The Scottish Socialist Party has unveiled its lead candidates for the Scottish Parliament regional lists for the election to be held in May 2011.

The list includes two former MSPs, Colin Fox and Frances Curran, SSP councillor on West Dunbartonshire council, Jim Bollan, along with leading SSP activists.

The SSP’s decision to contest all Scottish Regional lists will mean that every voter in Scotland will have the opportunity to vote for Scotland’s socialist party, founded in 1999.

The Scottish Socialist Party will campaign for the rejection of public spending cuts, for an alternative policy putting people before profit and for the core policy of the party, an independent socialist Scotland.

SSP co-spokesperson Colin Fox said;
“Working people are being hammered by the neo-liberal policies of the four establishment parties in Scotland.
“The Scottish Socialist Party is the only political party in Scotland that stands up for working people and we will be campaigning for an independent socialist Scotland in the coming Scottish Parliament elections as we have done in every election since our founding in 1999”.

Top of SSP lists for Scottish Regional seats

Central Scotland: Kevin McVey
Kevin McVey is 45 and has been actively involved in politics since 1984. Expelled from the Labour Party in 1989/90 for his involvement in local and national anti-poll tax campaigning, Kevin was a founding member of the SSP.

Kevin worked in the Tax Office for 20 years and PCS branch secretary for 3 years. Kevin is currently SSP National Secretary.

Glasgow: Frances Curran
Frances Curran, 49, was SSP MSP for the West of Scotland from 2003-2007, introducing a bill to provide free school meals which was ultimately voted down by the Parliament. Frances got involved in socialist politics when she joined the Labour Party Young Socialists in the early years of the Thatcher government, eventually being elected onto the Labour Party National Executive at 23 years old. Frances is currently co-spokesperson for the SSP

Highlands and Islands: Pam Currie
Pam Currie is 35 years old and lives in Glasgow with her cat, Banjo. She teaches in a Further Education college and is an activist in the EIS teachers’ union.

A Gaelic learner, Pam sings in a choir, enjoying her first trip to the National Mod in October 2010.

Pam is a Quaker, a feminist and an LGBT activist who has been involved in campaigns ranging from the peace movement to the Vigil for a Scottish Parliament. A graduate of the University of Paisley, she has also studied with the Open University and at Ruskin College and believes ‘lifelong education’ should be available and affordable to all.

Lothians: Colin Fox
Colin Fox joined Motherwell Labour Party Young Socialists in 1980, beginning a life of campaigning for socialism that continues 30 years on. Colin was SSP MSP for the Lothians from 2003-2007 and is co-spokesperson for the SSP. Colin co-organises the Edinburgh Mayday Festival and re-founded the Edinburgh People’s Festival in 2002. Aged 51, Colin lives in the Inch area of Edinburgh with his wife and two children.

Mid Scotland and Fife: Morag Balfour
Morag Balfour is a Quaker, vice-chair of Scottish CND and a member of the Iona Community. A firm believer in nonviolence, Morag regularly participates in peaceful direct action at Faslane. She has recently been involved in a pioneering befriending scheme supporting ex-young offenders released from Polmont YOI and is a former national co-chair of the SSP.

As well as experience of working directly with people, she has campaigned on wider issues such as nuclear disarmament and to prevent the building of a massive landfill site in the West of Fife.

North East Scotland: Angela Gorrie
Angela Gorrie, 23, first came to Dundee in 2005 to study at Dundee University where she was active in the campaign to remove Special Branch from campus and the fight for young workers’ rights. Now working in customer services and a member of USDAW, she has recently been involved in campaigns ranging from the retention of local services and calling to end unfair hospital parking charges to highlighting the inequality of the current Council Tax.
In her spare time Angela enjoys walking, football, cricket and music.

