This very good interview with Bob Crow by Simon Hattenstone is in today’s Guardian.

‘Ere’s a classic,” says Bob Crow, aka Big Bad Bob, aka the Crowbar, aka the Most Hated Man in London. The general secretary of the Rail Maritime and Transport Workers union is providing a guided tour of his office, just a spit and a cough from two great London tube landmarks, Euston and King’s Cross. There’s the bust of Lenin (his bust of Marx was nicked by a Marxist thief), tributes to Che and Fidel, boxing gloves from Alan Minter, painted plates in honour of striking miners and those who fought fascism at Cable Street in the 1930s, a photo of his 15-year-old daughter, Tanya, model trains, gold-braid union sashes presented to branch officials in the 1920s, and a brick from the house of Jim Connell, who wrote The Red Flag, inscribed with its opening verse “The people’s flag is deepest red/ It shrouded oft our martyred dead”.

Crow has stopped at a cartoon that appeared in the London Evening Standard, and shows a tube map drawn along new lines. “Absolute classic, this one. Look, you got the Militant Line, the Far Left Line, Bolshy Line, Greedy Fat Bastards Line, the Blackmail Line. Hahahaha! Brilliant!”

In a week when BA employees were asked to work for nothing and 900 workers at the Lindsey oil refinery in Lincolnshire were sacked for unofficial strike action, Crow looms larger than ever – as Scargill redux, an old-fashioned trade union tyrant, or a workers’ hero, depending on your perspective, and how keen you are to get into work on time.

Last week Crow almost brought London to a stop. Again. Two days’ strike action cost the economy an estimated £100m. London’s mayor, Boris Johnson, called him “demented” and throughout his tenure has refused to talk to him. The Sun newspaper sent a red double-decker bus round to his house to block his way to work, and give the public the chance to berate him. His enemies say he is a bully who regularly holds London to ransom. So do some of his friends.

Crow’s RMT is widely regarded as a militant sore. No wonder. His successes are undeniable – in the seven years he has led the union, membership has increased (from 50,000 to over 80,000) almost as fast as workers’ salaries. He even managed to get Network Rail to reintroduce a final salary pension scheme.

This week he’s been in talks with the tube bosses. Next week he’ll be in intensive talks. Yes, of course, he hopes to reach a settlement. No, of course, he’s not ruling out further action. He insists that the dispute has been misreported. The RMT did not demand 5% – its claim was for “inflation plus” when inflation was 4%. The dispute is primarily about protecting a no-compulsory redundancy scheme; Crow believes 4,000 of the tube’s 22,000 jobs are at risk.

What would he say if his members were asked to work for nothing? “Am I allowed to swear? I’d tell them to fuck off. Over the last two years, BA made around £900m profit one year and £500m the other. It’s an absolute scandal.”

To an extent Crow is a victim of his own success. The public seems to have little support for tube workers because they think they are already well rewarded. Is it true that drivers earn a basic £40,000? He looks at me, wide-eyed, as if he can’t quite believe the question. “Yeah! But we’ve got people on far more than that. Technical officers and signal workers are on £54,000. Basic. For a flat week. All pensionable.”

It’s a jungle out there

Blimey, I say. He gives me another look. “When I see Ronaldo earns half a million quid a month and he gets a signing on fee of £8m, and people say train drivers are greedy working nine hours downstairs in them kind of temperatures all day long. Nah. I think it’s the rate for the job. The reality is it’s a jungle out there.”

Crow, who earns £80,000, is sitting in his huge leather armchair. If the Sopranos was remade in Britain you could do worse than cast him as Tony – shaved bullet head, huge arms, the hard man’s splayed legs, a scarily soft handshake. Around his neck he wears a golden pair of boxing gloves. His summer shirt is loose and baggy, his trousers casual, and his sneakers carefully colour co-ordinated – a distinctive kind of dapper. Somehow you know he’s going to be a Millwall football fan.

Crow is a keen sportsman. He works out six days a week, and still plays five-a-side. When I ask who his sporting hero is, he instantly points to a framed picture of Millwall legend Terry Hurlock. “He’s a friend of mine. Absolute hero. He was a very, very hard player, but a very, very intelligent player.” As a footballer, has Crow got more of Hurlock’s hardness or intelligence? “Oh, his hardness. Imagine a stick of rock, and it says ‘Blackpool for ever’, well he had Millwall right the way through him.” Cut Crow in half and you’d probably find “No Surrender”.

When England played Andorra last week the tubes were on strike. One banner at Wembley read “Bob Crow is a ******”. Did he see it? “Oh yeah, it had six digits in it. Someone said to me it meant Bob crow is Golden.” He grins. “I understand that Fabio Capello wrote a letter to the bus workers, praising them for the extra workers they put on for the strike. I had a lot of time for Fab until then, but he actually supported strike breakers so he’s not one of my favourites no more. I shall remind the Italian trade union movement when I meet them of what he done.”

