image There’s something about the prospect of a meeting platform with ten or eleven speakers that has an inexplicable depressing effect. It has the potential to be utterly stultifying. This potential is generally fulfiled, especially when you know that they are all going to say more or less the same thing.

Last night’s meeting “Can’t pay, won’t pay: solidarity with the Greek protests” managed to avoid it. Rather than the droneathon you might have expected the pace was more like one of those conveyor belts in sushi restaurants where you get more or less interesting morsels at short intervals. Pleasingly robust chairing kept all the contributors to six or seven minutes.

And gosh there were loads of them. Tony Benn, Caroline Lucas, Christos Giovanopoulos, Aris Vasilopoulos of SYRIZA, Penny White of BASSA, Paul Mackney, Clare Solomon, John Rees and Michael Bradley who, to my disappointment, was not the former Undertone. Due to my habit of not taking notes at these things I’m pretty sure I’ve missed a couple of people off the list but perhaps the chap in the next row who was taking a verbatim record can flesh out the details.  The text of Aris’ speech can be found here.

There was general agreement on what we used to call “the nature of the period”. We are most likely facing a double dip recession, the ruling class wants working people to pay for it and it’s necessary to organise resistance to it. By looking at the Greek example and solidarising with Greek workers we begin to generalise some of these experiences. I think it would also be instructive to look at the Irish example where effective resistance to the budgetary carnage has been minimal but that always seems a bit of a downer.

Michael Bradley is in no doubt that an effective vehicle for resisting the ruling class offensive has already been assembled. In his account it has already succeeded in pulling together a coalition of left Labour MPs, Greens, trade unionists and campaigners. All that remains for the rest of us to do is to await further instructions from the Right To Work. One had a sense that many in the packed main auditorium in Conway Hall were not quite as enthusiastic.

John Rees took a rather different position arguing that an effective resistance to the new Thatcherism cannot be the property of a single party, group or union. Pointing to the history of involvement in the Stop The War Coalition of several of the top table he suggested that it might offer an alternative model.

This is a debate that is going to become immensely urgent in the next couple of months. Flat pack campaigning organisations which are widely viewed as under the control of a single group immediately impose a limit on their own credibility and effectiveness. The real impetus for organising local defensive campaigns has to come from the unions and they will need to orientate themselves to community organisations, the Greens, the Labour Party and formations like Respect very quickly.

However as Aris pointed out in his contribution last night and Padraic observes in a comment “the biggest crisis of capitalism for decades provides the opportunity for us to put forward a radical economic programme, which points in a positive direction. So what about an alternative economic programme which, for a start , targets the banks and the speculators?” And that requires more than a defensive campaign.

8 responses to “Fighting cuts – two models”

  1. Sounds good.What was the audience like?
    And to be fair to Micheal Bradley , wasn’t he there to represent Right to Work?

    Like

  2. There are not just cuts to fight, there is inflation and rising taxation too all of which are designed to transfer the burden of the banking bailout from the capitalist state and the capitalist economy to the working class and poor. But Padraic is correct about the need for a radical, socialist economic programme and alternative vision for society because whilst resistance to cuts, inflation, rising taxation are a necessity, a successful campaign that didn’t offer an alternative would be subject to accusations of selfishness and a right wing backlash as happened to the trade union in the late 70s (but with much more serious consequences) and of course would itself result in hyper-inflation.

    P.S. if the left wants to remain like a toxic waste dump it will call for more taxation. Neither cuts nor taxation can solve the problem. These apparently opposite policies have an identical effect. Both take money out of the economy to be thrown down the black hole of the deficit and will result in bankruptcies, job cuts and economic collapse. Even targetted tax rises aimed at the very rich would have no impact except to make the left synonymous with misery. Leave that to the Con/Dems. Get rich and pay your taxes was also one of New Labour’s most opportunist policies designed to make the poor dependent on the rich.

    No, we must have a radical, socialist policy for social transformation that is both in the interest of the workring class and attractive to the popular masses.

    Like

  3. http://www.internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article1856
    Özlem Onaran is a senior lecturer in economics at Middlesex University, Britain. She has published articles on globalization, distribution, employment, investment, and financial crisis in Cambridge Journal of Economics, World Development, Applied Economics, International Review of Applied Economics, Eastern European Economics, Labour. She collaborates with Socialist Resistance, the British section of the Fourth International and Yeniyol (New Course), publication of the Turkish section of the FI.

    I find the demands by the above interesting. Esp. on the need to have a shorter working week. Even without the current depression produictivity with IT etc. means that the working week should be a max of 4 days. 32 hours. Share the work. It even makes sense in a reformist way.
    I also find the international perspective logical. Capitalism cannot be fought within the confines of nation states even big ones like Britain.
    And maybe the weakness of the Irish fightback is a realisation of this

    Like

  4. Common ownership needs to be on the agenda, Elinor Ostrom win points to this.

    Economic democracy is the slogan with all of us owning the means of production in a cooperative commonwealth, not concentration in the hands of a tiny tiny minority in an ecologically destructive system based on exploitation of our labour power which is increasingly fragile and associated with esoteric forms of gambling.

    Like

  5. One day general strikes have either been called or are on the agenda in Greece, Spain, Italy and maybe elsewhere. Has there been any move to coordinate these protests? A one day general strike across a number of countries would have an enormous impact and would have historic symbolic importance. On the face of its it doesn’t seem that unlikely.

    Like

  6. The videos of all the speeches are now on YouTube and Counterfire. The quality is remarkably high and Tony Benn is a particular high point, as might be expected.

    All roads lead to 22 June and the protests at Osborne’s budget.

    Like

  7. So protesting against the cuts is good, unless these people do it, when it becomes dangerous substitutionism?

    Like

Leave a reply to Jim Monaghan Cancel reply

Trending