Here are a few videos  from a quick trawl on YouTube. I’ve included one from a pro-fascist in which a cop gives the state’s rationale for their operation and one showing the fascists entering the square. It does look like the balance of forces was  very unfavourable to the anti-fascists, a fact the police exploited with their decision to arrest Weyman Bennett and Martin Smith.

The report underneath is taken from Permanent Revolution. Even if you don’t agree with the political conclusions it’s self-evidently a strong eye witness account.

 

 

 

 

I was in Bolton, and I want to write a factual and reasonably unbiased account of what I saw, leaving commentary and criticism to others, but I don’t think I’ll be able to give an honest account of what happened without criticizing UAF. I know it’s a cliché to blanket criticize the SWP, but on this occasion I think their conduct deserves it….writes Bolton anti-fascist….

Police out of control from the start

Firstly, the police were heavy handed and violent towards us from the outset, with little or no provocation that I could see. Before anyone criticizes any of their comrades about what went wrong in Bolton, just remember that the police were completely out of control. The dogs were set loose on people for no reason, I saw one person get bitten just for having the rotten luck to be in the dogs path, and subsequently get taken to hospital with quite serious arm injuries. These initial ructions began at 9:30 and carried on for the next 2 hours.
After assembling in the square and seeing the barriers and portaloo’s they’d provided it was quite clear that we were going to be kettled all day, so some people tried to keep the exits to the square open and not let the police box us in so easily. The EDL had been sneaking people into our crowd through these exit points the police had set up, so early on I stood on one of the exits with a few people, trying to spot potential EDL and point them out. I feel the Police allowed people who were clearly EDL into our section of the crowd and put a lot of innocent people in danger by doing so. I also think that the UAF stewards, with a few very important exceptions, were too busy trying to set up their stalls and PA systems and get the generators going to cover the exits and keep an eye on what was going on. Despite trying to keep the exits clear, any attempts to get freedom of movement were short lived, and after about 10am all attempts to get out of the kettle were met with hostility from the police. The police manhandled anyone who tried to move through the choke-points they had created, and this is what led to the hostile atmosphere between the UAF and the police early on.
Between about 10-12 the police gradually became more and more hostile, refusing to allow groups of protestors from getting into the kettle to protest, resuting in chants of “Let them in” from the UAF PA system. As the situation was getting more heated, the police made the decision to arrest Martin Smith and Weymann Bennet by sending two snatch squads of riot police into the crowd to pick them up. I saw people putting up a brave fight in front of the police to prevent them being nicked, but the subsequent reaction of the SWP Martin Smith loyalists after this happened was problematic. A lot of them fell to bits, the only thing I saw them do in response was try to provoke chants of “let Martin go”, which seems like a pretty weak strategy to fall back on when your leadership has been arrested. It appeared that the SWP leadership, including Weyman Bennett before his arrest did not have much of a strategy. Weyman’s arrest was an outrageous provocation for the entire movement. We need to demand that all those arrested yesterday have the charges dropped now, they are an attempt to intimidate us all and we must unite to fight them together.

After the arrests

After the arrests, the SWP contingent were angry and leaderless, so the UAF stewards started to tell everyone to link arms and “hold the line” against the police, thereby ignoring the EDL gathering on the other side of the barriers. People were being encouraged to stand away from the EDL and direct their anger at the police. I could not for the life of me think why we should’ve done this, and I had it out with a few red-shirted stewards making this very point. There were no EDL on the other side of the police, only our own protestors who were just as hopelessly kettled as we were, and the police were allowing people to leave in ones and two’s if you needed to get out. I remember getting dragged into a pushing and shoving match with the police, out of pure herd mentality, then walking off around the side of the police lines and getting behind them without any hindrance! Then they let me back in! What’s also telling is that the UAF only attempted to do this when they knew the police were in sufficient numbers to handle it, they were not so keen to do it when they had a realistic chance of getting out of there through police lines. I personally feel they just wanted to link arms and push the police, partially out of revenge for their leader being arrested, and partially because I think they feel that’s what constitutes direct action, a bit of “we shall not be moved” and linking arms. Just going through the motions. There’s no point linking arms and chanting “we shall not be moved” when you’re kettled and unable to move anyway! It also led to people being needlessly arrested, good comrades of mine spent the night in jail and some of them are looking at serious charges for getting involved in that pointless waste of energy.
In the meantime the EDL were on the other side of the fence, having a smoke, walking around unhindered, throwing lighters at people and generally being the sort of fascist scum you can imagine. Their numbers were very small for most of the day and those who did stand there and chant at them, rather than needlessly fight the police, did a good j
ob of unnerving them. It was certainly more constructive than perpetually charging the police lines in the circumstances. By the time the main EDL contingent had arrived a lot of our best people had been arrested and others had been pushing and shoving the police for 3 hours and were dead tired. We were tired, demoralised, rain-soaked and bruised by the time they showed up.

