A group of former leaders of the British Army is concerned that “the reputation of the armed forces is being tarnished by right-wing political “extremists”. Commander of the Desert Rats in the first Gulf War, Major-General Sir Patrick Cordingley, generals Sir Mike Jackson and Sir Richard Dannatt and former Chief of Defence Staff Lord Guthrie  don’t seem to be playing it for laughs when they write on behalf of a campaign called Stolen Valour:

“We call on all those who seek to hijack the good name of Britain’s military for their own advantage to cease and desist. The values of these extremists – many of whom are essentially racist – are fundamentally at odds with the values of the modern British military, such as tolerance and fairness.”

What seems to have irked these champions of tolerance, fairness and going into other people’s countries to kill them is the use of a picture of a Spitfire fighter plane by the BNP during its European election campaign which it fought under the slogan “Battle for Britain”.

The trouble with adopting a new corporate ethos is that it does take rather a long time to change perceptions of what your organisation does. Although Rudyard Kipling did have a similar spin I must have missed the advertising campaigns announcing that the new purpose of the British Army is to bring the values of tolerance and fairness to benighted savage races  It’s labouring under the handicap that it has spent several centuries trying to position itself as the brand leader in killing machines, usually of folk of a slightly darker complexion than those currently permitted to join the BNP. If we quickly survey the post WW2 period it’s hard to find many examples of the British Army’s liberal values in Kenya, Cyprus, Malaysia, Aden, Iraq or Egypt just to pick a few random post colonial entanglements.

With racist historical baggage of that calibre in your kit it’s not too hard to work out that you might have something to offer the demoralised angry racists who join the BNP. That’s one side effect of having a substantial part of national identity tied up with former imperial victories.

 

 

image

image

7 responses to “Attacking foreigners is our job ex-army chiefs tells BNP”

  1. Hmm don’t know why that link hasn’t copied properly sorry.

    Like

  2. Liam that s a great piece there. Im not sure that we would agree politically on a lot of things, but your blog is much better than Newmans capitalist new labour unity or the sterile lenins tomb. Keep it up and just wish more people posted on your blog.

    Like

  3. All very well, but would you prefer it if these characters were siding with the BNP?

    Like

  4. Although I agree with everything Liam’s written, I also think that this rather odd intervention from the top brass is objectively quite useful, i.e. a ‘good thing’. When Jackson describes the BNP as “beyond the pale” that can only help to undermine the BNP’s continuing success. OTOH, the unintentional absurdity of their words about tolerance and fairness is indeed worthy of ridicule.

    Like

  5. Am i the only one less than comfortable in inlcuding army top brass in the all emcompassing anti-fascist front. Not ordinary squaddies, but top brass?

    today, crack out the “dont be beastly to generals and blair” placards

    tomorrow, “blair is a war criminal” placards will be available…

    Like

  6. Armchair – it’s obviously better that they are criticising the BNP than supporting them and there are plenty of others who will praise them for that.

    What is harder to find is some attempt to explain that the British Army’s reputation for tolerance and fairness exists mostly in its own imagination and lots of people who have had contact with the organisation over the centuries, or recent decades would not necessarily have shared it. Witness Harry Windsor pulverising a mud hut with a heavy machine gun expounding on “Terry Taliban”.

    Like

Leave a reply to Liam Cancel reply

Trending