In an innovative new procedure for reviewing a general election campaign The Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition (TUSC) will be discussing this text at a candidates’ meeting.

Proposals for developing TUSC into 2011

Elections and policy:

● The Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition (TUSC) should continue in existence after the 2010 general election, remaining registered with the Electoral Commission and maintaining a structure that enables it to fulfil its core task. This is, essentially, to provide an opportunity for local groups of trade unionists, community campaigners and socialist organisations who want to stand candidates in elections to appear on the ballot paper, if they so wish, as part of a wider challenge – as TUSC candidates rather than as ‘Independents’.

● To this end, TUSC will endeavour to co-ordinate challenges in the Scottish Parliament elections, the Welsh Assembly elections and the local elections that will take place in May 2011. We will organise a conference in Autumn 2010 open to local groups who are planning to stand candidates in the 2011 local elections and Welsh Assembly elections, and will support the Scottish TUSC steering committee in organising a similar event to prepare for the Scottish elections.

● TUSC will also consider, on a case-by-case basis, endorsing candidates to stand under its banner at parliamentary by-elections.

● The basic TUSC core policy statement developed for the 2010 general election shall remain in place subject to any revision agreed by the steering committee. In addition supplementary policy statements shall be developed for the Scottish Parliament, Welsh Assembly and local elections, to be discussed at the relevant conferences. We also confirm that, as a federal ‘umbrella’ organisation, participating organisations will continue to be able to produce their own supporting material, subject to electoral law, as was the practise successfully adopted in the general election campaign, which allowed different organisations and local campaigns to collaborate under a common banner.

Structure:

● TUSC shall continue to have a Steering Committee comprised of one representative of the Socialist Party and the Socialist Workers Party, plus in a personal capacity, Bob Crow, Craig Johnston, Brian Caton, Nina Franklin, Chris Baugh , John McInally and Nick Wrack. The steering committee will operate by consensus.

● The adherence of further organisations will be subject to the approval of the steering committee. The steering committee can also agree to expand its membership to other leading trade unionists as it decides.

● The Scottish TUSC Steering Committee shall continue to meet and function on the same autonomous basis as it did during the general election campaign.

● The participants in TUSC recognise that this structure is only an interim arrangement and that discussions will need to take place on the best way to organise the coalition as it develops in the future. We will look to organise a broader conference to include a debate on this issue in 2011.

Candidates:

● Candidates from organisations participating in the Steering Committee and the Scottish TUSC Steering Committee can expect to have their nomination papers for the elections outlined above signed by the coalition nominating officer as TUSC candidates if they so request. They can also stand, if they wish, under the existing registered electoral name of their organisation.

● Other prospective candidates, from local trade union organisations or other organisations, can also request to stand as TUSC candidates. All such requests shall be referred to the Steering Committee for decision.

● Prospective candidates will be asked to endorse the coalition’s core policy statement – and the relevant supplementary policy statement for the election they are contesting – but, with that provision, candidates will be responsible for their own campaign.

● The Steering Committee will have the final say on all coalition seats and candidates.

Election organisation:

● Steering committees will be established, where possible, for local government areas and parliamentary constituencies where seats are being contested by the coalition on whatever broadly similar basis is appropriate for each.

● The Steering Committee will seek to raise funds for national campaigning. For local challenges, the normal expectation will be that local deposits and campaigns will be financed locally.

28 responses to “TUSC looks into the future. Hmm.”

  1. “TUSC shall continue to have a Steering Committee comprised of one representative of the Socialist Party and the Socialist Workers Party, plus in a personal capacity, Bob Crow, Craig Johnston, Brian Caton, Nina Franklin, Chris Baugh , John McInally and Nick Wrack. The steering committee will operate by consensus” – that makes 4 SP members (1 as a party rep and 3 who are undercover).

    Like

  2. I’m sorry GT but that’s a dismally cynical remark. What are you trying to imply?

    Like

  3. Nice to see they let the little women have one of the seats on the board though. I suppose they needed someone to make the tea.

    Sorry, that’s a bit catty.

    Like

  4. Looks as if Solidarity is dead in Scotland or is this the escape hatch for CWI and SWP ?

    Like

  5. More seriously, I should have asked what is the status of this document? Who decided it and does it need to be ratified at a conference or something?

