Just because it’s really easy to ridicule the BNP does not make it wrong. Their councillors have earned a reputation for not always being the sharpest chisel in the toolbox and as if to prove the point thisln-chisels is what Councillor Pat Richardson, leader of the BNP group on Loughton council, had to say following racist attacks in the Essex borough:  “Firebombing is not a British method. A brick through the window is a British method, but firebombing is not a way of showing displeasure“.  Read that again!

On one level her honesty is commendable. Part of the BNP’s attraction for some racists is its lack of squeamishness in resorting to violence against anyone who is not part of the master race. If Richardson is doing anything it’s only letting slip what the party’s members really think about racist violence. On the other hand we will have to assume that the other members of her council group selected her as leader because of her greater political sophistication and ability to field tricky questions. Mmm.

Noor Ramjanally is a Muslim chaplain to the Metropolitan Police who has been using a hall near his Loughton home to run weekly prayer sessions. Police are investigating his abduction at knifepoint by two men who tried to intimidate him into ending the prayer sessions. This incident follows a suspected firebombing and hate mail. Noor says that there was a strong similarity between what his abductors said to him and the content of a recent BNP leaflet.

Richardson is indignant and has complained to the police that people are drawing a connection between her party’s literature, electoral success and racist attacks. Confirming that she’s not planning to give Slavoj Žižek a run for his money anytime soon her theory is that the prayers are all a clever scheme to vote out the BNP. “I was wondering whether it was a ploy to attract more Muslims to the area to try and vote out the BNP councillors”. That could take a while since only 1% of people in the area are Muslim, as Richardson remarks of the prayer meetings “It’s not really natural for the area because there are so few Muslims” but you probably don’t vote for a BNP candidate on account of their grasp of the finer detail.

What is genuinely bewildering about Richardson’s remarks is her idea of an acceptable scale of British racist violence. It presumably starts with staring and pointing, moves onto name calling, then to pushing, from that to dog shit through the letter box, bricks through the window, a good kicking. What is the final acceptably British sanction to the people the BNP want rid of?

But these people are no joke. L et’s leave the final word to Abdurahman Jafar, chair of the Muslim Safety Forum:

“The campaign of terror has followed a campaign organised by the BNP whereby they delivered hate literature to locals citing the small Friday prayer sessions as evidence of how ‘the Islamification process is almost complete’.” Recent months have seen a sharp rise in religiously motivated attacks against the Muslim community including attacks on outwardly Muslim appearing individuals, mosques and pogroms directed against the Muslim Community.”

9 responses to “Bricks not firebombs are the British way”

  1. […] This post was Twitted by GlobalCommunist […]

    Like

  2. […] video from Britain is called Griffin tells KKK plan to “sell” nazi BNP as “democratic” – then smash […]

    Like

  3. In Birmingham both UAF and Salma Yaqoob have called for a ban on the English Defence League’s demonstrations in the city.

    SR supporters there make the obvious point:

    “if we accept the precedent of allowing the state to ban demonstrations because there might be ‘trouble’ then it puts in jeopardy future anti-fascist events such as the recent successful mobilisation at Codnor as the police might be tempted to ban public demonstrations from an area whilst allowing the fascists to go ahead with a rally or festival which, since it is on private land, they have no current power to ban.”

    Countermobilisation stops fascism, not state bans

    Like

  4. I’m against socialists relying on the state to ban nazies. But I’m not against communities mobilising to demand that nazies not be permitted to march through their areas. Given that we are mobilising people to prevent precisely this, its kind of hard to imagine left wing activists explaining to the same people that if the state gives in, we have to oppose them doing so. I also think its a tremendous step foward in building up a head of steam around older and forgotten arguments about ‘no platform’.

    Like

  5. “I’m against socialists relying on the state to ban nazies. But I’m not against communities mobilising to demand that nazies not be permitted to march through their areas.”

    So you’re not really against it then? In fact you’re in favour of it;

    “I also think its a tremendous step foward in building up a head of steam around older and forgotten arguments about ‘no platform’.”

    I suppose its called moving with the times.

    Like

  6. In what sense is mobilising on the streets and demanding that fascists not be allowed to parade through areas “relying on the state” Bill? If you are mobilising people against the right of fascists to intimidate people in their own areas and the state backs down in the face of this mobilisation, you can’t suddenly reverse your politics. Ultimately this is an anarchist idea, and its not one you would accept in any other arena.

    Like

  7. Latest from Birmingham is that a ban has been implemented.
    Oh yeah, its a ban against our side though. The proposed Birmingham United initiative- a rally / gig to promote the positive multicultural aspects of the city, which UAF and Respect both backed, has been refused permission to go ahead.

    Meanwhile the EDL are free to march through the city centre and, at this late stage, there is unlikely to be a serious counter-demonstration.

    Like

  8. “Latest from Birmingham is that a ban has been implemented.
    Oh yeah, its a ban against our side though. The proposed Birmingham United initiative- a rally / gig to promote the positive multicultural aspects of the city, which UAF and Respect both backed, has been refused permission to go ahead. ”

    That is of course why arguing for a state ban is such a bad idea. Something similar happened in Oldham when after a series of fascists demos and much larger counter demos Blunkett banned all marches- which was used disproportionately against us while th epolic provided a protective cordon for the Nazis.

    The best way to stop the fascists is community mobilisation to prevent the fascsits from marching- not merely to ask the police to stop them which is forlorn and counterproductive- and for a united working class response to the problems which lead to fascists gaining ground.

    Like

  9. Can’t argue with Jason there. This is where left reformism shows its political weakness – no matter the progressive intentions of those calling for bans against organised racist activity, the capitalist state is not progressive and such calls can easily backfire, as this case shows.

    Not only that, but the Evening Mail in Birmingham refers to the EDL demonstrations as ‘anti-extremist’ actions. The conclusion from that being that the opponents of the EDL are ‘extremist’s. It is also running pictures of minority youth ‘wanted’ by the police for alleged ‘violence’ during the previous confrontation with the EDL.

    Not the first time that the Evening Mail has acted as a willing conduit for neo-Nazi propaganda, of course. In the 1970s they ran a regular ‘political columnist’, Kenneth Young, whose sympathy for the National Front was very thinly disguised indeed. Maybe a campaign targetting the Meaning Evil would be a good way to begin a fightback. And a decent, disciplined united-front demonstration against the next EDL provocation – with as much trade union support as can be mobilised.

    Like

Leave a reply to RobM Cancel reply

Trending