EDL not so big

Their numbers weren’t that big, 2,000 was an exaggeration I’d say around 1,300 for them and around 1,500 for us, and for most of the day they only had around 100-200 Bolton inbreds stood gormlessly on the other side of the fence. Also, when me and my contingent left town, we were confused with being EDL by the police and sent down the street to where they being held. A group of about 12 of us had to walk through 60 EDL outside a town centre pub, who’s name I don’t want to mention, and despite their huge numerical advantage we not only walked through them unharmed but even stood and gave them some abuse, all without any hindrance or threat of retaliation. Their average age was about 17 and when I stood there and said to them, eyeball to eyeball, they were fighting on the same side as Adolf Hitler, they just looked at the ground and said nothing. Without their hardcore off the coaches, who I assume are footie hooligans, the EDL were not at all scary, and every face to face encounter I’ve had with them they’ve bottled it.
The local Asian youth were up for it this time, although they didn’t come ’til later, they seemed much smarter and better organized than the UAF. They didn’t get kettled, and they didn’t spend 4 hours in the rain being battered by the police. They arrived later, in small mobile groups with cars and backup, and cleared Bolton of all the stray little groups of EDL that were lurking down the side streets. I don’t worry about the banner that says “Allah is the greatest”, it’s just something to wind them up a bit, the same way they have American and Israeli and Anti-Nazi flags to piss us off. Not all the Asian youth were associated with that banner anyway, some I heard even objected to it. It isn’t for me to judge to be honest.

UAF has failed

If we can take one thing from Bolton it is that the UAF has failed and the the SWP may well go down with it. I do not think putting the hopes of militant anti-fascism into the hands of a dying and outdated organisation, riven with factions and bitter personal disputes, is a smart idea. People should build demo’s locally, involve their trade unions, and when in the town centres try to be peaceful and co-operate with the police. If you want to confront fascists physically, do it in small groups, away from the peaceful protests, or even better do it before they even get into town. Small autonomous and mobile groups that have no names, no banners, no PA and no way of being kettled. That’s the way forward.
I want to apologize to all the staunch comrades who I know in the SWP who were there that day and who weren’t responsible for the terrible strategic mistakes that were made. I’m not directing what I say here at the whole SWP, and I hope the good ones salvage something out of the organization. Lions led by donkeys is a phrase that springs to mind.

29 responses to “Bolton – a video selection”

  1. http://www.manchesteruaf.org/

    I suggest this report is also urgently distributed. The actions of the police, the arrests of anti-fascists, the harrassment of UAF activists and the freedom of the streets given to the EDL to shout racist abuse is unacceptable.

    The charges against all anti-fascists, including Weyman, must be dropped. We should call for a labour movement enquiry into the role of the police in Bolton and demand the Home Secretary sacks the officers responsible.

    However neither individual and non identified groups on their own as a substitute for mass action is the answer. The united front of the working class and anti-fascist forces needs to be strengthened. Yes the tactics need to be reviewed. That is why we need the UAF to convene an emergency AGM with a nationally elected steering cttee.

    However it is wrong for Sabby of the UAF to call for State bans when the State is directing the police. The State is not neutral and the UAF never agreed to this position.

    Like

  2. I wasn’t in Bolton on Saturday, so I’m reticent to make any judgements about the tactics employed there.
    But I’ve been on enough of such demonstrations since Red Lion Square to feel qualified to comment:-

    I didn’t feel happy with the report above when it first appeared on “Socialist Unity”. Not because of the tactical criticisms it makes, but because of its final paragraph.

    The author seems more concerned with consigning the SWP-UAF to the dustbin of history than elucidating the correct tactics. Indeed, he actually gets it wrong by suggesting that the demonstrators should be split into small “autonomous” groups, which would lead to surrendering on the issue of who controls the space.

