Thanks to Mike for this from The Lancashire Evening Post.

By David Coates

The daughter of a former Preston MP is to stand against Mark Hendrick at the next general election.Valerie Wise is to stand against MP Mark Hendrick

Valerie Wise, whose mother Audrey represented the city in Parliament for 13 years until her death in 2000, has said she is “appalled” at revelations over Mr Hendrick’s expenses claims.

She has announced she will stand as an independent in the Westminster elections, which will be held next year.
Mr Hendrick has paid back £6,850.52 of taxpayers’ cash he received on his second home allowance for a mortgage covering both his homes in Fulwood and London and claimed £1,500 for a new bed after arguing it stopped him “aching in the morning”.

Mrs Wise, a former leader of Preston Council and the director of the city’s women’s refuge, said she intends to stand as an independent candidate at the next election, which must be held by next year, promising to “give people an alternative”.

She said: “I want a return to honest politics and give the people of Preston a real choice; they feel betrayed by all the major parties.
“I have not jumped straight in because I wanted to wait and see what Mr Hendrick’s situation was. I have given it a lot of thought and now I feel the time is right to do this.

“We have the people running the country and those who want to run it showing us they are incapable of doing the simplest things.

“I want to be the sort of MP who stands up for ordinary people in Preston.”

She said she will call a meeting in the next week to gather support from local political activists.

Mrs Wise worked for her mother during her time in Parliament, including filing her expenses claims, and said she would have been “utterly appalled” at the revelations currently coming out of the House of Commons.

She said: “She never flipped her home, she had a home in London but Preston was always her first home, and the idea our MP is claiming up to £300-a-month for food is just outrageous.

“That is more than a lot of people in this city have to live on for a month. It should be his responsibility, it is too easy to just blame his staff.

“The buck stops with him and the fact he has paid this money back shows he knows he has done wrong. If someone living in a normal home in Preston overclaimed benefits they would come down on them like a tonne of bricks.”

Carl Crompton, chairman of the constituency Labour party in Preston, said he believed Mrs Wise’s candidacy was “just settling old scores” after she missed out on being selected as the party’s candidate to Mr Hendrick in 2000.

Mrs Wise quit the Labour party in 2006 over the war in Iraq.

Coun Crompton said: “As far as I can see Mark has done everything within the rules and been up front with us as a party. Obviously, if it turns out he has not been completely truthful with us then our view may change.

“At the moment the party is quite happy with Mark as our MP.”

Audrey Wise, a staunch defender of women’s rights who often rebelled against the Government, died at the age of 65 in September 2000 after a battle with a brain tumour.

Coun John Collins, leader of the Labour group on Preston Council, said: “Mark Hendrick has opened up his finances for us to look at and it’s unfortunate that errors have occurred.”

Mr Hendrick said: “I do not want to comment on Valerie Wise – no comment.”

21 responses to “Valerie Wise to challenge Labour MP Hendrick”

  1. Is Valerie standing as a Respect candidate?

    Like

  2. Let’s hope she can get the backing of local activists.

    Like

  3. Prinkipo Exile Avatar
    Prinkipo Exile

    She will. And this is not just another a protest vote. We will be fighting to win the seat and wrest it from New Labour.

    Like

  4. Neil Williams Avatar
    Neil Williams

    Respect should be supporting Socialists like Valerie Wise and Dai Davis (in South Wales) and some sitting Labour MP’s such as Jeremy Corbyn in the next election. Better still to support them and our own Respect candidates under a progressive Socialist umbrella group if this is possible.

    What happens in the next twelve months could influence events for decades to come – we need to step up to the challange and not think that Respect on its own has all the answers (we dont!) or that Respect should go it alone in dozens of areas whilst possibly making only a minumum attempts to talk to others (if any at all) – lets get out there after Thurday Euro election and do the talking with other on the Left and Make History happen! But will we?

