Greens are a bourgeois party – a lot of them are very good people – but they’re not a working class party and they are not socialist, even though individual members might be.

I could not believe it and I was very angry. My hope is that the layers that have been involved in Respect – that is to say, predominantly the middle and working class layers of the Muslim population and some others – will fully join No2EU. My hope is that after the election the promised convention does take place and I want to see the development of a democratic and pluralist party grow out of it.

But the main forces involved have divergent positions on that. The official position of the CPB is that No2EU is just an electoral platform and after June 4 it will cease to exist.

Well, you go round the blocks probably more than I do, so you will be well aware that there is a momentum building. If there is a tiny vote, then perhaps the momentum will be lost. But I think that by the time of the election No2EU will actually do well. There is a very good chance that there might be one or two MEPs elected, of whom I reckon to be one. The disgust with the mainstream parties is such that many people to the left of Labour have been looking for something substantial they can vote for.

But, to get back to the convention, history moves. I know the SP is very committed to the Campaign for a New Workers’ Party – which incidentally I support – and I think the CPB and RMT will come on board, and hopefully small groups like the Alliance for Green Socialism, which are also involved. I just hope that the momentum will be such that we are living in historic times, so that a successful party to the left of Labour will be launched some time in the next couple of months.

I see from your blog that you are part of the wing that is for taking up your seats if you get elected.

I’ve always admired the integrity of what was the Militant and SP and their position of a workers’ MP on a skilled worker’s wage – even though I’ve disagreed with them historically on various issues.

Here I’m going to be careful what I say – I think the historic position of working class parties and socialists seeking election has always, quite rightly in my view, been to take up those positions and to use them as a platform and an arena of mobilisation. In the South East election material – and indeed in the television and radio broadcast – I have been very firm about saying we are for a worker’s MP on a worker’s wage.

That’s an advance on the position on the website.

Absolutely. I think we should view No2EU as developmental, and that website was put up at the very beginning. I would like to see a development of that in the manifesto. What I’ve been saying when I’ve been interviewed is that we’re working class and socialist activists. We will be mainly in Britain, but of course we’ll be supporting workers’ slogans and worke
rs’ issues in Europe. But there will no bathplugs or bungs on expenses for us!

We’ll be workers’ MPs on a worker’s wage, fighting for working class issues, rights, conditions and pay and opposing privatisation and neoliberalism.

It seems to me that the ‘Yes to democracy’ slogan is without content. It is posed in a way which suggests that the British parliament, House of Lords and monarchy is the alternative.

Yes, I agree with that 100%. I think a better slogan would have been ‘Yes to a workers’ democracy’ or ‘Yes to a socialist democracy’.

We have an article in the Weekly Worker calling for republican democracy.

I’m a convinced republican.

What we’re saying is: abolition of the monarchy and the second chamber, annual parliaments, as with the Chartists; recallable MPs on a worker’s wage, which you’ve already referred to; an end to the secret state …

… I haven’t thought about the annual parliaments, but I agree with retiring the monarchy and giving them all an old-age pension; and getting rid of the House of Lords and having an elected second chamber – if there is to be a second chamber. The term of the parliaments I’m not so sure about.

What I would say in defence of No2EU is, looking at the speeches of Bob Crow, Dave Nellist and various other comrades, it has been pretty clear that it is a leftwing, internationalist campaign that goes beyond the initially thought-up slogans.

I want to ask you about internationalism, but first can I put to you our last point on republican democracy? That is, replace the standing army with a popular militia and the constitutional right to bear arms, as in the United States. What do you reckon on that?

I haven’t given that any thought. I wouldn’t want to comment without doing so and discussing it.

OK, fair enough. Then let me take you up on what you said about internationalism. For example, the platform – which seems to be inspired by the worst part of the CPB’s programme of anti-EUism from a nationalist perspective – comes out against Fortress Europe, but gives every impression of being for ‘Fortress Britain’.

I fully understand what you’re saying and where you’re coming from. During an election campaign I’m not going to attack other constituent parts of the campaign of which I am a candidate.