    Likewise, in the subsequent discussion, he/or she was willing to tolerate provocative religious slogans, which could repel larger numbers of trade unionists and anti-fascists from turning up.
    Stewards should be trying to provide political, as well as organisational leadership.

    To do this on the basis that UAF fought, but got their leaders arrested seems very sectarian to me.
    Even the NUM in its heyday couldn’t stop Scargill being arrested and when they had 10,000 picketers at Orgreave he was put in hospital along with 100’s of other miners. In fact, despite the casualties, the picketing was successful, but was called off shortly afterwards.

    Orgreave was the first time the police implemented the new techniques they’d learned after the Brixton and Toxteth riots. They used a form of “kettling” by escorting the pickets into a box and then attacking them, forcing them to escape over the railway line to the south. Then they chased them into the village and conducted mass arrests of miners.

    Since then, the police have perfected these methods and are now far better equipped.
    By comparison, the tactics of the left have stood still or got worse.
    Most importantly, the numbers involved on the UAF demos don’t reflect the mass support it could be winning. This needs addressing urgently.

    Of all the reports I’ve seen the one by “Prinkipo in Exile” seems most accurate.

    See Comment #185 at :- http://www.socialistunity.com/?p=5429#comment-189272.

    “Prinkipo” is favourable to the tactics of the IMG at Lewisham and make some good criticisms of those at Bolton. But the main thing about Lewisham was that the ANL managed to mobilise huge numbers on the demonstration, which brought thousands of local youth out on to the streets. That’s what tilted the balance of forces. These youth would otherwise have been intimidated by the police-fascist presence. That’s a lesson that should be studied today.

    Like

  3. Thanks for the comments Prianikoff. I don’t agree with the Permanent Revolution’s call for the end of UAF either, only a change in direction and reevaluation by the SWP.

    One minor correction – the ANL did not exist at the time of the Lewisham demo (though its twin, Rock against Racism, did); the demo itself was called by ALCARAF, a front for the then Eurocommunist CPGB leadership, and included the backing of Bishop Mervyn Stockwood.

    Like

  4. Last week a meeting of the UAF at the railway club at temple meads, bristol, was attended by 10 edl supporters in a clear attempt to intimidate. A report is on the bristol indymedia website

    http://bristol.indymedia.org/

    Like

  5. I don’t think the article does call for an end the UAF, there is no point calling for it to end after all, it simply points out it has failed. It has failed.
    The rise of the EDL has been supplemented by the start of attacks on left meetings, not only Bristol, but several in Bolton and Manchester as well. That is a very alarming development indeed.
    The problem is that while the UAF has moved left – its finally dropped the call for state bans – it has not replaced it with anything. It has no independent organisation, no stewards team to speak of, no strategy at all apart from mass demos which aren’t really mass enough and get kettled by the cops. As happened on Saturday.
    Meanwhile the EDL goes from strength to strength. Clearly something has got to change.
    My personal opinion is that left anti-fascists need to organise outside the UAF. Sure work with it where possible, but do not rely on it for anything, and avoid being kettled and smashed up by the cops.

    Like

  6. Thanks for the correction Prinkipo.
    Even though I was a delegate to the founding conference of the ANL, I’d forgotten that it occurred after Lewisham.

    Dave Renton has done a lot to document the history of ANL-RAR and his website has a useful history of the Lewisham events:-
    “August 1977: the Battle of Lewisham”
    http://www.dkrenton.co.uk/lewisham_1977.html

    He concludes that:-

    “…..while Lewisham is not celebrated to the extent of the similar events at Southall, as a moment of anti-fascist history, it was of greater importance. For Lewisham knocked the stuffing out of a generation of fascists, splitting the leaders of the National Front in two, between one group who gave up immediately on previous ideas of dominating communities physically, and turned instead to electoralism; and a second group who adopted violence intensely and without political purpose. Each group was far smaller than the previous whole. For anti-fascists, it showed that fascism and racism could be confronted and defeated. It was the start of an upwards curve.”

    Jenny Bourne of the Institute of Race Relations provides another viewpoint:-
    “Lewisham ’77: success or failure?”
    http://www.irr.org.uk/2007/september/ha000019.html

    While witness accounts differ according to where people were on the day, they all agree on the depth of support for the demonstration and crucial role played by black youth in the area.

