image Is there such a thing as “Catholophobia”? A casual reading of the liberal press might make you think so.

But first a bit of background.

Kincora Boys’ Home, like many institutions in Britain and Ireland of its sort, was a loveless place where the young inmates were routinely emotionally, physically and sexually abused. What made it rather different was that both the Royal Ulster Constabulary (RUC) and MI5 knew about the extent of it and the participants’ identities.  It’s a murky area but it’s widely accepted in the north of Ireland that the state permitted the abuse to continue in order that it could blackmail those involved into providing intelligence about some of the loyalist gangster organisations. A similar concern for the welfare of abused children was displayed by both the RUC and the Republican Movement when Gerry Adams’ niece went to them with allegations of abuse against her father. The cops wanted her to provide information about family members.

On the radio earlier this week to plug his book Against All Odds was Paul Connolly. He  is “a celebrity fitness trainer and creator of the hugely popular Boxerobics”. Connolly spent his childhood in St Leonard’s Children’s Home in East London and his description of systematic sexual abuse by staff and older children was horrifying. in his account some staff members worked in the home for other purpose than to have access to children whom they could abuse. Until the mid 1980s there seemed to be no effective safeguards to protect children from any form of abuse in either state or church run institutions in Britain or Ireland and for some state agencies this was a perfectly valid tool for them to use in their counter-insurgency strategy.

Coming right up to date Birmingham Social Services is currently short of 150 staff. Under these circumstances it’s not surprising that children for whom it is responsible are being murdered by their parents and with the cuts that the council is proposing it is not easy to see how child protection is going to be enhanced anytime soon. You could make a fairly persuasive case that both the local and the national state are complicit in this abuse.

Yet no other organisation is receiving anything like the hammering that the Catholic Church is taking for a series of crimes that happened, for the most part, more than twenty years ago. Much of this opprobrium is well deserved. Its longstanding toleration of abuse and callous attempts to cover it up earned it that. It was one organisation among many which was charged with looking after children and instead destroyed them.

In Pope Benedict’s letter to be read out tomorrow he says to Irish Catholics  “Your trust has been betrayed and your dignity has been violated. I am truly sorry. I know that nothing can undo the wrong you have endured." He probably means it but whether or not it does any good is moot. Sean Brady got a round of applause for his apology earlier in the week.

The one thing that is certain is that the liberal press is going to carry on presenting every Catholic parish as a hotbed of child rape, intimidation and emotional violence. Having decided that climate change isn’t so important after all news outlets like the Guardian and Channel 4 have decided that the Papists are the biggest threat to right thinking people. This is a theme that Splintered has explored as well. The trouble is that it has nothing in common with the experience of currently active Catholics. The organisation has spent fifteen years putting in place safeguards comparable to those in the state sector. Catholic churches tend to be places where people come together for a sense of community and things that the outside world does not offer them. One sure way to antagonise lots of working class people will be if some militant secularists decide to protest when Benedict visits Britain. No one is forced to be a Catholic and, if we take the evidence of birth rates, not too many people listen to what the priests tell them about family planning or pre-marital sex.

There are a couple of distinct strands to the attacks on the Catholic Church. The sickly creature that was Irish liberalism is having a field day biting chunks out a big beast to make up for the decades in which it was unwilling to confront it politically. Yet  even still there are not too many voices in Ireland making the obvious demand to take the schools and hospitals out of Church control. Government ministers complain that they can’t afford to it and no one challenges the assertion.

Accompanying this is the bunch that wants to take a Dawkinsesque  pop at any manifestation of religious belief. It’s not just that they don’t take the trouble to find out what actually happens in active Catholic communities in 2010 it’s the laziness and obvious partiality of a lot of the coverage that becomes irritating.  Rather than devoting investigative resources into exploring how government spending decisions in Britain and Ireland are about to make the lives of many thousands of vulnerable children a great deal worse they take the much easier option of a bit of indignation about the Church’s crimes and cover ups.

That’s liberalism for you.

 

13 responses to “Catholophobia”

  1. splinteredsunrise Avatar
    splinteredsunrise

    There are a number of serious problems where I live. The potholes in the road are a menace to drivers. There is a shocking level of alcoholism. Anti-social behaviour is rife. There’s a high and climbing level of youth unemployment. Very little of this has anything to do with the churches.