    Like

  5. Neil: what makes you think Respect has not been talking to Dai Davis and Val Wise? If you stopped polarising matters artificially for a few minutes you might stoop to realise that others in Respect are way ahead of you. You’re ill informed and monotonous whingeing is becoming rather irritating. And others should be aware that your views are simply yours, and don’t reflect at all what Respect is doing.

    Why don’t you listen to people like Prinkipo Exile rather than lecture from a zero evidence base?

    Sorry to be so harsh, Neil. But you really ought to speak to people in Respect before giving the impression that they are not thinking matters through.

    Like

  6. Neil Williams Avatar
    Neil Williams

    “Neil: what makes you think Respect has not been talking to Dai Davis and Val Wise?”

    Very stange I was at the last National Coucil and not a word mentioned (and I have brought the subject of Dai Davis up more than once in informal discusion at the NC over the last 18 months) – must be very secret discusions then, so much so that the NC cant be told?

    Perhaps if the Respect Executive Commitee ever met (it has not since conference) a little more information could be be given to our rank and file members?

    Nas – the fantasy world on some members of the Respect NC who believe we can put up dozens of candidates in the next election when we have a falling membership of 350 beggers belief.

    Sorry to be so harsh Nas. But your really ought to speak to more members in other parts of the UK.

    Like

  7. Kevin Ovenden Avatar
    Kevin Ovenden

    Neil

    I too was at the last National Council and we had a discussion – including you specifically – at the start of the meeting about, inter alia, our cordial relations with Dai Davies.

    As for a falling membership – you were also present when it was reported that 45 people had joined in the last two weeks, without there being at that point any major push on recruitment.

    I think you’d be better off not claiming there are gulfs of difference when there are not. Similarly, a discussion based on fact about Respect is very welcome. One based on misrepresentation is not.

    Like

  8. Neil Williams Avatar
    Neil Williams

    “Similarly, a discussion based on fact about Respect is very welcome. One based on misrepresentation is not.”

    Agreed.

    Like

  9. As for a falling membership – you were also present when it was reported that 45 people had joined in the last two weeks, without there being at that point any major push on recruitment.
    Similarly, a discussion based on fact about Respect is very welcome.

    So what is the current membership of Respect(minority)? Bigger or smaller than the membership of the SWP?

    Like

  10. Could you want a better example of sect mentality? Never mind the quality feel the width.

    Like

  11. bill j – do you want to be a little more precise about what you’re talking about? If you’re denigrating my desire to get a straight answer about Respect(minority)’s membership figure, it seems it is crucial to answering the question of whether their coup in Respect(classic) had any democratic legitimacy.[Incidentally I’ve been thinking back to my question a while ago about what justification there was to the seizure of the name by the Renewalists, and the answer of little black sister that it was their claimed wider support that justified the coup. That is the same argument that the right in the Labour Party used to take power away from GMCs towards a one-member one-vote position. On second thoughts they were probably more democratic than her lot].

    If it is me you’re complaining about, why the obsession? If someone else, my apologies.

    Like

  12. Its a common trait on the left to measure their “success” by how many members they “recruit”.
    What they actually mean by that is not the success of their ideas, the influence they command within the trade union movement, their ability to actually shape events, but how many gullible individuals they can boss around.
    Hence your concern, that in my opinion is an expression of a sect mentality. Although safe to say its one shared by Kevin Ovenden who discusses the question in exactly the same terms.
    But two wrongs don’t make it right.

    Like

  13. I can’t recall anyone fooled into joining the SWP, so I don’t understand your use of the term “gullible”.If there was no benefit in left organisations, there would be no point to their existence. Possibly there are times when some organisations are more concerned with numbers on paper than with agreement, and there are times when I think that heavy-handed recruitment is a mistake, and it might be more productive to let potential recruits make up their own mind. Sometimes I think that there’s no harm in asking repeatedly, and many people need a push to join.

    Can you not understand my point that the question of how big Respect(Rump) is is a legitmate question of the legitmacy of their takeover of the name and the organisation?