    Like

  7. The dreadful and disturbing video footage of a riot police officer pushing Bertie Lois to the ground is starting to circulate. The police violence towards this 89 year old war veteran, antifascist protestor and Bolton resident will shock the nation and show the real nature of saturdays events. Circulate it everyone!

    The assault occurs about 26 seconds into the video. Two coppers are dragging a UAF protestor, and the riot cop on the right shoves Bertie to the ground.

    Bertie had given a widely reported quote to the media before the demo. This is from the Telegraph:

    “Second World War veteran Bertie Lois, 89, who lives in Farnworth, Bolton, protested with the UAF. He said: “I fought the Second World War against these Nazis. What did I fight for if we let them? The EDL are the enemy. I would say to them ‘you are the guys we fought for, what are you doing?’”I am also here because I am against the war in Afghanistan.”

    But none of the media have yet picked up on the story of the police violence towards Bertie.

    Like

  8. oh yes, just what we need, another piece of criticism

    from the irrelevant PR group, its a pity they cant

    mobilise much more than 2 men and a dog , then

    spend valuable telling all how shite uaf and the swp

    are……”uaf have failed ,” obviously, lol,

    whatever may be

    the faults of uaf, they and the swp are the only

    national organisations seriously standing up

    to both the EDL and their BNP pals….if both

    organisations hadnt done what they did on

    saturday, the edl would have had a merry old time due

    to the cops that day. Also, will you please, liam,

    take off the March 4 England video, do u not know

    they have various links with the EDL???

    Do some research, having a video put up by them to

    attack UAF is just shoddy, to say the least….

    i am all for debate but not with March 4 England.

    Hope to see you all in Dudley,

    April 3rd against the EDL

    Like

  9. In my experience of them the comrades of PR always tell the truth even if I don’t always agree with their political conclusions. This was not just a SWP event. Lessons need to be drawn from the experience. The way in which local organisations were ignored and slandered is particularly worrying. I hope to post more on this later.

    There are widely varying accounts of what happened on the day and the videos, even those from the enemy, allow us to help reach our own conclusions.

    Like

  10. Contrary to your assertion the balance of forces was on the side of the UAF. Having been present on Saturday and having viewed as much video footage as possible I would estimate the EDL at approx 800-1,000. The UAF by contrast mobilised well over 2,000. Bear in mind that until 3pm our forces were never in one space but were dispersed by the GMP. Despite that dispersal and the vicious attacks regularly launched against the rear of the main body of the UAF our demonstration was far more vocal and better disciplined than the drunken lumpens of the EDL.

    I note in passing that theGMP footage is revealing as it shows an unprovoked attack on the rear of the UAF demonstration by a GMP snatch squad, led by an oficer with the number 5119 on his helmet, intent on lifting Weyman Bennett. Note well that it is the police that push over the barriers they had erected and that it is the UAF that steps back in order that nobody is hurt.

    On to Dudley.

    NO PASARAN!

    Like

  11. So whatever the faults of the UAF its out of order to criticise them. Good to know the spirit of democracy and openness lives on then.
    The UAF have failed to stop the rise of the EDL that is blatantly obvious. That it refuses to seriously reconsider its tactics says only that it will fail again. Personally I think that’s bad.

    Like

  12. How quickly “a factual and reasonably unbiased account of what I saw, leaving commentary and criticism to others” morphs into “I do not think putting the hopes of militant anti-fascism into the hands of a dying and outdated organisation, riven with factions and bitter personal disputes, is a smart idea.”

    Can’t help feeling that he went to the protest already thinking that.

    Like

  13. “The UAF have failed to stop the rise of the EDL that is blatantly obvious. ”

    The EDL were formed less than a year ago, for christ’s sake. Or perhaps you were referring to the fact that the ANL, precursor to UAF, failed to eradicate fascism from the british national consciousness in the 1970s or 1990s. Or maybe the UAF is responsible for the continued existence of racism in the UK.

    I think you should invoke an equally incisive comment like “the swp have failed to stop attacks on the global working class” or “the swp have failed to overthrow capitalism” or “the swp failed to stop the death of my cat.”

    Like

  14. “the faults of uaf, they and the swp are the only
    national organisations seriously standing up
    to both the EDL and their BNP pals”

    This is not the approach needed. The truth is that the anti-fascist movement is not the property of one group, not even the SWP would claim that.