South of Scotland: Colin Turbett
An SSP member since 2001, Colin was a candidate for the Party in the 2005 and 2007 elections. He has been a qualified social worker since the late 1970s, working with the victims of a system that breeds inequality, racism and poverty. Chairperson of the 2500 strong North Ayrshire UNISON Branch, Colin is involved in the fight to save council jobs and services in one of Scotland’s worst areas of economic decline. Very interested in rural affairs, he is author of the SSP pamphlet ‘Rural Socialism and Scotland in the 21st Century’ and i s an ardent campaigner for the rights of Scottish Gypsy Travellers.

Colin is a longstanding trade union activist, he is currently Chairperson of North Ayrshire UNISON branch.

West of Scotland: Jim Bollan
Jim is SSP councillor for Leven Ward on West Dunbartonshire council. 63 years old, Jim first got involved in socialist politics 40 years ago when shop steward at Babcocks. Jim was at the forefront in the campaign to save Leven Cottage care home and the campaigns to save two primary schools, Christie Park and Renton Primary.
When he has any spare time Jim can be found walking his dog.

32 responses to “SSP announces top of Regional lists for 2011 Scottish Parliament election”

  1. The SSP is very well know in Scotland but for all the wrong reasons. It is known as the party which backed one of its members selling a secretly recorded tape of another member to the NOTW for £200,000 and whose leadership called for the state to begin a perjury trial of its former leader and his supporters in order to destroy a rival of theirs on the left. Therefore it is know as a party led by backstabbers with no socialist principles. It has no future as any type of socialist party with its present leadership

    sandy

    Like

  2. Sandy: that is not even sectarianism it’s just out and out misinformation and distortion. We know how the sect bosses work and how they were happy to put their own slant on events whilst trying to destroy Respect. Let’s stick to the politics shall we.

    It is a shame that in announcing this slate of candidates that the SSP could not at the same time have declared their intention to get behind Galloway’s efforts to get elected to the Scottish parliament. Two reasons: 1. Galloway is popular, and that is not to be sniffed at, and is clearly in political opposition to the New Labour bureaucrats and 2. it would signal to the wider electorate that socialism and the priorities of the labour movement are for it the more important part of the socialist scotland policy at this moment in time.

    You cannot simply opt out of british politics and expect to be taken seriously by workers in Scotland. I’m not saying you are doing that but sometimes it is the perception. Supporting Galloway will help you with that. The major question of the day for the Scottish working class are cuts, job cuts, wage freezes and trade union agreements negotiated state-wide. To start with the principle of an Independent Socialist Scotland is wrong-headed. You must start from the most urgent economic interests of the Scottish working class and it must be your priority to defend these. I do not wish to denigrate those who wish to see an independent Scotland but let us not get too hung up and sectarian about the issue. Keep it in your program by all means and prioritise it as appropriate but I would say that the socialist movement in Britain when it comes to power will give full independence and sovereignty to the nations of this island whilst offering them voluntary federation.

    For now, the first PRIORITY is a joint struggle of the working classes of Britain to smash the Coalition. The major PRINCIPLE of the day is for a state monopoly of credit i.e. the consolidation and nationalisation of the banks so that investment can be directed by the democratically elected government and credit made available to those who need it such as first time buyers and small and medium businesses. The most urgent NECESSITY is full employment in productive work which can only be achieved by socialising the monopolies and sharing the productive work.

    I would urge the SSP not to get into a sectarian mindset in regard of Galloway but to welcome his decision to stand as an opportunity for the Scottish working class to transcend the insular sectarianism of the left and make a big political step forward. Try to avoid the usual sectarian knee-jerk and do yourselves and the scottish working class a favour or carry on with the nightmare that left Scottish politics has become.

    Like

  3. Sandy: that is not even sectarianism it’s just out and out misinformation and distortion. We know how the sect bosses work and how they were happy to put their own slant on events whilst trying to destroy Respect. Let’s stick to the politics shall we.

    To call for a perjury investigation by the state into the leader of another left party is politics- anti working class politics! Ditto condoning a leading member selling his tape to the NOTW for £200,000. This is not misinformation but the truth. deal with it
    sandy

    Like

  4. The SSP did condone the selling of the tape to the NOTW. I tried to get the SSP to condemn it when i was a SSP member and had disciplinary action taken against me and was banned from the SSP discussion list. No action was taken against McNeilage. I put in a written complaint re his actions to the SSP regional organizer and nothing was done. Is McNeilage still a SSP member? What action was taken by the SSP to condemn his actions or discipline him?