What’s it like to be known as the most hated man in London? Crow, normally a motormouth, pauses. “Well, number one, if anybody says it is nice to be known as hated, they’re lying.” He pauses again. “But I’m not hated. They’re lying. I’m not the most hated. I tell you what, I’ve been travelling around on the trains, and I don’t get no aggro at all.”

Perhaps people are scared of you? “No, people actually come up to me and say, ‘Why are the trains running late Bob,’ and I say to them ‘I’m not responsible for running the trains. I wish I was, but I’m not.’”

The Times ran an editorial stating that Crow was class obsessed, and he says for once it was correct. “Yeah, spot on. Dead right they was on that. I am obsessed with workers. I’m not obsessed with bosses – I don’t represent them.”

Crow,
48, was born in Shadwell, east London, and his family moved to Hainault on the London/Essex border when he was an infant. His father was a docker; trade unionism was the norm in his family. He left school at 16, working for London Underground as a track repairer. A spat with his gang leader at 19 politicised him. He felt he was being picked on, went to his branch meeting to complain, and that was that. He joined the branch committee, was sent to trade union school to swot up, and fell in love with the movement. In 1983 he became local representative of the National Union of Railwaymen (NUR) and began a four-year fling with the Communist party. In 1990 the NUR merged with the National Union of Seamen to form the RMT, and in 2002 he was elected by the membership to succeed Jimmy Knapp as general secretary. He says he adores his job.

Even when the mayor of London calls him demented? He laughs, and tells me he was recently interviewed on Channel 4 news and Johnson was on a video link-up – when the mayor was told Crow was in the studio he said it was a set-up, and left. “He walked away with all these wires hanging from him. He looked like Frankenstein! Hahahaha!”

Ken Livingstone claims that the current dispute would not have happened if he was still mayor. Crow says it’s true that Livingstone did support the RMT’s no-compulsory deal, but he thinks the former mayor’s memory is rose-tinted. After all, it’s not long since the two fell out publicly. “He told people to cross picket lines. Maybe the job had gone to his head, and he thought, I’m mayor and I’ve got to give my principles up.”

How did he feel when Livingstone accused him of running a protection racket in 2007? He looks surprised. “I never heard that. I heard him say we were acting like gangsters.” Would he prefer to be protection racketeer or gangster? “That’s a good one, innit. Would you rather be hanged or stabbed to death? No, none of them really. What we want to be known as is a trade union that’s trying to defend its members. Every time we’ve taken action we’ve had a ballot and respected our members wishes.”

Crow’s politics are fascinating. He is an internationalist who recently stood in the European elections on an anti-EU ticket as part of a trade union coalition. As far as he’s concerned, the EU is a capitalist conspiracy to bring wage rates down. Does that mean at heart he is a little Englander? Christ no, he says. He doesn’t care where his workers come from so long as they’re being paid a fair rate. “People think we’re wrapping ourselves up in the union jack, but I have got more in common with a Chinese labourer than I have with Sir Fred Goodwin. I’m anti-EU, but I’m pro-European. Real European support for me means when French dockers take action in Calais, we back it.”

Does he agree with the Gordon Brown line, “British Jobs for British workers”? “No. And it didn’t work did it? The vote collapsed. Labour’s vote collapsed in the election, and it was all built up with scapegoat-ism. British jobs for British workers is just bullshit. Absolute bullshit.”

The night Labour won the general election in 1997, he drank a can of beer every time a member of the Tory cabinet lost a seat. How much did he drink that night? “Quite a lot. Nobody cheered more than me that night.” What is the Labour legacy 12 years on? “It’s left us with the BNP, that’s what it’s left us with.”

But Crow has never been a pessimist. He believes that now is the time for the big battle of ideas, and the left is on the march again. It doesn’t feel like that, I protest – bankers are bailed out by the government, while the rest of us suffer. Ach, that’s just capital’s dance of death, he says. “Joe Slovo, the great South African communist leader, said the Soviet Union may have failed with communism, but capitalism has failed mankind. I think that’s what it’s all about. People are going to say this system ain’t working, it’s not providing me with jobs, it’s not providing me with homes, it’s breaking down socially, it leads to wars.”

I ask him why nothing seems to scare him. He reaches into a cupboard and brings out his father’s war record. “Three medals he got. He was a PE instructor in the army. He went all over the world. He was unemployed in 1939, God’s honest truth, and war broke out and my dad said to my grandad, ‘I’m not signing up for the army, Hitler can come over here as far as I’m concerned, I ain’t got a job, I ain’t got a house, why should I fight for this country, I’ve got nothing to fight for,’ and my granddad, who was a Fusilier, said: ‘You’re going in the army,’ took him down, and signed him up. He didn’t want to come out in the end. He loved it.