What I would say is that in my view the enemy is capitalism, based in both the European Union and in Britain. They are the same. What I have been arguing for in the meetings I’ve been involved in is workers’ internationalism with no illusions in the sanctity of British capital. We’re a movement seeking to replace capitalism with socialism – and I’m not just talking about neoliberalism, which is simply the current version of the class war from above.

What I do think is that we’re living in tumultuous times. We’ve seen 30 years of incredible war on the workers since Thatcher and Reagan, and this is the chance that working class, socialist and progressive forces have to ally, nationally and internationally, to pose and to organise for a working class and socialist alternative to combat and replace capitalism.

If the platform read, ‘No to Fortress Europe, no to Fortress Britain’, how would that sound to you? In other words, for the free movement of labour.

I was a politician for many years, so I’m well used to not answering questions! What I will say is that the views expressed, for example, over the Lindsey refinery workers’ strike by the leaders of No2EU from all its sections have not been narrow little Englandism. What they have defended is the rights of all workers in Britain, wherever they might come from.

So I take heart not from the odd phrase that needs developing, but from the more lengthy phrases that No2EU speakers have been expressing on the stump and in public statements.

I agree with what you say about Lindsey and in fact I think the Socialist Party did a good job in helping to divert the strike away from the ‘British jobs’ slogan …

It was a dreadful slogan …

But that wasn’t actually the nature of the strike, which was to defend jobs. However, what about immigration controls? I’m against them.

Well, I’m not sure that the No2EU campaign has got a particular view on that …

What’s your view?

My personal view is that in my political life I’ve been opposed to racism and active in the Anti-Nazi League – and indeed was attacked on two occasions by fascists because of my leading local role in anti-fascist activity. My working life has involved teaching against race, gender and sexuality discrimination.

My view is that this is not a time to have completely open borders. On the other hand, I think that the current controls are racist and that people who are in this country should be treated with full human rights and have full workers’ rights. The conditions under which many refugees and asylum-seekers live are horrendous.

If ever – god forbid – there were a fascist government in this country, then people like me or you would have to seek asylum somewhere else unless we went underground. I would want us to be treated with full human rights and dignity and have the ability to lead a happy, healthy, safe and employed life.

So the anti-racist slant of No2EU is hugely important to me. I fear that now, unlike any time since the late 70s, when the left basically kicked the fascists off the streets, and unlike the 1930s, when the Battle of Cable Street did the same, the dangers of fascism and of a BNP revival are greater at this moment than at any time in the last 30 years. So we must have no truck with nationalistic slogans and must make very clear our internationalist and anti-racist beliefs.

Finally, I do hope that all of the left, including the CPGB, will come into No2EU and make it a democratic and pluralist organisation. I am including in that people like the Socialist Workers Party and Alliance for Workers’ Liberty – I am totally non-sectarian. I look with great hope to the new anti-capitalist party in France, the Bloco de Esquerda in Portugal and some of the experiences of Die Linke. That’s what I want this to develop into.

19 responses to “Hopeful of being elected”

  1. One thing I find contentious in the interview is this:

    “My view is that the Greens are a bourgeois party – a lot of them are very good people – but they’re not a working class party and they are not socialist, even though individual members might be.”

    Considering that the Federation of Small Businesses found the Greens to best for SMEs in the London mayoral and assembly elections, wouldn’t it be better to say “a petty bourgeois party’? 😉

    Seriously, though, I was a bit surprised to read that Dave thinks he’s got a chance of becoming an MEP. Truly this is optimism of the will – Gramsci would be proud. However, the South East has one Green MEP with a good record on workers’ rights and it would be wrong to view No2EU as in some way antagonistic to the Greens. In my view, come the general election, socialists should campaign for Labour, Green, Respect, or whatever, where there is a pro-worker candidate with a good chance of winning.

    Like

  2. Always good to hear the views of members of the ISG (British section of the Fourth International). Dave Hill ducks and dives to avoid difficult questions in the time honored fashion of the parliamentary candidate. But then, as he says “I was a politician for many years, so I’m well used to not answering questions!”

    What he does make clear is that he is “against open borders” but wants better treatment for migrants already here ie the same position as the stalinist CPB. Is the ISG now against abolishing immigration controls?