    Carolyn Leckie amongst others in the SSP leadership publically called for a perjury investigation when TS won his defamation case. The minute secretary of the SSP handed in to the police SSP “minutes” after TS won his case and she called for a perjury investigation

    “She [Barbara Scott] further informed the court that, three or so days after Tommy Sheridan’s victory in the libel trial, she took the original notes to Fettes Police station in Edinburgh and told the police she had evidence that a crime, ie perjury, had been committed by Mr Sheridan. She did this, she claims to “clear her name” and when asked confirmed that she was accompanied to the Police station by then MSPs Caroline Leckie and Rosie Kane.”

    http://sheridantrial.blogspot.com/2010/10/day-one-afternoon.html

    Like

  5. The SSP told the true about NOTW. This not misinformation but the true. The NOTW told the true
    about so called socialism in Solidarity. I will be voting
    the SSP in 2011 Scottish elections.

    Like

  6. I’m particularly excited to see Jim Bollan standing. He’s one of the left’s hidden electoral asset, and, apart from the Communist councillors in Fife, the only socialist to the left of Labour and the SNP to currently hold electoral office in Scotland. If you look at the council election results he always sails through because he’s hugely well regarded in his community for his consistent work. He was also suspended from the council for standing up to the SNP executive over their shameful treatment of council workers over single status.

    There’s no way of knowing how things will stand next may given all that could change in the intervening period, but I’m hopeful he will attract strong support in the west.

    Oh yeah, wait, I forgot, we’re dead, everybody hates us, Galloway is God etc. etc. lol. As opposed to the mass organisation that Sandy leads with huge respect among the Scottish working class. How foolish of me.

    David, I don’t think you realise that your assesment of the situation runs counter to the majority of the left that actually operates in Scotland (as opposed to parachuting in from outside.) We see the dissolution of the union as the key step towards establishing a state actually able to intervene in society through independence. This is a realistic and achievable goal, but one that will be delayed and hindered by the campaign of the Brit unionists of Galloway (a British nationalist if ever I saw one) and Respect.

    Like

  7. Sandy, is TS above the law? Should socialists defend his right to commit perjury with impunity?

    Like

  8. I support the SSP because tthey fight for working class
    poeple in Scotland, I will voting SSP in 2011 Scottish
    election. I hope the SSP win more votes and seats in
    Scottish Parliament. The SNP will lose 2011 Scottish
    elections. The Labour Party will win Scottish Parliament elections with more %0 MSP’s. The
    SSP must fight for more powers foor Scottish Parliament. In long term Scotland will win under
    socialism and SSP. I will voting SSP in 2011 elections
    in Scotland.

    Like

  9. I have no time for TS or his politics. He is a populist and not a marxist. However I dont accept that disputes on the left should be settled by the bourgeois courts. It goes against the marxist principle of fighting for working class independence from the ruling class. The action of McNeilage of selling his tape to the NOTW goes against elementary principles of working class solidarity against the bosses. The socialist movement should have dealt with TS not the courts. By relying on the police and the courts you have destroyed any socialist potential that the SSP had

    sandy

    Like

  10. What’s your alternative?

    Like

  11. Sandy, are you not a lawyer? Do you tell all your clients to solve their problems politically and not make use of the bourgeois system?

    Like

  12. Galloway is a plonker and is not popualr but a szswerious LIability for any ‘ Left ‘ political party just as is Tommy dickhead Sheridan who brought all this trouble upon himself and the SSP and they are best shot of him.

    Why the SSP should conceivably or possibly want to help Galloway, the tankie tosser ,on behalf of Respect , (his ever dwindling and fast declining one man show), become a MSP at their expense is beyond me as Dave Ellis suggests.

    Get behind the SSP as the only sane Socialist alternative in Scotland. SR have made a well overdue intelligent decision to part ways with Respect. About time too ! Phew !