They don’t frighten me

“The war changed people. My dad told me when they came back from the war they were going to have what they didn’t have before. They weren’t frightened no more. These people had just fought fascism and beat it. A miner from Wales had just built a national health service! A miner! So I ain’t frightened of these people now. Someone puts up a sign at a football match about Bob Crow, they don’t frighten me. From a bankrupt country they rebuilt Britain after a war and you’re telling me these people now are going to put up with 3.5 million to 4 million people on the dole with no prospects. These kids aren’t going to have it.”

Crow lives in Essex with his partner Nicola Hoarau who runs the RMT’s credit union – there were accusations of cronyims when she was appointed, but Crow says it was all kosher, and she was the only applicant. Between them, they have four children and assorted animals. “The dog is called Castro. The cat is Candy. I couldn’t get away with naming it after a political hero, and the fish has got no name. Goldfish, won it at a circus, 17 years of age.” A 17-year-old goldfish? “Yeah, I won it by throwing a dart at a board.” If you told your members you had a 17-year-old goldfish, they’d never believe another word you said, I say. He laughs. “It’s true. Totally true. Unbelievable fish he is. Incredible little fish. Fish with no name.”

Does he still think of himself as a communist? “Oh yeah. Absolutely, yeah. Communist stroke socialist, yeah.” How would he define that? “I’d say it was based on a society of people’s needs. For example, I still can’t understand how in a world that produces enough food to feed the world twice over every day, a third of the world is going to bed hungry every night. How can capitalism be working? I can’t accept that 50% of the world are working for $2 a day and I can’t accept that 10% of workers are working for a dollar a day.”

Would it scare his members to know their leader was a communist. “Nah,” he says with utter certainty. “If I were a worker and my trade union leader was a communist and he was getting me good pay rises, bring on more communists.”

44 responses to “Bob Crow – "British jobs for British workers is just bullsh##t"”

  1. Odd how people always moan about Bob Crow when there are strikes on the railways. Do they think he forces workers to withdraw their labour?

    It’s nice to know that there’s a fearless union leader in this country, most of the rest of them seem more scared of the employers and the anti-union laws.

    Like

  2. this article is absolutely brilliant!!!!

    Like

  3. The things that lept out in this interview for me were:

    1) He managed to increase the union membership.
    2) He managed to get Network Rail to reintroduce a final salary pension scheme.
    3) He’s proud of the fact that technical officers and signal workers are on £54,000. Basic. For a flat week. All pensionable.

    This is incredibly impressive. Oh and he would have told British Airways to f*** off when they proposed working for free.

    Like

  4. 4) A trade union leader who appears entirely disinterested in alliances with those who use the services his members provide, his natural allies if such an effort was made.

    Mark P

    Like

  5. Mark P really doesn’t like Bob Crow at all, does he?

    Like

  6. 5) A trade union leader who lead his own electoral vanity project’s list in London, managing to achieve the not insignificant target of a lower vote than the hapless Lindsay German in the previous year’s mayoral election. An achievement of no obvious worth to his union’s rank and file members who were singularly uninvolved in the vanity project but who will nevertheless be expected to pay for it’s not inconsiderable costs.

    Mark P

    Like

  7. Just the kind of attack I have spent years defending George Galloway against. Funny how the more things change, the more they stay the same….

    Like

  8. As far as I’m aware George is not a leader of a trade union which has resolutely refused ti build any kind of alliance with user groups, the union’s natural allies.

    Nor has George run an election campaign celebrated by others as representing a major step forward in working class politics whilst neither involving in any significant way the union’s membership in the campaign nor attracting any more than 1% of the vote, and in London less than the hapless Lindsey German’s candidature for Mayor.

    Don’t worry if George committed either of those gross errors I would be the first to criticise. But he hasn’t, Bob Crow has. That section of the left’s desperate inability to tell honest truths about their allies does neither them nor their allies is one of their least attractive qualities. It also explains their headlong rush into the jaws of defeat. Good luck on that road Ian, you’re going to need it.

    Mark P

    Like

  9. You really are a great ‘non-sectarian’ advert for Respect, aren’t you?

    Like

  10. Being non-sectarian has nothing to do with hiding the truth.

    In the excellent Guardian interview Bob Crow proudly claims 80,000 members for the RMT. To achieve that level of membership growth is to be applauded, its a magnificent achievement.

    So what % of RMT members were involved in the union backed No2EU campaign which apparently represented such a significant step forward in a trade union based new workers party. 10% would have generated a level of activism no other party could have matched. 1% would have created easily the most active campaign outside of the mainstream parties. In London even 0.1% would have dwarfed the earnest efforts of Southwark Respect in South London.

    Yet the involvement was nothing like even this! And what % of RMT members even voted for No2EU which their union had expensively bankrolled. The voting figures suggest nothing even approaching a small minority otherwise they would surely have done considrrably better than that 1%, in London in particular where there is high RMT membership and Bob Crow topped the list.