    I note that Kevin Ovenden doesn’t directly dispute Neil Williams’ figure, he just implies that it is irrelevant because 45 people have supposedly joined. Whether those names on paper are of the same calibre and level of activity as those who are leaving is extremely doubtful. I’m still hoping one day that when he accuses me of telling porkies and then is shown to be wrong he’ll apologise, but then I’m an optimist.

    Like

  14. I think Bill is right in one sense- that we should try to avoid the tendency to judge everyting in terms of numbers.

    For example if we are involved in a campaign e.g. to prevent a factory closure or prevent a deportation or stop a war then as revolutionaries we argue for the necessary tactics to achieve those aims. Even if nobody joins the organisation that is secondary to winning the campaign, winning also the idea that struggle leads to tangible succcesses, rebuilding the working class movement.

    Of course in the longer term it is precisely atht attitutde that will rebuild the left and win workers to revolution- the idea that ordinary working class people should rn our own lives rather than be dictated to by a tiny elite of corrupt murderers and their lackeys.

    Having said that I think there is no reason to be secretive about numbers on the left- the fact that the far left number scarcely more than 3000 if that is an indication of how marginal we have become.

    But what is needed primariuly is to revuild the fighting capacity of the working class and campaign open for revolutionary socialist ideas – someting presumably Kevin, Neil and skidmarx would agree on.

    Like

  15. Really? People aren’t fooled into joining the SWP? You’ve never seen it? I don’t even think you’re fooling yourself.
    But I wasn’t making a point about the SWP in particular in my experience this modus operandi applies to all the organisations on the far left.
    Essentially they are run for the benefit of a small clique of full time “revolutionaries”. These people control them tightly and yes order everyone about who is a member. That’s their pleasure. Its what they live for. And the reason why these organisations exist.
    Hence the emphasis on “recruitment”. The more “members” there are to be ordered about, the better these people feel.
    It also explains the marginalisation of the far left to a significant degree.

    Like

  16. If we were to play the numbers game then we might as well judge our prospects by comparing ourselves to churches or football supporters’ clubs. Bragging about size is best left to the playground.

    It’s what you do with the numbers that is important. The LCR had a membership broadly comparable to that of the SWP, albeit in a much more favourable national situation. It has transformed that quantity into quality through a distinctively pluralistic method which means that the NPA is likely to emerge as a nationally significant force.

    Like

  17. Of course, Liam. I think it ois not at all about recruitment or playing the numbers game but about revbuilding the working class movement through for example establishing networks of rank and file activists in the unions, links with community cmapigns, building socialist forums etc.

    However, there is no reason not to be completely open about numbers in the groups. We should have nothing to hide and be completely honest- not project some kind of hyper optimism based on euphoria which is merely a variant of the sterile old formula of join us the rest are crap that used to plague the left and has certainly palyed a role in leaving us almost completely marginalised.

    Like

  18. billj – No I haven’t. Do you know anyone who thought they were joining the Pony Club and unexpectedly found themselves in TrotWorld?[Use of “Pony Club” only to enable trotpun. Have never been near one personally]. I did always find a fairly high degree of agreement in the SWP, but the picture of people who are relatively independent of the prevailing ideas in society submitting themselves to everything John Rees says just because he says it is not a picture I recognise.

    LIam – To restate, I think the question of numbers is an important factor in judging the legitmacy of the coup in Respect. And as Jason is saying (I’ll try not to misquote too much) if you can’t be honest about the numbers believing your reach exceeds your grasp is the result.

    Like

  19. Yes I know a fair few. Most of the left is made up of people who once joined the SWP because they thought they were joining a revolutionary socialist organisation and then after a bit found out it had nothing to do with socialism – rigidly hierarchical, unthinking, staffed by bossy, very full of themselves full timers.
    That isn’t a situation that’s unique to the SWP btw, as I said its a pov shared by pretty much the whole left including everyone who’s obsessed by “members”. I suppose its just that cos you’re the biggest its perhaps clearest in your case.

    Like

  20. I report on this on my local Preston blog “River’s Stream”: http://www.blogstoday.co.uk/bloghome.aspx?username=River

    Like

Leave a reply to Jason Cancel reply

Trending