    The problem is that:
    a. The UAF needs to urgently convene an AGM and elect a democratic national steering cttee, inviting all anti-fascist and anti-racist groups to participate. Many of us have been arguing for this yet sttill awaiting a response.Now is the time for such a conference.

    b. The UAF must review its tactics and reconsider how to build at a local level campaigns against racism and fascism which can link into the local labour movement and community groups.

    c. The UAF must openly debate its strategy and not call for state bans on its website whilst also talking no platform position. The movement needs to discuss what this really means and how to implement this .

    After all, it is the same State that arrested Weyman and Martin, breaking up with riot police the peaceful counter demo. The same State that knocked down pensioners. The same State that kettled in innocent demonstrators. Sabby is this the State that you are appealing to?

    d. Yes ofcourse we demand all charges must be dropped against Weyman and co. We should also call for a labour movement enquiry into the role of the police and hold Alan Johnson responsible for the actions of the police.

    The point is that the UAF must address these issues .

    Like

  15. RBH – how would you know?
    CHJH – of course people have previous experience of the SWP/UAF on demos so the’re not going to go in with an open mind.
    The UAFs strategy has collapsed over the last year. To begin with the called on the state to ban the EDL. Then when that didn’t work they held passive protests that were easily kettled. Then when that didn’t work they hoped sheer force of numbers – without any organised stewarding to speak of – would do the trick.
    Now that hasn’t worked. But we still have the same culture of a top down organisation controlled by a few unaccountable bureaucrats not open to criticism.
    Not great.

    Like

  16. Marcius from Act 1,Scene 1 of Coriolanus:
    What’s the matter, you dissentious rogues,
    That, rubbing the poor itch of your opinion,
    Make yourselves scabs?

    If the argument put forward in the post, that the UAF has failed, the SWP has failed, were overwhelming why would it not be clear to UAF members, both from and outside the SWP, and the organisation changed rather than abandoned?
    I see there is a markedly different account at the Tomb, and rather than the UAF being headless after Martin and Weyman were arrested, it is suggested that Paul Holborrow took over rather seamlessly. I would have thought that if the leadership were diminished by the absence, and the police were so concerned by them they felt it necessary to make a priority of arresting them, anti-fascists should make a priority of defending them rather than looking for ways to bypass the UAF.

    alf – I think point d should be a priority, the others presuppose an aseessment that the UAF has the wrong strategy and the democracy it has comes to the wrong results. Point a especially seems to be based on an acknowledgement that most of UAF doesn’t agree with you, and so should change their minds because you’re right.

    billj – if the SWP had succesfully prevented the death of his cat it would still be hassling him for food.

    Like

  17. Yes point d is a priority. No I am not saying it has failed, you are making that wrong assumption. I suggest that there are issues to discuss and views to consider. I also consider the issue of organisation is equally important.
    Why so defensive? As to whether UAF members agree or disagree I will not presume, but a democratic conference and a nationally elected steering cttee will help to build real unity.
    Discussion over strategy and tactics should not be taken as negative but an essential part of this democratic process.

    Like

    1. I’ve still to see any sort of defence at all of this obsession with anti-democratic decision making processes.

      Are they demonstrably more effective? Do they help root campaigns in localities?

      We can reasonably assume that the far right will notch up some electoral gains. The rapid growth of the EDL is not likely to stop. That suggests that there is an urgent need for a campaigning orientation that treats local groups of anti-racists, militant youth and targetted communities as more than ancilliaries in a stage army on a rolling tour.

      One of the big lessons of Respect is that while concentrating decison making in a tightly knit group can briefly deliver spectacular results it does not enable newly radicalising forces to feel that they are part of the process. Sooner of later they get fed up with being directed and take their own path.

      The stakes this time should give us all pause to reflection that.

      Like

  18. Has billj joined the League of Gentlemen? His riposte to redbedhead seems to be “This is a LOCAL argument for LOCAL people.”

    Like

  19. I don’t live in Winnipeg, I don’t know anything about Winnipeg and therefore I don’t lecture the people of Winnipeg about what they should do.
    I do live in Manchester and I was in Bolton.

    Like

  20. alf – I’m confused. Didn’t UAF just have a conference? If that was insufficiently democratic, would dissolving the people and electing another really help?

    Liam – I’ve still to see this obsession with anti-democratic decision making processes.