    Like

  6. Nice to know that with Cameron softening us up on a daily basis for the cuts this blog is so relavant to building a fightback. What are ppl doing to build for protests on june 22nd? Apart from bemoaning the state of the Left?

    Like

  7. Well said Swoppie. Come on guys, quit this bemoaning and start selling papers. Swoppie is putting us all to shame with his / her building…

    Like

  8. Bemoan all you like. What else are you doing?

    Like

  9. Well Swoppie today’s earlier posting is one clue and several SR supporters were at last night’s comradely and constructive Can’t Pay Won’t Pay meeting in Conway Hall at which they reported on bits and pieces they’s been up to. They also made a couple of suggestions.

    We had thought about setting up a phony front organisation with the express purpose of selling a few magazines and carving everyone else by packing the meetings but decided against it.

    Can’t you really see any problem with the bureaucratic stitch up methodology in this document and that whole genre of organising that it reflects?

    Like

  10. The proposed structure makes it sound like a sort of umbrella group for all those (or only “independents”? and only local organisations? – plus the SP and SWP? – see 1st paragraph) who want to stand in elections as socialists, provided they get through whatever vetting procedure is currently operating. After that, there are no significant political obligations to one another from either TUSC as a national organisation or from whoever is standing the particular candidates.

    As far as it goes, this may be fairly innocuous – except possibly for the vetting process – but it not really even a step to a new workers’ party. Operating by consensus also means no party (including the ones already in it) is going to make a strong commitment to TUSC. It is a recipe for complete indecision, as it means each individual/org on the leadership has a veto (cf the UN). Similarly, there is no mechanism for any disciplined, or semi-disciplined, election campaign uniting the various disparate forces making up TUSC.

    At any future debate of the issue, I think the SP will prevent any changes in this structure, or walk out if their proposals are not passed, just like they did when the Socialist Alliance refused to have what they mis-name a “federal” structure.

    Like

  11. Liam: “We had thought about setting up a phony front organisation with the express purpose of selling a few magazines and carving everyone else by packing the meetings but decided against it”

    lol, but they’d have to be very small meetings for SR to ‘pack’ them, you’d struggle to pack a minibus

    Like

  12. So ‘several’ of you went to a meeting in London and made a few suggestions? That’ll have Osbourne quaking I’m sure.

    My basic point is that I think we are facing a real turning point in terms of what might be about to hit us. My perception is that millions of ordinary people are trying to deal with what’s being thrown at them, this whole softening us up for the cuts thing that we’re getting from the Tories. I don’t get any feeling that some sections of the Left are even attempting to come up with a strategy to respond to this, except to moan and groan about TUSC or RTW or the inadequacies of the existing leadreship.

    I’d infinitely rather be associated with a current that is actively seeking to build a response by (for example) building for protests on 22nd June than a current that simply engages in prolonged bouts of Left introspection.

    Like

  13. by ‘the existing leadership’ I mean the TU’s by the way. I don’t have that much of a delusion of grandeur about RTW or TUSC.

    And yes I can see problems with the documant that you posted. I just don’t think that discussion is remotely the priority right now. The whole Left electoral strategy is way back on a back burner. Its our response (or lack of one) to Osbourne and Camerons cuts that is crucial.

    Like

  14. “I just don’t think that discussion is remotely the priority right now.”

    It never is.

    Like

  15. purely electoralist … what is needed is an organization which can do day-to-day grassroots work

    Like

  16. Jim Jepps – you’re so right on, it hurts.

    Like

  17. Well it’s good that in this thread and the one on the Labour Party we’ve established to near universal satisfaction that Jim’s a tree hugging friend of the dolphins and that SR, the FI etc are pretty useless.

    What I would find genuinely interesting is a considered justification for the approach in this text and the Anglophone far left’s love affair with controlling front organisations.

    Any takers?

    Like

  18. I’m sure someone will take you up on your challenge Liam. Remember Kaur’s Law: “Where an idiocy remains unvoiced, a left group will step in to fill the vacuum”. ;o)

    Like

  19. This discussion is ABSOLUTELY “the priority right now”. Otherwise, TUSC will quickly dribble down the same pan that most other initiatives have.

    Who do you think is going to be remotely engaged by a self-selecting politbureau of middle-aged white blokes (sorry, plus one token woman)?