    What’s going to happen to the loan of your printing press and your paper which SR more than generously offered over to RESPECT ? I hope you wrote a binding contract which means you get it back or however it works.

    Like

  13. Jack

    my alternative is to be honest and open with the membership of the SSP and the working class. That is what a marxist party should be. However the SSP was not a marxist party but a left nationalism retreat from marxism.The SSP leadership was dominated by cliques and the membership were kept in the dark. the SSP built itself by promoting TS as a great working class leader with a spotless private life etc etc. The whole indepenent socialist scotland project fronted by TS was an attempted fraud from day one. It was inevitable that it would fall apart but the way that it happened was not ideal- to say the least

    However when TS left the SSP ( there was a good case for expelling him after the daily record story re scabs if not before) the SSP should have made plain to all that it was not calling for the state to intervene in the internal disputes in the workers movement . No calls for a perjury investigation and no cooperation with the NOTW. Mcneilage should have been expelled when he sold his tape..Mc Coombes should have been expelled when it became apparent he had lied to the SSP membeship re the affidavid he gave to the press.

    it is obvious that the SSP leadership has no socialist principles and dont undertand what the fight for socialism is about- the fight for working class independence from the ruling class and the fight for workers power. Instead the SSP was about promting the anti working class politics of the pro independnce section of the scottish establishment

    sandy

    Like

  14. You realise that you think we were all about the nationalism and weren’t socialists, whereas the SRSM fell out with us when conference ran over and we dinghied a motion they’d tried to get passed five times or something like that, that basically gave a meaningless ‘entrenchment’ to our position on independence, so they cried us Brits and left.

    lolarious inability to win

    Like

  15. I’d say when you’ve Sandy McBrit denouncing you as anti working class nationalists and on the side there’s the SRSM saying you’re not really pro-independence, you’ve probably got the balance about right.

    Like

  16. David, it’s totally unrealistic to imagine that the SSP, which campaigns for independence, could back Galloway, who opposes it. What would Galloway do to help build the left in Glasgow? Indeed, what did he do to build the left in Tower Hamlets? Compared to other MPs he spent next to no time in Parliament, on casework or with his local party organisation. How many people from Tower Hamlets were at the Respect conference?

    Like

  17. Mark Victorystooge Avatar
    Mark Victorystooge

    I lived for a time in Hackney South and Shoreditch, a seat adjoining the one GG was MP for in 2005-10. There was no functioning Respect branch I could see, even though GG was the MP for the seat next door. Respect party building was clearly extremely patchy. Respect stood in Hackney South in 2005, and got 4.5%, but if a branch was established, it did little or no work, otherwise I would have noticed it.
    If Labour in Glasgow quietly encourages their supporters to give GG their second vote, perhaps he would get in. But a basis for a left party he is not. His past behaviour and his current comments say as much.

    Like

  18. There was indeed a Respect branch in Hackney, and quite an active one – we got 6.3% in the Mayoral election in 2006. The 2005 campaign in south Hackney was somewhat notional, as a lot of resources went into GG’s camapign in Bethnal Green and Bow.

    Like

    1. On this issue of branches one of the things that always impressed me during my years trying to rupture social democracy was the mechanisms that the Labour Party had to hold MPs and councillors accountable. They had to submit a monthly report on their work and take questions. Whatever the actual power relations there was always a formal opportunity to make them answer for their actions and positions.  

      With the exception of a small number of carping whingers like myself that was never really identified as something that should also be standard practice in Respect. The result was that the MP was able to float free from the constituency party and his rare visits to meetings were promoted as something of a special treat rather than the normal functioning of a democratic organisation.  This encouraged a certain deference and failed to offer members who were unused to other forms of organisation an opportunity to develop a unique political culture for Respect.  

      Maybe it’ll be different in Glasgow.

      Like

  19. What a marvellous list of candidates. Committed, muliti talented and honest people. No prima donna among them apart from Pam’s cat!