    That suggests that there is an urgent need for a campaigning orientation that treats local groups of anti-racists, militant youth and targetted communities as more than ancilliaries in a stage army on a rolling tour.
    Is it really those groups making the complaints about UAF, or a small minority prejudiced against the SWP sniping from the sidelines? I tend to think the latter, but if it really is the former then there should be a change.

    One of the big lessons of RespectBefore or after the split? is that while concentrating decison making in a tightly knit group can briefly deliver spectacular results it does not enable newly radicalising forces to feel that they are part of the process. Sooner of later they get fed up with being directed and take their own path.
    So you are joining up with those Whitechapel anarchists. Good luck to you on this bold step into the unknown.

    Like

  21. I think it is an interesting report although I don’t agree with everything- for example, the bit at the end about the SWP and UAF for example.

    Btw it is not a PR report but an eyewitness account on the PR website- we are allowed to disagree with each other!

    I think key lessons are

    1)that we need to seriously get organising in the workplaces and communities to stregthen working class resistance to cutbacks, job losses, privatisation, crap housing etc. That is ultimatley what will pull the rug away from the racists and the fascists

    2) democratic mass meetings to plan tactics in advance of the demos

    3) mobile defence patrols situated round the twon to guard against racist attacks as well as a central demo

    4) a massive campaign in the trade unions and communites to drop the charges against all those arrested on Saturday

    Like

  22. to bill j and alf,

    i did say, “whatever their faults” re UAF, ie no its not out of order to criticise, obviously, none of us are above criticism.

    my point is , it is urgent that from top to bottom and vice

    versa the unions in particular need to get members out on the streets against the EDL.

    Yes a opening up of the Steering Committee is a

    good idea and as was said at UAF conference, to be acted upon by UAF. Problem is as you will

    appreciate alf, there is a lot of pressure on the small

    staff of UAF, not least given the crap the state are piling on the leadership.

    reddeadbed is right, the EDL are a new phenomenon,

    it didnt seem to me that uaf or the SWP had failed

    when we marched through the streets at the end of

    a long day.

    Indeed, the uaf office has had a number of calls from

    locals from Bolton praising their efforts, the various

    criticisms need to be put into a context of

    who always tries their hardest to mobilise and is at the forefront of the movement.. No one is saying alf,

    that anti fascism is the property of any body/group.

    But iti is no acciden t that the swp and their allies are central to todays fight. they do have a good tradition in

    that respect.

    Ideas are always tested in practice, from where i am,

    the swp and uaf did well on saturday, and i am sure

    they are thinking through how to do even better next time around,

    to paraphase mark twain, “reports of UAF’s death have

    been greatly exaggerated”.

    Of course,

    tactics need to be constantly evaluated, but ask the taxi drivers, mosque goers and others in Bolton who

    put in the leg work in the weeks running up to last

    Saturday, the proof is in the respect that UAF and yes the swp have got post Bolton.

    see you all in dudley

    Like

  23. We all recognise the hard work of the cdes in the UAF and the pressure on them. We also recognise the genuine efforts many are making. No we are not knocking anyone.
    What is being raised is the isue of an approach that needs to be reviewed by the UAF. No one is saying it is dead either. Yes Dudley is next and no doubt there will be many other cities and towns. Yes build for Dudley.
    However in building for Dudley and anywhere else, it is the approach to building that needs to be discussed. It is the relationship with local labour movement groups and community groups to consider.
    The anti-fascist movement must be built up as a united front from the base. Many others also have a good tradition and it is not about building one group but about the unity of the working class and their allies based on recognising the plurality of the Left.
    Yes see you in Dudley but yes when will we resolve the issues or are they to be put off to the next time…

    Like

  24. bill j – of course, you never comment on events that you haven’t personally attended. You were in Russia during the revolution. You often travel to other continents – just so that you can comment as a personal participant and spectator on things like the election of Obama, or the resistance in Afghanistan.
    I must say that I admire your commitment to truth and integrity.

    Like

  25. Fair enough but how does that address any of the points about the need for democracy, community defence or how to politically defeat fascism?

    Like

  26. billj – Winnipeg is cold as f**k. But I’ve never been there, it’s a 24 hour drive away.

    Like

  27. Right sounds chilly.

    Like

Leave a reply to Jason Cancel reply

Trending