Wigan Despite Wigan’s 5-0 thrashing by Manchester United in the town on the same day, when it comes to ‘Premiership’ flight progressive politics the day’s result from the nearby Pemberton Labour Club was altogether different.

What was witnessed there, less than two miles away, just off the road to Wigan Pier, was an even greater display of political ‘footwork’ with 5 parties having united for the launch of the new Wigan People’s Alliance.

The rousing launch rally which was supported by the Respect Party, Community Action Party, Socialist Party, Green Party and the SWP was attended by 70 people including members of the local Trades Council.

Speaker after speaker, including Coventry Socialist Party Councillor and ex-Labour MP Dave Nellist, Nahella Ashraf of the SWP, Alan Johnson from the Green Party, and Peter Franzen of the Wigan based Community Action Party commended the grassroots unity which has and is still being practically forged in the Wigan area around the fight against local school closures, PFI, job & service cuts, and around other issues as well. Also in terms of the decision to unite around the People’s Charter, which is the platform on which the new alliance is based and which has widespread support within the unions, the new alliance’s attempt to provide a genuine working class ‘people’s’ political alternative to the traditional parties and the BNP in the forthcoming elections.

Nick Griffin’s now regularly visits to the Wigan area since his election as a Euro MP and the fact that BNP are wanting to make a big organisational push in Wigan has helped to focus our minds especially since their activities puts us very much in the front line of the fight against the fascists.

However, while their activities are obviously of great concern, the main political enemy of ordinary people in our area at this moment in time is actually the Labour Party, they are the ones leading the attacks on ordinary folk now, and who are already preparing themselves for the loss of their overall control of the Council in the local elections by courting the Tories with a view to forming a coalition administration.

The last thing most people want to see in Wigan are the Tories getting back into power nationally, but that is precisely the prospect they are currently faced with under New Labour and in the case of Wigan Council a joint Tory-New Labour administration.

We want to stop that happening by offering a genuine ‘People’s’ alternative’ that fights for ordinary people both on a day to day basis and at the ballot box.

Manchester United may have bagged five goals at football in Wigan on Saturday, but as a city Manchester is politically and organisationally behind Wigan in terms of the huge tasks ahead of us.

But they could catch us up and likely supersede us in a matter of weeks if they made the same effort as we have. The same political forces and campaign activists who are working together in Wigan are to be found in Manchester and in much greater numbers. So just what is holding everyone back??

The Wigan People’s Alliance is now afloat and shows the way I say.

What we are wanting to do now is make it not just an alliance of progressive political parties which aims to link up with progressive unions to fight this or that campaign and/or the elections, but a genuine alliance of the people at a grassroots level.

Stephen Hall

Branch Organiser

South Lancs Respect Party

24 responses to “Wigan People's Alliance launched”

  1. Well done to Steve for all his efforts, but personally it was very disappointing to me that out of a three hour meeting, there was only 15 minutes set aside for discussion from the floor.
    My feelings of dread were further deepened by listening to Dave Nellist explain that the secret cabal who are setting up the People’s Alliance nationally (or whatever the replacement to No2EU will be called) will agree its programme and structure behind closed doors before its even had a single meeting.

    Like

  2. I am very grateful for this post as if I had’nt read it I’d have had to rely on the sectarian ranting in the comments section of socialist unity. Hats off to all the comrades in wigan.

    Like

  3. i think the name is terrible.

    anyway, it’s an interesting development, i’ll see where it goes.

    Like

  4. who cares about the name. after the dogdays of the last couple of years the fact that the left in Wigan collectively got their act togeather is a lesson for us all. Just imagine the situation if this was going on across the country. I’d give my eye’s teeth to see meetings like this going on everywhere. We’d all be in a much better situation. Impressive as well that the local trades council was involved. More of this. PLEASE.

    Like

  5. Lets just hope they don’t try to build a new ‘new party of the left’ which is the last thing we need imho. We need constructive dialogue and action between existing parties with people abandoning the futile goal of one monolithic mass party we can all join.

    Like

  6. ks – is it too reminiscent of “people’s republics”?

    The name Socialist Alliance is probably going unused at the moment. Or would that feel like too much of a timewarp?

    billj – “dread”? Isn’t it in your heart to view this as a positive move?

    Will Brown – would it really be a disaster if this became the seed of a mass party?

    Like

  7. I quite like the name ‘People’s Alliance’ it has a nice ring & means that you can pun with slogans like ‘Power to the People’ and so on. It could tap into a populist feeling of antipathy to politicians etc. ‘we are a party of the people not bankers, business and expenses’ etc. Though hopefully candidates if elected will take a ‘people’s wage’ (I notice that the Socialist Party managed not to raise the issue that Bob Crow has a salary that is somewhat more akin to a bosses rather than workers wage . . . )

    I also quite liked Craig Murray’s recent election slogan ‘Send an honest man to parliament’

    We could also use the name ‘Socialist Federation – Red, Green & Black Alliance’

    Like

  8. I think some socialist group abroad had a campaign ‘Power to the People’ around taking the gas & electricity utilities into democratic public ownership.

    Like

  9. It is a positive move. But it still fills me with dread. There you go.

    Like

  10. ‘Will Brown – would it really be a disaster if this became the seed of a mass party?’

