clip_image001My Italian chums just tend to weep uncontrollably at the very mention of Silvio Berlusconi’s name. He has given them a television system that is unwatchable for anyone who is not moronic or under heavy sedation. His wife walked out more or less accusing him of paedophilia and it’s strongly implied that he’s been buying in prostitutes for his guests. To be fair he retorts “I never understood where the satisfaction is when you are missing the pleasure of conquest.” Oh yeah and he lost a court case for defamation for the Economist’s front page with the strapline “Why Silvio Berlusconi is unfit to lead Italy”.

Only one man stands convinced that an appeal to Berlusconi’s better nature will turn him around. Only one man feels that he is the moral behemoth whose words by themselves have the power to make Mussolini’s heir see sense and start behaving like a decent human being.

My Irish chums just tend to swear uncontrollably at the very mention of Bono’s name. Here is what the Financial Times says he told a concert audience in Milan earlier this week.

“Italians have given many gifts to the world, modern physics, the renaissance . . . the piano, the gift of singing from Pavarotti to Puccini to Jovanotti to Zucchero. You have so many gifts.

“Well in the next few days . . . your leader will decide where he stands on the gift of life that lives beyond these shores.”

I’ve a passing familiarity with Zucchero’s oeuvre. It’s more merda than sugar unless portentous ballads in a Michael Bolton style are your tazza di té. Jovanotti is a rapper whom you can research for yourself but don’t build your hopes up. In any case both men’s gifts to the world count for rather less than Fermi’s, Marconi’s or Da Vinci’s. It’s a bit like saying “England has given the world Shakespeare, Milton, Norman Wisdom and the Noel Edmonds”. It may be true but it’s a bit of an incongruous ragbag.

This site’s pre-eminent hate figure is troubled by the Berlusconi regime’s contempt for anyone who is not a white small business owner or tax dodger. Italy is meeting a mere 3 per cent of its overseas aid commitments and while Bono can but feel a certain comradeship with Berlusconi’s tax dodging base his brand image relies heavily on him as the billionaire champion of the poor doggedly speaking for the voiceless in the halls of power. And in concert venues where you have to pay at least £60 a ticket to finance an entourage larger than the Irish army

Bob Geldof prefers to be the nasty multi-millionaire Dublin philanthropist in their bizarre double act. The way he put it was “What’s the legitimacy of this crowd of shysters to run the G7 this year? How dare they? How can you possibly trust any government that promises something, does nothing, and expect them to lead the world. How dare they?”

Ok the second “how dare they?” is a bit redundant but his point is a good one. Venomous contempt is about the only tone that is right to use when describing a creature like Berlusconi. If the BNP came to power in Britain with Robert Kilroy Silk as its leader the result would be something analogous to Berlusconi’s Italy. The outward appearance of parliamentary democracy would be preserved but the state would be run as a private kingdom and every sort of backward racist idea could be openly expressed. There is no better nature to appeal to and once again Bono struts the world stage like a pontificating imbecile.

11 responses to “So the first w*nker said to the second w*anker….”

  1. splinteredsunrise Avatar
    splinteredsunrise

    Well, Berlusconi was an old crooner in his day. Maybe Bono can do a duet with him, like he did with Sinatra.

    Though I still liked Sinatra’s initial response to that proposal: “If you think I’m going to duet with Sonny Bono…”

    Like

  2. Maybe Geldof was going for “How very dare they?” and stopped just in time. (Which would be another point in his favour.)

    Like

  3. There is no better nature to appeal to and once again Bono struts the world stage like a pontificating imbecile.

    Now that’s just an insult to pontificating imbeciles everywhere.

    Like

  4. To be fair to Bono, this song by U2 was good

    Like

  5. What’s fair got to do with it, Andy? This is Bono we’re talking about. Difficult to know what makes that video good, the presence of Johnny Cash or the absence of Bono.

    Like

  6. “the presence of Johnny Cash or the absence of Bono.”

    both.

    My point is that this video can help us comtemplate the world without Bono in it, which can only be a cause for happiness.

    Like

  7. “My point is that this video can help us comtemplate the world without Bono in it, which can only be a cause for happiness.”

    May I recommend “Socialism: Utopian and Scientific”?

    Like

  8. (abuse deleted) Andy Newman wouldn’t allow me to post this on his blog:

    “Defenders of social democracy tend to argue that terible things will ensue unless workers act as doctors to capitalism in crisis. Frequently the terrible things happen anyway because the severity of the crisis means that capitalists demand more from workers than they are prepared to give except under compulsion. It is not ‘crisis-mongering’, but a sober reflection of historical experience to point this out. During the First World War Lenin quoted Schiller in support of his advocacy of revolution to end the bloodshed:’Better a horrible end than a horror without end.’ Perhaps today we should emend this to: Better a horrible end that saves humanity than one which destroys it.”
    From Making History by Alex Callinicos.

    It would be nice to know exactly what has offended the “spam filter” here.
    johng- another to add to your lexicon:social democracy without socialism or democracy. Though rather predated by the old adage that the Communist Party of Great Britain was more Great British than communist.

    Latest from the BBC:
    Chinese police kill two Uighurs
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/8147657.stm

    Listening to an interview with one of the Bermuda Uighurs on the World Sevice, one of them told the BBC interviewer “unlike you, we’ve never known what it’s like to be free.” chjh- I think there is more to be said about China’s relative strength vis-a-vis American imperialism, I’ve been thinking about the 19th century situation where the British navy was supposed to be at least as strong as the next two strongest navies combined, yet could not enforce its will on other powers willy-nilly. Also the situation of those who have lived in societies where the balance between force and consent has shifted toward the former, without becoming an apologist for bourgeois democracy it seems important to understand how there is a pull in such societies towards it.

    It seems OK for David Ellis to make comments like “Fuck off Johng, you are the yapping meerkat of Western intervention, a true Kautskyite.” Andy Newman seemed to welcome a debate at #184 “Skidmarx in the unlikely event that you are trying to make a serious point…”.but at the end of the day in the fullness of time when all is asid and done, he’d rather throw his toys out of the pram.Here’s the assassination of John Fitzgerald Rees considered as a downmarket motor home gag again:

    Like

  9. Skidmarx – if you want to pursue your dialogue with Andy and David I’d prefer if you found an alternative place in which to do it.

    Like

  10. Sorry if I’m dragging you into a fight that’s not yours. I just wanted to let people know what censorship was taking place and that seemed like the easiest way to do it.

    Like

  11. Éamonn McCann the soul brother of Liam MacUaid :

    Bono, U2 and the Crisis of World Capitalism

    The Emperors of Bombast

    http://www.counterpunch.org/mccann07142009.html

    Like

Leave a reply to Ciarán Cancel reply

Trending