    Then he tells us that he is not going to criticise “constituent parts” of the campaign during the elections. Well, so all those criticisms in the ISG/SR resolution were just for the left, not to be raised in public where it counts.
    What a wretched position!

    Get an MEP? They will be lucky to break the 2% barrier – and this anti-EU, little-Englander campaign doesn’t deserve any better.

    Like

  3. Dave argues that “we must have no truck with nationalistic slogans and must make very clear our internationalist and anti-racist beliefs”

    He also however argues “this is not a time to have completely open borders.”a disgraceful position for an internationalist and a socialist. Borders are used by capitalists to divide and rule which is why socialists should be against them in favour of workers’ controls not immigration controls, against the use of racism, borders and discrimination to pit worker against worker.

    Furthermore supporting controls of any sort means supporting physical coercion, barbed wire fences, physical blocks and checks, border police with guns and the power of arrest and deportation. Immigration controls kill and it is disgraceful to support them.

    Dave also argues disingenuously that NO2EU does not take a position on immigration controls. Yet it states on the website in the section

    “The social dumping of exploited foreign workers in Britain is being carried out under EU rules demanding the “free movement of capital, goods, services and labour” within the EU….
    To ferry workers across Europe to carry out jobs that local workers can be trained to perform is an environmental, economic and social nonsense.

    If ‘food-miles’ represent an unacceptably large carbon footprint, then ‘labour-miles’ and shunting human beings around Europe in the pursuit of profit is even more damaging.”

    This sounds like it is against the ‘free movement of labour’ pretty clearly even if there is no formal policy in favour of immigration controls.

    Like

  4. Now, as I’m sure you guys will have experienced (I know I have) arguing with people for open borders isn’t easy. Why? Because our point – one we are well aware of – is that we want to abolish the socioeconomic conditions which make it necessary for workers to have to migrate, etc.

    Migration is used to divide workers as much as migration controls themselves – workers must move elsewhere to find work, to the ultimate benefit of the capitalists. As there are linguistic, cultural, religious differences, these are exploited by the capitalist class and fascist groups to try to undermine workers’ solidarity.

    Like

  5. It isn’t always easy- sure (though I think it is sometimes easier than people imagine that doesn’t negate Charlie’s point)

    But that doesn’t mean we should not have the argument even less say we therefore support controls or make statements that sound like we do.

    It is also true that migration can be and is used by capitalists- of course. But the best way for workers to stop migrants being used to undercut wages is to recruit migrant workers. organise together and be for equal rights for all- from a simply self-interested point of view. And actually whilst it can sometimes be a difficult argument it is often surprising how solidly working class predominantly white estates and workforces can show phenomenl support for migrants.

    But even when arguments are difficult we cannot and should not shy away from them nor treat our fellow workers in a patronising manner.

    Like

  6. Neil Williams Avatar
    Neil Williams

    Its amazing both Nick Wrack (former Respect National Secretary and London No2EU candidate) and Dave Hill (No 1 No2EU South East) are Respect members but dont have Respect support at national level (from the National Council). Respect has only agreed to allow branches and regions (what regions?) to support rather than national support for at least these two campaigns while endorsing at national level support for the Greens in the North West (due to an already agreed comittment made prior to the formation of No2EU campaign).

    This is a major mistake by Respect and one I am not sure we may recover from (it could even mark the beginning of the end for Respect as it is now). It indecates major mistakes in direction being made and now compounded at national level. For the first time we are tailending events instead of making them.

    Unlike some on the Respect Natonal Council I do not believe the future lies in dozens of Respect canidates at the next election but rather Respect standing as part of a new progressive socialist coalition if this is possible (while retaining the Respect Party name at this early stage).

    I garee with Dave Hill 100% when he states:
    “Finally, I do hope that all of the left, including the CPGB, will come into No2EU and make it a democratic and pluralist organisation. I am including in that people like the Socialist Workers Party and Alliance for Workers’ Liberty – I am totally non-sectarian. I look with great hope to the new anti-capitalist party in France, the Bloco de Esquerda in Portugal and some of the experiences of Die Linke. That’s what I want this to develop into.”