    So perhaps before Bob moans about the lack of media coverage in a double page spread in The Guardian, and Ian makes those grand claims about the bold beginnings of a new workers party maybe these home truths could be addressed . This is of course has nothing to do with sectarianism, and all to do with politics.

    Mark P

    Like

  11. Mark P is simply hostile to the labour movement. That’s what this is all about.

    Like

  12. Absolute rubbish. Answer the points. The fact is you can’t.

    The RMT rank and file membership turned their back on No2EU in overwhelming numbers, most didn’t even bother voting for Bob Crow in London. They like him because he wins disputes for his members, for which he should be congratulated. Though he has gone out of his way to chuck away every opportunity provided to establish any kind of alliance with users who poll after poll have shown support the renationalisation of the railways and oppose the PFI on the underground.

    Now you might not like any of these self-evident facts but don’t pretend by not pointing them out you are somehow helping the labour movement.

    Honesty even when it hurts should be the first principle of politics. That is what this is all about.

    Mark P

    Mark P

    Like

  13. The equation of No2EU with the SWP’s Left List is disgusting. That was a sectarian wrecking operation against Respect.

    No2EU was an attempt, at pretty short notice, to deal with the disturbing possiblity of BNP exploitation of the recession and EU neo-liberal measures, and the lack of any working class political input in the elections, in the context of the Lindsay strike and some of the distubing froth around that.

    A flawed, but positive forward step by the leadership of the most militant trade union in the country, and Mark P pours hatred and derision on it as if it were some kind of silly sectarian stunt by the likes of the SWP. It might have had very modest results, but it lays the basis for future political ventures by the RMT and other unions in the future.

    Some of the very early candidates of what became the Labour Party also got low votes initially. THey were still positive political moves by workers organisations, as was No2EU.

    (ABUSE DELETED – Liam)

    Like

  14. It might help if you addressed the facts.

    It is claimed by yourself and co-thinkers plus its backers in CPB, SP etc that No2EU represents a significant step forward in working class politics. This is justified by the involvement of a militant trade union. It is therefore entirely justifiable to ask for evidence of that involvement beyond bankrolling it and delegation of full time officials. I have suggested less than 0.1% of the RMT’s 80,000 members were involved and only a small minority even voted for No2EU. You decide not to refute this . That to me indicates a total disinterest in what wuld actually constitute genuine trade union backing for an initiative you claim rooted in working class politics.

    As for the hapless Lindsey German, the comparison made was with the votes achieved in London unless you have access to some mysteriously unpublished voting returns you will find No2EU did slightly worse even than Lindsey German’s Left list. Ig that is a significant breakthrough in terms of working class support you’re welcome to it.

    On this sorry basis the new Workers Party is being built, what a prospect to behold.

    Mark P

    Like

  15. Mark P – Is not the electorate in London a quite big user group?

    Like

  16. I’m sure Bob knows that the No2EU wasn’t an electoral success.

    Like

  17. We’ll know soon whether Bob thinks it was really a success or not, when there is a discussion of what comes afterwards. If No2EU is given a new brand for elections other than the Euros, but the suggestion is that it should continue with the same forces and leadership – then he’ll be acting as if he thought it was a success. If there is an attempt to broaden it, then he’ll be saying to the movement that it wasn’t a succes and something different needs to be done.

    My bet, for what it’s worth, is with the former.

    Like

  18. I shouldn’t have even mentioned the Linsday dispute and the issues posed by it, or anything like that in motivating this initiative because such questions are beyond Perryman’s comprehension or empathy. Many things attempted by trade unions in this period are very difficult and may even fall flat several times over before something sticks. But those who are loyal to working class organisations have a duty of solidarity, and to try to improve things, not to spread hatred and derision against people who are genuinely fighting for workers interests.

    (ABUSE DELETED – LIAM)

    Like

  19. I think Mark P’s comments make sense and he makes a number of very valid points which should be born in mind.

    It’s not at all helpful to merely demonise him and dismiss or distort his comments as they are perfectly constructive and a valuable contribution to the crucial ongoing debate on the future of the Left.

    All socialists interested in unity of the Left should be critically and constructively assessing and evaluating what occurred with the RMT,SP and CPGB backed European election initiative just as should the parties involved in it themselves..

    Certainly, a great many lessons need to be learnt from the experience which I personally was non too excited nor impressed with for many of the points outlined by Mark P above.

    Where was the discussion and democratic debate and consultation both within and without the union?

    What of the content and non too enticing or inspiring presentation or content ?

    What can you expect form such a hurriedly cobbled together bundle of stuff in such a short time? in terms of poor voting support with poor name recogntion, nevermind lacking credibiltiy, as the SWP too have previously found out to their cost with the Left List aside from other competing Left parties.

    However, Bob Crow’s subsequent comments following the very shortlived experiment was to make a genuine and sincere call for Left unity ,within the Labour and trade union movement,of all Left organisations and parties (as understood it) to urgently get together in discussion and it is this that we should be working towards and advancing positive ideas and suggestions on the basis of the lessons learnt from the all previous failed and ongoing live Left unity initiative’s because we can only sort this out together and we have seriously to get this sorted and what’s more get it right !!!!!!!!!!!.