    Like

  20. “during my years trying to rupture social democracy”

    I think that in the future I will always begin stories about my past with this prologue. Forget “once upon a time…”

    Like

  21. Mark Victorystooge Avatar
    Mark Victorystooge

    I was there between elections. I certainly don’t remember Respect leaflets through the door. There seemed to be just about every kind of left-wing exotica in Hackney, but not Respect.

    I was in the Labour Party, though outside London, and yes, there were formal opportunities to ask the MPs or councillors questions about what they were doing. Whereas it sounds like in Respect, and the SSP, the Great One condescended once and a while to show himself to his followers so they could touch the hem of his garment.

    Like

  22. Liam – if Respect had a worse internal culture than the Labour Party why did you stick it out so long? Shome mishtake shurely?

    Like

  23. Liam: that is a purely organisational, apolitical, almost anal retentive approach to the matter.

    Like

  24. Skidmarx – the whole time we were in we made the case for a pluralistic broad party with functioning structures and an internal life. That was not a conception shared by the leadership majority but we tried to win the position politically. It would have included building strong branches around more than elections, developing a collective leadership and a broader campaigning orientation.

    Our departure represents a political defeat and the weak state of Respect is a setback to the building of a party to Labour’s left. That is a cause of dismay.

    We are publishing a book early next year on the European experiences of anti-capitalist parties and there will be a substantial section on England and Scotland which analyses events in those two countries in some detail.

    David, if Trotsky had run a blog he would probably have a similar policy:

    “Abusive language and swearing are a legacy of slavery, humiliation, and disrespect for human dignity—one’s own and that of other people.”

    http://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/women/life/23_05_16.htm

    Like

  25. Mark Victorystooge Avatar
    Mark Victorystooge

    Re bad language in Russia, in the USSR swearing in public and bad language in print were discouraged. Such collections of Russian bad language as existed were published in the West, and were heavily based on accounts of thieves’ or convicts’ cant used in prisons or labour camps. Exile writers in Russian tended to use far more obscene language in their novels and short stories than those who published in the Soviet Union. One Russian literature academic once gave a talk I attended, where he described one of these emigré writers as specialising in “erotica, pornography and disgusting filth”.
    With the collapse of the USSR, books about “mat” (Russian coarse language) were published, and Soviet “prudishness” decried. Then again, the seamy side of Russian life is more easily visible and public than it was in the USSR.

    Like

  26. I think you are seeing things Liam. No bad language was used in the latest spat with the anti-trotskyist ID only political insults were marshalled but I think you’ll find that most of the insults and all of the misrepresentation was IDs.

    `Our departure represents a political defeat and the weak state of Respect is a setback to the building of a party to Labour’s left. That is a cause of dismay. ‘

    So you have added to this political defeat, weakened Respect, setback the cause and spread dismay. Why?

    As for the organisational questions you have approached the question in a thoroughly apolitical manner. Instead of taking advantage of the united front with Galloway SR’s sole and only concern seems to have been bureaucratic prissiness. SR should have been building itself and the marxist current not worrying about what other were doing. Building strong branches and a broader campaigning orientation was your job. Galloway never said that he intended to do this but he never stopped you either. As for developing a collective leadership Galloway certainly never promised that and it shows a total misreading of the situation you were in on your part. A great opportunity has been missed because of sectarian bluster once again and no doubt the people who joined you when the SWP try to wreck the project will be wondering why now.

    Like

  27. Sandy, is TS above the law? Should socialists defend his right to commit perjury with impunity?
    jack

    Were the striking miners above the law in 1984 or the poll tax “rioters”or the recent student protesters At Milbank?

    No they were and are not above the law. The law should take its course. Any socialist who has any info on the student rioters should pass it to the authorities. If any of the rioters have made any confessions to any socialist re their unlawful role in the riots these socialists should contact the authorities with the information they have and give evidence against the rioters, It is our duty as good citizens

    I remember one of the big problems the labour movement had during the miners strike of 84/85 was that, in general, miners were not willing to come forward and give evidence against other miners re their illegal activity in organizing mass pickets and attempts to intimate those miners who wanted to return to work. Unfortunately in the long history of the labour movement there are plenty of examples of so called socialists refusing to inform the authorities of the illegal activities of their comrades. When will we ever learn that the law most apply to all of us

    sandy

    Like

  28. Sandy,

    I’ve had nothing but antipathy towards Tommy Sheridan till I read your rant; I feel slightly sympathetic towards him in this case….but. only slightly.