    Its what Respect was formed for!!

    Like

  7. I think it is essential that any working class organisation is democratic and respectful f the rights of tendencies/minorities (whihc is what I assume ‘pluralistic’ means) However to say or agree with “all of the left, including the CPGB, will come into No2EU ” is the wrong way to pose it I think, Neil.

    Why should we come into something? Why not hod open organising meetings to debate the ways forward at campaigning, organisational level, including th epossibilities of standing in elections without setting barriers or preconditions such as agreeing with NO2EU or Respect? That really may be a step forward.

    Like

  8. “Why should we come into something? Why not hod open organising meetings to debate the ways forward at campaigning, organisational level, including th epossibilities of standing in elections without setting barriers or preconditions such as agreeing with NO2EU or Respect? That really may be a step forward.”

    Sounds like a proposal for a talking shop. I think those who want to act together, should act together, and those who wish to do nothing because they are too ‘pure’ should continue to do what they do best … chew the cud. I’m interested in unity in action, not fake ‘unity’ with people who are overtly hostile to left-wing initiatives that fall short of their ‘pure’ standards and end up supporting New Labour against them.

    (I note that this latter category now includes the CPGB/Weekly Worker, who in a significant shift to the right from their previous politics since 1981, appear to have now effectively endorsed Gordon Brown’s party in the European Elections.)

    This is a completely different issue from the right of tendencies and factions to exist within a left-wing project. The two issues should not be confused. Freedom of association also means the freedom to dissociate, as well as to associate, as I pointed out in an earlier discussion. Those who are fundamentally hostile to a political project have no right to expect representation on the bodies that direct its activity.

    Like

  9. I’m not proposing a talking shop at all- rather a series of meetings to plan definite actions and explore the possibilitiy of others.

    What I am saying is that those who propose ‘joining us’ or support for Respect or withdrawal from the EU as preconditions are acting as if they are not really interested in reviving working class struggle

    Like

  10. But Jason, don’t you think you would have more influence if you joined in the actions that are going on, instead of counterposing these calls for meetings to discuss ‘actions’ while others are actually carrying out real actions?

    An example of your wrong reasoning is your point on the EU. This issue, of withdrawal from the EU, was raised at a CPB public meeting in London a couple of weeks ago, and Rob Griffiths publicly stated that No2EU does not have a position on withdrawal from the EU one way or another. Its focus was rather on the Lisbon treaty, which enshrines privatisation in the very constitution of the EU.

    Now Rob Griffith’s politics are not the same as mine, but …. he is certainly well placed to know what No2EU’s positions are.

    It does say something about the last-minute nature of No2EU, that it came up with a registered party name that causes a degree of confusion, but on the other hand a little investigation and engagement might reveal that things are not quite as cut-and-dried as you imagine.

    Like

  11. It is as you say last-minute and ambiguous. I’m not arguing that things are cut and dried or that everything about NO2EU is negative.

    There are positives:

    Involvement of some trade unionists and campaigners with a proven track record;
    Putting the idea of standing against Labour from the left into some form of practice however hastily convened;

    However, there are also negatives:

    Most of all the lack of democracy, accountability and organic roots in/links to working class communities/trade unions

    Strongly implying that the EU is the main problem not class rule;
    Ambiguity at best and at least sometimes seeming hostility on the issue of foreign workers;

    Rob Griffiths may know the official party line on the EU withdrawal but it doesn’t mean much when the election broadcast made several comments arguing against the EU including Bob Crow saying it’s an issue of ‘sovereignty’

    Finally you say we should get involved- with what? Bill went to the public meeting of NO2EU where there only a few others. But we will continue to get involved in debates but as for
    ‘actually carrying out real actions’

    is this meant to imply we don’t? My activism has been lower recently, mainly confined to attending a few union meetings and one migrant workers’ conference, due to having recently adopted a son but members of PR including Bill and many others have been involved in:
    supporting the parent-led occupation of a Lewisham primary school
    antifascist leafleting
    campaigning on Palestine

    We are all for getting involved in real actions of the class, promoting them, organising them and from that base debating concrete ways forward

    Nothing in the class struggle is ‘cut and dried’ but the idea that to advance class struggle you proclaim ‘join us’ rather than engage in open debate and joint action is, or should be, over

    Like

  12. “Nothing in the class struggle is ‘cut and dried’ but the idea that to advance class struggle you proclaim ‘join us’ rather than engage in open debate and joint action is, or should be, over.”