    It’s a shame that there was very little or no reference to Left unity in the otherwise interesting article.

    Like

  20. “All socialists interested in unity of the Left should be critically and constructively assessing and evaluating what occurred with the RMT,SP and CPGB backed European election initiative just as should the parties involved in it themselves..”

    I’ve got no problem with constructive debate and criticism.
    I do have a problem with spreading hatred and derision against a political initiative of a workers organisation. If anyone is trying to ‘demonise’ anyone, it is Mark P, trying to demonise anyone who is in favour of working-class politics.

    Like

  21. ID. There is no hatred or derision rather a serious questioning of your pumped up claims to No2EU being a credible vehicle of working class politics.

    Almost the entirety of this claim is based on the RMT’s involvement.

    So without any hatred or derision why is it so unaccpateble to point out that while Bob Crow claims impressive increases in RMT membership to 80,000 less than 1%, far less in fact, of RMT members were involved with No2EU. And only a small minority even voted for it., including in London were Bob Crow was the lead candidate.

    That seems to me an entirely legitimate question for those who would denounce others in cartoon terms of ‘we ‘re working class politics you’re not’ without any basis in reality of organisation or votes.

    Mark P

    Like

  22. Same old nonsense. Ho hum.

    Like

  23. ID. Why are you using such heated and inflamatory language such as “spreading hate and derision” in respect to what Mark P has written.

    Sure you have a right to express yourself as you see fit but such unnecessary use of angry language merely serves to discredit what you are saying and debase the level of actual discussion and debate on this blog or brings it to a quick close or are you not interested in intelligent discussion and debate?.

    If there is a difference of opinion then lets hear the difference, let’s debate the difference in reasonable tones, let’s tolerate the difference instead of simply slamming into someone and demonsiing who they are and what they say.Socialists and people on the Left do themslves no credit whatsoever by acting in such an antagonistic way.

    Like

  24. Same old refusal to explain how the RMT backing an electoral initiative while convincing less than 1% of its members to get involved in it, only a small minority of its members to vote for it in any meaningful sense represents a move towards a trade-union backed workers party, or 1% of the total vote representing working class politics.

    Ho hum.

    Mark P

    Like

  25. I think you can make some legitimate criticisms of no2eu- primarily on the basis that it didn’t for whatever reason involve a great number of grassroots union activists or other campaigners.

    However, now the election is over and no2eu was only formed for that election Crow, the cnwp, what was no2eu and others have pout forward a call for a socialist alternative and a series of meetings leading up to it.

    In that spirit I think it is more productive to say let’s encourage local meetings, union activists and campaigners etc. to meet, discuss campaigning together and where or whether an election campaign can aid that unity of campaigning.

    Together the left can begin to have an impact on drawing in new militants to the class struggle and making sure that we co-ordinate our efforts as much as possible to make sure that when workers go into battle that they win.

    We are starting from a very bad place but the first task is honesty and when real lessons are genuinely learned it is possible to come back from the most dire situations by admitting that we got it wrong on so many things before (like saying join us or insisting on ultimatums) but that we are prepared to learn, to listen and to put our activism where it is actually needed.

    A prime and current example in class politics in Britain at the moment being support for the Lindsey oil workers.

    Like

  26. Agree with Fleabite. The hyperbole is overblown (by definition).

    Like

  27. Mark P mocks and derides all advocates of working class politics because he supports a non-working class party. But that is only part of the problem.

    Given that Mark P is a small businessman by profession and expresses gut-level, visceral hostility to anything smacking of working class politics of a kind I have heard elsewhere in British society, I see him simply as an spokesperson for hostile class forces. His attitudes and stridency remind me of Tories I have clashed with.

    In that sense, he is rather different from many of the other people in and around Respect or indeed elsewhere on the left who have illusions in the Greens or even Compass, who are of a left-wing disposition despite flaws. I’m not so sure Mark P has much of a left-wing disposition at all. He ‘entered’ Respect as the SWP exited; the well-being of the broad left party project is not his aim or concern in my view.

    Incidentally, I am not attacking him for his profession. As I noted in an earlier posting, Friedrich Engels was a factory owner. My hostile tone is a response to his hostile tone and attitudes, which I consider is a product of his class position and class outlook which seem in my opinion to be in tune with each other, hardened and pretty consciously held.

    That is the reason for the hostile tone, if you wan’t a truthful answer. It’s about class. Terrible thing, class struggle, isn’t it?