    My reservation is that for much of the leninist left the only issue for the last 90 years has been building a mass party – which is why people have been so unable to work with each other, or even talk to each other. Everybody wants to build a mass party with them as the leadership.

    I suggest the working class doesn’t want just one party with answers to every question, a secretive heirarchical leadership and an obsession with party building. I feel the last 30 years suggests this.

    Like

  11. Well, I look forward to the First Congress of People’s Alliances. It is certainly to be hoped that the self-serving sects that are incapable of exemplary work don’t get to splitting the Wigan Alliance and any others that may spring up and disrupting their ability to function. Undoubtedly they will bureaucratically attempt to impose their leadership through engineered schisms even if it means that all that is left at the end is smaller than what they began with. The best way to avoid this is to hope that a critical mass of ordinary workers, students, housewives, members of the community get involved and stay involved quickly thereby marginalising the sects and rendering them irrelevant and all but harmless. These alliances should become parliaments of the working class not playthings for sect bureaucrats, their egos and their braind dead, zombie followers.

    However, we can only be thankful that billj and his outfit are so sectarian they don’t want to get involved at all. Good, especially after their performance during the Lindsey dispute.

    Like

  12. Sounds like a cracking initiative.

    Got to ask though, which genius schedueled the meeting at the same time as the Man U Wigan game?

    Like

  13. As ever – rely on David Ellis to sum things up…

    Like

  14. Well there’s something we can agree on. Do you think his continual talk of sects is a case of projection?

    Like

  15. skidmarx and bill j: always nice to see two steel-trap minds working in unison. One blinds us with sophistry and righteous indignation whilst the other tries to cultivate the image of someone who has a grasp of post-modern irony and sarcasm and now a smattering of psychology when he is in fact just a vacuum.

    I suspect you two agree on a lot more than you let on.

    Good luck to the Wigan Alliance. Every independent socialist and socialist grouping in the area should be getting involved and helping to pull in a mass working class base.

    Like

  16. David Ellis – your really are a magnet for irony, though I don’t know what’s post-modern about it. In 18 hours you switch from complaining about “sects” to welcoming the involvement of every socialist grouping.
    I’d like to follow johng’s lead in moving on from the sectarian bickering you seem to delight in, though it does seem necessary to point out that the final demise of Respect [I’d currently guess sometime between the conference in November and the general election] will help clear the field for those who want to organise around class rather than celebrity.

    Like

  17. Not sure if he’s up to projection!

    Like

  18. Tweedle dee and tweedle dum.

    Like

  19. I suspect you two agree on a lot more than you let on.

    It would be nice to think we’ve entered a period where socialists find their points of agreement more important than their differences.

    Like

  20. I would hope so too. Whatever our differences I’m sure we can agree about David Ellis. I mean how hard can it be?

    Like

  21. Forming a “People’s Alliance” is a political retreat.
    As is the “Peoples Charter”, which is to the right of Labour’s 1918 Clause IV, part 4. Its aim was to:-

    “To secure for the workers by hand or by brain the full fruits of their industry and the most equitable distribution thereof that may be possible upon the basis of the common ownership of the means of production, distribution and exchange, and the best obtainable system of popular administration and control of each industry or service.”

    Whereas the Peoples Charter calls for a mixed economy and Keynesian reforms like low interest rates, (which have already been implemented under New Labour)

    * “Tightly regulate the City markets to facilitate lending ”
    * “Restructure the tax system so big business and the wealthy pay more…”
    * “Public and private investment must create new jobs”

    Even if the promoters of this approach see this as a clever manouever, the logic of such a movement is a “Peoples Democracy”, not a Socialist government.

    It wouldn’t even be able to achieve what Herbert Morrison achieved between 1946-8:-
    Nationalisation of the Bank of England , Telecommunications, the National Coal Board ( 90% of UK’s energy), the National Health Service , railways, canals, road haulage and electricity.iron, steel and gas.

    Unity around useless, opportunist politics will just help the Tories win a landslide at the next election.

    Like

  22. A political retreat from what? when your at zero one is better.

    Like

  23. Prianikoff:

    In many ways you are right. The People’s Charter is a hopelss imposition of a reformist mess of a programme on to reality. It bears little relationship to what is required. The three elements you point out above are truely ridiculous. They reflect the centrists desire to blur the edges between reform and revolution and to hand the intitiative and leadership to the right. For the centrist an alliance is always an opportunity to ditch the transitional programme for short term gains. United Fronts should be practical agreements and in no way infer a mixing or diluting of programme.

    But, but, but … the Wigan People’s Alliance is a great step forward and potentially a model for every town or district. It is clearly a left challenge not just to New Labour but to soft Labour as well and is a United Front despite the name which isn’t the end of the world. Socialists must take part enthusiastically in the building of these kind of alliances and argue for their programme within them. However, of course, it must be clear of its own programme in order to do so.

    Also, as the general election approaches rapidly we must make it clear that we are standing against New Labour wherever we can in order to mobilise the workers’ vote which is now in large measure dormant but that a Tory victory will be the fault of New Labour and not the radical left who will do what ever they can to prevent it including mobilising around Labour MPs where we don’t have a credible alternative candidate. We must avoid both programmatic opportunism and practical sectarianism and an organised revolutionary left will emerge with roots in the working class.

    Like

Leave a reply to David Ellis Cancel reply

Trending