    I’m sure everyone can the see obvious difference between working class solidarity on the part of the miners and allegedly perjuring oneselft in order to lift a payout from the Murdoch press; in case you’ve forgotten what it was like during the strike Sandy, it was a more or less full on class war with the police on the side of the ruling class. Individual coppers felt un-restrained when embarking on a bit of freelance violence against us. There was no problem within the labour movement wrt to knowing whose side to be on in that case.

    However one of the lessons that Militant -and Tommy Sheridan took this failure himself into the poll tax campaign- failed to learn from the Miner’s strike was that the police are not neutral ‘workers in uniform’ during strikes, demos etc.

    Left celebrities have a very dubious relationship with both the media and the police and they’d do well to remember those of us who’ve been in the front line to a battering from one or both when they conduct themselves.

    Like

  29. The NOTW and News international are truly horrendous anti human entities. No socialist should side with them when they attack working class militants. In part TS was being attacked in the NOTW because he was seen as a class fighter against the Establishment. Even if TS is found guilty by the jury what will he be found guilty of- going to a sex club and lying about it. Some people may say – big fn deal compared to the everyday crimes of the capitalist class against the working class of the world

    sandy

    Like

  30. Individual coppers felt un-restrained when embarking on a bit of freelance violence against us. There was no problem within the labour movement wrt to knowing whose side to be on in that case.
    Martin

    I think you will find that the majority of the leadership of the labour movement were opposed to the miners strike and helped thatcher win e.g. Kinnock,Willis etc etc (and dont forget Jimmy Reid and his disgraceful role in going on TV to denounce Scargill

    It is true that the majority of the working class were in favour of a miners victory and passively sided with the miners but not the leadership of the labour movment

    sandy

    Like

  31. SSP

    An important point to note about the SSP is that its formation was the work of a
    group breaking from any connection with the marxist tradition. They were
    consciously breaking towards nationalism in an attempt to become “relevant” and
    gain some “social weight” and, of course, political careers. Their previous
    futile and doomed strategy of attempting to win the labour party to socialism
    had failed and, demoralised in Scotland,they jumped onto the Scottish
    nationalist bandwagon. The organisation they built – the SSP- did not try to
    educate its recruits in the traditions of the marxist movement. Instead the main
    leadership clique encouraged all sorts of backwardness to flourish in its ranks
    in an attempt to distance itself from the Marxist tradition and become popular
    and acceptable to the Scottish establishment. Nationalism of the most stupid
    kind plus anti working class feminism and contempt for any Marxist theory were
    rampant. People like Lecky and Kane were promoted precisely because they were
    not Marxists and knew very little of the Marxist tradition. In some ways they
    are not to blame for having no understanding of socialist principles including
    the need to fight for the working class to become politically independent from
    the capitalist class and its state. They were given no education in the
    socialist tradition within the SSP. They probably don’t understand that handing
    in SSP minutes to the police and calling for perjury investigations by the state
    into opponents on the left and selling secretly recorded “tapes” of comrades to
    the class enemy for private gain are so very much against the socialist
    tradition as to cause any real partisan of the working class movement to feel
    outrage and anger at these actions . The SSP is finished in terms of any
    socialist potential but lets not kid ourselves- the actions of TS re this whole
    business has been oafish ( at best!) and anti socialist. Some of the anger felt
    against TS on the SSP side is justified and understandable. He put his own
    interests before the interests of the movement and started to believe his own
    hype. Lets hope he walks free but don’t kid yourself re his role in this whole
    debacle. It reeks of the actions of a charlatan and an anti working class
    chancer. It could have been different but that is another matter

    sandy

    Like

Leave a reply to Donkey Cancel reply

Trending