    So terrible that the ‘Marxist’ Liam has now decided that to attack someone for their hostile class outlook is outside the rules of debate for Marxists (I kid you not!). Poor old Marx – he would have been out the door pretty quick, I tell you! 😉

    Like

  28. Reflections on sections of the British Left

    The easy tiring and tedious part

    Having been out of the country for the last year working in Venezuela and Bolivia, seeing how well the Latin American Left is and isnt working together,possibly a touch wiser and clearer and coming back to Brown’s cold capitalist imperialist Britain, it’s all too clear to me that one thing large sections of the British Left need to learn, “if it actually is intent and serious about creating some kind of genuine Left unity” ,is to learn to “listen” and learn to discuss matters and issues in a “reasonable” and “democratic” manner and be able to”tolerate differences” instead of continuing to express and explode with so much self righteous misdirected bitterness , vitriol and yes……. hatred which is directed (especially expressed anonymously on Left blogs) at other ,other socialists and people on the Left !!!!!!!!, with whom they simply might not agree and of course,as ever………………………………… this only further deepens the animosity, the sectarian divisions, the endless internal resentments, the festering internal grievances,the mountain of mistrust and a deep deep sense of despair and we get absolutely no where.

    No gain not now not ever .

    Will we ever ever learn?

    It says alot about the overwhelming sense of powerlessness,loss of confidence and a self destructive and unfocussed use of anger.

    The harder but hopefully more constructive and positive part

    Well, if we , the Left,the British Left spent a lot less time on focussing on the seemingly insurmountable political and personal divisions,obstacles and differences between us and far far more time on what we actually have in common,our ideas, our humanity and presumably our interest in active left politics and living socialism and spent far more time in productive, creative and stimulating discussion sharing our ideas,resources and talents about creating realistic and possible radical social change then maybe just…………………………………………………………………. maybe we might find that we can actually move a few positive steps closer to some kind of “Left unity” or even greater understanding of eachother.

    What’s more we might ……………….just might find that we might start to draw in more people and win more people over to socialist ideas and a socialist vision.

    The idea is to grow in numbers and confidence isnt it?

    The choice is ours !

    PS. For want of a better term,’the Left’.

    The use of the term ‘the Left’ can of course mean all manner of all things to all manner of all people.

    PS. The term “Left unity” can of course mean all manner of all things to all people.

    Like

  29. ID. You really are absolutely not to answer the question why less than 1% of RMT members were involved in No2EU and what this says of the significance of its backing aren’t you?

    And in the worst time-honoured fashion you decide to plunge headfirst into gutter politics instead to obscure your unwillingness to answer this perfectly legitimate question. Legitimate because you and others choose to make the RMT’s backing the flag of significance for No2EU.

    Class and politics? Firstly the only party I’m a member of is Respect, so where does that leave my class status? Secondly, the Green candidate I voted for in the Euro elections Jean Lambert, has a voting and campaigning record which would match almost any left representative you could think of, including George Galloway. That is a matter of record, while you seem satisfied with ignoring this and using class as a cartoon straight out of the textbook of Marxism for Dummies.

    You appear to know nothing of my trade union membership nor active support for trade unionism. Questioning the worth of RMT expensive bankrolling for a party only a tiny minority of its members either supported or even voted for has nothing to do with anti-trade unionism.

    Yes I am a small businessperson. Not surprised in your energetic backing for the new Workers Party you want to cast aside the likes of me on the way, what was the percentage of RMT members you persuaded to get involved in No2EU again?

    As for joining Respect. Actually I joined long before the spat with the SWP but I’d let my membership lapse because of the very obvious and destructive SWP control of the organisation. I had no intention of being part of a Far Left sect. When George Galloway, Salma Yaqoob challenged their control I enthusiastically joined.

    Don’t worry if you and your cartoon version of working class politics, you know the one that gets an even lower vote than the hapless Lindsey German, show any signs of taking over Respect I;ll be the first one out the exit door. Thankfully you’re no nearer that than representing the working class so I won’t. Good luck in the new Workers Party mind.

    Mark P

    Like

  30. The tone isn’t about class. Its about not being able to write English.

    Like

  31. Yes I am a small businessperson, so where does that leave my class status?
    Petty-bourgeois I guess, unless by small you’re just talking of your stature.

    Like

  32. ‘Yes I am a small businessperson, so where does that leave my class status?’

    Of course, skidmarx, Mark P doesn’t say that. Distorting what people say is one of the most unattractive parts of so much of the far left.

    As for ID claiming that Mark P running an online T-shirt store means that his criticisms of No2EU and requests for an explanation of its poor vote can be dismissed as an expression of “hostile class forces”, well, it doesn’t get much more toy-town Bolshevik than that.

    What comes next? An explanation of the poor No2EU vote in Southwark that rests on the class antagonism – sometimes hidden sometimes open, you see – between barrister Nick Wrack (self employed professional whose labour power is not sold to a boss, shock horror) and the proletarian electorate, whose class position gave rise to collectivist, WORKERS consciousness, in opposition to the petit bourgeois Wrack.

    Like

  33. If that comrade went around making very strident, mocking attacks on trade unionists who stand in elections and mocking the very idea of a workers party, you might have a point. Since he doesn’t, you don’t.