    As far as The Scandal is concerned, the Catholic hierarchy deserve a great deal of the flak they’ve been getting. There’s a very serious reform needed, and the upcoming apostolic visitation will be dealing with that. But it’s more than a little disturbing how some well-meaning liberals are wallowing in this. There’s currently a major abuse scandal in the public schools in New York, and a lot of the people who are spitting blood over this are remarkably uninterested.

    Like

  2. I can only say that if the church doesn’t want to be portrayed as a giant nest of child abusers then it shouldn’t have allowed its minions to rape vast numbers of children over a period of decades.

    I have precisely zero sympathy for them and am genuinely baffled by what seems to be your urge to sort of defend them on the grounds that there are plenty of other child rapists out there. It looks like a sort of sectarian circling of the wagons – and perhaps some degree of that sort of thing is inevitable in the North, but from a Southern perspective I have no interest in excusing the Church in any way shape or form.

    The Catholic Church was the chief social bulwark of reaction in the South since independence. The fact that it’s social influence is being shattered is something we shouldn’t have the slightest problem with. Yes, there are plenty of other malevolent social forces which are also willing to dance on its grave but that doesn’t mean that the grave dancing is any less deserved.

    We should seize this opportunity to push for the destruction of the Church’s grip on education and health once and for all.

    Like

  3. We vigorously protested the pope’ visit to Australia –– No to pope — on many grounds but especially on the war the church wages against abortion and gay rights and its complicity in the genocide caused by the AIDS virus. (Aspects of Church active social doctrine you forgot to mention Liam.)

    in that we worked with many Catholics and fought a rear guard against those who wanted to make any actions down as anti clerical or those who abhorred our alliance on the grounds of a sort of Marxian Dawkinism.

    But you are dead wrong with your rush to apologise for the Church. The international scale of the RC’s complicity in institutional sexual abuse is now a tragic given. You do not even consider the cultural and religious practices than pander to the continuing sexual mores inside the Church.
    Nonetheless this is not about militant secularism and it is an obscene slander to label those who have just political cause to protest the pope.

    To infer that the Church should have a free hand to indulge its social and moral agenda and run a large scale ideological offensive against Women and LBGTI rights while the left , and the Marxist left, sits by the sidelines pleading for a liberal fair play . However what helps to cripple Irish Republicanism as a flexible and dynamic political force is its unholy and chronic partnership with the Catholic Church

    In a country like Ireland where religious affiliation and nationalism are paired the complication of the campaigns you run need to take into account that complexity., I’m sure. But that doesn’t mean that this gorilla that bullies the island and its people should get a free ride. After 1400 years something has to give, surely?

    The French left’s strident and hysterical anti clericalism as indicated by the furore over the NPA’s veiled candidate — is no excuse to flip to the obverse and pretend that the Church militant and political and organised — as distinct from religion per se — is of no day to day political consequence to the tasks that confront us. We all have to bend the stick one way or the other, but I fear Liam you are too keen to bend it so that it almost breaks.

    Like

  4. Ive just seen a news clip on the tele.A irish lady says the Pope should come over and hold a reconsiliation tribunual with the victims and offenders (those that havent already gone to hell).Sounded like a good idea to me.

    As for religion, they all have their skeltons.

    Like

  5. While I’m on a theme:. the Church is running a rearguard action in Latin America by drawing Danial Ortego (now “born again” and very opportunist )– and a section of the FSLN as well as the Salvadoran FMLN into its reactionary anti abortion agenda. It’s partnership with Bush on a AIDS and abortion is well known — so how about we recognize a reactionary institution for what it is, eh?

    Nonetheless, if you were to do your homework a bit more and explore the rich critique offered by Liberation Theology and excellent discourses such as Fidel on Religion : Conversations with Frei Betto on Marxism & Liberation Theology you’d be less prone to rush to the Church’s defence by excusing it as an institution and offering a few shallow comments rather than approaching it as a communalist ideology the intimacy of which millions adhere to and appreciate.

    The narrow context of trying to view Catholicism through the sterile religious prism of Ireland misses the richer and far broader inter-relationship that exists between Latin American social movements , Marxists and the grass root advocacy of sectors of the Church engaged actively in political struggle on a continent wide scale.