    Well, it is possible to do both at the same time. I.e. by involving yourself in working to build an initiative like this, you actually gain a hearing among those who support it and have a chance of influencing their future political direction.

    But if you rubbish it, and even go so far as to call on the public to vote for New Labour against it, then no chance.

    Like

  13. But what is “an intitiative like this”? One where program is delcared from on high in a hastily assembled campaign concocted beind closed doors. Well, no thanks.

    We spent several years building the Socialist Alliance which was closed down and a couple of years in the Campaign for a New Workers’ Party which didn’t get very far. However, I am still very much in favour of workers’ primaries, connecting variuous campaigns of direct action, and even of fielding workers’ candidates in elections where this supports wider struggle.

    Like

  14. And indeed the Convention of the Left who are having meetings in Liverpool and brighton this coming September.

    Perhaps it would be useful to involve the Convention steering committee, Respect, NO2EU, CNWP and any local initiatives as well as working class campaigns and rank and file trade union bodies in discussing how to take forward the fight for workers’ control and rebuilding the wrokers’ movement whilst sharing practical tips and lessons from e.g. Visteon dispute, the Lindsey dispute, claimate change direct action and the occupations against school closures

    Like

  15. Jason, my memory might be getting a little rusty but by the time the SA got ‘closed down’ hadn’t WP already flounced out in a huff about something or other?

    Like

  16. I wasn’t in the country at the time but I’m pretty sure from what people have told me that there was a conference where the Socialist Alliance that many of us worked hard to build was dissolved.

    Workers Power I beleive had left- premataturely in my opinion, even though I think there were many god activists in Workers Power and much politics that was good nevertheless I think definite political mistakes were made.

    That’s in the past- but looking ot the future I think we should have the sort of meeting I suggest above to explore ways forward.

    Like

  17. WP left the Socialist Alliance once it was confirmed that the SWP and Socialist Resistance were having secret negotiations with Galloway to dissolve the alliance and set up a new rotten bloc, and that there would be precisely zero attention paid to those of us who either opposed the move or who wanted the negotiations to be more open.

    Probably we made mistakes, but to have stayed in for those last few weeks before Respect was announced would have achieved zilch. Hanging on to some form of activity when there is no chance of having any effect is a mistake the left is far too prone to.

    Like

  18. If some in the Socialist Alliance had not fought like mad to keep the Alliance for Workers Liberty represented on the SA NC despite its open approval of the Daily Telegraph libel/witchhunt against Galloway, it is quite concievable that the SA could have remained intact and been a major player in the formation of Respect.

    This criticism is mainly directed at the CPGB (I was a member at the time, and this issue played an important role in my susbsequently leaving them), but I have a dim recollection that they also enlisted WP support also for their campaign to keep Martin Thomas on the SA NC slate.

    (Parentitically, and ironically, it was the SWP’s slate system that meant it was well nigh impossible to vote Thomas off the SA NC for his class treachery – once they had been politically blackmailed by Marcus Strom into keeping him on the slate).

    An alliance with Galloway was entirely correct and principled – indeed in my view obligatory – but politically impossible with these reactionaries represented on the SA NC. Once Martin Thomas was confirmed on the SA NC for another year, the SA was objectively a dead duck in terms of being the locus of a wider political intiative vis-a-vis the antiwar movement.

    Like

  19. […] See also the interview I did (Hill, 2009b) with Weekly Worker, online at the Respect blogspot, Interview with Dave Hill who tops the No2EU list in the South East at http://respectuk.blogspot.com/2009/05/interview-with-dave-hill-tops-no2eu.html. The main […]

    Like

Leave a reply to Neil Williams Cancel reply

Trending