    Like

  34. ID. You really need to catch up don’t you. The ‘very idea of a workers party’ is founded on attracting significant trade union support. It is in that context your endearing inablity to face the fact that less than 1% of RMT members, a lot less, campaigned for No2EU and only a small minority even voted for it remains, to put it politely, perverse.

    Meanwhile straight out of Marxism for Dummies you’ve appointed yourself withfinder-general on the case of class credibility. Perhaps you know something about my vast wealth, legions of workers, soaring surplus value that I don’t. If you do could you let my accountant know as it sounds like I;m going to need a tax haven.

    But I’m not the important figure in this ‘debate’, just the occasional whipping-boy. The important figure is the less than 1% of RMT members involved in No2EU. Some start to the new Workers Party that.

    Mark P

    Like

  35. Well, on the later point. Time will tell. I welcome all attempts by trade unions at independent political activity and am in favour of encouraging and helping them. Mark P does not.

    Like

  36. Funnily enough I agree with you on that. All the more reason not to hide the message behind a load of bile.

    Like

  37. On the contrary I not only welcome independent political activity by trade unions but a cursory look at the dissenters section on the http://www.philosophyfootball.com website of my small business would reveal am actively involved in a whole range of initiatives to that end.

    On the other hand I don’t pump up the claims of an outfit backed by a trade union which less than 1% of its members are involved in as a significant step towards a new workers party, and when only a tiny minority of that union even vote for said outfit its hardly a model of working class politics either.

    Mark P

    Mark P

    Like

  38. The typical model of trade union support for political parties is based on the leadership deciding who to back – and sometimes the membership are asked to rubber stamp the decision. I’m keener on branches of a union having autonomy and funds to decide who to support and then decisions are taken closer to the membership and they have more engagement with the process. Unfortunately PCS appears to be going with the top down approach with its proposal to possibly back a few trade union candidates at the next election, rather than allowing branches the opportunity to support whoever they decide locally (taking account of the union’s aims)

    Like

  39. What I thought was positive about the SWPs ‘open letter’ was that it was ‘open’ in terms of rather than starting from a blueprint and everything being decided in advance, pointing towards opening a debate over what kind of alternative we need. Respect and No2EU were both flawed, by the kind of approach, where the programme was worked out in advance in terms of backroom deals with leaders, rather than an open debate.

    No2EU (or the Bob Crow vanity project) -surely must mark a low point in left wing electoral interventions with a bizarre programme that focused on the EU as the root of evil and various dodgy nationalist pap, that only mentioned foreign workers negatively and disgustingly contained not a word standing shoulder-to-shoulder with asylum seekers, migrant workers and refugees – that either opportunism, or just plain reactionary.

    As a socialist, and therefore an extreme democrat. I found the SPs position on No2EU spineless and not boding well for workers self-management (just as similarly the SWPs refusal to have every party functionary elected by the rank and file is dubious). Essentially, the SP said, ‘bureaucrats can stitch everything up, because they are leaders of big unions ‘, we will stand candidates under a banner that we haven’t even been given much input into.

    Such supine politics, of submitting ones right to democracy to leaders is alien to my tradition of socialism.

    When I first heard that the RMT were talking about standing candidates I was very positive as this seemed like an interesting developmement, but the way it was stitched up by a bunch of trade union and stalinist bureaucrats totally undemocratically with a platform guaranteed to make it incapable of taking forward the class struggle, soon left me cold.

    For example, No2EU had a meeting in Wrexham at which Bob Crow was speaking. I heard a Plaid Councillor (a former member of now imploded Forward Wales that Wrexham RMT was afiliated to) report that the RMT branch secretary knew nothing of the meeting!

    The Socialist Party reply to the SWP is disappointing and generally negative –
    http://www.socialistparty.org.uk/issue/585/7477 – and somewhat arrogant (the SP continue to push the idea that they are totally perfect). It also hillariously over-eggs the significance of the No2EU initiative that had virtually zero impact on the working class in Britain.

    Generally it appears that the SP leadership believe that the future lies not in building an open, democratic, class struggle organisation, but hanging onto the coat-tails of the CPB and Bob Crow (who they seem to have forgotten to ask to take a workers wage!).

    Though positively, when I spoke to SP members on the ground locally, they semed more open to the idea that SP and SWP should be building a common organisation (hopefully, they won’t change their mind when they get the new line from on high)

    I don’t agree with everything in it, but the PR article on the SWPs open letter etc. is more positive

    ‘Any new coalition should be explicitly socialist and agree an action programme on the key issues. It must elevate the centrality of workers’ action above all else. But it is just as important to bring real new forces into any coalition. They can act as a real counter-weight to the existing left groups and their apparatuses. It needs strong local groups if a national coalition is to be stopped from travelling the same path as the Socialist Alliance and Respect. It should wage a campaign against the top down mentality that predominates amongst the existing left.