    Like

  20. ‘This discussion is ABSOLUTELY “the priority right now”. ‘

    unbelievable

    Like

  21. I agree with you that resisting the cuts is the priority, but we have to have some political regroupment to do so effectivley.

    I also think the TUSC document highlights its own irrelevancy, but it also highlights the far left’s failure to build a political alternative.

    This leaves us weakened in resisting the cuts, and groups for whom it is never the prioirity to discuss democracy and accountability have a large part of the responsibilty for this

    Like

  22. ‘Workers are angry, we need to build the next demo and recruit to the party’ – SWOPPIE

    Like

  23. “What I would find genuinely interesting is a considered justification for the approach in this text and the Anglophone far left’s love affair with controlling front organisations.

    Any takers?”

    Look, Liam it’;s a fundamentally flawed approach. It’s a load of crap.

    There’s going to be massive attacks on benefits both for the unemployed and low to middle income workers- things like child and working family tax credit.

    There’s going to be a considerable attack on the public sector.

    Swoppie’s idea that we organise against this is all well and good. But just carrying on in the same old way is not going to work.

    The left needs to get away from making decisions behind closed doors and telling everyone else what to think and do. It’s fundamentally crap.

    Of course we should where we have viable union branches and campaigns build for the 22nd demos. Of course. But we do need to build on the basis of engaging with people and not just directing them.

    Swoppie may dismiss this as intorspection but it’s actually a fundamental lesson. Engaging in work merely to build your own group is a fundamentally cyncial and deeply damaging exercise. That’s how many poeple perceive the left. Let’s prove them wrong by taking a new approach by for example listening as well as organising, engaging with people not just rallying them to the next evnt. Funnily enough asking people what they think and want to do is a better way to build campaigns anyway and should be fundamental to building a socialist society which is after all one based on workers’ self-organisation and collecgtive management of our own affairs.

    Like

  24. Apologies for overusing the word ‘fundamental’ so many times in the aove post- my only excuse is that it is before 5 o’clock in the morning!

    Like

  25. So the basic thesis of a fair few here is that we have to have political regroupment in order to fight the cuts? Then we’re stuffed. Regroupment to create an effective, cohesive new organisation would take far longer than we’ve got. That’s why the priority, right now, is campaigning. Osbourne isn’t going to wait.

    I’m not saying that there can’t be arguemnst about regroupment. I’m saying that to only have those argumenst while dissing all current attempts at mobilisation is a dereliction of duty. Its the old ‘how do you get to London? Well I wouldn’t start from here’ approach.

    We are where we are, and where we are is under attack.

    Like

  26. Obviously in the face of massive cuts campaigning is indeed a very high priority.

    “I’m not saying that there can’t be arguemnst about regroupment. I’m saying that to only have those argumenst while dissing all current attempts at mobilisation is a dereliction of duty.”

    I agree with that, too. You’re saying that discussions about the longer term future of the left are necessary but so is action and there’s no excuse for inaction on the basis that we have to first regroup. Of course.

    But it is also right to say that you can think, discuss and act all at the same time. My point was that actually to have an effective cuts campaign the left needs to get away from traditional approaches of just telling people what needs to be done. of course if you;ve got experience and ideas and proposals that you think will work put them forward by all means.

    But we also need to really involve working clss communties in fighting the cuts and for this to happen that will mean listening to people, not going in with all the answers which is how some people can end up perceiving the left.

    We are under attack. To effectivley resist it discussion whilst also planning action is essential.

    Like

  27. From my view during the General Election TUSC were a complete noinentity and it’s results were pitiful.

    SWP and SP activists not only did not work alongside eachother but both were far more interested in trying to advance their own party interests as ever.

    The best thing to come out of it was the quality of the leaflets which were by far better than those of any other political party.

    So it’s funny how iot can get some things right but it’s dificult to see where this can go as neither party are willing to put aside their narrow partry interests for the greater good and also I am not convinced that either is really interested in electoral politics.

    Setting itself as it did a mere few months before the elctions, TUSC is perceived as a fly by night organsation lacking any real credibility and any community involvement and vital trade backing.

    Like

  28. should read…trade union backing

    Like

Leave a reply to swoppie Cancel reply

Trending