    .

    Like

  6. It’s an attempt to put the thing in a broader context rather than a “sectarian circling of the wagons”. A lot more child abusing priests should have gone to prison and the Church management covered up for them. That’s such an obvious point that one would not have thought it worth making

    However in this wagon train Terry Eagleton is John Wayne, Eamonn Mc Cann is Ward Bond, Splintered can be Spencer Tracey or Walter Brennan and I’ll be Henry Fonda.

    Using phrases like “dancing on the grave”is a nice rhetorical flourish but organised religion in Britain or Ireland is not going to go way anytime soon and understanding its complexities seems like a worthwhile exercise.

    Another point on which I’d disagree with Mark is that without the imperialist domination of the country the Church would not have been able to have so much control over the political process, health and education in both states. And we all know who predicted that would be the result of partition.

    Dave – several of my ancestors were transported to Australia for stealing pigs (true) and it’s a deeply held belief of mine that a fulfiled and happy life requires the occasional bacon sandwich and a few beers every week. I could organise a lobby outside the local mosque to persuade them that they should change to my point of view. That would be as much use as Opus Dei picketing a Communist Party meeting to demand that it accepted the notion of transubstantiation. The doctrinal bases of Catholic teaching on sexuality are not going to be changed by athiests protesting. Part of the deal with Catholicism is that the punters don’t make the rules and they’ve never made a secret of it. The solution to that dilemma is an obvious one for a member of a voluntary association.

    Splintered has a lot more here

    Benedict addresses The Scandal… and what might come next

    Like

  7. decent interval Avatar
    decent interval

    “the richer and far broader inter-relationship that exists between Latin American social movements , Marxists and the grass root advocacy of sectors of the Church engaged actively in political struggle on a continent wide scale.”
    And are these grass roots advocates of sectors of the Church supporting abortion, gay marriage and the use of condoms which seem to be your key touchstones in defining what is “reactionary”?

    Like

  8. splinteredsunrise Avatar
    splinteredsunrise

    Of course, in Australia you have Cardinal Pell to deal with. He must be a nightmare for the secularist.

    Like

  9. It’s an attempt to put the thing in a broader context rather than a “sectarian circling of the wagons”.

    It carries more than a whiff of the usual sectarian whataboutery.

    Using phrases like “dancing on the grave”is a nice rhetorical flourish but organised religion in Britain or Ireland is not going to go way anytime soon and understanding its complexities seems like a worthwhile exercise.

    Who said it’s going to go away? The issue isn’t whether religious belief disappears but what social role it plays.

    Britain nowadays has a largely secular society, albeit one still inflected with bits of cultural pseudo-Anglicanism. There are still religious believers, but the three largest religions each have circa 2% of the population as regularly practicing adherents.

    In Ireland, partly for reasons to do with the deformation of our society by imperialism (and I’m not sure why you think I disagree with you there), religion is a stronger social force. Nevertheless it is one which has been in serious decline for decades, a decline which is being sped up by constant revelations of child abuse and institutional cover-ups but a decline which is happening for more basic social and economic reasons.

    This decline is a very good thing and one that we should welcome – this is a rare opportunity to establish secular education and health systems.

    Like

  10. “Yet no other organisation is receiving anything like the hammering that the Catholic Church is taking for a series of crimes that happened, for the most part, more than twenty years ago.”

    Revelations of historic abuse and blackmail to cover up that abuse are still occurring. As long as those in the know are not reporting past abusers, even from 20 years ago, surely a crime is still being committed?

    Like

  11. Ask Henry the eigth,i think thats how they said that number then.Religion is for those who choose to accept,and for our socialist cause is a hurdel, yet the least of our socialist diversions.

    Like

  12. Half cast paddies,what the —- do they know.No to much comrade yew1111h.WHAT.ignorant race full of religion and superstition.

    Like

  13. While I note that you don’t want to foster a pogrom against Catholics and sectarnianism against Catholicism ,allowing the pope to rule on without consequence is anathema to all principles of class, democracy and socialism. I think you do indeed indulge in liberal whitewash in order to make your argument. Here’s a good summar y of the overall y: The Pope, Pedophilia & Class Struggle

    Like

Leave a reply to Dave Riley Cancel reply

Trending