    Unity from the bottom up
    It should champion the drawing in of activists from the local unions, campaigns, from the Climate Campaign, from the anti-fascist campaigns, from the colleges etc. It should argue that prior to the formation of a national coalition there should be a three month campaign (October to Christmas) in every locality to build local Socialist Coalitions. The RMT and PCS should be asked to finance meetings, rallies, activities, etc. Their premises should be made available to local coalition members to produce leaflets, websites, facebook campaigns, text messaging drives, local meetings, socialist events, open “surgeries” for local communities telling people what socialist MPs would do and acting as organising centres for local struggles, campaigns and individuals issues.

    These activities should all be aimed at creating vigorous and large local groups that can find a voice that is strong enough to shout down the petty bureaucrats in the sects and the not so petty bureaucrats in the RMT and PCS if they try to turn the coalition into a passive vote gathering machine for them. In other words, the should try to build active socialist coalitions, oriented to the class struggle and centred on action in the run up to any national organisations being set up. Only that way will be able draw in forces to make any new coalition a meaningful answer to the political crisis that has led to the election of two fascist MPs and that is likely to see the return of a Tory government next year.

    Alongside this revolutionaries should continue their efforts to try and turn the fragmented forces of resistance into a network – especially in the unions with those who are or have been in struggle to become champions of the idea of struggle within the movement – the St Paul’s Way teachers, the Visteon workers, Linamar, the tube workers, the parents struggling over schools, the workers at and around the Lindsey strikes. Such militants working closely with the coalition (if it comes about) can help ensure that the idea of organising the working class for a fightback now is kept at the forefront of the moves towards left unity.’
    http://permanentrevolution.net/entry/2742

    Like

  40. ex-CPGB member Avatar
    ex-CPGB member

    Comrades who are understandably provoked by Mark P should remember one thing. He has consistently opposed militant, socialist working class politics for 25 years or more.
    In the former CPGB (not to be confused with the Chamberlain cult which has hijacked the name), Mark P was notorious for his shrill denunciations of Communism, Marxism, militant trade unionism and even the objective of socialism. Together with the Eurocommunist faction, he helped destroy the CPGB as it once was. He was also an enthusiastic cheerleader for all the ‘disciplinary hearings’, liquidations and expulsions of those who disagreed with him.
    And he did all of this with the same supercilious sneering which characterises much of his blogging today.
    Bob Crow’s understanding of class society, his loyalty to the working class, his willingness to identify with Communism, his trade union militancy, his associations with the CPB and the Morning Star – these represent everything that Mark P hates and always has hated.
    My sympathies are with Respect, if Mark P is now a member. He will seek to poison that organisation against other socialists and militant trade unionists, spreading bad feeling and division just as he did in the former CPGB.

    Like

  41. Perhaps the ex-CPGB member could explain precisely what is anti-trade union about asking why an outfit, No2EU, which is trumpeted by its supporters as representing a qualitative breakthrough in working class politucs has failed to attract the involvement of more than 1% of members of its principal backer the RMT which expensively bankrolled it. And for which a tiny minority of RMT even bothered to vote.

    The tradition of closing down any critical voices in the name of ‘anti trade unionism’ or ‘anti working class’ is one of the worst traits of stalinist political practice.

    Meanwhile glad to see the CPB enjoying such huge political successes freed from the clutches of Euros like me, or have I missed something?

    Mark P

    Like

  42. Here’s an item that puts the Greens’ relationship to the working class, the trade unions and the RMT into some sort of perspective.

    http://tinyurl.com/nscjxs

    Like

  43. The RMT has proposed the following motion to this weeks’s Irish Congress of Trade Unions (ICTU) in Tralee Co. Kerry. The union’s delegate is bob Crow.

    Link here :
    http://www.ictu.ie/bdc09/motions/detail/12461976871110204/

    Text :

    Motion 67 :

    This motion is due to be discussed on Friday 10 July between 09:50 AM and 11:15 AM.

    Congress is appalled that the Viking, Laval, Ruffert and Luxembourg judgments in the European Court of Justice (ECJ) are a fundamental attack on collective bargaining and the right to strike.

    Congress believes there is an urgent need to campaign strenuously for restoration of the fundamental human right to strike recognised but overridden in the ECJ cases.

    The unelected judges of the EU using the ‘free movement’ provisions have disembowelled the concept of social Europe and undermined the ability of unions to protect workers.

    The Lisbon Treaty would exacerbate these attacks by handing greater powers to the ECJ to interpret disputes concerning the Charter of Fundamental
    Rights.

    Congress also believes that the ECJ decisions are reflected in the increasingly neo-liberal policies emanating from the EU which are in turn
    reflected in the Lisbon Treaty and Congress therefore agrees to campaign to halt the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty.

    Proposing Union : RMT

    Like

Leave a reply to bill j Cancel reply

Trending